[PATCH v2 0/3] Use ARM SMC Calling Convention when OP-TEE is available

[PATCH v2 0/3] Use ARM SMC Calling Convention when OP-TEE is available

[Andrew F. Davis]

Hello all,

This is the reworked patch turned into a series to allow upstream kernels
to make use of OP-TEE on the OMAP2+ platform.

Thanks,
Andrew

Changes from v1:
 - Split into logical patches
 - Check for OP-TEE in DT only once
 - Check the OP-TEE node is "okay"

Andrew F. Davis (3):
  ARM: OMAP2+: Add omap_secure_init callback hook for secure
    initialization
  ARM: OMAP2+: Introduce check for OP-TEE in omap_secure_init()
  ARM: OMAP2+: Use ARM SMC Calling Convention when OP-TEE is available

 arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h      |  2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c          | 11 +++++++++
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h |  6 +++++
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S    |  6 ++---
 5 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.1

[PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: OMAP2+: Add omap_secure_init callback hook for secure initialization

[Andrew F. Davis]

This can be used for detecting secure features or making early device
init sequence changes based on device security type.

Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c          | 11 +++++++++++
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c |  4 ++++
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c
index 349e48042982..f28047233665 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
 #include "prm33xx.h"
 #include "prm44xx.h"
 #include "opp2xxx.h"
+#include "omap-secure.h"
 
 /*
  * omap_clk_soc_init: points to a function that does the SoC-specific
@@ -430,6 +431,7 @@ void __init omap2420_init_early(void)
 	omap_hwmod_init_postsetup();
 	omap_clk_soc_init = omap2420_dt_clk_init;
 	rate_table = omap2420_rate_table;
+	omap_secure_init();
 }
 
 void __init omap2420_init_late(void)
@@ -454,6 +456,7 @@ void __init omap2430_init_early(void)
 	omap_hwmod_init_postsetup();
 	omap_clk_soc_init = omap2430_dt_clk_init;
 	rate_table = omap2430_rate_table;
+	omap_secure_init();
 }
 
 void __init omap2430_init_late(void)
@@ -481,6 +484,7 @@ void __init omap3_init_early(void)
 	omap3xxx_clockdomains_init();
 	omap3xxx_hwmod_init();
 	omap_hwmod_init_postsetup();
+	omap_secure_init();
 }
 
 void __init omap3430_init_early(void)
@@ -533,6 +537,7 @@ void __init ti814x_init_early(void)
 	dm814x_hwmod_init();
 	omap_hwmod_init_postsetup();
 	omap_clk_soc_init = dm814x_dt_clk_init;
+	omap_secure_init();
 }
 
 void __init ti816x_init_early(void)
@@ -549,6 +554,7 @@ void __init ti816x_init_early(void)
 	dm816x_hwmod_init();
 	omap_hwmod_init_postsetup();
 	omap_clk_soc_init = dm816x_dt_clk_init;
+	omap_secure_init();
 }
 #endif
 
@@ -566,6 +572,7 @@ void __init am33xx_init_early(void)
 	am33xx_hwmod_init();
 	omap_hwmod_init_postsetup();
 	omap_clk_soc_init = am33xx_dt_clk_init;
+	omap_secure_init();
 }
 
 void __init am33xx_init_late(void)
@@ -589,6 +596,7 @@ void __init am43xx_init_early(void)
 	omap_hwmod_init_postsetup();
 	omap_l2_cache_init();
 	omap_clk_soc_init = am43xx_dt_clk_init;
+	omap_secure_init();
 }
 
 void __init am43xx_init_late(void)
@@ -617,6 +625,7 @@ void __init omap4430_init_early(void)
 	omap_hwmod_init_postsetup();
 	omap_l2_cache_init();
 	omap_clk_soc_init = omap4xxx_dt_clk_init;
+	omap_secure_init();
 }
 
 void __init omap4430_init_late(void)
@@ -643,6 +652,7 @@ void __init omap5_init_early(void)
 	omap54xx_hwmod_init();
 	omap_hwmod_init_postsetup();
 	omap_clk_soc_init = omap5xxx_dt_clk_init;
+	omap_secure_init();
 }
 
 void __init omap5_init_late(void)
@@ -666,6 +676,7 @@ void __init dra7xx_init_early(void)
 	dra7xx_hwmod_init();
 	omap_hwmod_init_postsetup();
 	omap_clk_soc_init = dra7xx_dt_clk_init;
+	omap_secure_init();
 }
 
 void __init dra7xx_init_late(void)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
index 24298e47b9f1..e936732cdc4f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
@@ -163,3 +163,7 @@ u32 rx51_secure_rng_call(u32 ptr, u32 count, u32 flag)
 				      NO_FLAG,
 				      3, ptr, count, flag, 0);
 }
+
+void __init omap_secure_init(void)
+{
+}
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
index 20046e8f8ecb..9aeeb236a224 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
@@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ extern u32 rx51_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 process, u32 flag, u32 nargs,
 extern u32 rx51_secure_update_aux_cr(u32 set_bits, u32 clear_bits);
 extern u32 rx51_secure_rng_call(u32 ptr, u32 count, u32 flag);
 
