linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH 04/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis
       [not found] <02ed01d1c47a$49fbfbc0$ddf3f340$@alibaba-inc.com>
@ 2016-06-12  7:33 ` Hillf Danton
  2016-06-14 14:47   ` Mel Gorman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Hillf Danton @ 2016-06-12  7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Mel Gorman'; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm

> @@ -3207,15 +3228,14 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
>  			sc.may_writepage = 1;
> 
>  		/*
> -		 * Now scan the zone in the dma->highmem direction, stopping
> -		 * at the last zone which needs scanning.
> -		 *
> -		 * We do this because the page allocator works in the opposite
> -		 * direction.  This prevents the page allocator from allocating
> -		 * pages behind kswapd's direction of progress, which would
> -		 * cause too much scanning of the lower zones.
> +		 * Continue scanning in the highmem->dma direction stopping at
> +		 * the last zone which needs scanning. This may reclaim lowmem
> +		 * pages that are not necessary for zone balancing but it
> +		 * preserves LRU ordering. It is assumed that the bulk of
> +		 * allocation requests can use arbitrary zones with the
> +		 * possible exception of big highmem:lowmem configurations.
>  		 */
> -		for (i = 0; i <= end_zone; i++) {
> +		for (i = end_zone; i >= end_zone; i--) {

s/i >= end_zone;/i >= 0;/ ?

>  			struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
> 
>  			if (!populated_zone(zone))

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 04/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis
  2016-06-12  7:33 ` [PATCH 04/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis Hillf Danton
@ 2016-06-14 14:47   ` Mel Gorman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2016-06-14 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hillf Danton; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm

On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 03:33:25PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > @@ -3207,15 +3228,14 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
> >  			sc.may_writepage = 1;
> > 
> >  		/*
> > -		 * Now scan the zone in the dma->highmem direction, stopping
> > -		 * at the last zone which needs scanning.
> > -		 *
> > -		 * We do this because the page allocator works in the opposite
> > -		 * direction.  This prevents the page allocator from allocating
> > -		 * pages behind kswapd's direction of progress, which would
> > -		 * cause too much scanning of the lower zones.
> > +		 * Continue scanning in the highmem->dma direction stopping at
> > +		 * the last zone which needs scanning. This may reclaim lowmem
> > +		 * pages that are not necessary for zone balancing but it
> > +		 * preserves LRU ordering. It is assumed that the bulk of
> > +		 * allocation requests can use arbitrary zones with the
> > +		 * possible exception of big highmem:lowmem configurations.
> >  		 */
> > -		for (i = 0; i <= end_zone; i++) {
> > +		for (i = end_zone; i >= end_zone; i--) {
> 
> s/i >= end_zone;/i >= 0;/ ?
> 

Yes although it's eliminated by "mm, vmscan: Make kswapd reclaim in
terms of nodes"

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 04/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis
  2016-06-23 11:07       ` Mel Gorman
@ 2016-06-23 11:13         ` Michal Hocko
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Michal Hocko @ 2016-06-23 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mel Gorman
  Cc: Vlastimil Babka, Andrew Morton, Linux-MM, Rik van Riel,
	Johannes Weiner, LKML

On Thu 23-06-16 12:07:28, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 06:00:12PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > >>-		enum zone_type classzone_idx;
> > >>-
> > >> 		if (!populated_zone(zone))
> > >> 			continue;
> > >>
> > >>-		classzone_idx = requested_highidx;
> > >>+		/*
> > >>+		 * Note that reclaim_idx does not change as it is the highest
> > >>+		 * zone reclaimed from which for empty zones is a no-op but
> > >>+		 * classzone_idx is used by shrink_node to test if the slabs
> > >>+		 * should be shrunk on a given node.
> > >>+		 */
> > >> 		while (!populated_zone(zone->zone_pgdat->node_zones +
> > >>-							classzone_idx))
> > >>+							classzone_idx)) {
> > >> 			classzone_idx--;
> > >>+			continue;
> > 
> > Oh and Michal's comment on Patch 20 made me realize that my objection to v6
> > about possible underflow of sc->reclaim_idx and classzone_idx seems to still
> > apply here for classzone_idx?
> 
> Potentially. The relevant code now looks like this
> 
>                 classzone_idx = sc->reclaim_idx;
>                 while (!populated_zone(zone->zone_pgdat->node_zones +
>                                                         classzone_idx))
>                         classzone_idx--;

Yes that makes much more sense to me.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 04/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis
  2016-06-22 16:00     ` Vlastimil Babka
@ 2016-06-23 11:07       ` Mel Gorman
  2016-06-23 11:13         ` Michal Hocko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2016-06-23 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vlastimil Babka
  Cc: Andrew Morton, Linux-MM, Rik van Riel, Johannes Weiner, LKML,
	Michal Hocko

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 06:00:12PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >>-		enum zone_type classzone_idx;
> >>-
> >> 		if (!populated_zone(zone))
> >> 			continue;
> >>
> >>-		classzone_idx = requested_highidx;
> >>+		/*
> >>+		 * Note that reclaim_idx does not change as it is the highest
> >>+		 * zone reclaimed from which for empty zones is a no-op but
> >>+		 * classzone_idx is used by shrink_node to test if the slabs
> >>+		 * should be shrunk on a given node.
> >>+		 */
> >> 		while (!populated_zone(zone->zone_pgdat->node_zones +
> >>-							classzone_idx))
> >>+							classzone_idx)) {
> >> 			classzone_idx--;
> >>+			continue;
> 
> Oh and Michal's comment on Patch 20 made me realize that my objection to v6
> about possible underflow of sc->reclaim_idx and classzone_idx seems to still
> apply here for classzone_idx?

Potentially. The relevant code now looks like this

                classzone_idx = sc->reclaim_idx;
                while (!populated_zone(zone->zone_pgdat->node_zones +
                                                        classzone_idx))
                        classzone_idx--;

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 04/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis
  2016-06-22 14:04   ` Vlastimil Babka
  2016-06-22 16:00     ` Vlastimil Babka
@ 2016-06-23 10:58     ` Mel Gorman
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2016-06-23 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vlastimil Babka
  Cc: Andrew Morton, Linux-MM, Rik van Riel, Johannes Weiner, LKML

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 04:04:34PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >-static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
> >+static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc,
> >+		enum zone_type classzone_idx)
> > {
> > 	struct zoneref *z;
> > 	struct zone *zone;
> > 	unsigned long nr_soft_reclaimed;
> > 	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
> > 	gfp_t orig_mask;
> >-	enum zone_type requested_highidx = gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask);
> >
> > 	/*
> > 	 * If the number of buffer_heads in the machine exceeds the maximum
> >@@ -2560,15 +2579,20 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
> >
> > 	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
> > 					gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
> 
> Using sc->reclaim_idx could be faster/nicer here than gfp_zone()?

