* [patch 1/6] rtmutex: Fix deadlock detector for real
2014-05-22 3:25 [patch 0/6] rtmutex: Repair deadlock detector and cleanup Thomas Gleixner
@ 2014-05-22 3:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-27 22:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-28 19:28 ` [tip:core/urgent] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 2/6] rtmutex: Remove builtin tester Thomas Gleixner
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2014-05-22 3:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Steven Rostedt, Lai Jiangshan
[-- Attachment #1: rtmutex-fix-deadlock-detector-for-real.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2662 bytes --]
The current deadlock detection logic does not work reliably due to the
following early exit path:
/*
* Drop out, when the task has no waiters. Note,
* top_waiter can be NULL, when we are in the deboosting
* mode!
*/
if (top_waiter && (!task_has_pi_waiters(task) ||
top_waiter != task_top_pi_waiter(task)))
goto out_unlock_pi;
So this not only exits when the task has no waiters, it also exits
unconditionally when the current waiter is not the top priority waiter
of the task.
So in a nested locking scenario, it might abort the lock chain walk
and therefor miss a potential deadlock.
Simple fix: Continue the chain walk, when deadlock detection is
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -343,16 +343,22 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
* top_waiter can be NULL, when we are in the deboosting
* mode!
*/
- if (top_waiter && (!task_has_pi_waiters(task) ||
- top_waiter != task_top_pi_waiter(task)))
- goto out_unlock_pi;
+ if (top_waiter) {
+ if (!task_has_pi_waiters(task))
+ goto out_unlock_pi;
+
+ if (!detect_deadlock && top_waiter != task_top_pi_waiter(task))
+ goto out_unlock_pi;
+ }
/*
* When deadlock detection is off then we check, if further
* priority adjustment is necessary.
*/
- if (!detect_deadlock && waiter->prio == task->prio)
- goto out_unlock_pi;
+ if (waiter->prio == task->prio) {
+ if (!detect_deadlock)
+ goto out_unlock_pi;
+ }
lock = waiter->lock;
if (!raw_spin_trylock(&lock->wait_lock)) {
@@ -361,7 +367,12 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
goto retry;
}
- /* Deadlock detection */
+ /*
+ * Deadlock detection. If the lock is the same as the original
+ * lock which caused us to walk the lock chain or if the
+ * current lock is owned by the task which initiated the chain
+ * walk, we detected a deadlock.
+ */
if (lock == orig_lock || rt_mutex_owner(lock) == top_task) {
debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(deadlock_detect, orig_waiter, lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
@@ -527,6 +538,10 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struc
unsigned long flags;
int chain_walk = 0, res;
+ /* Early deadlock detection */
+ if (detect_deadlock && owner == task)
+ return -EDEADLK;
+
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
waiter->task = task;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [patch 1/6] rtmutex: Fix deadlock detector for real
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 1/6] rtmutex: Fix deadlock detector for real Thomas Gleixner
@ 2014-05-27 22:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-28 9:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-28 19:28 ` [tip:core/urgent] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2014-05-27 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: LKML, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Lai Jiangshan
On Thu, 22 May 2014 03:25:39 -0000
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> The current deadlock detection logic does not work reliably due to the
> following early exit path:
>
> /*
> * Drop out, when the task has no waiters. Note,
> * top_waiter can be NULL, when we are in the deboosting
> * mode!
> */
> if (top_waiter && (!task_has_pi_waiters(task) ||
> top_waiter != task_top_pi_waiter(task)))
> goto out_unlock_pi;
>
> So this not only exits when the task has no waiters, it also exits
> unconditionally when the current waiter is not the top priority waiter
> of the task.
>
> So in a nested locking scenario, it might abort the lock chain walk
> and therefor miss a potential deadlock.
>
> Simple fix: Continue the chain walk, when deadlock detection is
> enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> +++ tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> @@ -343,16 +343,22 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
> * top_waiter can be NULL, when we are in the deboosting
> * mode!
> */
> - if (top_waiter && (!task_has_pi_waiters(task) ||
> - top_waiter != task_top_pi_waiter(task)))
> - goto out_unlock_pi;
> + if (top_waiter) {
> + if (!task_has_pi_waiters(task))
> + goto out_unlock_pi;
> +
> + if (!detect_deadlock && top_waiter != task_top_pi_waiter(task))
> + goto out_unlock_pi;
> + }
The above seems obvious.
>
> /*
> * When deadlock detection is off then we check, if further
> * priority adjustment is necessary.
> */
> - if (!detect_deadlock && waiter->prio == task->prio)
> - goto out_unlock_pi;
> + if (waiter->prio == task->prio) {
> + if (!detect_deadlock)
> + goto out_unlock_pi;
> + }
This too.
Although! if you want to micro-optimize the detect_deadlock case
where !detect_deadlock is false. You might want to reverse the order.
That way we don't need to dereference the ->prio for both waiter and
task before seeing that we don't go to the out_unlock_pi.
if (!detect_deadlock) {
if (waiter->prio == task->prio)
goto out_unlock_pi;
}
Hmm, or you did it this way for your "don't requeue" patch? Looking at
that one, it seems you did.
if (waiter->prio == task->prio) {
if (!detect_deadlock)
goto out_unlock_pi;
requeue = false;
}
Oh well. But for stable maybe have the optimized way? And change it
back when you add the requeue patch?
>
> lock = waiter->lock;
> if (!raw_spin_trylock(&lock->wait_lock)) {
> @@ -361,7 +367,12 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
> goto retry;
> }
>
> - /* Deadlock detection */
> + /*
> + * Deadlock detection. If the lock is the same as the original
> + * lock which caused us to walk the lock chain or if the
> + * current lock is owned by the task which initiated the chain
> + * walk, we detected a deadlock.
> + */
> if (lock == orig_lock || rt_mutex_owner(lock) == top_task) {
> debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(deadlock_detect, orig_waiter, lock);
> raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
> @@ -527,6 +538,10 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struc
> unsigned long flags;
> int chain_walk = 0, res;
>
> + /* Early deadlock detection */
> + if (detect_deadlock && owner == task)
> + return -EDEADLK;
> +
This is an optimization, right? Does it belong for stable?
-- Steve
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
> __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
> waiter->task = task;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [patch 1/6] rtmutex: Fix deadlock detector for real
2014-05-27 22:09 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2014-05-28 9:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2014-05-28 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt; +Cc: LKML, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Lai Jiangshan
On Tue, 27 May 2014, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 22 May 2014 03:25:39 -0000
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > * When deadlock detection is off then we check, if further
> > * priority adjustment is necessary.
> > */
> > - if (!detect_deadlock && waiter->prio == task->prio)
> > - goto out_unlock_pi;
> > + if (waiter->prio == task->prio) {
> > + if (!detect_deadlock)
> > + goto out_unlock_pi;
> > + }
>
> This too.
>
> Although! if you want to micro-optimize the detect_deadlock case
> where !detect_deadlock is false. You might want to reverse the order.
> That way we don't need to dereference the ->prio for both waiter and
> task before seeing that we don't go to the out_unlock_pi.
>
> if (!detect_deadlock) {
> if (waiter->prio == task->prio)
> goto out_unlock_pi;
> }
>
> Hmm, or you did it this way for your "don't requeue" patch? Looking at
> that one, it seems you did.
>
> if (waiter->prio == task->prio) {
> if (!detect_deadlock)
> goto out_unlock_pi;
> requeue = false;
> }
>
> Oh well. But for stable maybe have the optimized way? And change it
> back when you add the requeue patch?
Right.
> > @@ -527,6 +538,10 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struc
> > unsigned long flags;
> > int chain_walk = 0, res;
> >
> > + /* Early deadlock detection */
> > + if (detect_deadlock && owner == task)
> > + return -EDEADLK;
> > +
>
> This is an optimization, right? Does it belong for stable?
It's kind of an optimization, but we really want to avoid enqueueing
the task on its own pi waiter list in the first place. So I rather
keep it for stable as well.
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [tip:core/urgent] rtmutex: Fix deadlock detector for real
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 1/6] rtmutex: Fix deadlock detector for real Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-27 22:09 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2014-05-28 19:28 ` tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
1 sibling, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner @ 2014-05-28 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits; +Cc: linux-kernel, hpa, mingo, rostedt, peterz, tglx, laijs
Commit-ID: 397335f004f41e5fcf7a795e94eb3ab83411a17c
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/397335f004f41e5fcf7a795e94eb3ab83411a17c
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
AuthorDate: Thu, 22 May 2014 03:25:39 +0000
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Wed, 28 May 2014 17:28:13 +0200
rtmutex: Fix deadlock detector for real
The current deadlock detection logic does not work reliably due to the
following early exit path:
/*
* Drop out, when the task has no waiters. Note,
* top_waiter can be NULL, when we are in the deboosting
* mode!
*/
if (top_waiter && (!task_has_pi_waiters(task) ||
top_waiter != task_top_pi_waiter(task)))
goto out_unlock_pi;
So this not only exits when the task has no waiters, it also exits
unconditionally when the current waiter is not the top priority waiter
of the task.
So in a nested locking scenario, it might abort the lock chain walk
and therefor miss a potential deadlock.
Simple fix: Continue the chain walk, when deadlock detection is
enabled.
We also avoid the whole enqueue, if we detect the deadlock right away
(A-A). It's an optimization, but also prevents that another waiter who
comes in after the detection and before the task has undone the damage
observes the situation and detects the deadlock and returns
-EDEADLOCK, which is wrong as the other task is not in a deadlock
situation.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140522031949.725272460@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index aa4dff0..a620d4d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -343,9 +343,16 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
* top_waiter can be NULL, when we are in the deboosting
* mode!
*/
- if (top_waiter && (!task_has_pi_waiters(task) ||
- top_waiter != task_top_pi_waiter(task)))
- goto out_unlock_pi;
+ if (top_waiter) {
+ if (!task_has_pi_waiters(task))
+ goto out_unlock_pi;
+ /*
+ * If deadlock detection is off, we stop here if we
+ * are not the top pi waiter of the task.
+ */
+ if (!detect_deadlock && top_waiter != task_top_pi_waiter(task))
+ goto out_unlock_pi;
+ }
/*
* When deadlock detection is off then we check, if further
@@ -361,7 +368,12 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
goto retry;
}
- /* Deadlock detection */
+ /*
+ * Deadlock detection. If the lock is the same as the original
+ * lock which caused us to walk the lock chain or if the
+ * current lock is owned by the task which initiated the chain
+ * walk, we detected a deadlock.
+ */
if (lock == orig_lock || rt_mutex_owner(lock) == top_task) {
debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(deadlock_detect, orig_waiter, lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
@@ -527,6 +539,18 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
unsigned long flags;
int chain_walk = 0, res;
+ /*
+ * Early deadlock detection. We really don't want the task to
+ * enqueue on itself just to untangle the mess later. It's not
+ * only an optimization. We drop the locks, so another waiter
+ * can come in before the chain walk detects the deadlock. So
+ * the other will detect the deadlock and return -EDEADLOCK,
+ * which is wrong, as the other waiter is not in a deadlock
+ * situation.
