linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, acme@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, jolsa@kernel.org, eranian@google.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V4 03/14] perf/x86/intel: Move BTS index to 47
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:41:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190916134128.18120-4-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190916134128.18120-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

The bit 48 in the PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS is used to indicate the overflow
status of PERF_METRICS counters now.

Move BTS index to 47.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---

New patch for V4

 arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index 9f15a700d1db..eb460b63e07b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -175,11 +175,11 @@ struct x86_pmu_capability {
 /*
  * We model BTS tracing as another fixed-mode PMC.
  *
- * We choose a value in the middle of the fixed event range, since lower
+ * We choose value 47 for the fixed index of BTS, since lower
  * values are used by actual fixed events and higher values are used
  * to indicate other overflow conditions in the PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS msr.
  */
-#define INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_BTS				(INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED + 16)
+#define INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_BTS				(INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED + 15)
 
 #define GLOBAL_STATUS_COND_CHG				BIT_ULL(63)
 #define GLOBAL_STATUS_BUFFER_OVF			BIT_ULL(62)
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-16 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-16 13:41 [PATCH V4 00/14] TopDown metrics support for Icelake kan.liang
2019-09-16 13:41 ` [PATCH V4 01/14] perf/x86/intel: Introduce the fourth fixed counter kan.liang
2019-09-16 13:41 ` [PATCH V4 02/14] perf/x86/intel: Set correct mask for TOPDOWN.SLOTS kan.liang
2019-09-16 13:41 ` kan.liang [this message]
2019-09-16 13:41 ` [PATCH V4 04/14] perf/x86/intel: Basic support for metrics counters kan.liang
2019-09-16 13:41 ` [PATCH V4 05/14] perf/x86/intel: Fix the name of perf capabilities for perf METRICS kan.liang
2019-09-16 13:41 ` [PATCH V4 06/14] x86/math64: Provide a sane mul_u64_u32_div() implementation for x86_64 kan.liang
2019-09-16 13:41 ` [PATCH V4 07/14] perf/x86/intel: Support hardware TopDown metrics kan.liang
2019-09-30 13:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-30 14:07     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-30 14:53       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-30 16:17         ` Liang, Kan
2019-09-30 16:21           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-30 16:45             ` Liang, Kan
2019-09-30 18:18               ` Andi Kleen
2019-09-30 13:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-16 13:41 ` [PATCH V4 08/14] perf/x86/intel: Support per thread RDPMC " kan.liang
2019-09-30 15:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-30 18:18     ` Liang, Kan
2019-09-16 13:41 ` [PATCH V4 09/14] perf/x86/intel: Export TopDown events for Icelake kan.liang
2019-09-16 13:41 ` [PATCH V4 10/14] perf/x86/intel: Disable sampling read slots and topdown kan.liang
2019-09-16 13:41 ` [PATCH V4 11/14] perf/x86/intel: Name global status bit in NMI handler kan.liang
2019-09-16 13:41 ` [PATCH V4 12/14] perf/x86: Use event_base_rdpmc for RDPMC userspace support kan.liang
2019-09-16 13:41 ` [PATCH V4 13/14] perf, tools, stat: Support new per thread TopDown metrics kan.liang
2019-09-16 13:41 ` [PATCH V4 14/14] perf, tools: Add documentation for topdown metrics kan.liang
2019-09-30 12:48 ` [PATCH V4 00/14] TopDown metrics support for Icelake Liang, Kan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190916134128.18120-4-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).