Yes, then the reclaim_idx and classzone_idx needs to be updated if
buffer_heads_over_limit in the check above but that is better anyway.

> Although after "mm, vmscan: Update classzone_idx if buffer_heads_over_limit"
> there would need to be a variable for the highmem adjusted value - maybe
> reuse "requested_highidx"? Not important though.
> 

I think it's ok in the buffer_heads_over_limit case to reclaim
from more zones than requested. It may require another pass through
do_try_to_free_pages if a low zone was not reclaimed and required by the
caller but that's ok and expected if there are too many buffer_heads.

> >-		enum zone_type classzone_idx;
> >-
> > 		if (!populated_zone(zone))
> > 			continue;
> >
> >-		classzone_idx = requested_highidx;
> >+		/*
> >+		 * Note that reclaim_idx does not change as it is the highest
> >+		 * zone reclaimed from which for empty zones is a no-op but
> >+		 * classzone_idx is used by shrink_node to test if the slabs
> >+		 * should be shrunk on a given node.
> >+		 */
> > 		while (!populated_zone(zone->zone_pgdat->node_zones +
> >-							classzone_idx))
> >+							classzone_idx)) {
> > 			classzone_idx--;
> >+			continue;
> >+		}
> >
> > 		/*
> > 		 * Take care memory controller reclaiming has small influence
> >@@ -2594,8 +2618,8 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
> > 			 */
> > 			if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPACTION) &&
> > 			    sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER &&
> >-			    zonelist_zone_idx(z) <= requested_highidx &&
> >-			    compaction_ready(zone, sc->order, requested_highidx)) {
> >+			    zonelist_zone_idx(z) <= classzone_idx &&
> >+			    compaction_ready(zone, sc->order, classzone_idx)) {
> > 				sc->compaction_ready = true;
> > 				continue;
> > 			}
> >@@ -2615,7 +2639,7 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
> > 			/* need some check for avoid more shrink_zone() */
> > 		}
> >
> >-		shrink_zone(zone, sc, zone_idx(zone) == classzone_idx);
> >+		shrink_node(zone->zone_pgdat, sc, classzone_idx);
> > 	}
> >
> > 	/*
> >@@ -2647,6 +2671,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
> > 	int initial_priority = sc->priority;
> > 	unsigned long total_scanned = 0;
> > 	unsigned long writeback_threshold;
> >+	enum zone_type classzone_idx = sc->reclaim_idx;
> 
> Hmm, try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages() seems to call this with sc->reclaim_idx
> not explicitly inirialized (e.g. 0). And shrink_all_memory() as well. I
> probably didn't check them in v6 and pointed out only try_to_free_pages()
> (which is now OK), sorry.
> 

That gets fixed in "mm, memcg: move memcg limit enforcement from zones
to nodes" but I can move the hunk to this patch to make bisection a
little easier.

> > retry:
> > 	delayacct_freepages_start();
> >
> >@@ -2657,7 +2682,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
> > 		vmpressure_prio(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup,
> > 				sc->priority);
> > 		sc->nr_scanned = 0;
> >-		shrink_zones(zonelist, sc);
> >+		shrink_zones(zonelist, sc, classzone_idx);
> 
> Looks like classzone_idx here is only used here to pass to shrink_zones()
> unchanged, which means it can just use it directly without a new param?
> 

Yes

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 04/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis
  2016-06-22 14:04   ` Vlastimil Babka
@ 2016-06-22 16:00     ` Vlastimil Babka
  2016-06-23 11:07       ` Mel Gorman
  2016-06-23 10:58     ` Mel Gorman
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Vlastimil Babka @ 2016-06-22 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mel Gorman, Andrew Morton, Linux-MM
  Cc: Rik van Riel, Johannes Weiner, LKML, Michal Hocko

On 06/22/2016 04:04 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 06/21/2016 04:15 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
>> This patch makes reclaim decisions on a per-node basis. A reclaimer knows
>> what zone is required by the allocation request and skips pages from
>> higher zones. In many cases this will be ok because it's a GFP_HIGHMEM
>> request of some description. On 64-bit, ZONE_DMA32 requests will cause
>> some problems but 32-bit devices on 64-bit platforms are increasingly
>> rare. Historically it would have been a major problem on 32-bit with big
>> Highmem:Lowmem ratios but such configurations are also now rare and even
>> where they exist, they are not encouraged. If it really becomes a problem,
>> it'll manifest as very low reclaim efficiencies.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
>
> [...]
>
>> @@ -2540,14 +2559,14 @@ static inline bool compaction_ready(struct zone *zone, int order, int classzone_
>>   * If a zone is deemed to be full of pinned pages then just give it a light
>>   * scan then give up on it.
>>   */
>> -static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>> +static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc,
>> +		enum zone_type classzone_idx)
>>  {
>>  	struct zoneref *z;
>>  	struct zone *zone;
>>  	unsigned long nr_soft_reclaimed;
>>  	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
>>  	gfp_t orig_mask;
>> -	enum zone_type requested_highidx = gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask);
>>
>>  	/*
>>  	 * If the number of buffer_heads in the machine exceeds the maximum
>> @@ -2560,15 +2579,20 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>>
>>  	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
>>  					gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
>
> Using sc->reclaim_idx could be faster/nicer here than gfp_zone()?
> Although after "mm, vmscan: Update classzone_idx if buffer_heads_over_limit"
> there would need to be a variable for the highmem adjusted value - maybe reuse
> "requested_highidx"? Not important though.
>
>> -		enum zone_type classzone_idx;
>> -
>>  		if (!populated_zone(zone))
>>  			continue;
>>
>> -		classzone_idx = requested_highidx;
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Note that reclaim_idx does not change as it is the highest
>> +		 * zone reclaimed from which for empty zones is a no-op but
>> +		 * classzone_idx is used by shrink_node to test if the slabs
>> +		 * should be shrunk on a given node.
>> +		 */
>>  		while (!populated_zone(zone->zone_pgdat->node_zones +
>> -							classzone_idx))
>> +							classzone_idx)) {
>>  			classzone_idx--;
>> +			continue;

