linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Martin Fuzzey <mfuzzey@parkeon.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	jewalt@lgsinnovations.com, rafal@milecki.pl,
	Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"Li, Yi" <yi1.li@linux.intel.com>,
	atull@opensource.altera.com,
	Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@ettus.com>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
	Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>,
	Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] firmware: fix sending -ERESTARTSYS due to signal on fallback
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 23:12:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170609211217.GE27288@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <593A50FF.40604@parkeon.com>

On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 09:40:47AM +0200, Martin Fuzzey wrote:
> On 09/06/17 03:57, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > Android didn't send the signal, the kernel did (SIGCHLD).
> > > > 
> > > > Like this:
> > > > 
> > > > 1) Android init (pid=1) fork()s (say pid=42) [this child process is totally
> > > > unrelated to firmware loading]
> > > > 2) Android init (pid=1) does a write() on a (driver custom) sysfs file which
> > > > ends up calling request_firmware() kernel side
> > > > 3) The firmware loading fallback mechanism is used, the request is sent to
> > > > userspace and pid 1 waits in the kernel on wait_*
> > > > 4) before firmware loading completes pid 42 dies (for any reason - in my
> > > > case normal termination)
> > Martin just to be clear, by "normal case termination" do you mean
> > completing successfully ?? Ie the firmware actually did make it onto
> > the device ?
> 
> The firmware did *not* make it onto the device since the request_firmware()
> call returned an error
> (the code that would have transfered it to the device is only executed
> following a successful request_firmware)
> 
> The process that terminates normally is unrelated to firmware loading as I
> said above.
> 
> The only things that matter are:
> - It is a child process of the process that calls request_firmware()
> - It terminates *while* the the wait_ is still in progress
> 
> 
> Here is a way of reproducing the problem using the test_firmware module
> (which I only just saw) on normal linux with no Android or custom driver
> 
> 
> #!/bin/sh
> set -e
> 
> # Make sure the system firmware loader doesn't get in the way
> /etc/init.d/udev stop
> 
> modprobe test_firmware
> 
> DIR=/sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware
> 
> echo 10 >/sys/class/firmware/timeout;
> sleep 2 &
> echo -n "/some/non/existing/file.bin" > "$DIR"/trigger_request;
> 
> 
> 
> If run with the "sleep 2 &" it terminates after 2 seconds
> If the sleep is commented it runs for the expected 10 seconds (the firmware
> loading timeout)
> 
> Since the sleep process is a child of the script process requesting a
> firmware load its death causes a SIGCHLD causing request_firmware() to abort
> prematurely.

Thanks this could mean we also *should* trigger a failure if init is issuing
modprobe on a series of drivers and one completes before another while
request_firmware() is called on init or probe on a subsequent driver. If true
I'm surprised this never was reported back when the fallback mechanism was
popular, I suppose it was not an issue given most firmware *was* present on
/lib/firmware/ and the direct filesystem lookup first step always found the
firmware first, so this would only be an issue for folks relying on the
fallback mechanism exclusively.

Will include a test case based on your above script. Thanks!

  Luis

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-09 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-23 13:16 [PATCH] firmware: request_firmware() should propagate -ERESTARTSYS Martin Fuzzey
2017-05-23 13:31 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-05-23 14:32   ` Martin Fuzzey
2017-05-23 19:55     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-24 20:56       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-24 21:40         ` [PATCH v2] firmware: fix sending -ERESTARTSYS due to signal on fallback Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-24 22:00           ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-24 22:38             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-25  4:13               ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-25  8:28                 ` Fuzzey, Martin
2017-05-26 11:09                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-05-26 19:46                     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-26 21:26                       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-05-26 21:32                         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-26 21:55                           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-06-05 20:24                             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-06  9:04                               ` Martin Fuzzey
2017-06-06 16:34                                 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-06 17:52                                   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-06 14:53                               ` Alan Cox
2017-06-06 16:47                                 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-06 17:54                                   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-06 22:11                                   ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-06-07  0:22                                     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-07  4:56                                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-07  6:25                                         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-06-07 12:25                                           ` Alan Cox
2017-06-07 17:15                                             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-09  1:14                                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-09  1:33                                             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-09 21:29                                               ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-26 19:40                   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-26 20:23                     ` Fuzzey, Martin
2017-05-26 20:52                       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-07 17:08                   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-07 17:54                     ` Martin Fuzzey
2017-06-09  1:10                       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-09  1:57                         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-09  7:40                           ` Martin Fuzzey
2017-06-09 21:12                             ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2017-06-09 22:55                             ` Luis R. Rodriguez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170609211217.GE27288@wotan.suse.de \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
    --cc=atull@opensource.altera.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=jewalt@lgsinnovations.com \
    --cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luciano.coelho@intel.com \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mfuzzey@parkeon.com \
    --cc=moritz.fischer@ettus.com \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=wagi@monom.org \
    --cc=yi1.li@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).