linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	byungchul.park@lge.com, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC 6/8] rcu: Add back the Startedleaf tracepoint
Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 20:15:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180514031541.67247-7-joel@joelfernandes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180514031541.67247-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>

In recent discussion [1], the check for whether a leaf believes RCU is
not idle, is being added back to funnel locking code, to avoid more
locking. In this we are marking the leaf node for a future grace-period
and bailing out since a GP is currently in progress. However the
tracepoint is missing. Lets add it back.

Also add a small comment about why we do this check (basically the point
is to avoid locking intermediate nodes unnecessarily) and clarify the
comments in the trace event header now that we are doing traversal of
one or more intermediate nodes.

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180513190906.GL26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com

Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
 include/trace/events/rcu.h |  4 ++--
 kernel/rcu/tree.c          | 11 ++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/events/rcu.h b/include/trace/events/rcu.h
index 539900a9f8c7..dc0bd11739c7 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/rcu.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/rcu.h
@@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(rcu_grace_period,
  *
  * "Startleaf": Request a grace period based on leaf-node data.
  * "Prestarted": Someone beat us to the request
- * "Startedleaf": Leaf-node start proved sufficient.
- * "Startedleafroot": Leaf-node start proved sufficient after checking root.
+ * "Startedleaf": Leaf and one or more non-root nodes marked for future start.
+ * "Startedleafroot": all non-root nodes from leaf to root marked for future start.
  * "Startedroot": Requested a nocb grace period based on root-node data.
  * "NoGPkthread": The RCU grace-period kthread has not yet started.
  * "StartWait": Start waiting for the requested grace period.
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 40670047d22c..8401a253e7de 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1593,8 +1593,17 @@ static bool rcu_start_this_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
 			goto unlock_out;
 		}
 		rnp_node->gp_seq_needed = gp_seq_start;
-		if (rcu_seq_state(rcu_seq_current(&rnp->gp_seq)))
+
+		/*
+		 * Check if leaf believes a GP is in progress, if yes we can
+		 * bail and avoid more locking. We have already marked the leaf.
+		 */
+		if (rcu_seq_state(rcu_seq_current(&rnp->gp_seq))) {
+			trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp_node, rdp, gp_seq_start,
+					  TPS("Startedleaf"));
 			goto unlock_out;
+		}
+
 		if (rnp_node != rnp && rnp_node->parent != NULL)
 			raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rnp_node);
 		if (!rnp_node->parent) {
-- 
2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-14  3:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-14  3:15 [PATCH RFC 0/8] rcu fixes, clean ups for rcu/dev Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 1/8] rcu: Add comment documenting how rcu_seq_snap works Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14  3:47   ` Randy Dunlap
2018-05-14  5:05     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14 17:38   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  1:51     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15  3:59       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  7:02         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 12:55           ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 18:41             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 19:08               ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 22:55                 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-16 15:45                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-16 23:21                     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 2/8] rcu: Clarify usage of cond_resched for tasks-RCU Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 14:54   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-14 17:22     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:35       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15  3:42         ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 3/8] rcu: Add back the cpuend tracepoint Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 18:12   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:43     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 4/8] rcu: Get rid of old c variable from places in tree RCU Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 17:57   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:41     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 5/8] rcu: Use rcu_node as temporary variable in funnel locking loop Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 18:00   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:43     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` Joel Fernandes (Google) [this message]
2018-05-14 18:38   ` [PATCH RFC 6/8] rcu: Add back the Startedleaf tracepoint Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:57     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15  3:46       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 23:04         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-16 15:48           ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-16 23:13             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 7/8] rcu: trace CleanupMore condition only if needed Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 19:20   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  1:01     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15  3:47       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 8/8] rcu: Fix cpustart tracepoint gp_seq number Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 20:33   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  1:02     ` Joel Fernandes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180514031541.67247-7-joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).