Oh and Michal's comment on Patch 20 made me realize that my objection to v6 
about possible underflow of sc->reclaim_idx and classzone_idx seems to still 
apply here for classzone_idx? Updated example: Normal zone allocation. A small 
node 0 without Normal zone will get us classzone_idx == dma32. Node 1 next in 
zonelist won't have dma/dma32 zones so we won't see node_zones + classzone_idx 
populated, and the while loop will lead to underflow of classzone_idx.
I may be missing something, but I don't really see another way around it than 
resetting classzone_idx to sc->reclaim_idx before the while loop.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 04/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis
  2016-06-21 14:15 ` [PATCH 04/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis Mel Gorman
@ 2016-06-22 14:04   ` Vlastimil Babka
  2016-06-22 16:00     ` Vlastimil Babka
  2016-06-23 10:58     ` Mel Gorman
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Vlastimil Babka @ 2016-06-22 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mel Gorman, Andrew Morton, Linux-MM; +Cc: Rik van Riel, Johannes Weiner, LKML

On 06/21/2016 04:15 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> This patch makes reclaim decisions on a per-node basis. A reclaimer knows
> what zone is required by the allocation request and skips pages from
> higher zones. In many cases this will be ok because it's a GFP_HIGHMEM
> request of some description. On 64-bit, ZONE_DMA32 requests will cause
> some problems but 32-bit devices on 64-bit platforms are increasingly
> rare. Historically it would have been a major problem on 32-bit with big
> Highmem:Lowmem ratios but such configurations are also now rare and even
> where they exist, they are not encouraged. If it really becomes a problem,
> it'll manifest as very low reclaim efficiencies.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>

[...]

> @@ -2540,14 +2559,14 @@ static inline bool compaction_ready(struct zone *zone, int order, int classzone_
>   * If a zone is deemed to be full of pinned pages then just give it a light
>   * scan then give up on it.
>   */
> -static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
> +static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc,
> +		enum zone_type classzone_idx)
>  {
>  	struct zoneref *z;
>  	struct zone *zone;
>  	unsigned long nr_soft_reclaimed;
>  	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
>  	gfp_t orig_mask;
> -	enum zone_type requested_highidx = gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask);
>
>  	/*
>  	 * If the number of buffer_heads in the machine exceeds the maximum
> @@ -2560,15 +2579,20 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>
>  	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
>  					gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {

Using sc->reclaim_idx could be faster/nicer here than gfp_zone()?
Although after "mm, vmscan: Update classzone_idx if buffer_heads_over_limit" 
there would need to be a variable for the highmem adjusted value - maybe reuse 
"requested_highidx"? Not important though.

> -		enum zone_type classzone_idx;
> -
>  		if (!populated_zone(zone))
>  			continue;
>
> -		classzone_idx = requested_highidx;
> +		/*
> +		 * Note that reclaim_idx does not change as it is the highest
> +		 * zone reclaimed from which for empty zones is a no-op but
> +		 * classzone_idx is used by shrink_node to test if the slabs
> +		 * should be shrunk on a given node.
> +		 */
>  		while (!populated_zone(zone->zone_pgdat->node_zones +
> -							classzone_idx))
> +							classzone_idx)) {
>  			classzone_idx--;
> +			continue;
> +		}
>
>  		/*
>  		 * Take care memory controller reclaiming has small influence
> @@ -2594,8 +2618,8 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>  			 */
>  			if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPACTION) &&
>  			    sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER &&
> -			    zonelist_zone_idx(z) <= requested_highidx &&
> -			    compaction_ready(zone, sc->order, requested_highidx)) {
> +			    zonelist_zone_idx(z) <= classzone_idx &&
> +			    compaction_ready(zone, sc->order, classzone_idx)) {
>  				sc->compaction_ready = true;
>  				continue;
>  			}
> @@ -2615,7 +2639,7 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>  			/* need some check for avoid more shrink_zone() */
>  		}
>
> -		shrink_zone(zone, sc, zone_idx(zone) == classzone_idx);
> +		shrink_node(zone->zone_pgdat, sc, classzone_idx);
>  	}
>
>  	/*
> @@ -2647,6 +2671,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
>  	int initial_priority = sc->priority;
>  	unsigned long total_scanned = 0;
>  	unsigned long writeback_threshold;
> +	enum zone_type classzone_idx = sc->reclaim_idx;

Hmm, try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages() seems to call this with sc->reclaim_idx not 
explicitly inirialized (e.g. 0). And shrink_all_memory() as well. I probably 
didn't check them in v6 and pointed out only try_to_free_pages() (which is now 
OK), sorry.

>  retry:
>  	delayacct_freepages_start();
>
> @@ -2657,7 +2682,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
>  		vmpressure_prio(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup,
>  				sc->priority);
>  		sc->nr_scanned = 0;
> -		shrink_zones(zonelist, sc);
> +		shrink_zones(zonelist, sc, classzone_idx);

Looks like classzone_idx here is only used here to pass to shrink_zones() 
unchanged, which means it can just use it directly without a new param?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 04/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis
  2016-06-21 14:15 [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7 Mel Gorman
@ 2016-06-21 14:15 ` Mel Gorman
  2016-06-22 14:04   ` Vlastimil Babka
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2016-06-21 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton, Linux-MM
  Cc: Rik van Riel, Vlastimil Babka, Johannes Weiner, LKML, Mel Gorman

This patch makes reclaim decisions on a per-node basis. A reclaimer knows
what zone is required by the allocation request and skips pages from
higher zones. In many cases this will be ok because it's a GFP_HIGHMEM
request of some description. On 64-bit, ZONE_DMA32 requests will cause
some problems but 32-bit devices on 64-bit platforms are increasingly
rare. Historically it would have been a major problem on 32-bit with big
Highmem:Lowmem ratios but such configurations are also now rare and even
where they exist, they are not encouraged. If it really becomes a problem,
it'll manifest as very low reclaim efficiencies.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 39cd6375f54e..7d5bad437809 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ struct scan_control {
 	/* Scan (total_size >> priority) pages at once */
 	int priority;
 
+	/* The highest zone to isolate pages for reclaim from */
+	enum zone_type reclaim_idx;
+
 	unsigned int may_writepage:1;
 
