From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, tglx@linutronix.de, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
acme@kernel.org, gavin.hindman@intel.com, jithu.joseph@intel.com,
dave.hansen@intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/6] x86/intel_rdt: Create required perf event attributes
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:20:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201809121543.CXJ3t9f1%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <060c5fa0a1f227e6119841b3b617c3f0cc9d5da1.1536685533.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6683 bytes --]
Hi Reinette,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on tip/x86/core]
[also build test ERROR on v4.19-rc3 next-20180911]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Reinette-Chatre/perf-core-and-x86-intel_rdt-Fix-lack-of-coordination-with-perf/20180912-101526
config: i386-randconfig-x0-09121359 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-5 (Debian 5.5.0-3) 5.4.1 20171010
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
Note: the linux-review/Reinette-Chatre/perf-core-and-x86-intel_rdt-Fix-lack-of-coordination-with-perf/20180912-101526 HEAD b684b8727deb9e3cf635badb292b3314904d17b2 builds fine.
It only hurts bisectibility.
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:927:15: error: variable 'perf_miss_attr' has initializer but incomplete type
static struct perf_event_attr __attribute__((unused)) perf_miss_attr = {
^
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:928:2: error: unknown field 'type' specified in initializer
.type = PERF_TYPE_RAW,
^
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:928:11: error: 'PERF_TYPE_RAW' undeclared here (not in a function)
.type = PERF_TYPE_RAW,
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:928:11: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:928:11: note: (near initialization for 'perf_miss_attr')
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:929:2: error: unknown field 'size' specified in initializer
.size = sizeof(struct perf_event_attr),
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:929:18: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct perf_event_attr'
.size = sizeof(struct perf_event_attr),
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:929:11: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
.size = sizeof(struct perf_event_attr),
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:929:11: note: (near initialization for 'perf_miss_attr')
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:930:2: error: unknown field 'pinned' specified in initializer
.pinned = 1,
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:930:13: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
.pinned = 1,
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:930:13: note: (near initialization for 'perf_miss_attr')
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:931:2: error: unknown field 'disabled' specified in initializer
.disabled = 0,
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:931:14: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
.disabled = 0,
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:931:14: note: (near initialization for 'perf_miss_attr')
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:932:2: error: unknown field 'exclude_user' specified in initializer
.exclude_user = 1,
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:932:18: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
.exclude_user = 1,
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:932:18: note: (near initialization for 'perf_miss_attr')
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:935:15: error: variable 'perf_hit_attr' has initializer but incomplete type
static struct perf_event_attr __attribute__((unused)) perf_hit_attr = {
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:936:2: error: unknown field 'type' specified in initializer
.type = PERF_TYPE_RAW,
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:936:11: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
.type = PERF_TYPE_RAW,
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:936:11: note: (near initialization for 'perf_hit_attr')
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:937:2: error: unknown field 'size' specified in initializer
.size = sizeof(struct perf_event_attr),
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:937:18: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct perf_event_attr'
.size = sizeof(struct perf_event_attr),
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:937:11: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
.size = sizeof(struct perf_event_attr),
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:937:11: note: (near initialization for 'perf_hit_attr')
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:938:2: error: unknown field 'pinned' specified in initializer
.pinned = 1,
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:938:13: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
.pinned = 1,
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:938:13: note: (near initialization for 'perf_hit_attr')
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:939:2: error: unknown field 'disabled' specified in initializer
.disabled = 0,
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:939:14: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
.disabled = 0,
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:939:14: note: (near initialization for 'perf_hit_attr')
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:940:2: error: unknown field 'exclude_user' specified in initializer
.exclude_user = 1,
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:940:18: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
.exclude_user = 1,
^
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c:940:18: note: (near initialization for 'perf_hit_attr')
vim +/type +928 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c
917
918 /*
919 * Create a perf_event_attr for the hit and miss perf events that will
920 * be used during the performance measurement. A perf_event maintains
921 * a pointer to its perf_event_attr so a unique attribute structure is
922 * created for each perf_event.
923 *
924 * The actual configuration of the event is set right before use in order
925 * to use the X86_CONFIG macro.
926 */
> 927 static struct perf_event_attr __attribute__((unused)) perf_miss_attr = {
> 928 .type = PERF_TYPE_RAW,
> 929 .size = sizeof(struct perf_event_attr),
> 930 .pinned = 1,
> 931 .disabled = 0,
> 932 .exclude_user = 1,
933 };
934
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 25464 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-12 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-11 17:14 [PATCH V3 0/6] perf/core and x86/intel_rdt: Fix lack of coordination with perf Reinette Chatre
2018-09-11 17:14 ` [PATCH V3 1/6] perf/core: Add sanity check to deal with pinned event failure Reinette Chatre
2018-09-11 17:14 ` [PATCH V3 2/6] perf/core: Add helper to obtain performance counter index Reinette Chatre
2018-09-17 8:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-17 16:37 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-09-17 23:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-18 17:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-09-19 9:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-11 17:14 ` [PATCH V3 3/6] x86/intel_rdt: Remove local register variables Reinette Chatre
2018-09-11 17:14 ` [PATCH V3 4/6] x86/intel_rdt: Create required perf event attributes Reinette Chatre
2018-09-12 5:49 ` kbuild test robot
2018-09-12 7:20 ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2018-09-12 19:54 ` [PATCH V4 " Reinette Chatre
2018-09-11 17:14 ` [PATCH V3 5/6] x86/intel_rdt: Use perf infrastructure for measurements Reinette Chatre
2018-09-17 8:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-17 16:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-09-11 17:14 ` [PATCH V3 6/6] x86/intel_rdt: Re-enable pseudo-lock measurements Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201809121543.CXJ3t9f1%fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=gavin.hindman@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jithu.joseph@intel.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).