linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v7 2/5] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 10:49:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170911084931.zezai6aufcfi2ddt@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1709071114560.20082@nuc-kabylake>

On Thu 07-09-17 11:18:18, Cristopher Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Sep 2017, Roman Gushchin wrote
> 
> > To address these issues, cgroup-aware OOM killer is introduced.
> 
> You are missing a major issue here. Processes may have allocation
> constraints to memory nodes, special DMA zones etc etc. OOM conditions on
> such resource constricted allocations need to be dealt with. Killing
> processes that do not allocate with the same restrictions may not do
> anything to improve conditions.

memcg_oom_badness tries to be node aware - very similar to what the
oom_badness does for the regular oom killer. Or do you have anything
else in mind?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-11  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-04 14:21 [v7 0/5] cgroup-aware OOM killer Roman Gushchin
2017-09-04 14:21 ` [v7 1/5] mm, oom: refactor the oom_kill_process() function Roman Gushchin
2017-09-05 13:34   ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-04 14:21 ` [v7 2/5] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer Roman Gushchin
2017-09-05 14:57   ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-05 20:23     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-06  8:31       ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-06 12:57         ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-06 13:22           ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-06 13:41             ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-06 14:10               ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-06  8:34       ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-06 12:33         ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-07 16:18   ` Christopher Lameter
2017-09-11  8:49     ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-09-04 14:21 ` [v7 3/5] mm, oom: introduce oom_priority for memory cgroups Roman Gushchin
2017-09-04 14:21 ` [v7 4/5] mm, oom, docs: describe the cgroup-aware OOM killer Roman Gushchin
2017-09-04 14:21 ` [v7 5/5] mm, oom: cgroup v2 mount option to disable " Roman Gushchin
2017-09-04 17:32   ` Shakeel Butt
2017-09-04 17:51     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-05 13:44   ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-05 14:30     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-05 15:12       ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-05 19:16         ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-06  8:42           ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-06 17:40             ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-06 17:59               ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-06 20:59               ` David Rientjes
2017-09-07 14:43                 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-09-07 14:52                   ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-07 15:03                     ` Christopher Lameter
2017-09-07 16:42                       ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-07 17:03                         ` Christopher Lameter
2017-09-07 21:55                   ` David Rientjes
2017-09-07 16:21         ` Christopher Lameter
2017-09-05 21:53     ` Johannes Weiner
2017-09-06  8:28       ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-07 16:14         ` Johannes Weiner
2017-09-11  9:05           ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-11 12:50             ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-07 16:27         ` Christopher Lameter
2017-09-07 22:03           ` David Rientjes
2017-09-08 21:07             ` Christopher Lameter
2017-09-09  8:45               ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170911084931.zezai6aufcfi2ddt@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).