Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add required-opps support to devfreq passive gov

[Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>]

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 12:35 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 14-11-19, 00:23, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > Thanks for checking. I haven't abandoned this patch series. This patch
> > series depends on "lazy linking" of required-opps to avoid a cyclic
> > dependency between devfreq and OPP table population. But Viresh wasn't
> > happy with my implementation of the lazy liking for reasonable
> > reasons.
> >
> > I had a chat with Viresh during one of the several conferences that I
> > met him at. To fix the lazy linking in the way he wanted it meant we
> > had to fix other issues in the OPP framework that arise when OPP
> > tables are shared in DT but not in memory. So he was kind enough to
> > sign up to add lazy linking support to OPPs so that I won't have to do
> > it. So, I'm waiting on that. So once that's added, I should be able to
> > drop a few patches in this series, do some minor updates and then this
> > will be good to go.
>
> I am fixing few other issues in OPP core right now and lazy linking
> is next in the list :)

Thanks Viresh! Glad the offer still stands :)

-Saravana