+ */
+ if (detect_deadlock && owner == task)
+ return -EDEADLK;
+
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
waiter->task = task;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [patch 2/6] rtmutex: Remove builtin tester
2014-05-22 3:25 [patch 0/6] rtmutex: Repair deadlock detector and cleanup Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 1/6] rtmutex: Fix deadlock detector for real Thomas Gleixner
@ 2014-05-22 3:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-30 21:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 3/6] rtmutex: Cleanup deadlock detector debug logic Thomas Gleixner
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2014-05-22 3:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Steven Rostedt, Lai Jiangshan
[-- Attachment #1: rtmutex-remove-tester.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 45430 bytes --]
The tester has been broken for quite some time. It's possible to fix
it, but the main reason for having it in the kernel was the lock steal
mechanism in the rtmutex code. That's gone, so we can implement a
stateful correctness tester just via the futex syscall.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/locking/Makefile | 1
kernel/locking/rtmutex-tester.c | 420 ------------------
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 2
kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 22
lib/Kconfig.debug | 6
scripts/rt-tester/check-all.sh | 22
scripts/rt-tester/rt-tester.py | 220 ---------
scripts/rt-tester/t2-l1-2rt-sameprio.tst | 94 ----
scripts/rt-tester/t2-l1-pi.tst | 77 ---
scripts/rt-tester/t2-l1-signal.tst | 72 ---
scripts/rt-tester/t2-l2-2rt-deadlock.tst | 84 ---
scripts/rt-tester/t3-l1-pi-1rt.tst | 87 ---
scripts/rt-tester/t3-l1-pi-2rt.tst | 88 ---
scripts/rt-tester/t3-l1-pi-3rt.tst | 87 ---
scripts/rt-tester/t3-l1-pi-signal.tst | 93 ---
scripts/rt-tester/t3-l1-pi-steal.tst | 91 ---
scripts/rt-tester/t3-l2-pi.tst | 87 ---
scripts/rt-tester/t4-l2-pi-deboost.tst | 118 -----
scripts/rt-tester/t5-l4-pi-boost-deboost-setsched.tst | 178 -------
scripts/rt-tester/t5-l4-pi-boost-deboost.tst | 138 -----
20 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1986 deletions(-)
Index: tip/kernel/locking/Makefile
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/locking/Makefile
+++ tip/kernel/locking/Makefile
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += lglock.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) += spinlock.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES) += rtmutex.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES) += rtmutex-debug.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_RT_MUTEX_TESTER) += rtmutex-tester.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) += spinlock.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) += spinlock_debug.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK) += rwsem-spinlock.o
Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex-tester.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex-tester.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,420 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * RT-Mutex-tester: scriptable tester for rt mutexes
- *
- * started by Thomas Gleixner:
- *
- * Copyright (C) 2006, Timesys Corp., Thomas Gleixner <tglx@timesys.com>
- *
- */
-#include <linux/device.h>
-#include <linux/kthread.h>
-#include <linux/export.h>
-#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/sched/rt.h>
-#include <linux/spinlock.h>
-#include <linux/timer.h>
-#include <linux/freezer.h>
-#include <linux/stat.h>
-
-#include "rtmutex.h"
-
-#define MAX_RT_TEST_THREADS 8
-#define MAX_RT_TEST_MUTEXES 8
-
-static spinlock_t rttest_lock;
-static atomic_t rttest_event;
-
-struct test_thread_data {
- int opcode;
- int opdata;
- int mutexes[MAX_RT_TEST_MUTEXES];
- int event;
- struct device dev;
-};
-
-static struct test_thread_data thread_data[MAX_RT_TEST_THREADS];
-static struct task_struct *threads[MAX_RT_TEST_THREADS];
-static struct rt_mutex mutexes[MAX_RT_TEST_MUTEXES];
-
-enum test_opcodes {
- RTTEST_NOP = 0,
- RTTEST_SCHEDOT, /* 1 Sched other, data = nice */
- RTTEST_SCHEDRT, /* 2 Sched fifo, data = prio */
- RTTEST_LOCK, /* 3 Lock uninterruptible, data = lockindex */
- RTTEST_LOCKNOWAIT, /* 4 Lock uninterruptible no wait in wakeup, data = lockindex */
- RTTEST_LOCKINT, /* 5 Lock interruptible, data = lockindex */
- RTTEST_LOCKINTNOWAIT, /* 6 Lock interruptible no wait in wakeup, data = lockindex */
- RTTEST_LOCKCONT, /* 7 Continue locking after the wakeup delay */
- RTTEST_UNLOCK, /* 8 Unlock, data = lockindex */
- /* 9, 10 - reserved for BKL commemoration */
- RTTEST_SIGNAL = 11, /* 11 Signal other test thread, data = thread id */
- RTTEST_RESETEVENT = 98, /* 98 Reset event counter */
- RTTEST_RESET = 99, /* 99 Reset all pending operations */
-};
-
-static int handle_op(struct test_thread_data *td, int lockwakeup)
-{
- int i, id, ret = -EINVAL;
-
- switch(td->opcode) {
-
- case RTTEST_NOP:
- return 0;
-
- case RTTEST_LOCKCONT:
- td->mutexes[td->opdata] = 1;
- td->event = atomic_add_return(1, &rttest_event);
- return 0;
-
- case RTTEST_RESET:
- for (i = 0; i < MAX_RT_TEST_MUTEXES; i++) {
- if (td->mutexes[i] == 4) {
- rt_mutex_unlock(&mutexes[i]);
- td->mutexes[i] = 0;
- }
- }
- return 0;
-
- case RTTEST_RESETEVENT:
- atomic_set(&rttest_event, 0);
- return 0;
-
- default:
- if (lockwakeup)
- return ret;
- }
-
- switch(td->opcode) {
-
- case RTTEST_LOCK:
- case RTTEST_LOCKNOWAIT:
- id = td->opdata;
- if (id < 0 || id >= MAX_RT_TEST_MUTEXES)
- return ret;
-
- td->mutexes[id] = 1;
- td->event = atomic_add_return(1, &rttest_event);
- rt_mutex_lock(&mutexes[id]);
- td->event = atomic_add_return(1, &rttest_event);
- td->mutexes[id] = 4;
- return 0;
-
- case RTTEST_LOCKINT:
- case RTTEST_LOCKINTNOWAIT:
- id = td->opdata;
- if (id < 0 || id >= MAX_RT_TEST_MUTEXES)
- return ret;
-
- td->mutexes[id] = 1;
- td->event = atomic_add_return(1, &rttest_event);
- ret = rt_mutex_lock_interruptible(&mutexes[id], 0);
- td->event = atomic_add_return(1, &rttest_event);
- td->mutexes[id] = ret ? 0 : 4;
- return ret ? -EINTR : 0;
-
- case RTTEST_UNLOCK:
- id = td->opdata;
- if (id < 0 || id >= MAX_RT_TEST_MUTEXES || td->mutexes[id] != 4)
- return ret;
-
- td->event = atomic_add_return(1, &rttest_event);
- rt_mutex_unlock(&mutexes[id]);
- td->event = atomic_add_return(1, &rttest_event);
- td->mutexes[id] = 0;
- return 0;
-
- default:
- break;
- }
- return ret;
-}
-
-/*
- * Schedule replacement for rtsem_down(). Only called for threads with
- * PF_MUTEX_TESTER set.
- *
- * This allows us to have finegrained control over the event flow.
- *
- */
-void schedule_rt_mutex_test(struct rt_mutex *mutex)
-{
- int tid, op, dat;
- struct test_thread_data *td;
-
- /* We have to lookup the task */
- for (tid = 0; tid < MAX_RT_TEST_THREADS; tid++) {
- if (threads[tid] == current)
- break;
- }
-
- BUG_ON(tid == MAX_RT_TEST_THREADS);
-
- td = &thread_data[tid];
-
- op = td->opcode;
- dat = td->opdata;
-
- switch (op) {
- case RTTEST_LOCK:
- case RTTEST_LOCKINT:
- case RTTEST_LOCKNOWAIT:
- case RTTEST_LOCKINTNOWAIT:
- if (mutex != &mutexes[dat])
- break;
-
- if (td->mutexes[dat] != 1)
- break;
-
- td->mutexes[dat] = 2;
- td->event = atomic_add_return(1, &rttest_event);
- break;
-
- default:
- break;
- }
-
- schedule();
-
-
- switch (op) {
- case RTTEST_LOCK:
- case RTTEST_LOCKINT:
- if (mutex != &mutexes[dat])
- return;
-
- if (td->mutexes[dat] != 2)
- return;
-
- td->mutexes[dat] = 3;
- td->event = atomic_add_return(1, &rttest_event);
- break;
-
- case RTTEST_LOCKNOWAIT:
- case RTTEST_LOCKINTNOWAIT:
- if (mutex != &mutexes[dat])
- return;
-
- if (td->mutexes[dat] != 2)
- return;
-
- td->mutexes[dat] = 1;
- td->event = atomic_add_return(1, &rttest_event);
- return;
-
- default:
- return;
- }
-
- td->opcode = 0;
-
- for (;;) {
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-
- if (td->opcode > 0) {
- int ret;
-
- set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
- ret = handle_op(td, 1);
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- if (td->opcode == RTTEST_LOCKCONT)
- break;
- td->opcode = ret;
- }
-
- /* Wait for the next command to be executed */
- schedule();
- }
-
- /* Restore previous command and data */
- td->opcode = op;
- td->opdata = dat;
-}
-
-static int test_func(void *data)
-{
- struct test_thread_data *td = data;
- int ret;
-
- current->flags |= PF_MUTEX_TESTER;
- set_freezable();
- allow_signal(SIGHUP);
-
- for(;;) {
-
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-
- if (td->opcode > 0) {
- set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
- ret = handle_op(td, 0);
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- td->opcode = ret;
- }
-
- /* Wait for the next command to be executed */
- schedule();
- try_to_freeze();
-
- if (signal_pending(current))
- flush_signals(current);
-
- if(kthread_should_stop())
- break;
- }
- return 0;
-}
-
-/**
- * sysfs_test_command - interface for test commands
- * @dev: thread reference
- * @buf: command for actual step
- * @count: length of buffer
- *
- * command syntax:
- *
- * opcode:data
- */
-static ssize_t sysfs_test_command(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
- const char *buf, size_t count)
-{
- struct sched_param schedpar;
- struct test_thread_data *td;
- char cmdbuf[32];
- int op, dat, tid, ret;
-
- td = container_of(dev, struct test_thread_data, dev);
- tid = td->dev.id;
-
- /* strings from sysfs write are not 0 terminated! */
- if (count >= sizeof(cmdbuf))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- /* strip of \n: */
- if (buf[count-1] == '\n')
- count--;
- if (count < 1)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- memcpy(cmdbuf, buf, count);
- cmdbuf[count] = 0;
-
- if (sscanf(cmdbuf, "%d:%d", &op, &dat) != 2)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- switch (op) {
- case RTTEST_SCHEDOT:
- schedpar.sched_priority = 0;
- ret = sched_setscheduler(threads[tid], SCHED_NORMAL, &schedpar);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- set_user_nice(current, 0);
- break;
-
- case RTTEST_SCHEDRT:
- schedpar.sched_priority = dat;
- ret = sched_setscheduler(threads[tid], SCHED_FIFO, &schedpar);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- break;
-
- case RTTEST_SIGNAL:
- send_sig(SIGHUP, threads[tid], 0);
- break;
-
- default:
- if (td->opcode > 0)
- return -EBUSY;
- td->opdata = dat;
- td->opcode = op;
- wake_up_process(threads[tid]);
- }
-
- return count;
-}
-
-/**
- * sysfs_test_status - sysfs interface for rt tester
- * @dev: thread to query
- * @buf: char buffer to be filled with thread status info
- */
-static ssize_t sysfs_test_status(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
- char *buf)
-{
- struct test_thread_data *td;
- struct task_struct *tsk;
- char *curr = buf;
- int i;
-
- td = container_of(dev, struct test_thread_data, dev);
- tsk = threads[td->dev.id];
-
- spin_lock(&rttest_lock);
-
- curr += sprintf(curr,
- "O: %4d, E:%8d, S: 0x%08lx, P: %4d, N: %4d, B: %p, M:",
- td->opcode, td->event, tsk->state,
- (MAX_RT_PRIO - 1) - tsk->prio,
- (MAX_RT_PRIO - 1) - tsk->normal_prio,
- tsk->pi_blocked_on);
-
- for (i = MAX_RT_TEST_MUTEXES - 1; i >=0 ; i--)
- curr += sprintf(curr, "%d", td->mutexes[i]);
-
- spin_unlock(&rttest_lock);
-
- curr += sprintf(curr, ", T: %p, R: %p\n", tsk,
- mutexes[td->dev.id].owner);
-
- return curr - buf;
-}
-
-static DEVICE_ATTR(status, S_IRUSR, sysfs_test_status, NULL);
-static DEVICE_ATTR(command, S_IWUSR, NULL, sysfs_test_command);
-
-static struct bus_type rttest_subsys = {
- .name = "rttest",
- .dev_name = "rttest",
-};
-
-static int init_test_thread(int id)
-{
- thread_data[id].dev.bus = &rttest_subsys;
- thread_data[id].dev.id = id;
-
- threads[id] = kthread_run(test_func, &thread_data[id], "rt-test-%d", id);
- if (IS_ERR(threads[id]))
- return PTR_ERR(threads[id]);
-
- return device_register(&thread_data[id].dev);
-}
-
-static int init_rttest(void)
-{
- int ret, i;
-
- spin_lock_init(&rttest_lock);
-
- for (i = 0; i < MAX_RT_TEST_MUTEXES; i++)
- rt_mutex_init(&mutexes[i]);
-
- ret = subsys_system_register(&rttest_subsys, NULL);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- for (i = 0; i < MAX_RT_TEST_THREADS; i++) {
- ret = init_test_thread(i);
- if (ret)
- break;
- ret = device_create_file(&thread_data[i].dev, &dev_attr_status);
- if (ret)
- break;
- ret = device_create_file(&thread_data[i].dev, &dev_attr_command);
- if (ret)
- break;
- }
-
- printk("Initializing RT-Tester: %s\n", ret ? "Failed" : "OK" );
-
- return ret;
-}
-
-device_initcall(init_rttest);
Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *loc
debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(waiter);
- schedule_rt_mutex(lock);
+ schedule();
raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
set_current_state(state);
Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
+++ tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -15,28 +15,6 @@
#include <linux/rtmutex.h>
/*
- * The rtmutex in kernel tester is independent of rtmutex debugging. We
- * call schedule_rt_mutex_test() instead of schedule() for the tasks which
- * belong to the tester. That way we can delay the wakeup path of those
- * threads to provoke lock stealing and testing of complex boosting scenarios.
- */
-#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEX_TESTER
-
-extern void schedule_rt_mutex_test(struct rt_mutex *lock);
-
-#define schedule_rt_mutex(_lock) \
- do { \
- if (!(current->flags & PF_MUTEX_TESTER)) \
- schedule(); \
- else \
- schedule_rt_mutex_test(_lock); \
- } while (0)
-
-#else
-# define schedule_rt_mutex(_lock) schedule()
-#endif
-
-/*
* This is the control structure for tasks blocked on a rt_mutex,
* which is allocated on the kernel stack on of the blocked task.
*
Index: tip/lib/Kconfig.debug
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ tip/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -828,12 +828,6 @@ config DEBUG_PI_LIST
default y
depends on DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
-config RT_MUTEX_TESTER
- bool "Built-in scriptable tester for rt-mutexes"
- depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && RT_MUTEXES
- help
- This option enables a rt-mutex tester.
-
config DEBUG_SPINLOCK
bool "Spinlock and rw-lock debugging: basic checks"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
Index: tip/scripts/rt-tester/check-all.sh
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/scripts/rt-tester/check-all.sh
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,22 +0,0 @@
-
-
-function testit ()
-{
- printf "%-30s: " $1
- ./rt-tester.py $1 | grep Pass
-}
-
-testit t2-l1-2rt-sameprio.tst
-testit t2-l1-pi.tst
-testit t2-l1-signal.tst
-#testit t2-l2-2rt-deadlock.tst
-testit t3-l1-pi-1rt.tst
-testit t3-l1-pi-2rt.tst
-testit t3-l1-pi-3rt.tst
-testit t3-l1-pi-signal.tst
-testit t3-l1-pi-steal.tst
-testit t3-l2-pi.tst
-testit t4-l2-pi-deboost.tst
-testit t5-l4-pi-boost-deboost.tst
-testit t5-l4-pi-boost-deboost-setsched.tst
-
Index: tip/scripts/rt-tester/rt-tester.py
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/scripts/rt-tester/rt-tester.py
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,220 +0,0 @@
-#!/usr/bin/python
-#
-# rt-mutex tester
-#
-# (C) 2006 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-#
-# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
-# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
-# published by the Free Software Foundation.
