linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Lee@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>,
	Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@intel.com>,
	Ravi Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peter.zijlstra@intel.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] efi: Use efi_rts_workqueue to invoke EFI Runtime Services
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 11:26:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180306112610.7izxtuy33bt7ivfs@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1520292190-5027-4-git-send-email-sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>

On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 03:23:10PM -0800, Sai Praneeth Prakhya wrote:
> From: Sai Praneeth <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
> 
> Presently, efi_runtime_services() are executed by firmware in process
> context. To execute efi_runtime_service(), kernel switches the page
> directory from swapper_pgd to efi_pgd. However, efi_pgd doesn't have any
> user space mappings. A potential issue could be, for instance, an NMI
> interrupt (like perf) trying to profile some user data while in efi_pgd.

It might be worth pointing out that this could result in disaster (e.g.
if the frame pointer happens to point at MMIO in the EFI runtime
services mappings).

[...]

> pstore writes could potentially be invoked in interrupt context and it
> uses set_variable<>() and query_variable_info<>() to store logs. If we
> invoke efi_runtime_services() through efi_rts_wq while in atomic()
> kernel issues a warning ("scheduling wile in atomic") and prints stack
> trace. One way to overcome this is to not make the caller process wait
> for the worker thread to finish. This approach breaks pstore i.e. the
> log messages aren't written to efi variables. Hence, pstore calls
> efi_runtime_services() without using efi_rts_wq or in other words
> efi_rts_wq will be used unconditionally for all the
> efi_runtime_services() except set_variable<>() and
> query_variable_info<>()

Can't NMIs still come in during this?

... or do we assume that since something has already gone wrong, this
doesn't matter?

Otherwise, this doesn't seem to break basic stuff on arm64 platforms. I
can boot up, read the EFI RTC, and reboot. I ahd lockdep and KASAN
enabled, I received no splats from either.

FWIW:

Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com [arm64]

Thanks,
Mark.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-06 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-05 23:23 [PATCH V2 0/3] Use efi_rts_workqueue to invoke EFI Runtime Services Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2018-03-05 23:23 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] x86/efi: Call efi_delete_dummy_variable() during efi subsystem initialization Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2018-03-08  7:43   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-03-08 18:06     ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2018-03-05 23:23 ` [PATCH V2 2/3] efi: Introduce efi_rts_workqueue and some infrastructure to invoke all efi_runtime_services() Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2018-03-06 11:13   ` Mark Rutland
2018-03-08  4:00     ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2018-03-07 11:55   ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-03-08  4:22     ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2018-03-08  9:12       ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-03-08 18:09         ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2018-03-07 12:11   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-08  5:31     ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2018-03-08 14:08       ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-08 17:05         ` Luck, Tony
2018-03-09 10:57           ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-09  2:37         ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2018-03-09 11:11           ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-10  0:33             ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2018-03-14 17:40               ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-08  5:38     ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2018-03-05 23:23 ` [PATCH V2 3/3] efi: Use efi_rts_workqueue to invoke EFI Runtime Services Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2018-03-06  0:05   ` Dan Williams
2018-03-06  0:56     ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2018-03-06 11:26   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2018-03-08  4:11     ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2018-03-08  4:33       ` Dan Williams
2018-03-08  5:06         ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180306112610.7izxtuy33bt7ivfs@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=Lee@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=bhsharma@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=jlee@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=peter.zijlstra@intel.com \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
    --cc=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).