+void omap_secure_init(void);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SOC_HAS_REALTIME_COUNTER
 void set_cntfreq(void);
 #else
-- 
2.17.1

[PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: OMAP2+: Introduce check for OP-TEE in omap_secure_init()

[Andrew F. Davis]

This check and associated flag can be used to signal the presence
of OP-TEE on the platform. This can be used to determine which
SMC calls to make to perform secure operations.

Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h |  3 +++
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
index e936732cdc4f..39d8070aede6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/memblock.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
 
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
 #include <asm/memblock.h>
@@ -20,6 +21,18 @@
 
 static phys_addr_t omap_secure_memblock_base;
 
+bool optee_available;
+
+static void __init omap_optee_init_check(void)
+{
+	struct device_node *np;
+
+	np = of_find_node_by_path("/firmware/optee");
+	if (np && of_device_is_available(np))
+		optee_available = true;
+	of_node_put(np);
+}
+
 /**
  * omap_sec_dispatcher: Routine to dispatch low power secure
  * service routines
@@ -166,4 +179,5 @@ u32 rx51_secure_rng_call(u32 ptr, u32 count, u32 flag)
 
 void __init omap_secure_init(void)
 {
+	omap_optee_init_check();
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
index 9aeeb236a224..78a1c4f04bbe 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #ifndef OMAP_ARCH_OMAP_SECURE_H
 #define OMAP_ARCH_OMAP_SECURE_H
 
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
 /* Monitor error code */
 #define  API_HAL_RET_VALUE_NS2S_CONVERSION_ERROR	0xFFFFFFFE
 #define  API_HAL_RET_VALUE_SERVICE_UNKNWON		0xFFFFFFFF
@@ -72,6 +74,7 @@ extern u32 rx51_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 process, u32 flag, u32 nargs,
 extern u32 rx51_secure_update_aux_cr(u32 set_bits, u32 clear_bits);
 extern u32 rx51_secure_rng_call(u32 ptr, u32 count, u32 flag);
 
+extern bool optee_available;
 void omap_secure_init(void);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SOC_HAS_REALTIME_COUNTER
-- 
2.17.1

[PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: Use ARM SMC Calling Convention when OP-TEE is available

[Andrew F. Davis]

On High-Security(HS) OMAP2+ class devices a couple actions must be
performed from the ARM TrustZone during boot. These traditionally can be
performed by calling into the secure ROM code resident in this secure
world using legacy SMC calls. Optionally OP-TEE can replace this secure
world functionality by replacing the ROM after boot. ARM recommends a
standard calling convention is used for this interaction (SMC Calling
Convention). We check for the presence of OP-TEE and use this type of
call to perform the needed actions, falling back to the legacy OMAP ROM
call if OP-TEE is not available.

Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h      |  2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h |  1 +
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S    |  6 +++---
 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h
index 223b37c48389..3b1fd8e7d705 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ extern void gic_dist_disable(void);
 extern void gic_dist_enable(void);
 extern bool gic_dist_disabled(void);
 extern void gic_timer_retrigger(void);
-extern void omap_smc1(u32 fn, u32 arg);
+extern void _omap_smc1(u32 fn, u32 arg);
 extern void omap4_sar_ram_init(void);
 extern void __iomem *omap4_get_sar_ram_base(void);
 extern void omap4_mpuss_early_init(void);
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
index 39d8070aede6..6c6ff128c68e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
  * Copyright (C) 2013 Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
  */
 
+#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
@@ -17,12 +18,17 @@
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
 #include <asm/memblock.h>
 
+#include "common.h"
 #include "omap-secure.h"
 
 static phys_addr_t omap_secure_memblock_base;
 
 bool optee_available;
 
