* [PATCH] phy: rockchip-typec: Check for errors from tcphy_phy_init()
@ 2017-09-29 23:58 Douglas Anderson
2017-09-30 10:38 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Douglas Anderson @ 2017-09-29 23:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kishon
Cc: groeck, zyw, wulf, Douglas Anderson, linux-rockchip,
linux-kernel, Heiko Stuebner, linux-arm-kernel
The function tcphy_phy_init() could return an error but the callers
weren't checking the return value. They should. In at least one case
while testing I saw the message "wait pma ready timeout" which
indicates that tcphy_phy_init() really could return an error and we
should account for it.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
index 4d2c57f21d76..38831eebc934 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
@@ -685,8 +685,11 @@ static int rockchip_usb3_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
if (tcphy->mode == new_mode)
goto unlock_ret;
- if (tcphy->mode == MODE_DISCONNECT)
- tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
+ if (tcphy->mode == MODE_DISCONNECT) {
+ ret = tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
+ if (ret)
+ goto unlock_ret;
+ }
/* wait TCPHY for pipe ready */
for (timeout = 0; timeout < 100; timeout++) {
@@ -760,10 +763,12 @@ static int rockchip_dp_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
*/
if (new_mode == MODE_DFP_DP && tcphy->mode != MODE_DISCONNECT) {
tcphy_phy_deinit(tcphy);
- tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
+ ret = tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
} else if (tcphy->mode == MODE_DISCONNECT) {
- tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
+ ret = tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
}
+ if (ret)
+ goto unlock_ret;
ret = readx_poll_timeout(readl, tcphy->base + DP_MODE_CTL,
val, val & DP_MODE_A2, 1000,
--
2.14.2.822.g60be5d43e6-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] phy: rockchip-typec: Check for errors from tcphy_phy_init()
2017-09-29 23:58 [PATCH] phy: rockchip-typec: Check for errors from tcphy_phy_init() Douglas Anderson
@ 2017-09-30 10:38 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-10-03 9:41 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2017-09-30 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Douglas Anderson
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Guenter Roeck, Chris, wulf,
open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC...,
linux-kernel, Heiko Stuebner, linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
> The function tcphy_phy_init() could return an error but the callers
> weren't checking the return value. They should. In at least one case
> while testing I saw the message "wait pma ready timeout" which
> indicates that tcphy_phy_init() really could return an error and we
> should account for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
> ---
>
> drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
> index 4d2c57f21d76..38831eebc934 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
> @@ -685,8 +685,11 @@ static int rockchip_usb3_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> if (tcphy->mode == new_mode)
> goto unlock_ret;
>
> - if (tcphy->mode == MODE_DISCONNECT)
> - tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
> + if (tcphy->mode == MODE_DISCONNECT) {
> + ret = tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
> + if (ret)
> + goto unlock_ret;
> + }
>
> /* wait TCPHY for pipe ready */
> for (timeout = 0; timeout < 100; timeout++) {
> @@ -760,10 +763,12 @@ static int rockchip_dp_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> */
> if (new_mode == MODE_DFP_DP && tcphy->mode != MODE_DISCONNECT) {
> tcphy_phy_deinit(tcphy);
> - tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
> + ret = tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
> } else if (tcphy->mode == MODE_DISCONNECT) {
> - tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
> + ret = tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
> }
> + if (ret)
> + goto unlock_ret;
>
> ret = readx_poll_timeout(readl, tcphy->base + DP_MODE_CTL,
> val, val & DP_MODE_A2, 1000,
> --
> 2.14.2.822.g60be5d43e6-goog
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] phy: rockchip-typec: Check for errors from tcphy_phy_init()
2017-09-30 10:38 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2017-10-03 9:41 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I @ 2017-10-03 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck, Douglas Anderson
Cc: Guenter Roeck, Chris, wulf, open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC...,
linux-kernel, Heiko Stuebner, linux-arm-kernel
On Saturday 30 September 2017 04:08 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
>> The function tcphy_phy_init() could return an error but the callers
>> weren't checking the return value. They should. In at least one case
>> while testing I saw the message "wait pma ready timeout" which
>> indicates that tcphy_phy_init() really could return an error and we
>> should account for it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
merged, thanks!
-Kishon
>
>> ---
>>
>> drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c | 13 +++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
>> index 4d2c57f21d76..38831eebc934 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
>> @@ -685,8 +685,11 @@ static int rockchip_usb3_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
>> if (tcphy->mode == new_mode)
>> goto unlock_ret;
>>
>> - if (tcphy->mode == MODE_DISCONNECT)
>> - tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
>> + if (tcphy->mode == MODE_DISCONNECT) {
>> + ret = tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto unlock_ret;
>> + }
>>
>> /* wait TCPHY for pipe ready */
>> for (timeout = 0; timeout < 100; timeout++) {
>> @@ -760,10 +763,12 @@ static int rockchip_dp_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
>> */
>> if (new_mode == MODE_DFP_DP && tcphy->mode != MODE_DISCONNECT) {
>> tcphy_phy_deinit(tcphy);
>> - tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
>> + ret = tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
>> } else if (tcphy->mode == MODE_DISCONNECT) {
>> - tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
>> + ret = tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
>> }
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto unlock_ret;
>>
>> ret = readx_poll_timeout(readl, tcphy->base + DP_MODE_CTL,
>> val, val & DP_MODE_A2, 1000,
>> --
>> 2.14.2.822.g60be5d43e6-goog
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-03 9:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-09-29 23:58 [PATCH] phy: rockchip-typec: Check for errors from tcphy_phy_init() Douglas Anderson
2017-09-30 10:38 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-10-03 9:41 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).