Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add required-opps support to devfreq passive gov

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>,
	Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add required-opps support to devfreq passive gov
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:05:32 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191114083532.vmccmqgj2uj73tcn@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGETcx-tUtnX0T47YGdf7-cgp6e8K9Rgb34Mfe5Za9L4YMGS1g@mail.gmail.com>

On 14-11-19, 00:23, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Thanks for checking. I haven't abandoned this patch series. This patch
> series depends on "lazy linking" of required-opps to avoid a cyclic
> dependency between devfreq and OPP table population. But Viresh wasn't
> happy with my implementation of the lazy liking for reasonable
> reasons.
> 
> I had a chat with Viresh during one of the several conferences that I
> met him at. To fix the lazy linking in the way he wanted it meant we
> had to fix other issues in the OPP framework that arise when OPP
> tables are shared in DT but not in memory. So he was kind enough to
> sign up to add lazy linking support to OPPs so that I won't have to do
> it. So, I'm waiting on that. So once that's added, I should be able to
> drop a few patches in this series, do some minor updates and then this
> will be good to go.

I am fixing few other issues in OPP core right now and lazy linking
is next in the list :)

-- 
viresh