+#define OMAP_SIP_SMC_STD_CALL_VAL(func_num) \
+	ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_STD_CALL, ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32, \
+	ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_SIP, (func_num))
+
 static void __init omap_optee_init_check(void)
 {
 	struct device_node *np;
@@ -66,6 +72,23 @@ u32 omap_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 flag, u32 nargs, u32 arg1, u32 arg2,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+void omap_smc1(u32 fn, u32 arg)
+{
+	/*
+	 * If this platform has OP-TEE installed we use ARM SMC calls
+	 * otherwise fall back to the OMAP ROM style calls.
+	 */
+	if (optee_available) {
+		struct arm_smccc_res res;
+
+		arm_smccc_smc(OMAP_SIP_SMC_STD_CALL_VAL(fn), arg,
+			      0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
+		WARN(res.a0, "Secure function call 0x%08x failed\n", fn);
+	} else {
+		_omap_smc1(fn, arg);
+	}
+}
+
 /* Allocate the memory to save secure ram */
 int __init omap_secure_ram_reserve_memblock(void)
 {
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
index 78a1c4f04bbe..349101b3c771 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
 
 extern u32 omap_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 flag, u32 nargs,
 				u32 arg1, u32 arg2, u32 arg3, u32 arg4);
+extern void omap_smc1(u32 fn, u32 arg);
 extern u32 omap_smc2(u32 id, u32 falg, u32 pargs);
 extern u32 omap_smc3(u32 id, u32 process, u32 flag, u32 pargs);
 extern phys_addr_t omap_secure_ram_mempool_base(void);
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S
index fd2bcd91f4a1..d4832845a4e8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S
@@ -18,18 +18,18 @@
  * the monitor API number. It uses few CPU registers
  * internally and hence they need be backed up including
  * link register "lr".
- * Function signature : void omap_smc1(u32 fn, u32 arg)
+ * Function signature : void _omap_smc1(u32 fn, u32 arg)
  */
 	.arch armv7-a
 	.arch_extension sec
-ENTRY(omap_smc1)
+ENTRY(_omap_smc1)
 	stmfd   sp!, {r2-r12, lr}
 	mov	r12, r0
 	mov 	r0, r1
 	dsb
 	smc	#0
 	ldmfd   sp!, {r2-r12, pc}
-ENDPROC(omap_smc1)
+ENDPROC(_omap_smc1)
 
 /**
  * u32 omap_smc2(u32 id, u32 falg, u32 pargs)
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: OMAP2+: Introduce check for OP-TEE in omap_secure_init()

[Tony Lindgren]

* Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com> [191217 23:48]:
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
> @@ -20,6 +21,18 @@
>  
>  static phys_addr_t omap_secure_memblock_base;
>  
> +bool optee_available;

The above can be static bool optee_available?

> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
>  #ifndef OMAP_ARCH_OMAP_SECURE_H
>  #define OMAP_ARCH_OMAP_SECURE_H
>  
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
>  /* Monitor error code */
>  #define  API_HAL_RET_VALUE_NS2S_CONVERSION_ERROR	0xFFFFFFFE
>  #define  API_HAL_RET_VALUE_SERVICE_UNKNWON		0xFFFFFFFF
> @@ -72,6 +74,7 @@ extern u32 rx51_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 process, u32 flag, u32 nargs,
>  extern u32 rx51_secure_update_aux_cr(u32 set_bits, u32 clear_bits);
>  extern u32 rx51_secure_rng_call(u32 ptr, u32 count, u32 flag);
>  
> +extern bool optee_available;
>  void omap_secure_init(void);

And then this change should not be needed, right?

Otherwise series looks OK to me, thanks for updating it.

Regards,

Tony

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: OMAP2+: Introduce check for OP-TEE in omap_secure_init()

[Andrew F. Davis]

On 12/17/19 7:53 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com> [191217 23:48]:
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
>> @@ -20,6 +21,18 @@
>>  
>>  static phys_addr_t omap_secure_memblock_base;
>>  
>> +bool optee_available;
> 
> The above can be static bool optee_available?
> 
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
>> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
>>  #ifndef OMAP_ARCH_OMAP_SECURE_H
>>  #define OMAP_ARCH_OMAP_SECURE_H
>>  
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +
>>  /* Monitor error code */
>>  #define  API_HAL_RET_VALUE_NS2S_CONVERSION_ERROR	0xFFFFFFFE
>>  #define  API_HAL_RET_VALUE_SERVICE_UNKNWON		0xFFFFFFFF
>> @@ -72,6 +74,7 @@ extern u32 rx51_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 process, u32 flag, u32 nargs,
>>  extern u32 rx51_secure_update_aux_cr(u32 set_bits, u32 clear_bits);
>>  extern u32 rx51_secure_rng_call(u32 ptr, u32 count, u32 flag);
>>  
>> +extern bool optee_available;
>>  void omap_secure_init(void);
> 
> And then this change should not be needed, right?
> 


I have a staged change I'm about to post that makes use of this flag
from outside of omap-secure.c, otherwise I would have left it internal
to that file.