 	/* Can mapped pages be reclaimed? */
@@ -1386,6 +1389,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
 	unsigned long nr_taken = 0;
 	unsigned long nr_zone_taken[MAX_NR_ZONES] = { 0 };
 	unsigned long scan, nr_pages;
+	LIST_HEAD(pages_skipped);
 
 	for (scan = 0; scan < nr_to_scan && nr_taken < nr_to_scan &&
 					!list_empty(src); scan++) {
@@ -1396,6 +1400,11 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
 
 		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLRU(page), page);
 
+		if (page_zonenum(page) > sc->reclaim_idx) {
+			list_move(&page->lru, &pages_skipped);
+			continue;
+		}
+
 		switch (__isolate_lru_page(page, mode)) {
 		case 0:
 			nr_pages = hpage_nr_pages(page);
@@ -1414,6 +1423,15 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
 		}
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Splice any skipped pages to the start of the LRU list. Note that
+	 * this disrupts the LRU order when reclaiming for lower zones but
+	 * we cannot splice to the tail. If we did then the SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX
+	 * scanning would soon rescan the same pages to skip and put the
+	 * system at risk of premature OOM.
+	 */
+	if (!list_empty(&pages_skipped))
+		list_splice(&pages_skipped, src);
 	*nr_scanned = scan;
 	trace_mm_vmscan_lru_isolate(sc->order, nr_to_scan, scan,
 				    nr_taken, mode, is_file_lru(lru));
@@ -1583,7 +1601,7 @@ static int current_may_throttle(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * shrink_inactive_list() is a helper for shrink_zone().  It returns the number
+ * shrink_inactive_list() is a helper for shrink_node().  It returns the number
  * of reclaimed pages
  */
 static noinline_for_stack unsigned long
@@ -2395,12 +2413,13 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct zone *zone,
 	}
 }
 
-static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
-			bool is_classzone)
+static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc,
+			enum zone_type classzone_idx)
 {
 	struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
 	unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned;
 	bool reclaimable = false;
+	struct zone *zone = &pgdat->node_zones[classzone_idx];
 
 	do {
 		struct mem_cgroup *root = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
@@ -2432,7 +2451,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
 			shrink_zone_memcg(zone, memcg, sc, &lru_pages);
 			zone_lru_pages += lru_pages;
 
-			if (memcg && is_classzone)
+			if (!global_reclaim(sc) && sc->reclaim_idx == classzone_idx)
 				shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, zone_to_nid(zone),
 					    memcg, sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
 					    lru_pages);
@@ -2463,7 +2482,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
 		 * Shrink the slab caches in the same proportion that
 		 * the eligible LRU pages were scanned.
 		 */
-		if (global_reclaim(sc) && is_classzone)
+		if (global_reclaim(sc) && sc->reclaim_idx == classzone_idx)
 			shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, zone_to_nid(zone), NULL,
 				    sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
 				    zone_lru_pages);
@@ -2540,14 +2559,14 @@ static inline bool compaction_ready(struct zone *zone, int order, int classzone_
  * If a zone is deemed to be full of pinned pages then just give it a light
  * scan then give up on it.
  */
-static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
+static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc,
+		enum zone_type classzone_idx)
 {
 	struct zoneref *z;
 	struct zone *zone;
 	unsigned long nr_soft_reclaimed;
 	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
 	gfp_t orig_mask;
-	enum zone_type requested_highidx = gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask);
 
 	/*
 	 * If the number of buffer_heads in the machine exceeds the maximum
@@ -2560,15 +2579,20 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
 
 	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
 					gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
-		enum zone_type classzone_idx;
-
 		if (!populated_zone(zone))
 			continue;
 
-		classzone_idx = requested_highidx;
+		/*
+		 * Note that reclaim_idx does not change as it is the highest
+		 * zone reclaimed from which for empty zones is a no-op but
+		 * classzone_idx is used by shrink_node to test if the slabs
+		 * should be shrunk on a given node.
+		 */
 		while (!populated_zone(zone->zone_pgdat->node_zones +
-							classzone_idx))
+							classzone_idx)) {
 			classzone_idx--;
+			continue;
+		}
 
 		/*
 		 * Take care memory controller reclaiming has small influence
@@ -2594,8 +2618,8 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
 			 */
 			if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPACTION) &&
 			    sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER &&
-			    zonelist_zone_idx(z) <= requested_highidx &&
-			    compaction_ready(zone, sc->order, requested_highidx)) {
+			    zonelist_zone_idx(z) <= classzone_idx &&
+			    compaction_ready(zone, sc->order, classzone_idx)) {
 				sc->compaction_ready = true;
 				continue;
 			}
@@ -2615,7 +2639,7 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
 			/* need some check for avoid more shrink_zone() */
 		}
 
-		shrink_zone(zone, sc, zone_idx(zone) == classzone_idx);
+		shrink_node(zone->zone_pgdat, sc, classzone_idx);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -2647,6 +2671,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
 	int initial_priority = sc->priority;
 	unsigned long total_scanned = 0;
 	unsigned long writeback_threshold;
+	enum zone_type classzone_idx = sc->reclaim_idx;
 retry:
 	delayacct_freepages_start();
 
@@ -2657,7 +2682,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
 		vmpressure_prio(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup,
 				sc->priority);
 		sc->nr_scanned = 0;
-		shrink_zones(zonelist, sc);
+		shrink_zones(zonelist, sc, classzone_idx);
 
 		total_scanned += sc->nr_scanned;
 		if (sc->nr_reclaimed >= sc->nr_to_reclaim)
@@ -2841,6 +2866,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
 	struct scan_control sc = {
 		.nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
 		.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask = memalloc_noio_flags(gfp_mask)),
+		.reclaim_idx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask),
 		.order = order,
 		.nodemask = nodemask,
 		.priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
@@ -3112,7 +3138,7 @@ static bool kswapd_shrink_zone(struct zone *zone,
 						balance_gap, classzone_idx))
 		return true;
 
-	shrink_zone(zone, sc, zone_idx(zone) == classzone_idx);
+	shrink_node(zone->zone_pgdat, sc, classzone_idx);
 
 	/* TODO: ANOMALY */
 	clear_bit(PGDAT_WRITEBACK, &pgdat->flags);
@@ -3161,6 +3187,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
 	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
 	struct scan_control sc = {
 		.gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
+		.reclaim_idx = MAX_NR_ZONES - 1,
 		.order = order,
 		.priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
 		.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
@@ -3231,15 +3258,14 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
 			sc.may_writepage = 1;
 
