linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Liang Z Li <liang.z.li@intel.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>,
	Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>,
	Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org, wine-devel@winehq.org,
	Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
	Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>,
	Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
	Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 12/26] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get segment descriptor base address and limit
Date: Fri,  5 May 2017 11:17:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170505181724.55000-13-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170505181724.55000-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>

With segmentation, the base address of the segment descriptor is needed
to compute a linear address. The segment descriptor used in the address
computation depends on either any segment override prefixes in the
instruction or the default segment determined by the registers involved
in the address computation. Thus, both the instruction as well as the
register (specified as the offset from the base of pt_regs) are given as
inputs, along with a boolean variable to select between override and
default.

The segment selector is determined by get_seg_selector() with the inputs
described above. Once the selector is known, the base address is
determined. In protected mode, the selector is used to obtain the segment
descriptor and then its base address. If in 64-bit user mode, the segment
base address is zero except when FS or GS are used. In virtual-8086 mode,
the base address is computed as the value of the segment selector shifted 4
positions to the left.

In protected mode, segment limits are enforced. Thus, a function to
determine the limit of the segment is added. Segment limits are not
enforced in long or virtual-8086. For the latter, addresses are limited
to 20 bits; address size will be handled when computing the linear
address.

Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/insn-eval.h |   2 +
 arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c         | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 129 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/insn-eval.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/insn-eval.h
index 7e8c963..7f3c7fe 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/insn-eval.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/insn-eval.h
@@ -13,5 +13,7 @@
 
 void __user *insn_get_addr_ref(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs);
 int insn_get_modrm_rm_off(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs);
+unsigned long insn_get_seg_base(struct pt_regs *regs, struct insn *insn,
+				int regoff);
 
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_INSN_EVAL_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
index f46cb31..c77ed80 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
@@ -476,6 +476,133 @@ static struct desc_struct *get_desc(unsigned short sel)
 }
 