I could also have moved the flag in the patch that uses it, but it
seemed like an unnecessary change given I know it will be needed here soon.

Andrew


> Otherwise series looks OK to me, thanks for updating it.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: OMAP2+: Introduce check for OP-TEE in omap_secure_init()

[Tony Lindgren]

* Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com> [191218 01:01]:
> On 12/17/19 7:53 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com> [191217 23:48]:
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
> >> @@ -20,6 +21,18 @@
> >>  
> >>  static phys_addr_t omap_secure_memblock_base;
> >>  
> >> +bool optee_available;
> > 
> > The above can be static bool optee_available?
> > 
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
> >> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
> >>  #ifndef OMAP_ARCH_OMAP_SECURE_H
> >>  #define OMAP_ARCH_OMAP_SECURE_H
> >>  
> >> +#include <linux/types.h>
> >> +
> >>  /* Monitor error code */
> >>  #define  API_HAL_RET_VALUE_NS2S_CONVERSION_ERROR	0xFFFFFFFE
> >>  #define  API_HAL_RET_VALUE_SERVICE_UNKNWON		0xFFFFFFFF
> >> @@ -72,6 +74,7 @@ extern u32 rx51_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 process, u32 flag, u32 nargs,
> >>  extern u32 rx51_secure_update_aux_cr(u32 set_bits, u32 clear_bits);
> >>  extern u32 rx51_secure_rng_call(u32 ptr, u32 count, u32 flag);
> >>  
> >> +extern bool optee_available;
> >>  void omap_secure_init(void);
> > 
> > And then this change should not be needed, right?
> > 
> 
> 
> I have a staged change I'm about to post that makes use of this flag
> from outside of omap-secure.c, otherwise I would have left it internal
> to that file.
> 
> I could also have moved the flag in the patch that uses it, but it
> seemed like an unnecessary change given I know it will be needed here soon.

OK best to post all them together. Or initially just set it static
as otherwise people reading the patches will wonder about it with
no user. And all the automated test systems will start sending out
patches :)

Regards,

Tony

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: OMAP2+: Introduce check for OP-TEE in omap_secure_init()

[Andrew F. Davis]

On 12/30/19 12:36 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com> [191218 01:01]:
>> On 12/17/19 7:53 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com> [191217 23:48]:
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
>>>> @@ -20,6 +21,18 @@
>>>>  
>>>>  static phys_addr_t omap_secure_memblock_base;
>>>>  
>>>> +bool optee_available;
>>>
>>> The above can be static bool optee_available?
>>>
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
>>>> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
>>>>  #ifndef OMAP_ARCH_OMAP_SECURE_H
>>>>  #define OMAP_ARCH_OMAP_SECURE_H
>>>>  
>>>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>>>> +
>>>>  /* Monitor error code */
>>>>  #define  API_HAL_RET_VALUE_NS2S_CONVERSION_ERROR	0xFFFFFFFE
>>>>  #define  API_HAL_RET_VALUE_SERVICE_UNKNWON		0xFFFFFFFF
>>>> @@ -72,6 +74,7 @@ extern u32 rx51_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 process, u32 flag, u32 nargs,
>>>>  extern u32 rx51_secure_update_aux_cr(u32 set_bits, u32 clear_bits);
>>>>  extern u32 rx51_secure_rng_call(u32 ptr, u32 count, u32 flag);
>>>>  
>>>> +extern bool optee_available;
>>>>  void omap_secure_init(void);
>>>
>>> And then this change should not be needed, right?
>>>
>>
>>
>> I have a staged change I'm about to post that makes use of this flag
>> from outside of omap-secure.c, otherwise I would have left it internal
>> to that file.
>>
>> I could also have moved the flag in the patch that uses it, but it
>> seemed like an unnecessary change given I know it will be needed here soon.
> 
> OK best to post all them together. Or initially just set it static
> as otherwise people reading the patches will wonder about it with
> no user. And all the automated test systems will start sending out
> patches :)
> 


Okay, I'll post everything together, will add the extra patch for AM43xx
HS suspend/resume that uses this to the end of this series.

Thanks,
Andrew


> Regards,
> 
> Tony
>