* [PATCH] [net-next] bridge: move maybe_deliver_addr() inside #ifdef
@ 2017-01-25 22:29 Arnd Bergmann
2017-01-26 0:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-01-26 4:16 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2017-01-25 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger, David S. Miller
Cc: Linus Lüssing, Arnd Bergmann, Nikolay Aleksandrov,
Felix Fietkau, bridge, netdev, linux-kernel
The only caller of this new function is inside of an #ifdef checking
for CONFIG_BRIDGE_IGMP_SNOOPING, so we should move the implementation
there too, in order to avoid this harmless warning:
net/bridge/br_forward.c:177:13: error: 'maybe_deliver_addr' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
Fixes: 6db6f0eae605 ("bridge: multicast to unicast")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
net/bridge/br_forward.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_forward.c b/net/bridge/br_forward.c
index a0f9d0037d24..5a1f8ef49899 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_forward.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_forward.c
@@ -174,31 +174,6 @@ static struct net_bridge_port *maybe_deliver(
return p;
}
-static void maybe_deliver_addr(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct sk_buff *skb,
- const unsigned char *addr, bool local_orig)
-{
- struct net_device *dev = BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->brdev;
- const unsigned char *src = eth_hdr(skb)->h_source;
-
- if (!should_deliver(p, skb))
- return;
-
- /* Even with hairpin, no soliloquies - prevent breaking IPv6 DAD */
- if (skb->dev == p->dev && ether_addr_equal(src, addr))
- return;
-
- skb = skb_copy(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (!skb) {
- dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
- return;
- }
-
- if (!is_broadcast_ether_addr(addr))
- memcpy(eth_hdr(skb)->h_dest, addr, ETH_ALEN);
-
- __br_forward(p, skb, local_orig);
-}
-
/* called under rcu_read_lock */
void br_flood(struct net_bridge *br, struct sk_buff *skb,
enum br_pkt_type pkt_type, bool local_rcv, bool local_orig)
@@ -245,6 +220,31 @@ void br_flood(struct net_bridge *br, struct sk_buff *skb,
}
#ifdef CONFIG_BRIDGE_IGMP_SNOOPING
+static void maybe_deliver_addr(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ const unsigned char *addr, bool local_orig)
+{
+ struct net_device *dev = BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->brdev;
+ const unsigned char *src = eth_hdr(skb)->h_source;
+
+ if (!should_deliver(p, skb))
+ return;
+
+ /* Even with hairpin, no soliloquies - prevent breaking IPv6 DAD */
+ if (skb->dev == p->dev && ether_addr_equal(src, addr))
+ return;
+
+ skb = skb_copy(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (!skb) {
+ dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (!is_broadcast_ether_addr(addr))
+ memcpy(eth_hdr(skb)->h_dest, addr, ETH_ALEN);
+
+ __br_forward(p, skb, local_orig);
+}
+
/* called with rcu_read_lock */
void br_multicast_flood(struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mdst,
struct sk_buff *skb,
--
2.9.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] [net-next] bridge: move maybe_deliver_addr() inside #ifdef
2017-01-25 22:29 [PATCH] [net-next] bridge: move maybe_deliver_addr() inside #ifdef Arnd Bergmann
@ 2017-01-26 0:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-01-26 4:16 ` David Miller
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2017-01-26 0:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: David S. Miller, Linus Lüssing, Nikolay Aleksandrov,
Felix Fietkau, bridge, netdev, linux-kernel
On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 23:29:33 +0100
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> The only caller of this new function is inside of an #ifdef checking
> for CONFIG_BRIDGE_IGMP_SNOOPING, so we should move the implementation
> there too, in order to avoid this harmless warning:
>
> net/bridge/br_forward.c:177:13: error: 'maybe_deliver_addr' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
>
> Fixes: 6db6f0eae605 ("bridge: multicast to unicast")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> net/bridge/br_forward.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_forward.c b/net/bridge/br_forward.c
> index a0f9d0037d24..5a1f8ef49899 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_forward.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_forward.c
> @@ -174,31 +174,6 @@ static struct net_bridge_port *maybe_deliver(
> return p;
> }
>
> -static void maybe_deliver_addr(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct sk_buff *skb,
> - const unsigned char *addr, bool local_orig)
> -{
> - struct net_device *dev = BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->brdev;
> - const unsigned char *src = eth_hdr(skb)->h_source;
> -
> - if (!should_deliver(p, skb))
> - return;
> -
> - /* Even with hairpin, no soliloquies - prevent breaking IPv6 DAD */
> - if (skb->dev == p->dev && ether_addr_equal(src, addr))
> - return;
> -
> - skb = skb_copy(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> - if (!skb) {
> - dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - if (!is_broadcast_ether_addr(addr))
> - memcpy(eth_hdr(skb)->h_dest, addr, ETH_ALEN);
> -
> - __br_forward(p, skb, local_orig);
> -}
> -
> /* called under rcu_read_lock */
> void br_flood(struct net_bridge *br, struct sk_buff *skb,
> enum br_pkt_type pkt_type, bool local_rcv, bool local_orig)
> @@ -245,6 +220,31 @@ void br_flood(struct net_bridge *br, struct sk_buff *skb,
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_BRIDGE_IGMP_SNOOPING
> +static void maybe_deliver_addr(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct sk_buff *skb,
> + const unsigned char *addr, bool local_orig)
> +{
> + struct net_device *dev = BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->brdev;
> + const unsigned char *src = eth_hdr(skb)->h_source;
> +
> + if (!should_deliver(p, skb))
> + return;
> +
> + /* Even with hairpin, no soliloquies - prevent breaking IPv6 DAD */
> + if (skb->dev == p->dev && ether_addr_equal(src, addr))
> + return;
> +
> + skb = skb_copy(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (!skb) {
> + dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (!is_broadcast_ether_addr(addr))
> + memcpy(eth_hdr(skb)->h_dest, addr, ETH_ALEN);
> +
> + __br_forward(p, skb, local_orig);
> +}
> +
> /* called with rcu_read_lock */
> void br_multicast_flood(struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mdst,
> struct sk_buff *skb,
Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] [net-next] bridge: move maybe_deliver_addr() inside #ifdef
2017-01-25 22:29 [PATCH] [net-next] bridge: move maybe_deliver_addr() inside #ifdef Arnd Bergmann
2017-01-26 0:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2017-01-26 4:16 ` David Miller
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2017-01-26 4:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: arnd; +Cc: stephen, linus.luessing, nikolay, nbd, bridge, netdev, linux-kernel
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 23:29:33 +0100
> The only caller of this new function is inside of an #ifdef checking
> for CONFIG_BRIDGE_IGMP_SNOOPING, so we should move the implementation
> there too, in order to avoid this harmless warning:
>
> net/bridge/br_forward.c:177:13: error: 'maybe_deliver_addr' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
>
> Fixes: 6db6f0eae605 ("bridge: multicast to unicast")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Applied, thank you.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-01-26 4:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-01-25 22:29 [PATCH] [net-next] bridge: move maybe_deliver_addr() inside #ifdef Arnd Bergmann
2017-01-26 0:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-01-26 4:16 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).