-#
-import os
-import sys
-import getopt
-import shutil
-import string
-
-# Globals
-quiet = 0
-test = 0
-comments = 0
-
-sysfsprefix = "/sys/devices/system/rttest/rttest"
-statusfile = "/status"
-commandfile = "/command"
-
-# Command opcodes
-cmd_opcodes = {
- "schedother" : "1",
- "schedfifo" : "2",
- "lock" : "3",
- "locknowait" : "4",
- "lockint" : "5",
- "lockintnowait" : "6",
- "lockcont" : "7",
- "unlock" : "8",
- "signal" : "11",
- "resetevent" : "98",
- "reset" : "99",
- }
-
-test_opcodes = {
- "prioeq" : ["P" , "eq" , None],
- "priolt" : ["P" , "lt" , None],
- "priogt" : ["P" , "gt" , None],
- "nprioeq" : ["N" , "eq" , None],
- "npriolt" : ["N" , "lt" , None],
- "npriogt" : ["N" , "gt" , None],
- "unlocked" : ["M" , "eq" , 0],
- "trylock" : ["M" , "eq" , 1],
- "blocked" : ["M" , "eq" , 2],
- "blockedwake" : ["M" , "eq" , 3],
- "locked" : ["M" , "eq" , 4],
- "opcodeeq" : ["O" , "eq" , None],
- "opcodelt" : ["O" , "lt" , None],
- "opcodegt" : ["O" , "gt" , None],
- "eventeq" : ["E" , "eq" , None],
- "eventlt" : ["E" , "lt" , None],
- "eventgt" : ["E" , "gt" , None],
- }
-
-# Print usage information
-def usage():
- print "rt-tester.py <-c -h -q -t> <testfile>"
- print " -c display comments after first command"
- print " -h help"
- print " -q quiet mode"
- print " -t test mode (syntax check)"
- print " testfile: read test specification from testfile"
- print " otherwise from stdin"
- return
-
-# Print progress when not in quiet mode
-def progress(str):
- if not quiet:
- print str
-
-# Analyse a status value
-def analyse(val, top, arg):
-
- intval = int(val)
-
- if top[0] == "M":
- intval = intval / (10 ** int(arg))
- intval = intval % 10
- argval = top[2]
- elif top[0] == "O":
- argval = int(cmd_opcodes.get(arg, arg))
- else:
- argval = int(arg)
-
- # progress("%d %s %d" %(intval, top[1], argval))
-
- if top[1] == "eq" and intval == argval:
- return 1
- if top[1] == "lt" and intval < argval:
- return 1
- if top[1] == "gt" and intval > argval:
- return 1
- return 0
-
-# Parse the commandline
-try:
- (options, arguments) = getopt.getopt(sys.argv[1:],'chqt')
-except getopt.GetoptError, ex:
- usage()
- sys.exit(1)
-
-# Parse commandline options
-for option, value in options:
- if option == "-c":
- comments = 1
- elif option == "-q":
- quiet = 1
- elif option == "-t":
- test = 1
- elif option == '-h':
- usage()
- sys.exit(0)
-
-# Select the input source
-if arguments:
- try:
- fd = open(arguments[0])
- except Exception,ex:
- sys.stderr.write("File not found %s\n" %(arguments[0]))
- sys.exit(1)
-else:
- fd = sys.stdin
-
-linenr = 0
-
-# Read the test patterns
-while 1:
-
- linenr = linenr + 1
- line = fd.readline()
- if not len(line):
- break
-
- line = line.strip()
- parts = line.split(":")
-
- if not parts or len(parts) < 1:
- continue
-
- if len(parts[0]) == 0:
- continue
-
- if parts[0].startswith("#"):
- if comments > 1:
- progress(line)
- continue
-
- if comments == 1:
- comments = 2
-
- progress(line)
-
- cmd = parts[0].strip().lower()
- opc = parts[1].strip().lower()
- tid = parts[2].strip()
- dat = parts[3].strip()
-
- try:
- # Test or wait for a status value
- if cmd == "t" or cmd == "w":
- testop = test_opcodes[opc]
-
- fname = "%s%s%s" %(sysfsprefix, tid, statusfile)
- if test:
- print fname
- continue
-
- while 1:
- query = 1
- fsta = open(fname, 'r')
- status = fsta.readline().strip()
- fsta.close()
- stat = status.split(",")
- for s in stat:
- s = s.strip()
- if s.startswith(testop[0]):
- # Separate status value
- val = s[2:].strip()
- query = analyse(val, testop, dat)
- break
- if query or cmd == "t":
- break
-
- progress(" " + status)
-
- if not query:
- sys.stderr.write("Test failed in line %d\n" %(linenr))
- sys.exit(1)
-
- # Issue a command to the tester
- elif cmd == "c":
- cmdnr = cmd_opcodes[opc]
- # Build command string and sys filename
- cmdstr = "%s:%s" %(cmdnr, dat)
- fname = "%s%s%s" %(sysfsprefix, tid, commandfile)
- if test:
- print fname
- continue
- fcmd = open(fname, 'w')
- fcmd.write(cmdstr)
- fcmd.close()
-
- except Exception,ex:
- sys.stderr.write(str(ex))
- sys.stderr.write("\nSyntax error in line %d\n" %(linenr))
- if not test:
- fd.close()
- sys.exit(1)
-
-# Normal exit pass
-print "Pass"
-sys.exit(0)
-
-
Index: tip/scripts/rt-tester/t2-l1-2rt-sameprio.tst
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/scripts/rt-tester/t2-l1-2rt-sameprio.tst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,94 +0,0 @@
-#
-# RT-Mutex test
-#
-# Op: C(ommand)/T(est)/W(ait)
-# | opcode
-# | | threadid: 0-7
-# | | | opcode argument
-# | | | |
-# C: lock: 0: 0
-#
-# Commands
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-# schedother nice value
-# schedfifo priority
-# lock lock nr (0-7)
-# locknowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockint lock nr (0-7)
-# lockintnowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockcont lock nr (0-7)
-# unlock lock nr (0-7)
-# signal 0
-# reset 0
-# resetevent 0
-#
-# Tests / Wait
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-#
-# prioeq priority
-# priolt priority
-# priogt priority
-# nprioeq normal priority
-# npriolt normal priority
-# npriogt normal priority
-# locked lock nr (0-7)
-# blocked lock nr (0-7)
-# blockedwake lock nr (0-7)
-# unlocked lock nr (0-7)
-# opcodeeq command opcode or number
-# opcodelt number
-# opcodegt number
-# eventeq number
-# eventgt number
-# eventlt number
-
-#
-# 2 threads 1 lock
-#
-C: resetevent: 0: 0
-W: opcodeeq: 0: 0
-
-# Set schedulers
-C: schedfifo: 0: 80
-C: schedfifo: 1: 80
-
-# T0 lock L0
-C: locknowait: 0: 0
-C: locknowait: 1: 0
-W: locked: 0: 0
-W: blocked: 1: 0
-T: prioeq: 0: 80
-
-# T0 unlock L0
-C: unlock: 0: 0
-W: locked: 1: 0
-
-# Verify T0
-W: unlocked: 0: 0
-T: prioeq: 0: 80
-
-# Unlock
-C: unlock: 1: 0
-W: unlocked: 1: 0
-
-# T1,T0 lock L0
-C: locknowait: 1: 0
-C: locknowait: 0: 0
-W: locked: 1: 0
-W: blocked: 0: 0
-T: prioeq: 1: 80
-
-# T1 unlock L0
-C: unlock: 1: 0
-W: locked: 0: 0
-
-# Verify T1
-W: unlocked: 1: 0
-T: prioeq: 1: 80
-
-# Unlock and exit
-C: unlock: 0: 0
-W: unlocked: 0: 0
-
Index: tip/scripts/rt-tester/t2-l1-pi.tst
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/scripts/rt-tester/t2-l1-pi.tst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,77 +0,0 @@
-#
-# RT-Mutex test
-#
-# Op: C(ommand)/T(est)/W(ait)
-# | opcode
-# | | threadid: 0-7
-# | | | opcode argument
-# | | | |
-# C: lock: 0: 0
-#
-# Commands
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-# schedother nice value
-# schedfifo priority
-# lock lock nr (0-7)
-# locknowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockint lock nr (0-7)
-# lockintnowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockcont lock nr (0-7)
-# unlock lock nr (0-7)
-# signal 0
-# reset 0
-# resetevent 0
-#
-# Tests / Wait
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-#
-# prioeq priority
-# priolt priority
-# priogt priority
-# nprioeq normal priority
-# npriolt normal priority
-# npriogt normal priority
-# locked lock nr (0-7)
-# blocked lock nr (0-7)
-# blockedwake lock nr (0-7)
-# unlocked lock nr (0-7)
-# opcodeeq command opcode or number
-# opcodelt number
-# opcodegt number
-# eventeq number
-# eventgt number
-# eventlt number
-
-#
-# 2 threads 1 lock with priority inversion
-#
-C: resetevent: 0: 0
-W: opcodeeq: 0: 0
-
-# Set schedulers
-C: schedother: 0: 0
-C: schedfifo: 1: 80
-
-# T0 lock L0
-C: locknowait: 0: 0
-W: locked: 0: 0
-
-# T1 lock L0
-C: locknowait: 1: 0
-W: blocked: 1: 0
-T: prioeq: 0: 80
-
-# T0 unlock L0
-C: unlock: 0: 0
-W: locked: 1: 0
-
-# Verify T1
-W: unlocked: 0: 0
-T: priolt: 0: 1
-
-# Unlock and exit
-C: unlock: 1: 0
-W: unlocked: 1: 0
-
Index: tip/scripts/rt-tester/t2-l1-signal.tst
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/scripts/rt-tester/t2-l1-signal.tst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,72 +0,0 @@
-#
-# RT-Mutex test
-#
-# Op: C(ommand)/T(est)/W(ait)
-# | opcode
-# | | threadid: 0-7
-# | | | opcode argument
-# | | | |
-# C: lock: 0: 0
-#
-# Commands
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-# schedother nice value
-# schedfifo priority
-# lock lock nr (0-7)
-# locknowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockint lock nr (0-7)
-# lockintnowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockcont lock nr (0-7)
-# unlock lock nr (0-7)
-# signal 0
-# reset 0
-# resetevent 0
-#
-# Tests / Wait
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-#
-# prioeq priority
-# priolt priority
-# priogt priority
-# nprioeq normal priority
-# npriolt normal priority
-# npriogt normal priority
-# locked lock nr (0-7)
-# blocked lock nr (0-7)
-# blockedwake lock nr (0-7)
-# unlocked lock nr (0-7)
-# opcodeeq command opcode or number
-# opcodelt number
-# opcodegt number
-# eventeq number
-# eventgt number
-# eventlt number
-
-#
-# 2 threads 1 lock with priority inversion
-#
-C: resetevent: 0: 0
-W: opcodeeq: 0: 0
-
-# Set schedulers
-C: schedother: 0: 0
-C: schedother: 1: 0
-
-# T0 lock L0
-C: locknowait: 0: 0
-W: locked: 0: 0
-
-# T1 lock L0
-C: lockintnowait: 1: 0
-W: blocked: 1: 0
-
-# Interrupt T1
-C: signal: 1: 0
-W: unlocked: 1: 0
-T: opcodeeq: 1: -4
-
-# Unlock and exit
-C: unlock: 0: 0
-W: unlocked: 0: 0
Index: tip/scripts/rt-tester/t2-l2-2rt-deadlock.tst
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/scripts/rt-tester/t2-l2-2rt-deadlock.tst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,84 +0,0 @@
-#
-# RT-Mutex test
-#
-# Op: C(ommand)/T(est)/W(ait)
-# | opcode
-# | | threadid: 0-7
-# | | | opcode argument
-# | | | |
-# C: lock: 0: 0
-#
-# Commands
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-# schedother nice value
-# schedfifo priority
-# lock lock nr (0-7)
-# locknowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockint lock nr (0-7)
-# lockintnowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockcont lock nr (0-7)
-# unlock lock nr (0-7)
-# signal 0
-# reset 0
-# resetevent 0
-#
-# Tests / Wait
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-#
-# prioeq priority
-# priolt priority
-# priogt priority
-# nprioeq normal priority
-# npriolt normal priority
-# npriogt normal priority
-# locked lock nr (0-7)
-# blocked lock nr (0-7)
-# blockedwake lock nr (0-7)
-# unlocked lock nr (0-7)
-# opcodeeq command opcode or number
-# opcodelt number
-# opcodegt number
-# eventeq number
-# eventgt number
-# eventlt number
-
-#
-# 2 threads 2 lock
-#
-C: resetevent: 0: 0
-W: opcodeeq: 0: 0
-
-# Set schedulers
-C: schedfifo: 0: 80
-C: schedfifo: 1: 80
-
-# T0 lock L0
-C: locknowait: 0: 0
-W: locked: 0: 0
-
-# T1 lock L1
-C: locknowait: 1: 1
-W: locked: 1: 1
-
-# T0 lock L1
-C: lockintnowait: 0: 1
-W: blocked: 0: 1
-
-# T1 lock L0
-C: lockintnowait: 1: 0
-W: blocked: 1: 0
-
-# Make deadlock go away
-C: signal: 1: 0
-W: unlocked: 1: 0
-C: signal: 0: 0
-W: unlocked: 0: 1
-
-# Unlock and exit
-C: unlock: 0: 0
-W: unlocked: 0: 0
-C: unlock: 1: 1
-W: unlocked: 1: 1
-
Index: tip/scripts/rt-tester/t3-l1-pi-1rt.tst
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/scripts/rt-tester/t3-l1-pi-1rt.tst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
-#
-# rt-mutex test
-#
-# Op: C(ommand)/T(est)/W(ait)
-# | opcode
-# | | threadid: 0-7
-# | | | opcode argument
-# | | | |
-# C: lock: 0: 0
-#
-# Commands
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-# schedother nice value
-# schedfifo priority
-# lock lock nr (0-7)
-# locknowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockint lock nr (0-7)
-# lockintnowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockcont lock nr (0-7)
-# unlock lock nr (0-7)
-# signal thread to signal (0-7)
-# reset 0
-# resetevent 0
-#
-# Tests / Wait
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-#
-# prioeq priority
-# priolt priority
-# priogt priority
-# nprioeq normal priority
-# npriolt normal priority
