From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>
Cc: balbi@ti.com, mturquette@linaro.org, james.hogan@imgtec.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: add flags to distinguish xtal clocks
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:40:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131113144010.GB3538@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1384243549.12583.36.camel@porter.coelho.fi>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 900 bytes --]
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:05:49AM +0200, Luca Coelho wrote:
> > What I'm not really convinced about is *how* you carry that metadata
> > in the DT, that's all, nothing more.
>
> Okay, I get you. My point is that being a crystal or not *is* a
> characteristic of the clock, so I think it could be part of the flags
> that describe it.
Yeah, but then, a crystal has a slightly different behaviour and
property than a oscillator, therefore the two aren't fully
"compatible" with each other.
> In any case, it's not really my call. This is about the clock and it's
> not even my home turf (wireless). ;)
>
> Thanks for your comments. And I'm sorry if the tone of my previous
> email sounded harsh, it was not supposed to. :)
That's fine, don't worry :)
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-13 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-04 21:05 [RFC] clk: add flags to distinguish xtal clocks Luciano Coelho
[not found] ` <20130704222538.10823.2559@quantum>
2013-07-04 22:37 ` Luciano Coelho
[not found] ` <20130704231953.10823.94331@quantum>
2013-07-05 7:54 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-07-29 13:50 ` Luciano Coelho
[not found] ` <20131007074424.7445.52119@quantum>
2013-10-08 15:27 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-10-16 10:24 ` Luca Coelho
2013-10-23 9:24 ` Mike Turquette
2013-10-23 11:35 ` Luca Coelho
2013-11-08 18:00 ` [PATCH] " Felipe Balbi
2013-11-08 19:16 ` Luca Coelho
2013-11-10 11:37 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-11-11 19:42 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-11-11 19:50 ` Luca Coelho
2013-11-11 20:59 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-11-12 8:05 ` Luca Coelho
2013-11-13 14:40 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2013-11-11 20:54 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-11-11 16:27 ` Stephen Warren
2013-11-11 19:43 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-05 13:12 ` [RFC] " James Hogan
2013-07-05 13:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-05 13:22 ` Luciano Coelho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131113144010.GB3538@lukather \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca@coelho.fi \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).