From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mm: kmemleak: replace __GFP_NOFAIL to GFP_NOWAIT in gfp_kmemleak_mask
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 17:00:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+YWUgyzCBadg+Oe8wDkFCaBzmcKDgu3rKjQxim7NXNLpg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180422125141.GF17484@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri 20-04-18 18:50:24, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 12:58:33AM +0800, Chunyu Hu wrote:
>> > __GFP_NORETRY and __GFP_NOFAIL are combined in gfp_kmemleak_mask now.
>> > But it's a wrong combination. As __GFP_NOFAIL is blockable, but
>> > __GFP_NORETY is not blockable, make it self-contradiction.
>> >
>> > __GFP_NOFAIL means 'The VM implementation _must_ retry infinitely'. But
>> > it's not the real intention, as kmemleak allow alloc failure happen in
>> > memory pressure, in that case kmemleak just disables itself.
>>
>> Good point. The __GFP_NOFAIL flag was added by commit d9570ee3bd1d
>> ("kmemleak: allow to coexist with fault injection") to keep kmemleak
>> usable under fault injection.
>>
>> > commit 9a67f6488eca ("mm: consolidate GFP_NOFAIL checks in the allocator
>> > slowpath") documented that what user wants here should use GFP_NOWAIT, and
>> > the WARN in __alloc_pages_slowpath caught this weird usage.
>> >
>> > <snip>
>> > WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 64 at mm/page_alloc.c:4261 __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x1cc3/0x2780
>> [...]
>> > Replace the __GFP_NOFAIL with GFP_NOWAIT in gfp_kmemleak_mask, __GFP_NORETRY
>> > and GFP_NOWAIT are in the gfp_kmemleak_mask. So kmemleak object allocaion
>> > is no blockable and no reclaim, making kmemleak less disruptive to user
>> > processes in pressure.
>>
>> It doesn't solve the fault injection problem for kmemleak (unless we
>> change __should_failslab() somehow, not sure yet). An option would be to
>> replace __GFP_NORETRY with __GFP_NOFAIL in kmemleak when fault injection
>> is enabled.
>
> Cannot we simply have a disable_fault_injection knob around the
> allocation rather than playing this dirty tricks with gfp flags which do
> not make any sense?
>
>> BTW, does the combination of NOWAIT and NORETRY make kmemleak
>> allocations more likely to fail?
>
> NOWAIT + NORETRY simply doesn't make much sesne. It is equivalent to
> NOWAIT.
Specifying a flag that says "don't do fault injection for this
allocation" looks like a reasonable solution. Fewer lines of code and
no need to switch on interrupts. __GFP_NOFAIL seems to mean more than
that, so perhaps we need a separate flag that affects only fault
injection and should be used only in debugging code (no-op without
fault injection anyway).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-22 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-20 16:58 [RFC] mm: kmemleak: replace __GFP_NOFAIL to GFP_NOWAIT in gfp_kmemleak_mask Chunyu Hu
2018-04-20 17:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-04-20 17:52 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-04-22 12:51 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-22 15:00 ` Dmitry Vyukov [this message]
2018-04-23 4:17 ` Chunyu Hu
2018-04-24 13:20 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-24 13:41 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-04-25 9:50 ` Chunyu Hu
2018-04-25 12:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-04-25 14:33 ` Chunyu Hu
2018-04-27 10:13 ` Chunyu Hu
2018-04-24 16:48 ` Chunyu Hu
2018-04-24 17:02 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-24 17:16 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-04-26 12:23 ` Chunyu Hu
2018-04-26 12:56 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-04-27 10:17 ` Chunyu Hu
2018-04-23 3:30 ` Chunyu Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACT4Y+YWUgyzCBadg+Oe8wDkFCaBzmcKDgu3rKjQxim7NXNLpg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chuhu@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).