-# npriogt normal priority
-# locked lock nr (0-7)
-# blocked lock nr (0-7)
-# blockedwake lock nr (0-7)
-# unlocked lock nr (0-7)
-# opcodeeq command opcode or number
-# opcodelt number
-# opcodegt number
-# eventeq number
-# eventgt number
-# eventlt number
-
-#
-# 3 threads 1 lock PI
-#
-C: resetevent: 0: 0
-W: opcodeeq: 0: 0
-
-# Set schedulers
-C: schedother: 0: 0
-C: schedother: 1: 0
-C: schedfifo: 2: 82
-
-# T0 lock L0
-C: locknowait: 0: 0
-W: locked: 0: 0
-
-# T1 lock L0
-C: locknowait: 1: 0
-W: blocked: 1: 0
-T: priolt: 0: 1
-
-# T2 lock L0
-C: locknowait: 2: 0
-W: blocked: 2: 0
-T: prioeq: 0: 82
-
-# T0 unlock L0
-C: unlock: 0: 0
-
-# Wait until T2 got the lock
-W: locked: 2: 0
-W: unlocked: 0: 0
-T: priolt: 0: 1
-
-# T2 unlock L0
-C: unlock: 2: 0
-
-W: unlocked: 2: 0
-W: locked: 1: 0
-
-C: unlock: 1: 0
-W: unlocked: 1: 0
Index: tip/scripts/rt-tester/t3-l1-pi-2rt.tst
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/scripts/rt-tester/t3-l1-pi-2rt.tst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,88 +0,0 @@
-#
-# rt-mutex test
-#
-# Op: C(ommand)/T(est)/W(ait)
-# | opcode
-# | | threadid: 0-7
-# | | | opcode argument
-# | | | |
-# C: lock: 0: 0
-#
-# Commands
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-# schedother nice value
-# schedfifo priority
-# lock lock nr (0-7)
-# locknowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockint lock nr (0-7)
-# lockintnowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockcont lock nr (0-7)
-# unlock lock nr (0-7)
-# signal thread to signal (0-7)
-# reset 0
-# resetevent 0
-#
-# Tests / Wait
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-#
-# prioeq priority
-# priolt priority
-# priogt priority
-# nprioeq normal priority
-# npriolt normal priority
-# npriogt normal priority
-# locked lock nr (0-7)
-# blocked lock nr (0-7)
-# blockedwake lock nr (0-7)
-# unlocked lock nr (0-7)
-# opcodeeq command opcode or number
-# opcodelt number
-# opcodegt number
-# eventeq number
-# eventgt number
-# eventlt number
-
-#
-# 3 threads 1 lock PI
-#
-C: resetevent: 0: 0
-W: opcodeeq: 0: 0
-
-# Set schedulers
-C: schedother: 0: 0
-C: schedfifo: 1: 81
-C: schedfifo: 2: 82
-
-# T0 lock L0
-C: locknowait: 0: 0
-W: locked: 0: 0
-
-# T1 lock L0
-C: locknowait: 1: 0
-W: blocked: 1: 0
-T: prioeq: 0: 81
-
-# T2 lock L0
-C: locknowait: 2: 0
-W: blocked: 2: 0
-T: prioeq: 0: 82
-T: prioeq: 1: 81
-
-# T0 unlock L0
-C: unlock: 0: 0
-
-# Wait until T2 got the lock
-W: locked: 2: 0
-W: unlocked: 0: 0
-T: priolt: 0: 1
-
-# T2 unlock L0
-C: unlock: 2: 0
-
-W: unlocked: 2: 0
-W: locked: 1: 0
-
-C: unlock: 1: 0
-W: unlocked: 1: 0
Index: tip/scripts/rt-tester/t3-l1-pi-3rt.tst
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/scripts/rt-tester/t3-l1-pi-3rt.tst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
-#
-# rt-mutex test
-#
-# Op: C(ommand)/T(est)/W(ait)
-# | opcode
-# | | threadid: 0-7
-# | | | opcode argument
-# | | | |
-# C: lock: 0: 0
-#
-# Commands
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-# schedother nice value
-# schedfifo priority
-# lock lock nr (0-7)
-# locknowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockint lock nr (0-7)
-# lockintnowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockcont lock nr (0-7)
-# unlock lock nr (0-7)
-# signal thread to signal (0-7)
-# reset 0
-# resetevent 0
-#
-# Tests / Wait
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-#
-# prioeq priority
-# priolt priority
-# priogt priority
-# nprioeq normal priority
-# npriolt normal priority
-# npriogt normal priority
-# locked lock nr (0-7)
-# blocked lock nr (0-7)
-# blockedwake lock nr (0-7)
-# unlocked lock nr (0-7)
-# opcodeeq command opcode or number
-# opcodelt number
-# opcodegt number
-# eventeq number
-# eventgt number
-# eventlt number
-
-#
-# 3 threads 1 lock PI
-#
-C: resetevent: 0: 0
-W: opcodeeq: 0: 0
-
-# Set schedulers
-C: schedfifo: 0: 80
-C: schedfifo: 1: 81
-C: schedfifo: 2: 82
-
-# T0 lock L0
-C: locknowait: 0: 0
-W: locked: 0: 0
-
-# T1 lock L0
-C: locknowait: 1: 0
-W: blocked: 1: 0
-T: prioeq: 0: 81
-
-# T2 lock L0
-C: locknowait: 2: 0
-W: blocked: 2: 0
-T: prioeq: 0: 82
-
-# T0 unlock L0
-C: unlock: 0: 0
-
-# Wait until T2 got the lock
-W: locked: 2: 0
-W: unlocked: 0: 0
-T: prioeq: 0: 80
-
-# T2 unlock L0
-C: unlock: 2: 0
-
-W: locked: 1: 0
-W: unlocked: 2: 0
-
-C: unlock: 1: 0
-W: unlocked: 1: 0
Index: tip/scripts/rt-tester/t3-l1-pi-signal.tst
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/scripts/rt-tester/t3-l1-pi-signal.tst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,93 +0,0 @@
-#
-# rt-mutex test
-#
-# Op: C(ommand)/T(est)/W(ait)
-# | opcode
-# | | threadid: 0-7
-# | | | opcode argument
-# | | | |
-# C: lock: 0: 0
-#
-# Commands
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-# schedother nice value
-# schedfifo priority
-# lock lock nr (0-7)
-# locknowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockint lock nr (0-7)
-# lockintnowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockcont lock nr (0-7)
-# unlock lock nr (0-7)
-# signal thread to signal (0-7)
-# reset 0
-# resetevent 0
-#
-# Tests / Wait
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-#
-# prioeq priority
-# priolt priority
-# priogt priority
-# nprioeq normal priority
-# npriolt normal priority
-# npriogt normal priority
-# locked lock nr (0-7)
-# blocked lock nr (0-7)
-# blockedwake lock nr (0-7)
-# unlocked lock nr (0-7)
-# opcodeeq command opcode or number
-# opcodelt number
-# opcodegt number
-# eventeq number
-# eventgt number
-# eventlt number
-
-# Reset event counter
-C: resetevent: 0: 0
-W: opcodeeq: 0: 0
-
-# Set priorities
-C: schedother: 0: 0
-C: schedfifo: 1: 80
-C: schedfifo: 2: 81
-
-# T0 lock L0
-C: lock: 0: 0
-W: locked: 0: 0
-
-# T1 lock L0, no wait in the wakeup path
-C: locknowait: 1: 0
-W: blocked: 1: 0
-T: prioeq: 0: 80
-T: prioeq: 1: 80
-
-# T2 lock L0 interruptible, no wait in the wakeup path
-C: lockintnowait: 2: 0
-W: blocked: 2: 0
-T: prioeq: 0: 81
-T: prioeq: 1: 80
-
-# Interrupt T2
-C: signal: 2: 2
-W: unlocked: 2: 0
-T: prioeq: 1: 80
-T: prioeq: 0: 80
-
-T: locked: 0: 0
-T: blocked: 1: 0
-
-# T0 unlock L0
-C: unlock: 0: 0
-
-# Wait until T1 has locked L0 and exit
-W: locked: 1: 0
-W: unlocked: 0: 0
-T: priolt: 0: 1
-
-C: unlock: 1: 0
-W: unlocked: 1: 0
-
-
-
Index: tip/scripts/rt-tester/t3-l1-pi-steal.tst
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/scripts/rt-tester/t3-l1-pi-steal.tst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,91 +0,0 @@
-#
-# rt-mutex test
-#
-# Op: C(ommand)/T(est)/W(ait)
-# | opcode
-# | | threadid: 0-7
-# | | | opcode argument
-# | | | |
-# C: lock: 0: 0
-#
-# Commands
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-# schedother nice value
-# schedfifo priority
-# lock lock nr (0-7)
-# locknowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockint lock nr (0-7)
-# lockintnowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockcont lock nr (0-7)
-# unlock lock nr (0-7)
-# signal thread to signal (0-7)
-# reset 0
-# resetevent 0
-#
-# Tests / Wait
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-#
-# prioeq priority
-# priolt priority
-# priogt priority
-# nprioeq normal priority
-# npriolt normal priority
-# npriogt normal priority
-# locked lock nr (0-7)
-# blocked lock nr (0-7)
-# blockedwake lock nr (0-7)
-# unlocked lock nr (0-7)
-# opcodeeq command opcode or number
-# opcodelt number
-# opcodegt number
-# eventeq number
-# eventgt number
-# eventlt number
-
-#
-# 3 threads 1 lock PI steal pending ownership
-#
-C: resetevent: 0: 0
-W: opcodeeq: 0: 0
-
-# Set schedulers
-C: schedother: 0: 0
-C: schedfifo: 1: 80
-C: schedfifo: 2: 81
-
-# T0 lock L0
-C: lock: 0: 0
-W: locked: 0: 0
-
-# T1 lock L0
-C: lock: 1: 0
-W: blocked: 1: 0
-T: prioeq: 0: 80
-
-# T0 unlock L0
-C: unlock: 0: 0
-
-# Wait until T1 is in the wakeup loop
-W: blockedwake: 1: 0
-T: priolt: 0: 1
-
-# T2 lock L0
-C: lock: 2: 0
-# T1 leave wakeup loop
-C: lockcont: 1: 0
-
-# T2 must have the lock and T1 must be blocked
-W: locked: 2: 0
-W: blocked: 1: 0
-
-# T2 unlock L0
-C: unlock: 2: 0
-
-# Wait until T1 is in the wakeup loop and let it run
-W: blockedwake: 1: 0
-C: lockcont: 1: 0
-W: locked: 1: 0
-C: unlock: 1: 0
-W: unlocked: 1: 0
Index: tip/scripts/rt-tester/t3-l2-pi.tst
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/scripts/rt-tester/t3-l2-pi.tst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
-#
-# rt-mutex test
-#
-# Op: C(ommand)/T(est)/W(ait)
-# | opcode
-# | | threadid: 0-7
-# | | | opcode argument
-# | | | |
-# C: lock: 0: 0
-#
-# Commands
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-# schedother nice value
-# schedfifo priority
-# lock lock nr (0-7)
-# locknowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockint lock nr (0-7)
-# lockintnowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockcont lock nr (0-7)
-# unlock lock nr (0-7)
-# signal thread to signal (0-7)
-# reset 0
-# resetevent 0
-#
-# Tests / Wait
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-#
-# prioeq priority
-# priolt priority
-# priogt priority
-# nprioeq normal priority
-# npriolt normal priority
-# npriogt normal priority
-# locked lock nr (0-7)
-# blocked lock nr (0-7)
-# blockedwake lock nr (0-7)
-# unlocked lock nr (0-7)
-# opcodeeq command opcode or number
-# opcodelt number
-# opcodegt number
-# eventeq number
-# eventgt number
-# eventlt number
-
-#
-# 3 threads 2 lock PI
-#
-C: resetevent: 0: 0
-W: opcodeeq: 0: 0
-
-# Set schedulers
-C: schedother: 0: 0
-C: schedother: 1: 0
-C: schedfifo: 2: 82
-
-# T0 lock L0
-C: locknowait: 0: 0
-W: locked: 0: 0
-
-# T1 lock L0
-C: locknowait: 1: 0
-W: blocked: 1: 0
-T: priolt: 0: 1
-
-# T2 lock L0
-C: locknowait: 2: 0
-W: blocked: 2: 0
-T: prioeq: 0: 82
-
-# T0 unlock L0
-C: unlock: 0: 0
-
-# Wait until T2 got the lock
-W: locked: 2: 0
-W: unlocked: 0: 0
-T: priolt: 0: 1
-
-# T2 unlock L0
-C: unlock: 2: 0
-
-W: unlocked: 2: 0
-W: locked: 1: 0
-
-C: unlock: 1: 0
-W: unlocked: 1: 0
Index: tip/scripts/rt-tester/t4-l2-pi-deboost.tst
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/scripts/rt-tester/t4-l2-pi-deboost.tst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,118 +0,0 @@
-#
-# rt-mutex test
-#
-# Op: C(ommand)/T(est)/W(ait)
-# | opcode
-# | | threadid: 0-7
-# | | | opcode argument
-# | | | |
-# C: lock: 0: 0
-#
-# Commands
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-# schedother nice value
-# schedfifo priority
-# lock lock nr (0-7)
-# locknowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockint lock nr (0-7)
-# lockintnowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockcont lock nr (0-7)
-# unlock lock nr (0-7)
-# signal thread to signal (0-7)
-# reset 0
-# resetevent 0
-#
-# Tests / Wait
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-#
-# prioeq priority
-# priolt priority
-# priogt priority
-# nprioeq normal priority
-# npriolt normal priority
-# npriogt normal priority
-# locked lock nr (0-7)
-# blocked lock nr (0-7)
-# blockedwake lock nr (0-7)
-# unlocked lock nr (0-7)
-# opcodeeq command opcode or number
-# opcodelt number
-# opcodegt number
-# eventeq number
-# eventgt number
-# eventlt number
-
-#
-# 4 threads 2 lock PI
-#
-C: resetevent: 0: 0
-W: opcodeeq: 0: 0
-
-# Set schedulers
-C: schedother: 0: 0
-C: schedother: 1: 0
-C: schedfifo: 2: 82
-C: schedfifo: 3: 83
-
-# T0 lock L0
-C: locknowait: 0: 0
-W: locked: 0: 0
-
-# T1 lock L1
-C: locknowait: 1: 1
-W: locked: 1: 1
-
-# T3 lock L0
-C: lockintnowait: 3: 0
-W: blocked: 3: 0
-T: prioeq: 0: 83
-
-# T0 lock L1
-C: lock: 0: 1
-W: blocked: 0: 1
-T: prioeq: 1: 83
-
-# T1 unlock L1
-C: unlock: 1: 1
-
-# Wait until T0 is in the wakeup code
-W: blockedwake: 0: 1
-
-# Verify that T1 is unboosted
-W: unlocked: 1: 1
-T: priolt: 1: 1
-
-# T2 lock L1 (T0 is boosted and pending owner !)
