linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/4] drivers/base: bugfix for supplier<-consumer ordering in device_kset
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 10:36:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180706083603.GA9063@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0jo5-z0ZYDzdNPpn54+oAxpdG_=EvVDdz-HKxp7psu-EA@mail.gmail.com>

[cc += Kishon Vijay Abraham]

On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 11:18:28AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> OK, so calling devices_kset_move_last() from really_probe() clearly is
> a mistake.
> 
> I'm not really sure what the intention of it was as the changelog of
> commit 52cdbdd49853d doesn't really explain that (why would it be
> insufficient without that change?)

It seems 52cdbdd49853d fixed an issue with boards which have an MMC
whose reset pin needs to be driven high on shutdown, lest the MMC
won't be found on the next boot.

The boards' devicetrees use a kludge wherein the reset pin is modelled
as a regulator.  The regulator is enabled when the MMC probes and
disabled on driver unbind and shutdown.  As a result, the pin is driven
low on shutdown and the MMC is not found on the next boot.

To fix this, another kludge was invented wherein the GPIO expander
driving the reset pin unconditionally drives all its pins high on
shutdown, see pcf857x_shutdown() in drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.c
(commit adc284755055, "gpio: pcf857x: restore the initial line state
of all pcf lines").

For this kludge to work, the GPIO expander's ->shutdown hook needs to
be executed after the MMC expander's ->shutdown hook.

Commit 52cdbdd49853d achieved that by reordering devices_kset according
to the probe order.  Apparently the MMC probes after the GPIO expander,
possibly because it returns -EPROBE_DEFER if the vmmc regulator isn't
available yet, see mmc_regulator_get_supply().

Note, I'm just piecing the information together from git history,
I'm not responsible for these kludges.  (I'm innocent!)

@Pingfan Liu, if you just remove the call to devices_kset_move_last()
from really_probe(), does the issue go away?

If so, it might be best to remove that call and model the dependency
with a call to device_link_add() in mmc_regulator_get_supply().
Another idea would be to automatically add a device_link in the
driver core if -EPROBE_DEFER is returned.

Thanks,

Lukas

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-06  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-03  6:50 [PATCHv3 0/4] drivers/base: bugfix for supplier<-consumer ordering in device_kset Pingfan Liu
2018-07-03  6:50 ` [PATCHv3 1/4] drivers/base: fold the routine of device's shutdown into a func Pingfan Liu
2018-07-03  6:50 ` [PATCHv3 2/4] drivers/base: utilize device tree info to shutdown devices Pingfan Liu
2018-07-03  7:51   ` Lukas Wunner
2018-07-03  9:26     ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-04  3:10       ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-03 10:58   ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-07-03 17:03     ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-04 17:04   ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-05 10:11   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-06  3:02     ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-06  9:53       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-07  4:02         ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-06 10:00       ` [PATCH] driver core: Drop devices_kset_move_last() call from really_probe() Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-09 13:57         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-07-09 21:35           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-09 22:06             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-07-10  6:19               ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2018-07-10 10:32                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-10 10:29               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-10  6:33         ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-10 11:35         ` [PATCH] driver core: Partially revert "driver core: correct device's shutdown order" Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-10 12:22           ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2018-07-10 12:38             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-10 12:51           ` [PATCH v2] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-10 12:59             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-07-10 15:40               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-10 15:47                 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-07-10 19:13                   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2018-07-03  6:50 ` [PATCHv3 3/4] drivers/base: clean up the usage of devices_kset_move_last() Pingfan Liu
2018-07-03 14:26   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-04  4:40     ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-04 10:17       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-05  2:32         ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-03  6:50 ` [PATCHv3 4/4] Revert "driver core: correct device's shutdown order" Pingfan Liu
2018-07-03 14:35 ` [PATCHv3 0/4] drivers/base: bugfix for supplier<-consumer ordering in device_kset Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-04  2:47   ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-04 10:21     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-05  2:44       ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-05  9:18         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-06  8:36           ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2018-07-06  8:47             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-06 13:55               ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-07  4:24                 ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-08  8:25                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-09  6:48                     ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-09  7:48                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-09  8:40                         ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-09  8:58                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-06 10:02             ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2018-07-06 13:52             ` Pingfan Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180706083603.GA9063@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernelfans@gmail.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).