linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com>
Cc: mhocko@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mm: kmemleak: replace __GFP_NOFAIL to GFP_NOWAIT in gfp_kmemleak_mask
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 18:50:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180420175023.3c4okuayrcul2bom@armageddon.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1524243513-29118-1-git-send-email-chuhu@redhat.com>

On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 12:58:33AM +0800, Chunyu Hu wrote:
> __GFP_NORETRY and  __GFP_NOFAIL are combined in gfp_kmemleak_mask now.
> But it's a wrong combination. As __GFP_NOFAIL is blockable, but
> __GFP_NORETY is not blockable, make it self-contradiction.
> 
> __GFP_NOFAIL means 'The VM implementation _must_ retry infinitely'. But
> it's not the real intention, as kmemleak allow alloc failure happen in
> memory pressure, in that case kmemleak just disables itself.

Good point. The __GFP_NOFAIL flag was added by commit d9570ee3bd1d
("kmemleak: allow to coexist with fault injection") to keep kmemleak
usable under fault injection.

> commit 9a67f6488eca ("mm: consolidate GFP_NOFAIL checks in the allocator
> slowpath") documented that what user wants here should use GFP_NOWAIT, and
> the WARN in __alloc_pages_slowpath caught this weird usage.
> 
>  <snip>
>  WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 64 at mm/page_alloc.c:4261 __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x1cc3/0x2780
[...]
> Replace the __GFP_NOFAIL with GFP_NOWAIT in gfp_kmemleak_mask, __GFP_NORETRY
> and GFP_NOWAIT are in the gfp_kmemleak_mask. So kmemleak object allocaion
> is no blockable and no reclaim, making kmemleak less disruptive to user
> processes in pressure.

It doesn't solve the fault injection problem for kmemleak (unless we
change __should_failslab() somehow, not sure yet). An option would be to
replace __GFP_NORETRY with __GFP_NOFAIL in kmemleak when fault injection
is enabled.

BTW, does the combination of NOWAIT and NORETRY make kmemleak
allocations more likely to fail?

Cc'ing Dmitry as well.

> Signed-off-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com>
> CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> ---
>  mm/kmemleak.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
> index 9a085d5..4ea07e4 100644
> --- a/mm/kmemleak.c
> +++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@
>  /* GFP bitmask for kmemleak internal allocations */
>  #define gfp_kmemleak_mask(gfp)	(((gfp) & (GFP_KERNEL | GFP_ATOMIC)) | \
>  				 __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | \
> -				 __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NOFAIL)
> +				 __GFP_NOWARN | GFP_NOWAIT)
>  
>  /* scanning area inside a memory block */
>  struct kmemleak_scan_area {
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-20 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-20 16:58 [RFC] mm: kmemleak: replace __GFP_NOFAIL to GFP_NOWAIT in gfp_kmemleak_mask Chunyu Hu
2018-04-20 17:50 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2018-04-20 17:52   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-04-22 12:51   ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-22 15:00     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-04-23  4:17       ` Chunyu Hu
2018-04-24 13:20         ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-24 13:41           ` Catalin Marinas
2018-04-25  9:50             ` Chunyu Hu
2018-04-25 12:51               ` Catalin Marinas
2018-04-25 14:33                 ` Chunyu Hu
2018-04-27 10:13                   ` Chunyu Hu
2018-04-24 16:48           ` Chunyu Hu
2018-04-24 17:02             ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-24 17:16               ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-04-26 12:23               ` Chunyu Hu
2018-04-26 12:56                 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-04-27 10:17                   ` Chunyu Hu
2018-04-23  3:30   ` Chunyu Hu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180420175023.3c4okuayrcul2bom@armageddon.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chuhu@redhat.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).