-C: locknowait: 2: 1
-W: blocked: 2: 1
-T: prioeq: 0: 83
-
-# Interrupt T3 and wait until T3 returned
-C: signal: 3: 0
-W: unlocked: 3: 0
-
-# Verify prio of T0 (still pending owner,
-# but T2 is enqueued due to the previous boost by T3
-T: prioeq: 0: 82
-
-# Let T0 continue
-C: lockcont: 0: 1
-W: locked: 0: 1
-
-# Unlock L1 and let T2 get L1
-C: unlock: 0: 1
-W: locked: 2: 1
-
-# Verify that T0 is unboosted
-W: unlocked: 0: 1
-T: priolt: 0: 1
-
-# Unlock everything and exit
-C: unlock: 2: 1
-W: unlocked: 2: 1
-
-C: unlock: 0: 0
-W: unlocked: 0: 0
-
Index: tip/scripts/rt-tester/t5-l4-pi-boost-deboost-setsched.tst
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/scripts/rt-tester/t5-l4-pi-boost-deboost-setsched.tst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,178 +0,0 @@
-#
-# rt-mutex test
-#
-# Op: C(ommand)/T(est)/W(ait)
-# | opcode
-# | | threadid: 0-7
-# | | | opcode argument
-# | | | |
-# C: lock: 0: 0
-#
-# Commands
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-# schedother nice value
-# schedfifo priority
-# lock lock nr (0-7)
-# locknowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockint lock nr (0-7)
-# lockintnowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockcont lock nr (0-7)
-# unlock lock nr (0-7)
-# signal thread to signal (0-7)
-# reset 0
-# resetevent 0
-#
-# Tests / Wait
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-#
-# prioeq priority
-# priolt priority
-# priogt priority
-# nprioeq normal priority
-# npriolt normal priority
-# npriogt normal priority
-# locked lock nr (0-7)
-# blocked lock nr (0-7)
-# blockedwake lock nr (0-7)
-# unlocked lock nr (0-7)
-# opcodeeq command opcode or number
-# opcodelt number
-# opcodegt number
-# eventeq number
-# eventgt number
-# eventlt number
-
-#
-# 5 threads 4 lock PI - modify priority of blocked threads
-#
-C: resetevent: 0: 0
-W: opcodeeq: 0: 0
-
-# Set schedulers
-C: schedother: 0: 0
-C: schedfifo: 1: 81
-C: schedfifo: 2: 82
-C: schedfifo: 3: 83
-C: schedfifo: 4: 84
-
-# T0 lock L0
-C: locknowait: 0: 0
-W: locked: 0: 0
-
-# T1 lock L1
-C: locknowait: 1: 1
-W: locked: 1: 1
-
-# T1 lock L0
-C: lockintnowait: 1: 0
-W: blocked: 1: 0
-T: prioeq: 0: 81
-
-# T2 lock L2
-C: locknowait: 2: 2
-W: locked: 2: 2
-
-# T2 lock L1
-C: lockintnowait: 2: 1
-W: blocked: 2: 1
-T: prioeq: 0: 82
-T: prioeq: 1: 82
-
-# T3 lock L3
-C: locknowait: 3: 3
-W: locked: 3: 3
-
-# T3 lock L2
-C: lockintnowait: 3: 2
-W: blocked: 3: 2
-T: prioeq: 0: 83
-T: prioeq: 1: 83
-T: prioeq: 2: 83
-
-# T4 lock L3
-C: lockintnowait: 4: 3
-W: blocked: 4: 3
-T: prioeq: 0: 84
-T: prioeq: 1: 84
-T: prioeq: 2: 84
-T: prioeq: 3: 84
-
-# Reduce prio of T4
-C: schedfifo: 4: 80
-T: prioeq: 0: 83
-T: prioeq: 1: 83
-T: prioeq: 2: 83
-T: prioeq: 3: 83
-T: prioeq: 4: 80
-
-# Increase prio of T4
-C: schedfifo: 4: 84
-T: prioeq: 0: 84
-T: prioeq: 1: 84
-T: prioeq: 2: 84
-T: prioeq: 3: 84
-T: prioeq: 4: 84
-
-# Reduce prio of T3
-C: schedfifo: 3: 80
-T: prioeq: 0: 84
-T: prioeq: 1: 84
-T: prioeq: 2: 84
-T: prioeq: 3: 84
-T: prioeq: 4: 84
-
-# Increase prio of T3
-C: schedfifo: 3: 85
-T: prioeq: 0: 85
-T: prioeq: 1: 85
-T: prioeq: 2: 85
-T: prioeq: 3: 85
-T: prioeq: 4: 84
-
-# Reduce prio of T3
-C: schedfifo: 3: 83
-T: prioeq: 0: 84
-T: prioeq: 1: 84
-T: prioeq: 2: 84
-T: prioeq: 3: 84
-T: prioeq: 4: 84
-
-# Signal T4
-C: signal: 4: 0
-W: unlocked: 4: 3
-T: prioeq: 0: 83
-T: prioeq: 1: 83
-T: prioeq: 2: 83
-T: prioeq: 3: 83
-
-# Signal T3
-C: signal: 3: 0
-W: unlocked: 3: 2
-T: prioeq: 0: 82
-T: prioeq: 1: 82
-T: prioeq: 2: 82
-
-# Signal T2
-C: signal: 2: 0
-W: unlocked: 2: 1
-T: prioeq: 0: 81
-T: prioeq: 1: 81
-
-# Signal T1
-C: signal: 1: 0
-W: unlocked: 1: 0
-T: priolt: 0: 1
-
-# Unlock and exit
-C: unlock: 3: 3
-C: unlock: 2: 2
-C: unlock: 1: 1
-C: unlock: 0: 0
-
-W: unlocked: 3: 3
-W: unlocked: 2: 2
-W: unlocked: 1: 1
-W: unlocked: 0: 0
-
Index: tip/scripts/rt-tester/t5-l4-pi-boost-deboost.tst
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/scripts/rt-tester/t5-l4-pi-boost-deboost.tst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,138 +0,0 @@
-#
-# rt-mutex test
-#
-# Op: C(ommand)/T(est)/W(ait)
-# | opcode
-# | | threadid: 0-7
-# | | | opcode argument
-# | | | |
-# C: lock: 0: 0
-#
-# Commands
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-# schedother nice value
-# schedfifo priority
-# lock lock nr (0-7)
-# locknowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockint lock nr (0-7)
-# lockintnowait lock nr (0-7)
-# lockcont lock nr (0-7)
-# unlock lock nr (0-7)
-# signal thread to signal (0-7)
-# reset 0
-# resetevent 0
-#
-# Tests / Wait
-#
-# opcode opcode argument
-#
-# prioeq priority
-# priolt priority
-# priogt priority
-# nprioeq normal priority
-# npriolt normal priority
-# npriogt normal priority
-# locked lock nr (0-7)
-# blocked lock nr (0-7)
-# blockedwake lock nr (0-7)
-# unlocked lock nr (0-7)
-# opcodeeq command opcode or number
-# opcodelt number
-# opcodegt number
-# eventeq number
-# eventgt number
-# eventlt number
-
-#
-# 5 threads 4 lock PI
-#
-C: resetevent: 0: 0
-W: opcodeeq: 0: 0
-
-# Set schedulers
-C: schedother: 0: 0
-C: schedfifo: 1: 81
-C: schedfifo: 2: 82
-C: schedfifo: 3: 83
-C: schedfifo: 4: 84
-
-# T0 lock L0
-C: locknowait: 0: 0
-W: locked: 0: 0
-
-# T1 lock L1
-C: locknowait: 1: 1
-W: locked: 1: 1
-
-# T1 lock L0
-C: lockintnowait: 1: 0
-W: blocked: 1: 0
-T: prioeq: 0: 81
-
-# T2 lock L2
-C: locknowait: 2: 2
-W: locked: 2: 2
-
-# T2 lock L1
-C: lockintnowait: 2: 1
-W: blocked: 2: 1
-T: prioeq: 0: 82
-T: prioeq: 1: 82
-
-# T3 lock L3
-C: locknowait: 3: 3
-W: locked: 3: 3
-
-# T3 lock L2
-C: lockintnowait: 3: 2
-W: blocked: 3: 2
-T: prioeq: 0: 83
-T: prioeq: 1: 83
-T: prioeq: 2: 83
-
-# T4 lock L3
-C: lockintnowait: 4: 3
-W: blocked: 4: 3
-T: prioeq: 0: 84
-T: prioeq: 1: 84
-T: prioeq: 2: 84
-T: prioeq: 3: 84
-
-# Signal T4
-C: signal: 4: 0
-W: unlocked: 4: 3
-T: prioeq: 0: 83
-T: prioeq: 1: 83
-T: prioeq: 2: 83
-T: prioeq: 3: 83
-
-# Signal T3
-C: signal: 3: 0
-W: unlocked: 3: 2
-T: prioeq: 0: 82
-T: prioeq: 1: 82
-T: prioeq: 2: 82
-
-# Signal T2
-C: signal: 2: 0
-W: unlocked: 2: 1
-T: prioeq: 0: 81
-T: prioeq: 1: 81
-
-# Signal T1
-C: signal: 1: 0
-W: unlocked: 1: 0
-T: priolt: 0: 1
-
-# Unlock and exit
-C: unlock: 3: 3
-C: unlock: 2: 2
-C: unlock: 1: 1
-C: unlock: 0: 0
-
-W: unlocked: 3: 3
-W: unlocked: 2: 2
-W: unlocked: 1: 1
-W: unlocked: 0: 0
-
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [patch 2/6] rtmutex: Remove builtin tester
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 2/6] rtmutex: Remove builtin tester Thomas Gleixner
@ 2014-05-30 21:36 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2014-05-30 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: LKML, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Lai Jiangshan
On Thu, 22 May 2014 03:25:42 -0000
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> The tester has been broken for quite some time. It's possible to fix
> it, but the main reason for having it in the kernel was the lock steal
> mechanism in the rtmutex code. That's gone, so we can implement a
> stateful correctness tester just via the futex syscall.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
> kernel/locking/Makefile | 1
> kernel/locking/rtmutex-tester.c | 420 ------------------
> kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 2
> kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 22
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 6
> scripts/rt-tester/check-all.sh | 22
> scripts/rt-tester/rt-tester.py | 220 ---------
> scripts/rt-tester/t2-l1-2rt-sameprio.tst | 94 ----
> scripts/rt-tester/t2-l1-pi.tst | 77 ---
> scripts/rt-tester/t2-l1-signal.tst | 72 ---
> scripts/rt-tester/t2-l2-2rt-deadlock.tst | 84 ---
> scripts/rt-tester/t3-l1-pi-1rt.tst | 87 ---
> scripts/rt-tester/t3-l1-pi-2rt.tst | 88 ---
> scripts/rt-tester/t3-l1-pi-3rt.tst | 87 ---
> scripts/rt-tester/t3-l1-pi-signal.tst | 93 ---
> scripts/rt-tester/t3-l1-pi-steal.tst | 91 ---
> scripts/rt-tester/t3-l2-pi.tst | 87 ---
> scripts/rt-tester/t4-l2-pi-deboost.tst | 118 -----
> scripts/rt-tester/t5-l4-pi-boost-deboost-setsched.tst | 178 -------
> scripts/rt-tester/t5-l4-pi-boost-deboost.tst | 138 -----
> 20 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1986 deletions(-)
>
Missed some:
-- Steve
diff --git a/arch/parisc/configs/c8000_defconfig b/arch/parisc/configs/c8000_defconfig
index 8249ac9..4e407e0 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/configs/c8000_defconfig
+++ b/arch/parisc/configs/c8000_defconfig
@@ -241,7 +241,6 @@ CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR=y
CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_SOFTLOCKUP_PANIC=y
CONFIG_PANIC_ON_OOPS=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=y
-CONFIG_RT_MUTEX_TESTER=y
CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_DELAY=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_BLOCK_EXT_DEVT=y
CONFIG_LATENCYTOP=y
diff --git a/arch/parisc/configs/generic-32bit_defconfig b/arch/parisc/configs/generic-32bit_defconfig
index 33b148f..0ffb08f 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/configs/generic-32bit_defconfig
+++ b/arch/parisc/configs/generic-32bit_defconfig
@@ -295,7 +295,6 @@ CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ=y
CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK=y
CONFIG_TIMER_STATS=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=y
-CONFIG_RT_MUTEX_TESTER=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES=y
CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO=y
diff --git a/arch/s390/configs/default_defconfig b/arch/s390/configs/default_defconfig
index 8df022c..2b3ef70 100644
--- a/arch/s390/configs/default_defconfig
+++ b/arch/s390/configs/default_defconfig
@@ -574,7 +574,6 @@ CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ=y
CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK=y
CONFIG_TIMER_STATS=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=y
-CONFIG_RT_MUTEX_TESTER=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH=y
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y
CONFIG_LOCK_STAT=y
diff --git a/arch/xtensa/configs/iss_defconfig b/arch/xtensa/configs/iss_defconfig
index 1493c68..5e922fe 100644
--- a/arch/xtensa/configs/iss_defconfig
+++ b/arch/xtensa/configs/iss_defconfig
@@ -619,7 +619,6 @@ CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y
# CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is not set
# CONFIG_SLUB_STATS is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES is not set
-# CONFIG_RT_MUTEX_TESTER is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP is not set
diff --git a/arch/xtensa/configs/s6105_defconfig b/arch/xtensa/configs/s6105_defconfig
index 12a492a..4b900c9 100644
--- a/arch/xtensa/configs/s6105_defconfig
+++ b/arch/xtensa/configs/s6105_defconfig
@@ -560,7 +560,6 @@ CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_SOFTLOCKUP_PANIC_VALUE=0
# CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES is not set
-# CONFIG_RT_MUTEX_TESTER is not set
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP=y
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [patch 3/6] rtmutex: Cleanup deadlock detector debug logic
2014-05-22 3:25 [patch 0/6] rtmutex: Repair deadlock detector and cleanup Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 1/6] rtmutex: Fix deadlock detector for real Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 2/6] rtmutex: Remove builtin tester Thomas Gleixner
@ 2014-05-22 3:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-30 22:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-21 20:32 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 4/6] rtmutex: Confine deadlock logic to futex Thomas Gleixner
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2014-05-22 3:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Steven Rostedt, Lai Jiangshan
[-- Attachment #1: rtmutex-clarify-conditional-deadlock-detection.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5808 bytes --]
The conditions under which deadlock detection is conducted are unclear
and undocumented.
Add constants instead of using 0/1 and provide a selection function
which hides the additional debug dependency from the calling code.
