From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 1/5] sched/core: add capacity constraints to CPU controller
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 13:36:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170320173611.GA7398@htj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170320171511.GB3623@htj.duckdns.org>
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 01:15:11PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > a) are tunable at all hierarchy levels, i.e. root group too
>
> This usually is problematic because there should be a non-cgroup way
> of configuring the feature in case cgroup isn't configured or used,
> and it becomes awkward to have two separate mechanisms configuring the
> same thing. Maybe the feature is cgroup specific enough that it makes
> sense here but this needs more explanation / justification.
A related issue here is that what the non-cgroup interface and its
interaction with cgroup should be. In the long term, I think it's
better to have a generic non-cgroup interface for these new features,
and we've gotten it wrong, or at least inconsistent, across different
settings - most don't affect API accessible settings and just confine
the configuration requested by the application inside the cgroup
constraints; however, cpuset does it the other way and overwrites
configurations set by individual applications.
If we agree that exposing this only through cgroup is fine, this isn't
a concern, but, given that this is a thread property and can obviously
be useful outside cgroups, that seems debatable at the very least.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-20 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-28 14:38 [RFC v3 0/5] Add capacity capping support to the CPU controller Patrick Bellasi
2017-02-28 14:38 ` [RFC v3 1/5] sched/core: add capacity constraints to " Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-13 10:46 ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2017-03-15 11:20 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-15 13:20 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-03-15 16:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-15 16:44 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-15 17:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-15 17:57 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-20 17:15 ` Tejun Heo
2017-03-20 17:36 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2017-03-20 18:08 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-23 0:28 ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2017-03-23 10:32 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-23 16:01 ` Tejun Heo
2017-03-23 18:15 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-23 18:39 ` Tejun Heo
2017-03-24 6:37 ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2017-03-24 15:00 ` Tejun Heo
2017-03-30 21:13 ` Paul Turner
2017-03-24 7:02 ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2017-03-30 21:15 ` Paul Turner
2017-04-01 16:25 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-02-28 14:38 ` [RFC v3 2/5] sched/core: track CPU's capacity_{min,max} Patrick Bellasi
2017-02-28 14:38 ` [RFC v3 3/5] sched/core: sync capacity_{min,max} between slow and fast paths Patrick Bellasi
2017-02-28 14:38 ` [RFC v3 4/5] sched/{core,cpufreq_schedutil}: add capacity clamping for FAIR tasks Patrick Bellasi
2017-02-28 14:38 ` [RFC v3 5/5] sched/{core,cpufreq_schedutil}: add capacity clamping for RT/DL tasks Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-13 10:08 ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2017-03-15 11:40 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-15 12:59 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-03-15 14:44 ` Juri Lelli
2017-03-15 16:13 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-03-15 16:24 ` Juri Lelli
2017-03-15 23:40 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-03-16 11:16 ` Juri Lelli
2017-03-16 12:27 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-16 12:44 ` Juri Lelli
2017-03-16 16:58 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-03-16 17:17 ` Juri Lelli
2017-03-15 11:41 ` [RFC v3 0/5] Add capacity capping support to the CPU controller Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-15 12:59 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-16 1:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-16 3:15 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-03-20 22:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-21 11:01 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-24 23:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-16 12:23 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-20 14:51 ` Tejun Heo
2017-03-20 17:22 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-04-10 7:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-11 17:58 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-04-12 12:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-12 13:55 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-04-12 15:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-13 11:33 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-04-12 12:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-12 13:34 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-04-12 14:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-12 12:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-12 13:24 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-04-12 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-12 13:27 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-04-12 14:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-12 14:43 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-04-12 16:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-13 10:34 ` Patrick Bellasi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170320173611.GA7398@htj.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).