 		/*
-		 * Now scan the zone in the dma->highmem direction, stopping
-		 * at the last zone which needs scanning.
-		 *
-		 * We do this because the page allocator works in the opposite
-		 * direction.  This prevents the page allocator from allocating
-		 * pages behind kswapd's direction of progress, which would
-		 * cause too much scanning of the lower zones.
+		 * Continue scanning in the highmem->dma direction stopping at
+		 * the last zone which needs scanning. This may reclaim lowmem
+		 * pages that are not necessary for zone balancing but it
+		 * preserves LRU ordering. It is assumed that the bulk of
+		 * allocation requests can use arbitrary zones with the
+		 * possible exception of big highmem:lowmem configurations.
 		 */
-		for (i = 0; i <= end_zone; i++) {
+		for (i = end_zone; i >= 0; i--) {
 			struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
 
 			if (!populated_zone(zone))
@@ -3250,6 +3276,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
 				continue;
 
 			sc.nr_scanned = 0;
+			sc.reclaim_idx = i;
 
 			nr_soft_scanned = 0;
 			/*
@@ -3698,6 +3725,7 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
 		.may_writepage = !!(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_WRITE),
 		.may_unmap = !!(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_UNMAP),
 		.may_swap = 1,
+		.reclaim_idx = zone_idx(zone),
 	};
 
 	cond_resched();
@@ -3717,7 +3745,7 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
 		 * priorities until we have enough memory freed.
 		 */
 		do {
-			shrink_zone(zone, &sc, true);
+			shrink_node(zone->zone_pgdat, &sc, zone_idx(zone));
 		} while (sc.nr_reclaimed < nr_pages && --sc.priority >= 0);
 	}
 
-- 
2.6.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 04/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis
  2016-06-09 18:04 ` [PATCH 04/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis Mel Gorman
@ 2016-06-15 12:52   ` Vlastimil Babka
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Vlastimil Babka @ 2016-06-15 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mel Gorman, Andrew Morton, Linux-MM; +Cc: Rik van Riel, Johannes Weiner, LKML

On 06/09/2016 08:04 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> This patch makes reclaim decisions on a per-node basis. A reclaimer knows
> what zone is required by the allocation request and skips pages from
> higher zones. In many cases this will be ok because it's a GFP_HIGHMEM
> request of some description. On 64-bit, ZONE_DMA32 requests will cause
> some problems but 32-bit devices on 64-bit platforms are increasingly
> rare. Historically it would have been a major problem on 32-bit with big
> Highmem:Lowmem ratios but such configurations are also now rare and even
> where they exist, they are not encouraged. If it really becomes a problem,
> it'll manifest as very low reclaim efficiencies.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index f87a5a0f8793..ab1b28e7e20a 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ struct scan_control {
>  	/* Scan (total_size >> priority) pages at once */
>  	int priority;
>
> +	/* The highest zone to isolate pages for reclaim from */
> +	enum zone_type reclaim_idx;
> +
>  	unsigned int may_writepage:1;
>
>  	/* Can mapped pages be reclaimed? */
> @@ -1369,6 +1372,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
>  	struct list_head *src = &lruvec->lists[lru];
>  	unsigned long nr_taken = 0;
>  	unsigned long scan;
> +	LIST_HEAD(pages_skipped);
>
>  	for (scan = 0; scan < nr_to_scan && nr_taken < nr_to_scan &&
>  					!list_empty(src); scan++) {
> @@ -1379,6 +1383,11 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
>
>  		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLRU(page), page);
>
> +		if (page_zonenum(page) > sc->reclaim_idx) {
> +			list_move(&page->lru, &pages_skipped);
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
>  		switch (__isolate_lru_page(page, mode)) {
>  		case 0:
>  			nr_taken += hpage_nr_pages(page);
> @@ -1395,6 +1404,15 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
>  		}
>  	}
>
> +	/*
> +	 * Splice any skipped pages to the start of the LRU list. Note that
> +	 * this disrupts the LRU order when reclaiming for lower zones but
> +	 * we cannot splice to the tail. If we did then the SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX
> +	 * scanning would soon rescan the same pages to skip and put the
> +	 * system at risk of premature OOM.
> +	 */
> +	if (!list_empty(&pages_skipped))
> +		list_splice(&pages_skipped, src);

Hmm, that's unfortunate. But probably better than reclaiming the pages 
in the name of LRU order, even though it wouldn't help the allocation at 
hand.

[...]

> @@ -2516,14 +2535,14 @@ static inline bool compaction_ready(struct zone *zone, int order, int classzone_
>   * If a zone is deemed to be full of pinned pages then just give it a light
>   * scan then give up on it.
>   */
> -static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
> +static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc,
> +		enum zone_type classzone_idx)
>  {
>  	struct zoneref *z;
>  	struct zone *zone;
>  	unsigned long nr_soft_reclaimed;
>  	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
>  	gfp_t orig_mask;
> -	enum zone_type requested_highidx = gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask);
>
>  	/*
>  	 * If the number of buffer_heads in the machine exceeds the maximum
> @@ -2536,15 +2555,15 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>
>  	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
>  					gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
> -		enum zone_type classzone_idx;
> -
>  		if (!populated_zone(zone))
>  			continue;
>
> -		classzone_idx = requested_highidx;
>  		while (!populated_zone(zone->zone_pgdat->node_zones +
> -							classzone_idx))
> +							classzone_idx)) {
> +			sc->reclaim_idx--;
>  			classzone_idx--;
> +			continue;

Isn't this wrong to do this across whole zonelist which will contain 
multiple nodes? Example: a small node 0 without Normal zone will get us 
sc->reclaim_idx == classzone_idx == dma32. Node 1 won't have dma/dma32 
zones so we won't see classzone_idx populated, and the while loop will 
lead to underflow?

And sc->reclaim_idx seems to be unitialized when called via 
try_to_free_pages() -> do_try_to_free_pages() -> shrink_zones() ?
Which means it's zero and we underflow immediately?