Add comments where needed.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/futex.c | 13 ++++++++-----
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
kernel/locking/rtmutex.h | 7 ++++++-
kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Index: tip/kernel/futex.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/futex.c
+++ tip/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1619,7 +1619,8 @@ retry_private:
this->pi_state = pi_state;
ret = rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(&pi_state->pi_mutex,
this->rt_waiter,
- this->task, 1);
+ this->task,
+ RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
if (ret == 1) {
/* We got the lock. */
requeue_pi_wake_futex(this, &key2, hb2);
@@ -2238,9 +2239,10 @@ retry_private:
/*
* Block on the PI mutex:
*/
- if (!trylock)
- ret = rt_mutex_timed_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, to, 1);
- else {
+ if (!trylock) {
+ ret = rt_mutex_timed_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, to,
+ RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
+ } else {
ret = rt_mutex_trylock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex);
/* Fixup the trylock return value: */
ret = ret ? 0 : -EWOULDBLOCK;
@@ -2562,7 +2564,8 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __u
*/
WARN_ON(!q.pi_state);
pi_mutex = &q.pi_state->pi_mutex;
- ret = rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter, 1);
+ ret = rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter,
+ RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&rt_waiter);
spin_lock(q.lock_ptr);
Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -256,6 +256,25 @@ static void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct
}
/*
+ * Deadlock detection is conditional:
+ *
+ * If CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=n, deadlock detection is only conducted
+ * if the detect argument is != 0.
+ *
+ * If CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=y, deadlock detection is always
+ * conducted independent of the detect argument.
+ *
+ * If the waiter argument is NULL this indicates the deboost path and
+ * deadlock detection is disabled independent of the detect argument
+ * and the config settings.
+ */
+static int
+rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, int detect)
+{
+ return debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(waiter, detect);
+}
+
+/*
* Max number of times we'll walk the boosting chain:
*/
int max_lock_depth = 1024;
@@ -289,8 +308,8 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
int detect_deadlock, ret = 0, depth = 0;
unsigned long flags;
- detect_deadlock = debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(orig_waiter,
- deadlock_detect);
+ detect_deadlock = rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(orig_waiter,
+ deadlock_detect);
/*
* The (de)boosting is a step by step approach with a lot of
@@ -569,9 +588,10 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struc
if (owner->pi_blocked_on)
chain_walk = 1;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
- }
- else if (debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(waiter, detect_deadlock))
+
+ } else if (rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(waiter, detect_deadlock)) {
chain_walk = 1;
+ }
if (!chain_walk)
return 0;
@@ -674,7 +694,8 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mute
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
- rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, 0, lock, NULL, current);
+ rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, lock,
+ NULL, current);
raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
}
@@ -702,7 +723,8 @@ void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_stru
/* gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! */
get_task_struct(task);
- rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, 0, NULL, NULL, task);
+ rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, NULL, NULL,
+ task);
}
/**
@@ -928,7 +950,8 @@ void __sched rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mut
{
might_sleep();
- rt_mutex_fastlock(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0, rt_mutex_slowlock);
+ rt_mutex_fastlock(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK,
+ rt_mutex_slowlock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock);
Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.h
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex.h
+++ tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.h
@@ -22,5 +22,10 @@
#define debug_rt_mutex_init(m, n) do { } while (0)
#define debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(d, a ,l) do { } while (0)
#define debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(w) do { } while (0)
-#define debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(w,d) (d)
#define debug_rt_mutex_reset_waiter(w) do { } while (0)
+
+static inline int debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
+ int detect)
+{
+ return detect == RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK;
+}
Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
+++ tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -80,6 +80,21 @@ static inline struct task_struct *rt_mut
}
/*
+ * Constants for rt mutex functions which have a selectable deadlock
+ * detection.
+ *
+ * RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK: Stops the lock chain walk when there are
+ * no further PI adjustments to be made.
+ *
+ * RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK: Invoke deadlock detection with a full
+ * walk of the lock chain.
+ */
+enum {
+ RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK,
+ RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK,
+};
+
+/*
* PI-futex support (proxy locking functions, etc.):
*/
extern struct task_struct *rt_mutex_next_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [patch 3/6] rtmutex: Cleanup deadlock detector debug logic
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 3/6] rtmutex: Cleanup deadlock detector debug logic Thomas Gleixner
@ 2014-05-30 22:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-21 20:32 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
1 sibling, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2014-05-30 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: LKML, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Lai Jiangshan
On Thu, 22 May 2014 03:25:47 -0000
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> +++ tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> @@ -256,6 +256,25 @@ static void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct
> }
>
> /*
> + * Deadlock detection is conditional:
> + *
> + * If CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=n, deadlock detection is only conducted
> + * if the detect argument is != 0.
"if the detect argument is not RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK."
We want to get rid of magic numbers right?
> + *
> + * If CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=y, deadlock detection is always
> + * conducted independent of the detect argument.
> + *
> + * If the waiter argument is NULL this indicates the deboost path and
> + * deadlock detection is disabled independent of the detect argument
> + * and the config settings.
> + */
> +static int
> +rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, int detect)
> +{
> + return debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(waiter, detect);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> /*
> + * Constants for rt mutex functions which have a selectable deadlock
> + * detection.
> + *
> + * RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK: Stops the lock chain walk when there are
> + * no further PI adjustments to be made.
> + *
> + * RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK: Invoke deadlock detection with a full
> + * walk of the lock chain.
> + */
> +enum {
> + RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK,
> + RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK,
> +};
Why not name this enum and instead of passing in int into the
functions, pass the enum in. That way, in the future, people looking at
this code can see what parameters are permitted.
-- Steve
> +
> +/*
> * PI-futex support (proxy locking functions, etc.):
> */
> extern struct task_struct *rt_mutex_next_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [tip:locking/core] rtmutex: Cleanup deadlock detector debug logic
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 3/6] rtmutex: Cleanup deadlock detector debug logic Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-30 22:08 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2014-06-21 20:32 ` tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
1 sibling, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner @ 2014-06-21 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits; +Cc: linux-kernel, hpa, mingo, rostedt, peterz, tglx, laijs
Commit-ID: 8930ed80f970a90a795239e7415c9b0e6f964649
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/8930ed80f970a90a795239e7415c9b0e6f964649
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
AuthorDate: Thu, 22 May 2014 03:25:47 +0000
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 22:05:30 +0200
rtmutex: Cleanup deadlock detector debug logic
The conditions under which deadlock detection is conducted are unclear
and undocumented.
Add constants instead of using 0/1 and provide a selection function
which hides the additional debug dependency from the calling code.
Add comments where needed.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140522031949.947264874@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c | 5 +--
kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.h | 7 ++--
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
kernel/locking/rtmutex.h | 7 +++-
kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 15 ++++++++
5 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c
index 49b2ed3..62b6cee 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c
@@ -66,12 +66,13 @@ void rt_mutex_debug_task_free(struct task_struct *task)
* the deadlock. We print when we return. act_waiter can be NULL in
* case of a remove waiter operation.
*/
-void debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(int detect, struct rt_mutex_waiter *act_waiter,
+void debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk,
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter *act_waiter,
struct rt_mutex *lock)
{
struct task_struct *task;
- if (!debug_locks || detect || !act_waiter)
+ if (!debug_locks || chwalk == RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK || !act_waiter)
return;
task = rt_mutex_owner(act_waiter->lock);
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.h b/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.h
index ab29b6a..d0519c3 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.h
@@ -20,14 +20,15 @@ extern void debug_rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock);
extern void debug_rt_mutex_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct task_struct *powner);
extern void debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock);
-extern void debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(int detect, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
+extern void debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk,
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
struct rt_mutex *lock);
extern void debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter);
# define debug_rt_mutex_reset_waiter(w) \
do { (w)->deadlock_lock = NULL; } while (0)
-static inline int debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
- int detect)
+static inline bool debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
+ enum rtmutex_chainwalk walk)
{
return (waiter != NULL);
}
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 3290648..c6ffdaa 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -308,6 +308,32 @@ static void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task)
}
/*
+ * Deadlock detection is conditional:
+ *
+ * If CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=n, deadlock detection is only conducted
+ * if the detect argument is == RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK.
+ *
+ * If CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=y, deadlock detection is always
+ * conducted independent of the detect argument.
+ *
+ * If the waiter argument is NULL this indicates the deboost path and
+ * deadlock detection is disabled independent of the detect argument
+ * and the config settings.
+ */
+static bool rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
+ enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk)
+{
+ /*
+ * This is just a wrapper function for the following call,
+ * because debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock() smells like a magic
+ * debug feature and I wanted to keep the cond function in the
+ * main source file along with the comments instead of having
+ * two of the same in the headers.
+ */
+ return debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(waiter, chwalk);
+}
+
+/*
* Max number of times we'll walk the boosting chain:
*/
int max_lock_depth = 1024;
@@ -381,7 +407,7 @@ static inline struct rt_mutex *task_blocked_on_lock(struct task_struct *p)
* goto again;
*/
static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
- int deadlock_detect,
+ enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk,
struct rt_mutex *orig_lock,
struct rt_mutex *next_lock,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *orig_waiter,
@@ -389,12 +415,12 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
{
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, *top_waiter = orig_waiter;
struct rt_mutex_waiter *prerequeue_top_waiter;
- int detect_deadlock, ret = 0, depth = 0;
+ int ret = 0, depth = 0;
struct rt_mutex *lock;
+ bool detect_deadlock;
unsigned long flags;
- detect_deadlock = debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(orig_waiter,
- deadlock_detect);
+ detect_deadlock = rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(orig_waiter, chwalk);
/*
* The (de)boosting is a step by step approach with a lot of
@@ -520,7 +546,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
* walk, we detected a deadlock.
*/
if (lock == orig_lock || rt_mutex_owner(lock) == top_task) {
- debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(deadlock_detect, orig_waiter, lock);
+ debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(chwalk, orig_waiter, lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
ret = -EDEADLK;
goto out_unlock_pi;
@@ -784,7 +810,7 @@ takeit:
static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
struct task_struct *task,
- int detect_deadlock)
+ enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk)
{
struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter = waiter;
@@ -830,7 +856,7 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner);
if (owner->pi_blocked_on)
chain_walk = 1;
- } else if (debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(waiter, detect_deadlock)) {
+ } else if (rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(waiter, chwalk)) {
chain_walk = 1;
}
@@ -855,7 +881,7 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
- res = rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, detect_deadlock, lock,
+ res = rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, chwalk, lock,
next_lock, waiter, task);
raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
@@ -960,7 +986,8 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
- rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, 0, lock, next_lock, NULL, current);
+ rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, lock,
+ next_lock, NULL, current);
raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
}
@@ -990,7 +1017,8 @@ void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task)
/* gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! */
get_task_struct(task);
- rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, 0, NULL, next_lock, NULL, task);
+ rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, NULL,
+ next_lock, NULL, task);
}
/**
@@ -1068,7 +1096,7 @@ static void rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(int res, int detect_deadlock,
static int __sched
rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
- int detect_deadlock)
+ enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk)
{
struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter;
int ret = 0;
@@ -1094,7 +1122,7 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
timeout->task = NULL;
}
- ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, current, detect_deadlock);
+ ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, current, chwalk);
if (likely(!ret))
ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, state, timeout, &waiter);
@@ -1103,7 +1131,7 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
if (unlikely(ret)) {
remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
- rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, detect_deadlock, &waiter);
+ rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, chwalk, &waiter);
}
/*
@@ -1230,27 +1258,29 @@ static inline int
rt_mutex_fastlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
- int detect_deadlock))
+ enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk))
{
if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) {
rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current);
return 0;
} else
- return slowfn(lock, state, NULL, 0);
+ return slowfn(lock, state, NULL, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK);
}
static inline int
rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
- struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, int detect_deadlock,
+ struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
+ enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk,
int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
- int detect_deadlock))
+ enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk))
{
- if (!detect_deadlock && likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) {
+ if (chwalk == RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK &&
+ likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) {
rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current);
return 0;
} else
- return slowfn(lock, state, timeout, detect_deadlock);
+ return slowfn(lock, state, timeout, chwalk);
}
static inline int
@@ -1312,7 +1342,8 @@ int rt_mutex_timed_futex_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
{
might_sleep();
- return rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout, 1,
+ return rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout,
+ RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK,
rt_mutex_slowlock);
}
@@ -1334,7 +1365,8 @@ rt_mutex_timed_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout)
{
might_sleep();
- return rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout, 0,
+ return rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout,
+ RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK,
rt_mutex_slowlock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_timed_lock);
@@ -1463,7 +1495,8 @@ int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
}
/* We enforce deadlock detection for futexes */
- ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, 1);
+ ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task,
+ RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
if (ret && !rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
/*
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.h b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.h
index f6a1f3c..c406058 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.h
@@ -22,10 +22,15 @@
#define debug_rt_mutex_init(m, n) do { } while (0)
#define debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(d, a ,l) do { } while (0)
#define debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(w) do { } while (0)
-#define debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(w,d) (d)
#define debug_rt_mutex_reset_waiter(w) do { } while (0)
static inline void rt_mutex_print_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *w)
{
WARN(1, "rtmutex deadlock detected\n");
}
+
+static inline bool debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *w,
+ enum rtmutex_chainwalk walk)
+{
+ return walk == RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK;
+}
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
index cd3ec20..8552125 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -102,6 +102,21 @@ static inline struct task_struct *rt_mutex_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock)
}
/*
+ * Constants for rt mutex functions which have a selectable deadlock
+ * detection.
+ *
+ * RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK: Stops the lock chain walk when there are
+ * no further PI adjustments to be made.
+ *
+ * RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK: Invoke deadlock detection with a full
+ * walk of the lock chain.
+ */
+enum rtmutex_chainwalk {
+ RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK,
+ RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK,
+};
+
+/*
* PI-futex support (proxy locking functions, etc.):
*/
extern struct task_struct *rt_mutex_next_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [patch 4/6] rtmutex: Confine deadlock logic to futex
2014-05-22 3:25 [patch 0/6] rtmutex: Repair deadlock detector and cleanup Thomas Gleixner
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 3/6] rtmutex: Cleanup deadlock detector debug logic Thomas Gleixner
@ 2014-05-22 3:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-22 7:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-31 2:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 5/6] rtmutex: Clarify the lock chain walk Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 6/6] rtmutex: Avoid pointless requeueing in the deadlock detection " Thomas Gleixner
5 siblings, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2014-05-22 3:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Steven Rostedt, Lai Jiangshan
[-- Attachment #1: rtmutex-confine-deadlock-logic-to-futex.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 7273 bytes --]
The builtin tester is gone,, so the deadlock logic is now only
required for futexes.
