From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, fenghua.yu@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, gavin.hindman@intel.com,
jithu.joseph@intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 5/6] x86/intel_rdt: Use perf infrastructure for measurements
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 10:58:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180917085848.GQ24124@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e49f32d40c53839c31e1376f11059539afd08f23.1536685533.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com>
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 10:14:36AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> +static int measure_l2_residency(void *_plr)
> +{
> + measure_residency_fn(&perf_miss_attr, &perf_hit_attr, plr, &counts);
> +}
> +
> +static int measure_l3_residency(void *_plr)
> +{
> + measure_residency_fn(&perf_miss_attr, &perf_hit_attr, plr, &counts);
Not sure it's important, but both sites loose the error return.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-17 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-11 17:14 [PATCH V3 0/6] perf/core and x86/intel_rdt: Fix lack of coordination with perf Reinette Chatre
2018-09-11 17:14 ` [PATCH V3 1/6] perf/core: Add sanity check to deal with pinned event failure Reinette Chatre
2018-09-11 17:14 ` [PATCH V3 2/6] perf/core: Add helper to obtain performance counter index Reinette Chatre
2018-09-17 8:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-17 16:37 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-09-17 23:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-18 17:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-09-19 9:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-11 17:14 ` [PATCH V3 3/6] x86/intel_rdt: Remove local register variables Reinette Chatre
2018-09-11 17:14 ` [PATCH V3 4/6] x86/intel_rdt: Create required perf event attributes Reinette Chatre
2018-09-12 5:49 ` kbuild test robot
2018-09-12 7:20 ` kbuild test robot
2018-09-12 19:54 ` [PATCH V4 " Reinette Chatre
2018-09-11 17:14 ` [PATCH V3 5/6] x86/intel_rdt: Use perf infrastructure for measurements Reinette Chatre
2018-09-17 8:58 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-09-17 16:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-09-11 17:14 ` [PATCH V3 6/6] x86/intel_rdt: Re-enable pseudo-lock measurements Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180917085848.GQ24124@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=gavin.hindman@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jithu.joseph@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).