> @@ -3207,15 +3228,14 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
>  			sc.may_writepage = 1;
>
>  		/*
> -		 * Now scan the zone in the dma->highmem direction, stopping
> -		 * at the last zone which needs scanning.
> -		 *
> -		 * We do this because the page allocator works in the opposite
> -		 * direction.  This prevents the page allocator from allocating
> -		 * pages behind kswapd's direction of progress, which would
> -		 * cause too much scanning of the lower zones.
> +		 * Continue scanning in the highmem->dma direction stopping at
> +		 * the last zone which needs scanning. This may reclaim lowmem
> +		 * pages that are not necessary for zone balancing but it
> +		 * preserves LRU ordering. It is assumed that the bulk of
> +		 * allocation requests can use arbitrary zones with the
> +		 * possible exception of big highmem:lowmem configurations.
>  		 */
> -		for (i = 0; i <= end_zone; i++) {
> +		for (i = end_zone; i >= end_zone; i--) {

				   i >= 0 ?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 04/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis
  2016-06-09 18:04 [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v6 Mel Gorman
@ 2016-06-09 18:04 ` Mel Gorman
  2016-06-15 12:52   ` Vlastimil Babka
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2016-06-09 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton, Linux-MM
  Cc: Rik van Riel, Vlastimil Babka, Johannes Weiner, LKML, Mel Gorman

This patch makes reclaim decisions on a per-node basis. A reclaimer knows
what zone is required by the allocation request and skips pages from
higher zones. In many cases this will be ok because it's a GFP_HIGHMEM
request of some description. On 64-bit, ZONE_DMA32 requests will cause
some problems but 32-bit devices on 64-bit platforms are increasingly
rare. Historically it would have been a major problem on 32-bit with big
Highmem:Lowmem ratios but such configurations are also now rare and even
where they exist, they are not encouraged. If it really becomes a problem,
it'll manifest as very low reclaim efficiencies.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index f87a5a0f8793..ab1b28e7e20a 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ struct scan_control {
 	/* Scan (total_size >> priority) pages at once */
 	int priority;
 
+	/* The highest zone to isolate pages for reclaim from */
+	enum zone_type reclaim_idx;
+
 	unsigned int may_writepage:1;
 
 	/* Can mapped pages be reclaimed? */
@@ -1369,6 +1372,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
 	struct list_head *src = &lruvec->lists[lru];
 	unsigned long nr_taken = 0;
 	unsigned long scan;
+	LIST_HEAD(pages_skipped);
 
 	for (scan = 0; scan < nr_to_scan && nr_taken < nr_to_scan &&
 					!list_empty(src); scan++) {
@@ -1379,6 +1383,11 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
 
 		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLRU(page), page);
 
+		if (page_zonenum(page) > sc->reclaim_idx) {
+			list_move(&page->lru, &pages_skipped);
+			continue;
+		}
+
 		switch (__isolate_lru_page(page, mode)) {
 		case 0:
 			nr_taken += hpage_nr_pages(page);
@@ -1395,6 +1404,15 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
 		}
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Splice any skipped pages to the start of the LRU list. Note that
+	 * this disrupts the LRU order when reclaiming for lower zones but
+	 * we cannot splice to the tail. If we did then the SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX
+	 * scanning would soon rescan the same pages to skip and put the
+	 * system at risk of premature OOM.
+	 */
+	if (!list_empty(&pages_skipped))
+		list_splice(&pages_skipped, src);
 	*nr_scanned = scan;
 	trace_mm_vmscan_lru_isolate(sc->order, nr_to_scan, scan,
 				    nr_taken, mode, is_file_lru(lru));
@@ -1557,7 +1575,7 @@ static int current_may_throttle(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * shrink_inactive_list() is a helper for shrink_zone().  It returns the number
+ * shrink_inactive_list() is a helper for shrink_node().  It returns the number
  * of reclaimed pages
  */
 static noinline_for_stack unsigned long
@@ -2371,12 +2389,13 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct zone *zone,
 	}
 }
 
-static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
-			bool is_classzone)
+static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc,
+			enum zone_type classzone_idx)
 {
 	struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
 	unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned;
 	bool reclaimable = false;
+	struct zone *zone = &pgdat->node_zones[classzone_idx];
 
 	do {
 		struct mem_cgroup *root = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
@@ -2408,7 +2427,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
 			shrink_zone_memcg(zone, memcg, sc, &lru_pages);
 			zone_lru_pages += lru_pages;
 
-			if (memcg && is_classzone)
+			if (!global_reclaim(sc) && sc->reclaim_idx == classzone_idx)
 				shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, zone_to_nid(zone),
 					    memcg, sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
 					    lru_pages);
@@ -2439,7 +2458,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
 		 * Shrink the slab caches in the same proportion that
 		 * the eligible LRU pages were scanned.
 		 */
-		if (global_reclaim(sc) && is_classzone)
+		if (global_reclaim(sc) && sc->reclaim_idx == classzone_idx)
 			shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, zone_to_nid(zone), NULL,
 				    sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
 				    zone_lru_pages);
@@ -2516,14 +2535,14 @@ static inline bool compaction_ready(struct zone *zone, int order, int classzone_
  * If a zone is deemed to be full of pinned pages then just give it a light
  * scan then give up on it.
  */
-static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
+static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc,
+		enum zone_type classzone_idx)
 {
 	struct zoneref *z;
 	struct zone *zone;
 	unsigned long nr_soft_reclaimed;
 	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
 	gfp_t orig_mask;
-	enum zone_type requested_highidx = gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask);
 
 	/*
 	 * If the number of buffer_heads in the machine exceeds the maximum
@@ -2536,15 +2555,15 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
 
 	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
 					gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
-		enum zone_type classzone_idx;
-
 		if (!populated_zone(zone))
 			continue;
 
-		classzone_idx = requested_highidx;
 		while (!populated_zone(zone->zone_pgdat->node_zones +
-							classzone_idx))
+							classzone_idx)) {
+			sc->reclaim_idx--;
 			classzone_idx--;
+			continue;
+		}
 
 		/*
 		 * Take care memory controller reclaiming has small influence
@@ -2570,8 +2589,8 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
 			 */
 			if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPACTION) &&
 			    sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER &&
-			    zonelist_zone_idx(z) <= requested_highidx &&
-			    compaction_ready(zone, sc->order, requested_highidx)) {
+			    zonelist_zone_idx(z) <= classzone_idx &&
+			    compaction_ready(zone, sc->order, classzone_idx)) {
 				sc->compaction_ready = true;
 				continue;
 			}
@@ -2591,7 +2610,7 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
 			/* need some check for avoid more shrink_zone() */
 		}
 
-		shrink_zone(zone, sc, zone_idx(zone) == classzone_idx);
+		shrink_node(zone->zone_pgdat, sc, classzone_idx);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -2623,6 +2642,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
 	int initial_priority = sc->priority;
 	unsigned long total_scanned = 0;
 	unsigned long writeback_threshold;
+	enum zone_type classzone_idx = gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask);
 retry:
 	delayacct_freepages_start();
 
