linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Martin Fuzzey <mfuzzey@parkeon.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	jewalt@lgsinnovations.com, rafal@milecki.pl,
	Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"Li, Yi" <yi1.li@linux.intel.com>,
	atull@opensource.altera.com,
	Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@ettus.com>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
	Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>,
	Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] firmware: fix sending -ERESTARTSYS due to signal on fallback
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 00:55:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170609225527.GF27288@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <593A50FF.40604@parkeon.com>

On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 09:40:47AM +0200, Martin Fuzzey wrote:
> On 09/06/17 03:57, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > Android didn't send the signal, the kernel did (SIGCHLD).
> > > > 
> > > > Like this:
> > > > 
> > > > 1) Android init (pid=1) fork()s (say pid=42) [this child process is totally
> > > > unrelated to firmware loading]
> > > > 2) Android init (pid=1) does a write() on a (driver custom) sysfs file which
> > > > ends up calling request_firmware() kernel side
> > > > 3) The firmware loading fallback mechanism is used, the request is sent to
> > > > userspace and pid 1 waits in the kernel on wait_*
> > > > 4) before firmware loading completes pid 42 dies (for any reason - in my
> > > > case normal termination)
> > Martin just to be clear, by "normal case termination" do you mean
> > completing successfully ?? Ie the firmware actually did make it onto
> > the device ?
> 
> The firmware did *not* make it onto the device since the request_firmware()
> call returned an error
> (the code that would have transfered it to the device is only executed
> following a successful request_firmware)
> 
> The process that terminates normally is unrelated to firmware loading as I
> said above.
> 
> The only things that matter are:
> - It is a child process of the process that calls request_firmware()
> - It terminates *while* the the wait_ is still in progress
> 
> 
> Here is a way of reproducing the problem using the test_firmware module
> (which I only just saw) on normal linux with no Android or custom driver
> 
> 
> #!/bin/sh
> set -e
> 
> # Make sure the system firmware loader doesn't get in the way
> /etc/init.d/udev stop
> 
> modprobe test_firmware
> 
> DIR=/sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware
> 
> echo 10 >/sys/class/firmware/timeout;
> sleep 2 &
> echo -n "/some/non/existing/file.bin" > "$DIR"/trigger_request;
> 
> 
> 
> If run with the "sleep 2 &" it terminates after 2 seconds
> If the sleep is commented it runs for the expected 10 seconds (the firmware
> loading timeout)
> 
> Since the sleep process is a child of the script process requesting a
> firmware load its death causes a SIGCHLD causing request_firmware() to abort
> prematurely.

BTW I've run some more tests and if you use request_firmware_nowait() the above
issue also is avoidable. Also, if you use the custom fallback (uevent parameter
is false) the timeout is max value always. The only way to kill the custom
requests is through the echo -1 > loading or the max timeout triggers (don't
rely on that!). The custom interface was a bad idea though so best to just
avoid it.

Anyway I can reproduce in my tests now, will add this testcase as well.
The stable fixes will be sent as well.

  Luis

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-06-09 22:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-23 13:16 [PATCH] firmware: request_firmware() should propagate -ERESTARTSYS Martin Fuzzey
2017-05-23 13:31 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-05-23 14:32   ` Martin Fuzzey
2017-05-23 19:55     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-24 20:56       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-24 21:40         ` [PATCH v2] firmware: fix sending -ERESTARTSYS due to signal on fallback Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-24 22:00           ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-24 22:38             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-25  4:13               ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-25  8:28                 ` Fuzzey, Martin
2017-05-26 11:09                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-05-26 19:46                     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-26 21:26                       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-05-26 21:32                         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-26 21:55                           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-06-05 20:24                             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-06  9:04                               ` Martin Fuzzey
2017-06-06 16:34                                 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-06 17:52                                   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-06 14:53                               ` Alan Cox
2017-06-06 16:47                                 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-06 17:54                                   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-06 22:11                                   ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-06-07  0:22                                     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-07  4:56                                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-07  6:25                                         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-06-07 12:25                                           ` Alan Cox
2017-06-07 17:15                                             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-09  1:14                                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-09  1:33                                             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-09 21:29                                               ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-26 19:40                   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-26 20:23                     ` Fuzzey, Martin
2017-05-26 20:52                       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-07 17:08                   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-07 17:54                     ` Martin Fuzzey
2017-06-09  1:10                       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-09  1:57                         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-09  7:40                           ` Martin Fuzzey
2017-06-09 21:12                             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-09 22:55                             ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170609225527.GF27288@wotan.suse.de \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
    --cc=atull@opensource.altera.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=jewalt@lgsinnovations.com \
    --cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luciano.coelho@intel.com \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mfuzzey@parkeon.com \
    --cc=moritz.fischer@ettus.com \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=wagi@monom.org \
    --cc=yi1.li@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).