From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
dipankar@in.ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
josh@joshtriplett.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
bobby prani <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/18] rcu: Move rcu_report_exp_rnp() to allow consolidation
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 20:05:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201510072009.PqS2YzTh%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151007115046.GK11639@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2214 bytes --]
Hi Peter,
[auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc4 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore]
config: i386-randconfig-x004-201540 (attached as .config)
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
kernel/rcu/tree.c: In function '_raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node':
>> kernel/rcu/tree.c:1488:2: error: too many arguments to function '_raw_spin_lock_irqsave'
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
^
In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:280:0,
from kernel/rcu/tree.c:33:
include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:34:26: note: declared here
unsigned long __lockfunc _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
^
kernel/rcu/tree.c: At top level:
>> kernel/rcu/tree.c:1493:34: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before '(' token
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node((rnp), &(flags))
^
>> kernel/rcu/tree.c:1493:41: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before '&' token
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node((rnp), &(flags))
^
kernel/rcu/tree.c: In function 'note_gp_changes':
>> kernel/rcu/tree.c:1807:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'raw_spin_trylock_rcu_node' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
!raw_spin_trylock_rcu_node(rnp)) { /* irqs already off, so later. */
^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/_raw_spin_lock_irqsave +1488 kernel/rcu/tree.c
1482 smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
1483 }
1484
1485 static inline void
1486 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long *flags)
1487 {
> 1488 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
1489 smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
1490 }
1491
1492 #define raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags)
> 1493 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node((rnp), &(flags))
1494
1495 static inline bool raw_spin_trylock_rcu_node(struct rcu_node *rnp)
1496 {
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 20374 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-07 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-06 16:29 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/18] Expedited grace-period improvements for 4.4 Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/18] rcu: Use rsp->expedited_wq instead of sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/18] rcu: Move rcu_report_exp_rnp() to allow consolidation Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 20:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-06 20:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 8:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-10-07 11:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 11:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 12:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 12:05 ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2015-10-07 12:09 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-07 12:11 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-07 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 13:44 ` [kbuild-all] " Fengguang Wu
2015-10-07 13:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 14:21 ` Fengguang Wu
2015-10-07 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 15:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-08 10:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 15:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 14:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 14:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 16:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-08 9:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-08 15:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-08 17:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-08 17:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-09 0:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-09 8:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/18] rcu: Consolidate tree setup for synchronize_rcu_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/18] rcu: Use single-stage IPI algorithm for RCU expedited grace period Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 13:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 18:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 13:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 15:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 13:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 13:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 16:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-08 9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 16:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/18] rcu: Move synchronize_sched_expedited() to combining tree Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/18] rcu: Rename qs_pending to core_needs_qs Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/18] rcu: Invert passed_quiesce and rename to cpu_no_qs Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/18] rcu: Make ->cpu_no_qs be a union for aggregate OR Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/18] rcu: Switch synchronize_sched_expedited() to IPI Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 14:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 16:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/18] rcu: Stop silencing lockdep false positive for expedited grace periods Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/18] rcu: Stop excluding CPU hotplug in synchronize_sched_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/18] cpu: Remove try_get_online_cpus() Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/18] rcu: Prepare for consolidating expedited CPU selection Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/18] rcu: Consolidate " Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/18] rcu: Add online/offline info to expedited stall warning message Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/18] rcu: Add tasks to expedited stall-warning messages Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/18] rcu: Enable stall warnings for synchronize_rcu_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/18] rcu: Better hotplug handling for synchronize_sched_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 14:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 16:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-08 9:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-08 15:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-08 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-08 15:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-08 18:01 ` Josh Triplett
2015-10-09 0:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-09 0:48 ` Josh Triplett
2015-10-09 3:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201510072009.PqS2YzTh%fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).