@@ -2633,7 +2653,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
 		vmpressure_prio(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup,
 				sc->priority);
 		sc->nr_scanned = 0;
-		shrink_zones(zonelist, sc);
+		shrink_zones(zonelist, sc, classzone_idx);
 
 		total_scanned += sc->nr_scanned;
 		if (sc->nr_reclaimed >= sc->nr_to_reclaim)
@@ -3088,7 +3108,7 @@ static bool kswapd_shrink_zone(struct zone *zone,
 						balance_gap, classzone_idx))
 		return true;
 
-	shrink_zone(zone, sc, zone_idx(zone) == classzone_idx);
+	shrink_node(zone->zone_pgdat, sc, classzone_idx);
 
 	/* TODO: ANOMALY */
 	clear_bit(PGDAT_WRITEBACK, &pgdat->flags);
@@ -3137,6 +3157,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
 	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
 	struct scan_control sc = {
 		.gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
+		.reclaim_idx = MAX_NR_ZONES - 1,
 		.order = order,
 		.priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
 		.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
@@ -3207,15 +3228,14 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
 			sc.may_writepage = 1;
 
 		/*
-		 * Now scan the zone in the dma->highmem direction, stopping
-		 * at the last zone which needs scanning.
-		 *
-		 * We do this because the page allocator works in the opposite
-		 * direction.  This prevents the page allocator from allocating
-		 * pages behind kswapd's direction of progress, which would
-		 * cause too much scanning of the lower zones.
+		 * Continue scanning in the highmem->dma direction stopping at
+		 * the last zone which needs scanning. This may reclaim lowmem
+		 * pages that are not necessary for zone balancing but it
+		 * preserves LRU ordering. It is assumed that the bulk of
+		 * allocation requests can use arbitrary zones with the
+		 * possible exception of big highmem:lowmem configurations.
 		 */
-		for (i = 0; i <= end_zone; i++) {
+		for (i = end_zone; i >= end_zone; i--) {
 			struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
 
 			if (!populated_zone(zone))
@@ -3226,6 +3246,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
 				continue;
 
 			sc.nr_scanned = 0;
+			sc.reclaim_idx = i;
 
 			nr_soft_scanned = 0;
 			/*
@@ -3674,6 +3695,7 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
 		.may_writepage = !!(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_WRITE),
 		.may_unmap = !!(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_UNMAP),
 		.may_swap = 1,
+		.reclaim_idx = zone_idx(zone),
 	};
 
 	cond_resched();
@@ -3693,7 +3715,7 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
 		 * priorities until we have enough memory freed.
 		 */
 		do {
-			shrink_zone(zone, &sc, true);
+			shrink_node(zone->zone_pgdat, &sc, zone_idx(zone));
 		} while (sc.nr_reclaimed < nr_pages && --sc.priority >= 0);
 	}
 
-- 
2.6.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 04/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis
  2016-04-15  9:13 [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v5 Mel Gorman
@ 2016-04-15  9:13 ` Mel Gorman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2016-04-15  9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton, Linux-MM
  Cc: Rik van Riel, Vlastimil Babka, Johannes Weiner,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer, LKML, Mel Gorman

This patch makes reclaim decisions on a per-node basis. A reclaimer knows
what zone is required by the allocation request and skips pages from
higher zones. In many cases this will be ok because it's a GFP_HIGHMEM
request of some description. On 64-bit, ZONE_DMA32 requests will cause
some problems but 32-bit devices on 64-bit platforms are increasingly
rare. Historically it would have been a major problem on 32-bit with big
Highmem:Lowmem ratios but such configurations are also now rare and even
where they exist, they are not encouraged. If it really becomes a problem,
it'll manifest as very low reclaim efficiencies.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 75acb89c9df5..0f8dc3488f9d 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ struct scan_control {
 	/* Scan (total_size >> priority) pages at once */
 	int priority;
 
+	/* The highest zone to isolate pages for reclaim from */
+	enum zone_type reclaim_idx;
+
 	unsigned int may_writepage:1;
 
 	/* Can mapped pages be reclaimed? */
@@ -1369,6 +1372,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
 	struct list_head *src = &lruvec->lists[lru];
 	unsigned long nr_taken = 0;
 	unsigned long scan;
+	LIST_HEAD(pages_skipped);
 
 	for (scan = 0; scan < nr_to_scan && nr_taken < nr_to_scan &&
 					!list_empty(src); scan++) {
@@ -1380,6 +1384,11 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
 
 		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLRU(page), page);
 
+		if (page_zonenum(page) > sc->reclaim_idx) {
+			list_move(&page->lru, &pages_skipped);
+			continue;
+		}
+
 		switch (__isolate_lru_page(page, mode)) {
 		case 0:
 			nr_pages = hpage_nr_pages(page);
@@ -1398,6 +1407,15 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
 		}
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Splice any skipped pages to the start of the LRU list. Note that
+	 * this disrupts the LRU order when reclaiming for lower zones but
+	 * we cannot splice to the tail. If we did then the SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX
+	 * scanning would soon rescan the same pages to skip and put the
+	 * system at risk of premature OOM.
+	 */
+	if (!list_empty(&pages_skipped))
+		list_splice(&pages_skipped, src);
 	*nr_scanned = scan;
 	trace_mm_vmscan_lru_isolate(sc->order, nr_to_scan, scan,
 				    nr_taken, mode, is_file_lru(lru));
@@ -1560,7 +1578,7 @@ static int current_may_throttle(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * shrink_inactive_list() is a helper for shrink_zone().  It returns the number
+ * shrink_inactive_list() is a helper for shrink_node().  It returns the number
  * of reclaimed pages
  */
 static noinline_for_stack unsigned long
@@ -2394,12 +2412,13 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct zone *zone,
 	}
 }
 
-static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
-			bool is_classzone)
+static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc,
+			enum zone_type classzone_idx)
 {
 	struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
 	unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned;
 	bool reclaimable = false;
+	struct zone *zone = &pgdat->node_zones[classzone_idx];
 
 	do {
 		struct mem_cgroup *root = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
@@ -2431,7 +2450,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
 			shrink_zone_memcg(zone, memcg, sc, &lru_pages);
 			zone_lru_pages += lru_pages;
 
