linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v7 2/5] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 16:10:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170906141034.aw2nzl577m5tt6om@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170906134142.GA15796@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com>

On Wed 06-09-17 14:41:42, Roman Gushchin wrote:
[...]
> Although, I don't think the whole thing is useful without any way
> to adjust the memcg selection, so we can't postpone if for too long.
> Anyway, if you think it's a way to go forward, let's do it.

I am not really sure we are in a rush here. The whole oom_score_adj
fiasco has showed that most users tend to only care "to never kill this
and that". A better fine tuned oom control sounds useful at first but
apart from very special usecases turns out very impractical to set
up. At least that is my experience. There are special cases of course
but we should target general use first.

Kill the whole memcg is a really useful feature on its own for proper
container cleanup.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-06 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-04 14:21 [v7 0/5] cgroup-aware OOM killer Roman Gushchin
2017-09-04 14:21 ` [v7 1/5] mm, oom: refactor the oom_kill_process() function Roman Gushchin
2017-09-05 13:34   ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-04 14:21 ` [v7 2/5] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer Roman Gushchin
2017-09-05 14:57   ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-05 20:23     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-06  8:31       ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-06 12:57         ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-06 13:22           ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-06 13:41             ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-06 14:10               ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-09-06  8:34       ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-06 12:33         ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-07 16:18   ` Christopher Lameter
2017-09-11  8:49     ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-04 14:21 ` [v7 3/5] mm, oom: introduce oom_priority for memory cgroups Roman Gushchin
2017-09-04 14:21 ` [v7 4/5] mm, oom, docs: describe the cgroup-aware OOM killer Roman Gushchin
2017-09-04 14:21 ` [v7 5/5] mm, oom: cgroup v2 mount option to disable " Roman Gushchin
2017-09-04 17:32   ` Shakeel Butt
2017-09-04 17:51     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-05 13:44   ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-05 14:30     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-05 15:12       ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-05 19:16         ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-06  8:42           ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-06 17:40             ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-06 17:59               ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-06 20:59               ` David Rientjes
2017-09-07 14:43                 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-09-07 14:52                   ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-07 15:03                     ` Christopher Lameter
2017-09-07 16:42                       ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-07 17:03                         ` Christopher Lameter
2017-09-07 21:55                   ` David Rientjes
2017-09-07 16:21         ` Christopher Lameter
2017-09-05 21:53     ` Johannes Weiner
2017-09-06  8:28       ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-07 16:14         ` Johannes Weiner
2017-09-11  9:05           ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-11 12:50             ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-07 16:27         ` Christopher Lameter
2017-09-07 22:03           ` David Rientjes
2017-09-08 21:07             ` Christopher Lameter
2017-09-09  8:45               ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170906141034.aw2nzl577m5tt6om@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).