From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vince@deater.net,
eranian@google.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf: Synchronously cleanup child events
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 13:12:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160122121222.GR6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lh7hhmnn.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 01:35:40PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:
>
> > So I think there's a number of problems still :-(
>
> Also, it does indeed race with
> __perf_event_exit_task()/sync_child_event(), but that one I'd fix by
> simply wrapping the sync_child_event()/free_event() in
>
> mutex_lock(&parent_event->child_mutex);
> if (!is_orphan_event(parent_event)) {
> sync_child_event(child_event);
> free_event(child_event);
> }
> mutex_unlock(&parent_event->child_event);
So I've been staring at exactly that code for a while because Ingo
managed to trigger that race (and I could reproduce with his
'workload').
But I'm not seeing how; both sites hold ctx->mutex and remove the event
from the ctx->event_list.
So the way I'm seeing it, either the orphan_work find and frees it, or
the __perf_event_exit_task() one does, but I'm a bit stumped on how they
can both do.
Sure, the sync stuff is pointless if we're orphan, but I don't see how
it can harm.
> At some later point in time the code there could use a bit of
> reshuffling, I guess.
Yes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-22 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-15 11:22 [PATCH] perf: Cleanup user's child events Alexander Shishkin
2016-01-15 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15 13:05 ` Alexander Shishkin
2016-01-15 13:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15 14:07 ` [PATCH] perf: Synchronously cleanup " Alexander Shishkin
2016-01-15 17:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-18 12:07 ` Alexander Shishkin
2016-01-18 12:37 ` Alexander Shishkin
2016-01-18 14:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-19 15:12 ` [PATCH v2] " Alexander Shishkin
2016-01-19 20:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-19 21:58 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-01-20 8:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-21 4:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-01-20 7:04 ` Alexander Shishkin
2016-01-20 8:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-22 11:35 ` Alexander Shishkin
2016-01-22 12:12 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-01-22 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-22 19:44 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-01-25 11:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-25 14:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-25 21:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-26 4:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-01-26 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-26 17:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-26 23:31 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-01-27 9:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-27 17:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-01-29 11:28 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/bpf: Convert perf_event_array to use struct file tip-bot for Alexei Starovoitov
2016-01-29 20:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-01-19 20:07 ` [PATCH v2] perf: Synchronously cleanup child events Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-19 7:45 ` [PATCH] " Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160122121222.GR6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=vince@deater.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).