-			if (memcg && is_classzone)
+			if (!global_reclaim(sc) && sc->reclaim_idx == classzone_idx)
 				shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, zone_to_nid(zone),
 					    memcg, sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
 					    lru_pages);
@@ -2462,7 +2481,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
 		 * Shrink the slab caches in the same proportion that
 		 * the eligible LRU pages were scanned.
 		 */
-		if (global_reclaim(sc) && is_classzone)
+		if (global_reclaim(sc) && sc->reclaim_idx == classzone_idx)
 			shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, zone_to_nid(zone), NULL,
 				    sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
 				    zone_lru_pages);
@@ -2541,14 +2560,14 @@ static inline bool compaction_ready(struct zone *zone, int order)
  *
  * Returns true if a zone was reclaimable.
  */
-static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
+static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc,
+		enum zone_type classzone_idx)
 {
 	struct zoneref *z;
 	struct zone *zone;
 	unsigned long nr_soft_reclaimed;
 	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
 	gfp_t orig_mask;
-	enum zone_type requested_highidx = gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask);
 	bool reclaimable = false;
 
 	/*
@@ -2561,16 +2580,12 @@ static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
 		sc->gfp_mask |= __GFP_HIGHMEM;
 
 	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
-					requested_highidx, sc->nodemask) {
-		enum zone_type classzone_idx;
-
-		if (!populated_zone(zone))
-			continue;
-
-		classzone_idx = requested_highidx;
-		while (!populated_zone(zone->zone_pgdat->node_zones +
-							classzone_idx))
+					classzone_idx, sc->nodemask) {
+		if (!populated_zone(zone)) {
+			sc->reclaim_idx--;
 			classzone_idx--;
+			continue;
+		}
 
 		/*
 		 * Take care memory controller reclaiming has small influence
@@ -2596,7 +2611,7 @@ static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
 			 */
 			if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPACTION) &&
 			    sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER &&
-			    zonelist_zone_idx(z) <= requested_highidx &&
+			    zonelist_zone_idx(z) <= classzone_idx &&
 			    compaction_ready(zone, sc->order)) {
 				sc->compaction_ready = true;
 				continue;
@@ -2619,7 +2634,7 @@ static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
 			/* need some check for avoid more shrink_zone() */
 		}
 
-		if (shrink_zone(zone, sc, zone_idx(zone) == classzone_idx))
+		if (shrink_node(zone->zone_pgdat, sc, classzone_idx))
 			reclaimable = true;
 
 		if (global_reclaim(sc) &&
@@ -2659,6 +2674,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
 	unsigned long total_scanned = 0;
 	unsigned long writeback_threshold;
 	bool zones_reclaimable;
+	enum zone_type classzone_idx = gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask);
 retry:
 	delayacct_freepages_start();
 
@@ -2669,7 +2685,8 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
 		vmpressure_prio(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup,
 				sc->priority);
 		sc->nr_scanned = 0;
-		zones_reclaimable = shrink_zones(zonelist, sc);
+		sc->reclaim_idx = classzone_idx;
+		zones_reclaimable = shrink_zones(zonelist, sc, classzone_idx);
 
 		total_scanned += sc->nr_scanned;
 		if (sc->nr_reclaimed >= sc->nr_to_reclaim)
@@ -3128,7 +3145,7 @@ static bool kswapd_shrink_zone(struct zone *zone,
 						balance_gap, classzone_idx))
 		return true;
 
-	shrink_zone(zone, sc, zone_idx(zone) == classzone_idx);
+	shrink_node(zone->zone_pgdat, sc, classzone_idx);
 
 	/* TODO: ANOMALY */
 	clear_bit(PGDAT_WRITEBACK, &pgdat->flags);
@@ -3177,6 +3194,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
 	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
 	struct scan_control sc = {
 		.gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
+		.reclaim_idx = MAX_NR_ZONES - 1,
 		.order = order,
 		.priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
 		.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
@@ -3247,15 +3265,14 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
 			sc.may_writepage = 1;
 
 		/*
-		 * Now scan the zone in the dma->highmem direction, stopping
-		 * at the last zone which needs scanning.
-		 *
-		 * We do this because the page allocator works in the opposite
-		 * direction.  This prevents the page allocator from allocating
-		 * pages behind kswapd's direction of progress, which would
-		 * cause too much scanning of the lower zones.
+		 * Continue scanning in the highmem->dma direction stopping at
+		 * the last zone which needs scanning. This may reclaim lowmem
+		 * pages that are not necessary for zone balancing but it
+		 * preserves LRU ordering. It is assumed that the bulk of
+		 * allocation requests can use arbitrary zones with the
+		 * possible exception of big highmem:lowmem configurations.
 		 */
-		for (i = 0; i <= end_zone; i++) {
+		for (i = end_zone; i >= end_zone; i--) {
 			struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
 
 			if (!populated_zone(zone))
@@ -3266,6 +3283,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
 				continue;
 
 			sc.nr_scanned = 0;
+			sc.reclaim_idx = i;
 
 			nr_soft_scanned = 0;
 			/*
@@ -3714,6 +3732,7 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
 		.may_writepage = !!(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_WRITE),
 		.may_unmap = !!(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_UNMAP),
 		.may_swap = 1,
+		.reclaim_idx = zone_idx(zone),
 	};
 
 	cond_resched();
@@ -3733,7 +3752,7 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
 		 * priorities until we have enough memory freed.
 		 */
 		do {
-			shrink_zone(zone, &sc, true);
+			shrink_node(zone->zone_pgdat, &sc, zone_idx(zone));
 		} while (sc.nr_reclaimed < nr_pages && --sc.priority >= 0);
 	}
 
-- 
2.6.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-06-23 11:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <02ed01d1c47a$49fbfbc0$ddf3f340$@alibaba-inc.com>
2016-06-12  7:33 ` [PATCH 04/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis Hillf Danton
2016-06-14 14:47   ` Mel Gorman
2016-06-21 14:15 [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7 Mel Gorman
2016-06-21 14:15 ` [PATCH 04/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis Mel Gorman
2016-06-22 14:04   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-22 16:00     ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-23 11:07       ` Mel Gorman
2016-06-23 11:13         ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-23 10:58     ` Mel Gorman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-06-09 18:04 [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v6 Mel Gorman
2016-06-09 18:04 ` [PATCH 04/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis Mel Gorman
2016-06-15 12:52   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-15  9:13 [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v5 Mel Gorman
2016-04-15  9:13 ` [PATCH 04/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis Mel Gorman

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).