From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/alternative: Use a single access in text_poke() where possible
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:19:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190115111922.153240f0@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49f9bb3d-7b65-06e8-b0b3-42cf7f0a82b5@oracle.com>
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 12:10:19 +0100
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com> wrote:
> Thinking more about it (and I've probably missed something or I am just being
> totally stupid because this seems way too simple), can't we just replace the
> "call" with "push+jmp" and patch the jmp instruction?
>
> Instead of having:
>
> call target
>
> Have:
>
> push $done
> static_call:
> jmp target
> done:
But how do you implement it? Inline assembly()? Then you need to be
able to do that for any type of function parameters (there will be
users that have 13 parameters!)
I believe people have mentioned having a gcc plugin that would do it
for us, which was one of the suggested solutions.
-- Steve
>
> Then we can safely patch the "jmp" instruction to jump to a new target
> with text_poke_bp(), using the new target as the text_poke_bp() handler:
>
> new_jmp_code = opcode of "jmp new_target"
>
> text_poke_bp(static_call, new_jmp_code, new_jmp_code_size, new_target);
>
> Problems come with patching a call instruction, but there's no issue with patching
> a jmp, no? (that's what jump labels do).
>
> No change to the int3 handler, no thunk, this seems really too simple... :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-15 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-09 22:59 [PATCH v3 0/6] Static calls Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-09 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] compiler.h: Make __ADDRESSABLE() symbol truly unique Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-09 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] static_call: Add basic static call infrastructure Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 14:03 ` Edward Cree
2019-01-10 18:37 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-09 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] x86/static_call: Add out-of-line static call implementation Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 0:16 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-10 16:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-09 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] static_call: Add inline static call infrastructure Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-09 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/alternative: Use a single access in text_poke() where possible Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 9:32 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-10 17:20 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 17:29 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-10 17:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-01-10 17:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-01-10 17:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-01-10 18:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-01-10 18:21 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 18:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-01-11 12:10 ` Alexandre Chartre
2019-01-11 15:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-11 16:46 ` Alexandre Chartre
2019-01-11 16:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-11 17:41 ` Jason Baron
2019-01-11 17:54 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-15 11:10 ` Alexandre Chartre
2019-01-15 16:19 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2019-01-15 16:45 ` Alexandre Chartre
2019-01-11 0:59 ` hpa
2019-01-11 1:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-01-11 8:13 ` hpa
2019-01-09 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] x86/static_call: Add inline static call implementation for x86-64 Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 1:21 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] Static calls Nadav Amit
2019-01-10 16:44 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 17:32 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-10 18:18 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 19:45 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-10 20:32 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 20:48 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-10 20:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 21:47 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-10 17:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-10 20:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2019-01-10 20:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-10 20:52 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-10 23:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-11 0:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-01-11 1:47 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-11 15:15 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-11 15:48 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-11 16:07 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-11 17:23 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-11 19:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-11 19:17 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-11 19:23 ` hpa
2019-01-11 19:33 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-11 19:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-13 0:34 ` hpa
2019-01-13 0:36 ` hpa
2019-01-11 19:39 ` Jiri Kosina
2019-01-14 2:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2019-01-14 2:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2019-01-14 20:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-01-14 22:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2019-01-14 22:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2019-01-15 3:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-01-15 5:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2019-01-15 5:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2019-01-14 23:27 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-01-14 23:51 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-15 2:28 ` hpa
2019-01-11 20:04 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-11 20:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-11 20:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-11 20:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-11 21:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-01-11 21:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-11 21:32 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-14 12:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-11 21:22 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-11 21:23 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-11 21:25 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-11 21:36 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-11 21:41 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-01-11 21:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-01-11 21:59 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-11 21:56 ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-12 23:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-02-17 21:10 ` Jann Horn
2020-02-17 21:57 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190115111922.153240f0@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=ecree@solarflare.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=julia@ni.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).