linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	byungchul.park@lge.com, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/8] rcu: Add comment documenting how rcu_seq_snap works
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 10:38:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180514173816.GA26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180514031541.67247-2-joel@joelfernandes.org>

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 08:15:34PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> rcu_seq_snap may be tricky for someone looking at it for the first time.
> Lets document how it works with an example to make it easier.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> ---
>  kernel/rcu/rcu.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> index 003671825d62..fc3170914ac7 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> @@ -91,7 +91,29 @@ static inline void rcu_seq_end(unsigned long *sp)
>  	WRITE_ONCE(*sp, rcu_seq_endval(sp));
>  }
> 
> -/* Take a snapshot of the update side's sequence number. */
> +/*
> + * Take a snapshot of the update side's sequence number.
> + *
> + * This function predicts what the grace period number will be the next
> + * time an RCU callback will be executed, given the current grace period's
> + * number. This can be gp+1 if RCU is idle, or gp+2 if a grace period is
> + * already in progress.

How about something like this?

	This function returns the earliest value of the grace-period
	sequence number that will indicate that a full grace period has
	elapsed since the current time.  Once the grace-period sequence
	number has reached this value, it will be safe to invoke all
	callbacks that have been registered prior to the current time.
	This value is the current grace-period number plus two to the
	power of the number of low-order bits reserved for state, then
	rounded up to the next value in which the state bits are all zero.

> + *
> + * We do this with a single addition and masking.

Please either fold this sentence into rest of the paragraph or add a
blank line after it.

> + * For example, if RCU_SEQ_STATE_MASK=1 and the least significant bit (LSB) of
> + * the seq is used to track if a GP is in progress or not, its sufficient if we
> + * add (2+1) and mask with ~1. Let's see why with an example:
> + *
> + * Say the current seq is 6 which is 0b110 (gp is 3 and state bit is 0).
> + * To get the next GP number, we have to at least add 0b10 to this (0x1 << 1)
> + * to account for the state bit. However, if the current seq is 7 (gp is 3 and
> + * state bit is 1), then it means the current grace period is already in
> + * progress so the next time the callback will run is at the end of grace
> + * period number gp+2. To account for the extra +1, we just overflow the LSB by
> + * adding another 0x1 and masking with ~0x1. In case no GP was in progress (RCU
> + * is idle), then the addition of the extra 0x1 and masking will have no
> + * effect. This is calculated as below.
> + */

Having the explicit numbers is good, but please use RCU_SEQ_STATE_MASK=3,
since that is the current value.  One alternative (or perhaps addition)
is to have a short table of numbers showing the mapping from *sp to the
return value.  (I started from such a table when writing this function,
for whatever that is worth.)

						Thanx, Paul

>  static inline unsigned long rcu_seq_snap(unsigned long *sp)
>  {
>  	unsigned long s;
> -- 
> 2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-14 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-14  3:15 [PATCH RFC 0/8] rcu fixes, clean ups for rcu/dev Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 1/8] rcu: Add comment documenting how rcu_seq_snap works Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14  3:47   ` Randy Dunlap
2018-05-14  5:05     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14 17:38   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-05-15  1:51     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15  3:59       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  7:02         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 12:55           ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 18:41             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 19:08               ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 22:55                 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-16 15:45                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-16 23:21                     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 2/8] rcu: Clarify usage of cond_resched for tasks-RCU Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 14:54   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-14 17:22     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:35       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15  3:42         ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 3/8] rcu: Add back the cpuend tracepoint Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 18:12   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:43     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 4/8] rcu: Get rid of old c variable from places in tree RCU Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 17:57   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:41     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 5/8] rcu: Use rcu_node as temporary variable in funnel locking loop Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 18:00   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:43     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 6/8] rcu: Add back the Startedleaf tracepoint Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 18:38   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:57     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15  3:46       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 23:04         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-16 15:48           ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-16 23:13             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 7/8] rcu: trace CleanupMore condition only if needed Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 19:20   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  1:01     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15  3:47       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 8/8] rcu: Fix cpustart tracepoint gp_seq number Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 20:33   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  1:02     ` Joel Fernandes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180514173816.GA26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).