Remove the extra arguments for the public functions and also for the
futex specific ones which get always called with deadlock detection
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
include/linux/rtmutex.h | 6 +---
kernel/futex.c | 9 ++----
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 7 ++---
4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
Index: tip/include/linux/rtmutex.h
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/include/linux/rtmutex.h
+++ tip/include/linux/rtmutex.h
@@ -90,11 +90,9 @@ extern void __rt_mutex_init(struct rt_mu
extern void rt_mutex_destroy(struct rt_mutex *lock);
extern void rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock);
-extern int rt_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct rt_mutex *lock,
- int detect_deadlock);
+extern int rt_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct rt_mutex *lock);
extern int rt_mutex_timed_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
- struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
- int detect_deadlock);
+ struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout);
extern int rt_mutex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock);
Index: tip/kernel/futex.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/futex.c
+++ tip/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1619,8 +1619,7 @@ retry_private:
this->pi_state = pi_state;
ret = rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(&pi_state->pi_mutex,
this->rt_waiter,
- this->task,
- RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
+ this->task);
if (ret == 1) {
/* We got the lock. */
requeue_pi_wake_futex(this, &key2, hb2);
@@ -2240,8 +2239,7 @@ retry_private:
* Block on the PI mutex:
*/
if (!trylock) {
- ret = rt_mutex_timed_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, to,
- RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
+ ret = __rt_mutex_timed_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, to);
} else {
ret = rt_mutex_trylock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex);
/* Fixup the trylock return value: */
@@ -2564,8 +2562,7 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __u
*/
WARN_ON(!q.pi_state);
pi_mutex = &q.pi_state->pi_mutex;
- ret = rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter,
- RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
+ ret = rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter);
debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&rt_waiter);
spin_lock(q.lock_ptr);
Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -957,47 +957,53 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock);
/**
* rt_mutex_lock_interruptible - lock a rt_mutex interruptible
*
- * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
- * @detect_deadlock: deadlock detection on/off
+ * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
*
* Returns:
- * 0 on success
- * -EINTR when interrupted by a signal
- * -EDEADLK when the lock would deadlock (when deadlock detection is on)
+ * 0 on success
+ * -EINTR when interrupted by a signal
*/
-int __sched rt_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct rt_mutex *lock,
- int detect_deadlock)
+int __sched rt_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct rt_mutex *lock)
{
might_sleep();
return rt_mutex_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE,
- detect_deadlock, rt_mutex_slowlock);
+ RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, rt_mutex_slowlock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock_interruptible);
+/*
+ * Futex variant to allow full deadlock detection.
+ */
+int __rt_mutex_timed_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+ struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout)
+{
+ might_sleep();
+
+ return rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout,
+ RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK,
+ rt_mutex_slowlock);
+}
+
/**
* rt_mutex_timed_lock - lock a rt_mutex interruptible
* the timeout structure is provided
* by the caller
*
- * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
+ * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
* @timeout: timeout structure or NULL (no timeout)
- * @detect_deadlock: deadlock detection on/off
*
* Returns:
- * 0 on success
- * -EINTR when interrupted by a signal
+ * 0 on success
+ * -EINTR when interrupted by a signal
* -ETIMEDOUT when the timeout expired
- * -EDEADLK when the lock would deadlock (when deadlock detection is on)
*/
int
-rt_mutex_timed_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
- int detect_deadlock)
+rt_mutex_timed_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout)
{
- might_sleep();
-
return rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout,
- detect_deadlock, rt_mutex_slowlock);
+ RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK,
+ rt_mutex_slowlock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_timed_lock);
@@ -1103,7 +1109,6 @@ void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mut
* @lock: the rt_mutex to take
* @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
* @task: the task to prepare
- * @detect_deadlock: perform deadlock detection (1) or not (0)
*
* Returns:
* 0 - task blocked on lock
@@ -1114,7 +1119,7 @@ void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mut
*/
int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
- struct task_struct *task, int detect_deadlock)
+ struct task_struct *task)
{
int ret;
@@ -1125,7 +1130,8 @@ int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_
return 1;
}
- ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, detect_deadlock);
+ ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task,
+ RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
if (ret && !rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
/*
@@ -1171,9 +1177,8 @@ struct task_struct *rt_mutex_next_owner(
* rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock() - Complete lock acquisition
* @lock: the rt_mutex we were woken on
* @to: the timeout, null if none. hrtimer should already have
- * been started.
+ * been started.
* @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
- * @detect_deadlock: perform deadlock detection (1) or not (0)
*
* Complete the lock acquisition started our behalf by another thread.
*
@@ -1185,8 +1190,7 @@ struct task_struct *rt_mutex_next_owner(
*/
int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct hrtimer_sleeper *to,
- struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
- int detect_deadlock)
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
{
int ret;
Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
+++ tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -104,12 +104,11 @@ extern void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct
struct task_struct *proxy_owner);
extern int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
- struct task_struct *task,
- int detect_deadlock);
+ struct task_struct *task);
extern int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct hrtimer_sleeper *to,
- struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
- int detect_deadlock);
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter);
+extern int __rt_mutex_timed_lock(struct rt_mutex *l, struct hrtimer_sleeper *to);
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
# include "rtmutex-debug.h"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [patch 4/6] rtmutex: Confine deadlock logic to futex
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 4/6] rtmutex: Confine deadlock logic to futex Thomas Gleixner
@ 2014-05-22 7:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-28 20:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-31 2:06 ` Steven Rostedt
1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2014-05-22 7:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: LKML, Ingo Molnar, Steven Rostedt, Lai Jiangshan
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 447 bytes --]
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 03:25:50AM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The builtin tester is gone,, so the deadlock logic is now only
> required for futexes.
>
> Remove the extra arguments for the public functions and also for the
> futex specific ones which get always called with deadlock detection
> enabled.
This reminds me, the raw rt_mutex primitives have no lockdep support,
and we've grown a few users in-tree. We should fix that.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 4/6] rtmutex: Confine deadlock logic to futex
2014-05-22 7:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2014-05-28 20:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2014-05-28 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra; +Cc: LKML, Ingo Molnar, Steven Rostedt, Lai Jiangshan
On Thu, 22 May 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 03:25:50AM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > The builtin tester is gone,, so the deadlock logic is now only
> > required for futexes.
> >
> > Remove the extra arguments for the public functions and also for the
> > futex specific ones which get always called with deadlock detection
> > enabled.
>
> This reminds me, the raw rt_mutex primitives have no lockdep support,
> and we've grown a few users in-tree. We should fix that.
It shouldn't be that hard. We just need to exclude the futex mess ...
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 4/6] rtmutex: Confine deadlock logic to futex
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 4/6] rtmutex: Confine deadlock logic to futex Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-22 7:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2014-05-31 2:06 ` Steven Rostedt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2014-05-31 2:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: LKML, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Lai Jiangshan
On Thu, 22 May 2014 03:25:50 -0000
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> +++ tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> @@ -957,47 +957,53 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock);
> /**
> * rt_mutex_lock_interruptible - lock a rt_mutex interruptible
> *
> - * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
> - * @detect_deadlock: deadlock detection on/off
> + * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
> *
> * Returns:
> - * 0 on success
> - * -EINTR when interrupted by a signal
> - * -EDEADLK when the lock would deadlock (when deadlock detection is on)
> + * 0 on success
> + * -EINTR when interrupted by a signal
> */
> -int __sched rt_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct rt_mutex *lock,
> - int detect_deadlock)
> +int __sched rt_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct rt_mutex *lock)
> {
> might_sleep();
>
> return rt_mutex_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE,
> - detect_deadlock, rt_mutex_slowlock);
> + RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, rt_mutex_slowlock);
I noticed after this change, the only two callers of rt_mutex_fastlock()
only pass in RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK. We could remove the passing of
detect_deadlock to that too, and simplify that function.
-- Steve
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock_interruptible);
>
> +/*
> + * Futex variant to allow full deadlock detection.
> + */
> +int __rt_mutex_timed_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
> + struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout)
> +{
> + might_sleep();
> +
> + return rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout,
> + RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK,
> + rt_mutex_slowlock);
> +}
> +
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [patch 5/6] rtmutex: Clarify the lock chain walk
2014-05-22 3:25 [patch 0/6] rtmutex: Repair deadlock detector and cleanup Thomas Gleixner
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 4/6] rtmutex: Confine deadlock logic to futex Thomas Gleixner
@ 2014-05-22 3:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-31 2:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 6/6] rtmutex: Avoid pointless requeueing in the deadlock detection " Thomas Gleixner
5 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2014-05-22 3:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Steven Rostedt, Lai Jiangshan
[-- Attachment #1: rtmutex-clarify-chain-walk.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3817 bytes --]
Add a separate local variable for the boost/deboost logic to make the
code more readable. Add comments where appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -302,9 +302,10 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
struct rt_mutex_waiter *orig_waiter,
struct task_struct *top_task)
{
- struct rt_mutex *lock;
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, *top_waiter = orig_waiter;
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter *prerequeue_top_waiter;
int detect_deadlock, ret = 0, depth = 0;
+ struct rt_mutex *lock;
unsigned long flags;
detect_deadlock = rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(orig_waiter,
@@ -379,6 +380,11 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
}
lock = waiter->lock;
+ /*
+ * We need to trylock here as we are holding task->pi_lock,
+ * which is the reverse lock order versus the other rtmutex
+ * operations.
+ */
if (!raw_spin_trylock(&lock->wait_lock)) {
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
cpu_relax();
@@ -398,7 +404,11 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
goto out_unlock_pi;
}
- top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
+ /*
+ * Store the top waiter before doing any requeue operation. We
+ * need it for the boost/deboost decision below.
+ */
+ prerequeue_top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
/* Requeue the waiter */
rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
@@ -407,13 +417,18 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
/* Release the task */
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
+
+ /*
+ * We must abort the chain walk if there is no lock owner even
+ * in the dead lock detection case, as we have nothing to
+ * follow here.
+ */
if (!rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
/*
* If the requeue above changed the top waiter, then we need
* to wake the new top waiter up to try to get the lock.
*/
-
- if (top_waiter != rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock))
+ if (prerequeue_top_waiter != rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock))
wake_up_process(rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->task);
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
goto out_put_task;
@@ -426,17 +441,31 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
- /* Boost the owner */
- rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, top_waiter);
+ /*
+ * The waiter became the top waiter on the
+ * lock. Remove the previous top waiter from the tasks
+ * pi waiters list and add waiter to it.
+ */
+ rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, prerequeue_top_waiter);
rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
- } else if (top_waiter == waiter) {
- /* Deboost the owner */
+ } else if (prerequeue_top_waiter == waiter) {
+ /*
+ * The waiter was the top waiter on the lock. Remove
+ * waiter from the tasks pi waiters list and add the
+ * new top waiter to it.
+ */
rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter);
waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
+
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Nothing changed. No need to do any priority
+ * adjustment.
+ */
}
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
@@ -444,6 +473,11 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ /*
+ * If the current waiter is not the top waiter on the lock,
+ * then we can stop the chain walk here if we are not in full
+ * deadlock detection mode.
+ */
if (!detect_deadlock && waiter != top_waiter)
goto out_put_task;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [patch 5/6] rtmutex: Clarify the lock chain walk
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 5/6] rtmutex: Clarify the lock chain walk Thomas Gleixner
@ 2014-05-31 2:19 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2014-05-31 2:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: LKML, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Lai Jiangshan
On Thu, 22 May 2014 03:25:54 -0000
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> Add a separate local variable for the boost/deboost logic to make the
> code more readable. Add comments where appropriate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
> kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> +++ tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> @@ -302,9 +302,10 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
> struct rt_mutex_waiter *orig_waiter,
> struct task_struct *top_task)
> {
> - struct rt_mutex *lock;
> struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, *top_waiter = orig_waiter;
> + struct rt_mutex_waiter *prerequeue_top_waiter;
> int detect_deadlock, ret = 0, depth = 0;
> + struct rt_mutex *lock;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> detect_deadlock = rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(orig_waiter,
> @@ -379,6 +380,11 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
> }
>
> lock = waiter->lock;
> + /*
> + * We need to trylock here as we are holding task->pi_lock,
> + * which is the reverse lock order versus the other rtmutex
> + * operations.
> + */
> if (!raw_spin_trylock(&lock->wait_lock)) {
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
> cpu_relax();
> @@ -398,7 +404,11 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
> goto out_unlock_pi;
> }
>
> - top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
> + /*
> + * Store the top waiter before doing any requeue operation. We
> + * need it for the boost/deboost decision below.
> + */
> + prerequeue_top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
>
> /* Requeue the waiter */
> rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
> @@ -407,13 +417,18 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
>
> /* Release the task */
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
> +
> + /*
> + * We must abort the chain walk if there is no lock owner even
> + * in the dead lock detection case, as we have nothing to
> + * follow here.
You could mention that this is the end of the chain. That is, the chain
is lock->owner->lock->owner->lock->... Once you have a lock without
owner, or a owner not blocked on a lock, that's it. Pretty self
explanatory. Don't Need to change anything. Just add "This is the end
of the chain that we are walking."
> + */
> if (!rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
> /*
> * If the requeue above changed the top waiter, then we need
> * to wake the new top waiter up to try to get the lock.
> */
> -
> - if (top_waiter != rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock))
> + if (prerequeue_top_waiter != rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock))
> wake_up_process(rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->task);
> raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
> goto out_put_task;
> @@ -426,17 +441,31 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
>
> if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
> - /* Boost the owner */
> - rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, top_waiter);
> + /*
> + * The waiter became the top waiter on the
> + * lock. Remove the previous top waiter from the tasks
> + * pi waiters list and add waiter to it.
Just to be a bit more verbose:
The waiter became the new top waiter on the lock. Replace the previous
top waiter from the tasks pi waiters list with this waiter.
If anything, I like to use "Replace .. with" instead of "Remove .. add"
as for me, it gives a better idea of what is actually being done
instead of just stating how it is being implemented.
> + */
> + rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, prerequeue_top_waiter);
> rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
> __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
>
> - } else if (top_waiter == waiter) {
> - /* Deboost the owner */
> + } else if (prerequeue_top_waiter == waiter) {
> + /*
> + * The waiter was the top waiter on the lock. Remove
> + * waiter from the tasks pi waiters list and add the
> + * new top waiter to it.
