linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	ebiederm@xmission.com, keescook@chromium.org,
	joel@joelfernandes.org, tglx@linutronix.de, tj@kernel.org,
	dhowells@redhat.com, jannh@google.com, luto@kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, cyphar@cyphar.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	kernel-team@android.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] pidfd: add pidfd_wait()
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:21:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190725102156.nqnngsrb6dwmyztb@brauner.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190725101626.GD4707@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:16:27PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 07/24, Christian Brauner wrote:
> >
> > +SYSCALL_DEFINE6(pidfd_wait, int, pidfd, int __user *, stat_addr,
> > +		siginfo_t __user *, info, struct rusage __user *, ru,
> > +		unsigned int, states, unsigned int, flags)
> > +{
> 
> Oh, I too think that P_PIDFD makes more sense.

I have already updated the patch to introduce P_PIDFD.

> 
> and could you explain in the changelog why? I am not arguing and if
> nothing else this is consistent with other pidfd features, but if you
> are parent/debugger you can't hit the problem with pid-reuse, unless
> you races with your sub-threads.

One of the things is that later on this will allow us to make it
possible to retrieve the exit status via waitid(P_PIDFD) for non-parent
processes if handed a _suitable_ pidfd that has this feature set. Maybe
even - if safe - make it possible to wait on a process as a non-parent.
And some tools just really want to do away with pids completely.

Christian

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-25 10:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-24 14:46 [PATCH 0/5] pidfd: waiting on processes through pidfds Christian Brauner
2019-07-24 14:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] exit: kill struct waitid_info Christian Brauner
2019-07-24 17:37   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-07-24 22:01     ` Christian Brauner
2019-07-25 12:46     ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-07-26  8:01       ` Christian Brauner
2019-07-26 11:59         ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-07-26 12:37           ` Christian Brauner
2019-07-25  9:40   ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-07-25 10:07     ` Christian Brauner
2019-07-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 2/5] pidfd: add pidfd_wait() Christian Brauner
2019-07-24 17:45   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-07-24 17:50     ` Christian Brauner
2019-07-24 17:52       ` Christian Brauner
2019-07-25 14:34     ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-07-25 10:16   ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-07-25 10:21     ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2019-07-26  8:19   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-26  8:24     ` Christian Brauner
2019-07-26  9:57       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 3/5] arch: wire-up pidfd_wait() Christian Brauner
2019-07-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 4/5] pidfd: add CLONE_WAIT_PID Christian Brauner
2019-07-24 18:14   ` Jann Horn
2019-07-24 18:27     ` Christian Brauner
2019-07-24 19:07       ` Jann Horn
2019-07-24 19:10         ` Christian Brauner
2019-07-25 10:11           ` Christian Brauner
2019-07-25 10:30         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-07-25 10:36           ` Christian Brauner
2019-07-25 10:35   ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-07-25 10:40     ` Christian Brauner
2019-07-25 11:25       ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-07-25 11:41         ` Christian Brauner
2019-07-25 11:43         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-07-25 12:26           ` Christian Brauner
2019-07-25 16:13             ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-07-25 16:56               ` Christian Brauner
2019-07-25 16:57             ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-07-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 5/5] pidfd: add pidfd_wait tests Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190725102156.nqnngsrb6dwmyztb@brauner.io \
    --to=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).