 /**
+ * insn_get_seg_base() - Obtain base address of segment descriptor.
+ * @regs:	Structure with register values as seen when entering kernel mode
+ * @insn:	Instruction structure with selector override prefixes
+ * @regoff:	Operand offset, in pt_regs, of which the selector is needed
+ *
+ * Obtain the base address of the segment descriptor as indicated by either
+ * any segment override prefixes contained in insn or the default segment
+ * applicable to the register indicated by regoff. regoff is specified as the
+ * offset in bytes from the base of pt_regs.
+ *
+ * Return: In protected mode, base address of the segment. Zero in for long
+ * mode, except when FS or GS are used. In virtual-8086 mode, the segment
+ * selector shifted 4 positions to the right. -1L in case of
+ * error.
+ */
+unsigned long insn_get_seg_base(struct pt_regs *regs, struct insn *insn,
+				int regoff)
+{
+	struct desc_struct *desc;
+	unsigned short sel;
+	enum segment_register seg_reg;
+
+	seg_reg = resolve_seg_register(insn, regs, regoff);
+	if (seg_reg == SEG_REG_INVAL)
+		return -1L;
+
+	sel = get_segment_selector(regs, seg_reg);
+	if ((short)sel < 0)
+		return -1L;
+
+	if (v8086_mode(regs))
+		/*
+		 * Base is simply the segment selector shifted 4
+		 * positions to the right.
+		 */
+		return (unsigned long)(sel << 4);
+
+	if (user_64bit_mode(regs)) {
+		/*
+		 * Only FS or GS will have a base address, the rest of
+		 * the segments' bases are forced to 0.
+		 */
+		unsigned long base;
+
+		if (seg_reg == SEG_REG_FS)
+			rdmsrl(MSR_FS_BASE, base);
+		else if (seg_reg == SEG_REG_GS)
+			/*
+			 * swapgs was called at the kernel entry point. Thus,
+			 * MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE will have the user-space GS base.
+			 */
+			rdmsrl(MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE, base);
+		else if (seg_reg != SEG_REG_IGNORE)
+			/* We should ignore the rest of segment registers */
+			base = -1L;
+		else
+			base = 0;
+		return base;
+	}
+
+	/* In protected mode the segment selector cannot be null */
+	if (!sel)
+		return -1L;
+
+	desc = get_desc(sel);
+	if (!desc)
+		return -1L;
+
+	return get_desc_base(desc);
+}
+
+/**
+ * get_seg_limit() - Obtain the limit of a segment descriptor
+ * @regs:	Structure with register values as seen when entering kernel mode
+ * @insn:	Instruction structure with selector override prefixes
+ * @regoff:	Operand offset, in pt_regs, of which the selector is needed
+ *
+ * Obtain the limit of the segment descriptor. The segment selector is obtained
+ * by inspecting any segment override prefixes or the default selector
+ * inferred by regoff. regoff is specified as the offset in bytes from the base
+ * of pt_regs.
+ *
+ * Return: In protected mode, the limit of the segment descriptor in bytes.
+ * In long mode and virtual-8086 mode, segment limits are not enforced. Thus,
+ * limit is returned as -1L to imply a limit-less segment. Zero is returned on
+ * error.
+ */
+static unsigned long get_seg_limit(struct pt_regs *regs, struct insn *insn,
+				   int regoff)
+{
+	struct desc_struct *desc;
+	unsigned short sel;
+	unsigned long limit;
+	enum segment_register seg_reg;
+
+	seg_reg = resolve_seg_register(insn, regs, regoff);
+	if (seg_reg == SEG_REG_INVAL)
+		return 0;
+
+	sel = get_segment_selector(regs, seg_reg);
+	if ((short)sel < 0)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (user_64bit_mode(regs) || v8086_mode(regs))
+		return -1L;
+
+	if (!sel)
+		return 0;
+
+	desc = get_desc(sel);
+	if (!desc)
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * If the granularity bit is set, the limit is given in multiples
+	 * of 4096. When the granularity bit is set, the least 12 significant
+	 * bits are not tested when checking the segment limits. In practice,
+	 * this means that the segment ends in (limit << 12) + 0xfff.
+	 */
+	limit = get_desc_limit(desc);
+	if (desc->g)
+		limit <<= 12 | 0x7;
+
+	return limit;
+}
+
+/**
  * insn_get_reg_offset_modrm_rm() - Obtain register in r/m part of ModRM byte
  * @insn:	Instruction structure containing the ModRM byte
  * @regs:	Structure with register values as seen when entering kernel mode
-- 
2.9.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-05 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-05 18:16 [PATCH v7 00/26] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri
2017-05-05 18:16 ` [PATCH v7 01/26] ptrace,x86: Make user_64bit_mode() available to 32-bit builds Ricardo Neri
2017-05-21 14:19   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 02/26] x86/mm: Relocate page fault error codes to traps.h Ricardo Neri
2017-05-21 14:23   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-27  3:40     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-05-27 10:13       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-06-01  3:09         ` Ricardo Neri
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 03/26] x86/mpx: Use signed variables to compute effective addresses Ricardo Neri
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 04/26] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB.index if its value is 100b and ModRM.mod is not 11b Ricardo Neri
2017-05-24 13:37   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-27  3:36     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 05/26] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB.base if its value is 101b and ModRM.mod = 0 Ricardo Neri
2017-05-29 13:07   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-06-06  6:08     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 06/26] x86/mpx, x86/insn: Relocate insn util functions to a new insn-eval file Ricardo Neri
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 07/26] x86/insn-eval: Do not BUG on invalid register type Ricardo Neri
2017-05-29 16:37   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-06-06  6:06     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-06-06 11:58       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-06-07  0:28         ` Ricardo Neri
2017-06-07 12:21           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 08/26] x86/insn-eval: Add a utility function to get register offsets Ricardo Neri
2017-05-29 17:16   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-06-06  6:02     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 09/26] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to identify string instructions Ricardo Neri
2017-05-29 21:48   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-06-06  6:01     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-06-06 12:04       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 10/26] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get segment selector Ricardo Neri
2017-05-30 10:35   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-06-15 18:37     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-06-15 19:04       ` Ricardo Neri
2017-06-19 15:29         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-06-19 15:37       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 11/26] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to get segment descriptor Ricardo Neri
2017-05-05 18:17 ` Ricardo Neri [this message]
2017-05-31 16:58   ` [PATCH v7 12/26] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get segment descriptor base address and limit Borislav Petkov
2017-06-03 17:23     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 13/26] x86/insn-eval: Add function to get default params of code segment Ricardo Neri
2017-06-07 12:59   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-06-15 19:24     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-06-19 17:11       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 14/26] x86/insn-eval: Indicate a 32-bit displacement if ModRM.mod is 0 and ModRM.rm is 5 Ricardo Neri
2017-06-07 13:15   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-06-15 19:36     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 15/26] x86/insn-eval: Incorporate segment base and limit in linear address computation Ricardo Neri
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 16/26] x86/insn-eval: Support both signed 32-bit and 64-bit effective addresses Ricardo Neri
2017-06-07 15:48   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 23:48     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-07-27 13:26       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-28  2:04         ` Ricardo Neri
2017-07-28  6:50           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-06-07 15:49   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-06-15 19:58     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 17/26] x86/insn-eval: Handle 32-bit address encodings in virtual-8086 mode Ricardo Neri
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 18/26] x86/insn-eval: Add support to resolve 16-bit addressing encodings Ricardo Neri
2017-06-07 16:28   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-06-15 21:50     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 19/26] x86/insn-eval: Add wrapper function for 16-bit and 32-bit address encodings Ricardo Neri
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 20/26] x86/cpufeature: Add User-Mode Instruction Prevention definitions Ricardo Neri
2017-05-06  9:04   ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-11  3:23     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-06-07 18:24   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 21/26] x86: Add emulation code for UMIP instructions Ricardo Neri
2017-06-08 18:38   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-06-17  1:34     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 22/26] x86/umip: Force a page fault when unable to copy emulated result to user Ricardo Neri
2017-06-09 11:02   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 23:50     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 23/26] x86/traps: Fixup general protection faults caused by UMIP Ricardo Neri
2017-06-09 13:02   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 23:51     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 24/26] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri
2017-06-09 16:10   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-26  0:44     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-07-27 13:57       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 25/26] selftests/x86: Add tests for " Ricardo Neri
2017-05-05 18:17 ` [PATCH v7 26/26] selftests/x86: Add tests for instruction str and sldt Ricardo Neri
2017-05-17 18:42 ` [PATCH v7 00/26] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri
2017-05-27  3:49   ` Neri, Ricardo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170505181724.55000-13-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=adam.buchbinder@gmail.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=cmetcalf@mellanox.com \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=julliard@winehq.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=liang.z.li@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qiaowei.ren@intel.com \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=slaoub@gmail.com \
    --cc=stsp@list.ru \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thgarnie@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=wine-devel@winehq.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).