Again, I would prefer to use "Replace .. with":
The waiter was the top waiter on the lock but it is no longer the
highest priority waiter. Replace the waiter from the tasks pi waiters
list with the new top waiter (the highest priority one).
> + */
> rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter);
> waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
> rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
> __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
> +
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Nothing changed. No need to do any priority
> + * adjustment.
> + */
> }
>
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
> @@ -444,6 +473,11 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
> top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
> raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
>
> + /*
> + * If the current waiter is not the top waiter on the lock,
> + * then we can stop the chain walk here if we are not in full
> + * deadlock detection mode.
> + */
> if (!detect_deadlock && waiter != top_waiter)
> goto out_put_task;
>
>
Rest looks good.
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [patch 6/6] rtmutex: Avoid pointless requeueing in the deadlock detection chain walk
2014-05-22 3:25 [patch 0/6] rtmutex: Repair deadlock detector and cleanup Thomas Gleixner
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 5/6] rtmutex: Clarify the lock chain walk Thomas Gleixner
@ 2014-05-22 3:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-27 22:49 ` Jason Low
2014-06-21 20:33 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
5 siblings, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2014-05-22 3:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Steven Rostedt, Lai Jiangshan
[-- Attachment #1: rtmutex-avoid-pointless-requeueing.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4631 bytes --]
In case the dead lock detector is enabled we follow the lock chain to
the end in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain, even if we could stop earlier
due to the priority/waiter constellation.
But once we are not longer the top priority waiter in a certain step
or the task holding the lock has already the same priority then there
is no point in dequeing and enqueing along the lock chain as there is
no change at all.
So stop the queueing at this point.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -307,6 +307,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
int detect_deadlock, ret = 0, depth = 0;
struct rt_mutex *lock;
unsigned long flags;
+ bool requeue = true;
detect_deadlock = rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(orig_waiter,
deadlock_detect);
@@ -366,8 +367,11 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
if (!task_has_pi_waiters(task))
goto out_unlock_pi;
- if (!detect_deadlock && top_waiter != task_top_pi_waiter(task))
- goto out_unlock_pi;
+ if (top_waiter != task_top_pi_waiter(task)) {
+ if (!detect_deadlock)
+ goto out_unlock_pi;
+ requeue = false;
+ }
}
/*
@@ -377,6 +381,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
if (waiter->prio == task->prio) {
if (!detect_deadlock)
goto out_unlock_pi;
+ requeue = false;
}
lock = waiter->lock;
@@ -410,10 +415,16 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
*/
prerequeue_top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
- /* Requeue the waiter */
- rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
- waiter->prio = task->prio;
- rt_mutex_enqueue(lock, waiter);
+ /*
+ * Requeue the waiter, if we are in the boost/deboost
+ * operation and not just following the lock chain for
+ * deadlock detection.
+ */
+ if (requeue) {
+ rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
+ waiter->prio = task->prio;
+ rt_mutex_enqueue(lock, waiter);
+ }
/* Release the task */
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
@@ -428,7 +439,8 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
* If the requeue above changed the top waiter, then we need
* to wake the new top waiter up to try to get the lock.
*/
- if (prerequeue_top_waiter != rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock))
+ if (requeue &&
+ prerequeue_top_waiter != rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock))
wake_up_process(rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->task);
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
goto out_put_task;
@@ -440,32 +452,41 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
get_task_struct(task);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
- if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
- /*
- * The waiter became the top waiter on the
- * lock. Remove the previous top waiter from the tasks
- * pi waiters list and add waiter to it.
- */
- rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, prerequeue_top_waiter);
- rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
- __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
-
- } else if (prerequeue_top_waiter == waiter) {
- /*
- * The waiter was the top waiter on the lock. Remove
- * waiter from the tasks pi waiters list and add the
- * new top waiter to it.
- */
- rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter);
- waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
- rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
- __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
-
- } else {
- /*
- * Nothing changed. No need to do any priority
- * adjustment.
- */
+ /*
+ * In case we are just following the lock chain for deadlock
+ * detection we can avoid the whole requeue and priority
+ * adjustment business.
+ */
+ if (requeue) {
+ if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
+ /*
+ * The waiter became the top waiter on the
+ * lock. Remove the previous top waiter from
+ * the tasks pi waiters list and add waiter to
+ * it.
+ */
+ rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, prerequeue_top_waiter);
+ rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
+ __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
+
+ } else if (prerequeue_top_waiter == waiter) {
+ /*
+ * The waiter was the top waiter on the
+ * lock. Remove waiter from the tasks pi
+ * waiters list and add the new top waiter to
+ * it.
+ */
+ rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter);
+ waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
+ rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
+ __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
+
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Nothing changed. No need to do any priority
+ * adjustment.
+ */
+ }
}
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [patch 6/6] rtmutex: Avoid pointless requeueing in the deadlock detection chain walk
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 6/6] rtmutex: Avoid pointless requeueing in the deadlock detection " Thomas Gleixner
@ 2014-05-27 22:49 ` Jason Low
2014-05-28 9:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-21 20:33 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Jason Low @ 2014-05-27 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: LKML, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Steven Rostedt, Lai Jiangshan
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> @@ -440,32 +452,41 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
> get_task_struct(task);
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
>
> - if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
> - /*
> - * The waiter became the top waiter on the
> - * lock. Remove the previous top waiter from the tasks
> - * pi waiters list and add waiter to it.
> - */
> - rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, prerequeue_top_waiter);
> - rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
> - __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
> -
> - } else if (prerequeue_top_waiter == waiter) {
> - /*
> - * The waiter was the top waiter on the lock. Remove
> - * waiter from the tasks pi waiters list and add the
> - * new top waiter to it.
> - */
> - rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter);
> - waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
> - rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
> - __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
> -
> - } else {
> - /*
> - * Nothing changed. No need to do any priority
> - * adjustment.
> - */
> + /*
> + * In case we are just following the lock chain for deadlock
> + * detection we can avoid the whole requeue and priority
> + * adjustment business.
> + */
> + if (requeue) {
> + if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
> + /*
> + * The waiter became the top waiter on the
> + * lock. Remove the previous top waiter from
> + * the tasks pi waiters list and add waiter to
> + * it.
> + */
> + rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, prerequeue_top_waiter);
> + rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
> + __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
> +
> + } else if (prerequeue_top_waiter == waiter) {
> + /*
> + * The waiter was the top waiter on the
> + * lock. Remove waiter from the tasks pi
> + * waiters list and add the new top waiter to
> + * it.
> + */
> + rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter);
> + waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
> + rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
> + __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
> +
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Nothing changed. No need to do any priority
> + * adjustment.
> + */
> + }
> }
>
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
In the above case, could we go 1 step further and avoid taking the pi
lock as well?
if (requeue) {
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
/*
* The waiter became the top waiter on the
* lock. Remove the previous top waiter from
* the tasks pi waiters list and add waiter to
* it.
*/
rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, prerequeue_top_waiter);
rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
} else if (prerequeue_top_waiter == waiter) {
/*
* The waiter was the top waiter on the
* lock. Remove waiter from the tasks pi
* waiters list and add the new top waiter to
* it.
*/
rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter);
waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
} else {
/*
* Nothing changed. No need to do any priority
* adjustment.
*/
}
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [patch 6/6] rtmutex: Avoid pointless requeueing in the deadlock detection chain walk
2014-05-27 22:49 ` Jason Low
@ 2014-05-28 9:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-31 2:21 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2014-05-28 9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Low
Cc: LKML, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Steven Rostedt, Lai Jiangshan
On Tue, 27 May 2014, Jason Low wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > @@ -440,32 +452,41 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
> > get_task_struct(task);
> > raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
> >
> > - if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
> > - /*
> > - * The waiter became the top waiter on the
> > - * lock. Remove the previous top waiter from the tasks
> > - * pi waiters list and add waiter to it.
> > - */
> > - rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, prerequeue_top_waiter);
> > - rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
> > - __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
> > -
> > - } else if (prerequeue_top_waiter == waiter) {
> > - /*
> > - * The waiter was the top waiter on the lock. Remove
> > - * waiter from the tasks pi waiters list and add the
> > - * new top waiter to it.
> > - */
> > - rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter);
> > - waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
> > - rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
> > - __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
> > -
> > - } else {
> > - /*
> > - * Nothing changed. No need to do any priority
> > - * adjustment.
> > - */
> > + /*
> > + * In case we are just following the lock chain for deadlock
> > + * detection we can avoid the whole requeue and priority
> > + * adjustment business.
> > + */
> > + if (requeue) {
> > + if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
> > + /*
> > + * The waiter became the top waiter on the
> > + * lock. Remove the previous top waiter from
> > + * the tasks pi waiters list and add waiter to
> > + * it.
> > + */
> > + rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, prerequeue_top_waiter);
> > + rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
> > + __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
> > +
> > + } else if (prerequeue_top_waiter == waiter) {
> > + /*
> > + * The waiter was the top waiter on the
> > + * lock. Remove waiter from the tasks pi
> > + * waiters list and add the new top waiter to
> > + * it.
> > + */
> > + rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter);
> > + waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
> > + rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
> > + __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
> > +
> > + } else {
> > + /*
> > + * Nothing changed. No need to do any priority
> > + * adjustment.
> > + */
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
>
> In the above case, could we go 1 step further and avoid taking the pi
> lock as well?
>
> if (requeue) {
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
>
> if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
> /*
> * The waiter became the top waiter on the
> * lock. Remove the previous top waiter from
> * the tasks pi waiters list and add waiter to
> * it.
> */
> rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, prerequeue_top_waiter);
> rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
> __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
>
> } else if (prerequeue_top_waiter == waiter) {
> /*
> * The waiter was the top waiter on the
> * lock. Remove waiter from the tasks pi
> * waiters list and add the new top waiter to
> * it.
> */
> rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter);
> waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
> rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
> __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
>
> } else {
> /*
> * Nothing changed. No need to do any priority
> * adjustment.
> */
> }
>
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
> }
Indeed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [patch 6/6] rtmutex: Avoid pointless requeueing in the deadlock detection chain walk
2014-05-28 9:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2014-05-31 2:21 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2014-05-31 2:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: Jason Low, LKML, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Lai Jiangshan
On Wed, 28 May 2014 11:43:16 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > In the above case, could we go 1 step further and avoid taking the pi
> > lock as well?
[snip]
>
> Indeed.
>
>
Are you going to repost this patch? I'd like to review that one instead
of this one if you're going to make such a charge.
Thanks,
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [tip:locking/core] rtmutex: Avoid pointless requeueing in the deadlock detection chain walk
2014-05-22 3:25 ` [patch 6/6] rtmutex: Avoid pointless requeueing in the deadlock detection " Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-27 22:49 ` Jason Low
@ 2014-06-21 20:33 ` tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
1 sibling, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner @ 2014-06-21 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits; +Cc: linux-kernel, hpa, mingo, rostedt, peterz, tglx, laijs
Commit-ID: 67792e2cabadbadd1a93f6790fa7bcbd47eca7c3
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/67792e2cabadbadd1a93f6790fa7bcbd47eca7c3
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
AuthorDate: Thu, 22 May 2014 03:25:57 +0000
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 22:05:31 +0200
rtmutex: Avoid pointless requeueing in the deadlock detection chain walk
In case the dead lock detector is enabled we follow the lock chain to
the end in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain, even if we could stop earlier
due to the priority/waiter constellation.
But once we are no longer the top priority waiter in a certain step
or the task holding the lock has already the same priority then there
is no point in dequeing and enqueing along the lock chain as there is
no change at all.
So stop the queueing at this point.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140522031950.280830190@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index c6ffdaa..a0ea2a1 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -419,6 +419,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
struct rt_mutex *lock;
bool detect_deadlock;
unsigned long flags;
+ bool requeue = true;
detect_deadlock = rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(orig_waiter, chwalk);
@@ -508,18 +509,31 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
goto out_unlock_pi;
/*
* If deadlock detection is off, we stop here if we
- * are not the top pi waiter of the task.
+ * are not the top pi waiter of the task. If deadlock
+ * detection is enabled we continue, but stop the
+ * requeueing in the chain walk.
*/
- if (!detect_deadlock && top_waiter != task_top_pi_waiter(task))
- goto out_unlock_pi;
+ if (top_waiter != task_top_pi_waiter(task)) {
+ if (!detect_deadlock)
+ goto out_unlock_pi;
+ else
+ requeue = false;
+ }
}
/*
- * When deadlock detection is off then we check, if further
- * priority adjustment is necessary.
+ * If the waiter priority is the same as the task priority
+ * then there is no further priority adjustment necessary. If
+ * deadlock detection is off, we stop the chain walk. If its
+ * enabled we continue, but stop the requeueing in the chain
+ * walk.
*/
- if (!detect_deadlock && waiter->prio == task->prio)
- goto out_unlock_pi;
+ if (waiter->prio == task->prio) {
+ if (!detect_deadlock)
+ goto out_unlock_pi;
+ else
+ requeue = false;
+ }
/*
* [4] Get the next lock
@@ -553,6 +567,55 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
}
/*
+ * If we just follow the lock chain for deadlock detection, no
+ * need to do all the requeue operations. To avoid a truckload
+ * of conditionals around the various places below, just do the
+ * minimum chain walk checks.
+ */
+ if (!requeue) {
+ /*
+ * No requeue[7] here. Just release @task [8]
+ */
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
+ put_task_struct(task);
+
+ /*
+ * [9] check_exit_conditions_3 protected by lock->wait_lock.
+ * If there is no owner of the lock, end of chain.
+ */
+ if (!rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
+ raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /* [10] Grab the next task, i.e. owner of @lock */
+ task = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
+ get_task_struct(task);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
+
+ /*
+ * No requeue [11] here. We just do deadlock detection.
+ *
+ * [12] Store whether owner is blocked
+ * itself. Decision is made after dropping the locks
+ */
+ next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(task);
+ /*
+ * Get the top waiter for the next iteration
+ */
+ top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
+
+ /* [13] Drop locks */
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+
+ /* If owner is not blocked, end of chain. */
+ if (!next_lock)
+ goto out_put_task;
+ goto again;
+ }
+
+ /*
* Store the current top waiter before doing the requeue
* operation on @lock. We need it for the boost/deboost
* decision below.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread