linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	byungchul.park@lge.com, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC 5/8] rcu: Use rcu_node as temporary variable in funnel locking loop
Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 20:15:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180514031541.67247-6-joel@joelfernandes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180514031541.67247-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>

The funnel locking loop in rcu_start_this_gp uses rcu_root as a
temporary variable while walking the combining tree. This causes a
tiresome exercise of a code reader reminding themselves that rcu_root
may not be root. Lets just call it rcu_node, and then finally when
rcu_node is the rcu_root, lets assign it at that time.

Just a clean up patch, no logical change.

Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 9f5679ba413b..40670047d22c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1568,7 +1568,7 @@ static bool rcu_start_this_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
 {
 	bool ret = false;
 	struct rcu_state *rsp = rdp->rsp;
-	struct rcu_node *rnp_root;
+	struct rcu_node *rnp_node, *rnp_root = NULL;
 
 	/*
 	 * Use funnel locking to either acquire the root rcu_node
@@ -1581,24 +1581,26 @@ static bool rcu_start_this_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
 	 */
 	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
 	trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp, rdp, gp_seq_start, TPS("Startleaf"));
-	for (rnp_root = rnp; 1; rnp_root = rnp_root->parent) {
-		if (rnp_root != rnp)
-			raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp_root);
-		if (ULONG_CMP_GE(rnp_root->gp_seq_needed, gp_seq_start) ||
-		    rcu_seq_done(&rnp_root->gp_seq, gp_seq_start) ||
-		    (rnp != rnp_root &&
-		     rcu_seq_state(rcu_seq_current(&rnp_root->gp_seq)))) {
-			trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp_root, rdp, gp_seq_start,
+	for (rnp_node = rnp; 1; rnp_node = rnp_node->parent) {
+		if (rnp_node != rnp)
+			raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp_node);
+		if (ULONG_CMP_GE(rnp_node->gp_seq_needed, gp_seq_start) ||
+		    rcu_seq_done(&rnp_node->gp_seq, gp_seq_start) ||
+		    (rnp != rnp_node &&
+		     rcu_seq_state(rcu_seq_current(&rnp_node->gp_seq)))) {
+			trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp_node, rdp, gp_seq_start,
 					  TPS("Prestarted"));
 			goto unlock_out;
 		}
-		rnp_root->gp_seq_needed = gp_seq_start;
+		rnp_node->gp_seq_needed = gp_seq_start;
 		if (rcu_seq_state(rcu_seq_current(&rnp->gp_seq)))
 			goto unlock_out;
-		if (rnp_root != rnp && rnp_root->parent != NULL)
-			raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rnp_root);
-		if (!rnp_root->parent)
+		if (rnp_node != rnp && rnp_node->parent != NULL)
+			raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rnp_node);
+		if (!rnp_node->parent) {
+			rnp_root = rnp_node;
 			break;  /* At root, and perhaps also leaf. */
+		}
 	}
 
 	/* If GP already in progress, just leave, otherwise start one. */
@@ -1616,10 +1618,10 @@ static bool rcu_start_this_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
 	trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_seq), TPS("newreq"));
 	ret = true;  /* Caller must wake GP kthread. */
 unlock_out:
-	if (rnp != rnp_root)
-		raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rnp_root);
+	if (rnp != rnp_node)
+		raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rnp_node);
 	/* Push furthest requested GP to leaf node and rcu_data structure. */
-	if (ULONG_CMP_GE(rnp_root->gp_seq_needed, gp_seq_start)) {
+	if (ULONG_CMP_GE(rnp_node->gp_seq_needed, gp_seq_start)) {
 		rnp->gp_seq_needed = gp_seq_start;
 		rdp->gp_seq_needed = gp_seq_start;
 	}
-- 
2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-14  3:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-14  3:15 [PATCH RFC 0/8] rcu fixes, clean ups for rcu/dev Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 1/8] rcu: Add comment documenting how rcu_seq_snap works Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14  3:47   ` Randy Dunlap
2018-05-14  5:05     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14 17:38   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  1:51     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15  3:59       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  7:02         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 12:55           ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 18:41             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 19:08               ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 22:55                 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-16 15:45                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-16 23:21                     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 2/8] rcu: Clarify usage of cond_resched for tasks-RCU Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 14:54   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-14 17:22     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:35       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15  3:42         ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 3/8] rcu: Add back the cpuend tracepoint Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 18:12   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:43     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 4/8] rcu: Get rid of old c variable from places in tree RCU Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 17:57   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:41     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` Joel Fernandes (Google) [this message]
2018-05-14 18:00   ` [PATCH RFC 5/8] rcu: Use rcu_node as temporary variable in funnel locking loop Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:43     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 6/8] rcu: Add back the Startedleaf tracepoint Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 18:38   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:57     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15  3:46       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 23:04         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-16 15:48           ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-16 23:13             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 7/8] rcu: trace CleanupMore condition only if needed Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 19:20   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  1:01     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15  3:47       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 8/8] rcu: Fix cpustart tracepoint gp_seq number Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 20:33   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  1:02     ` Joel Fernandes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180514031541.67247-6-joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).