Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs-fixes tree

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs-fixes tree

[David Sterba]

On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 08:24:31AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the btrfs-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> fs/btrfs/inode.c: In function 'btrfs_unlink_subvol':
> fs/btrfs/inode.c:4283:16: error: 'inode' undeclared (first use in this function)
>  4283 |  if (btrfs_ino(inode) == BTRFS_EMPTY_SUBVOL_DIR_OBJECTID) {
>       |                ^~~~~
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   b225d1cb20cc ("btrfs: fix invalid removal of root ref")
> 
> I have reverted that commit for today.

Updated next-fixes branch pushed.

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs-fixes tree

[David Sterba]

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 09:17:55AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the btrfs-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c: In function 'btrfs_scan_one_device':
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1413:55: error: 'bdev_handle' undeclared (first use in this function)
>  1413 |         if (btrfs_skip_registration(disk_super, path, bdev_handle->bdev->bd_dev,
>       |                                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1413:55: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in

I've updated the for-next snapshot so it contains the updated version
that is based on top of the required changes. The same patch will be
also sent for merge.

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs-fixes tree

[David Sterba]

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 09:17:55AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the btrfs-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c: In function 'btrfs_scan_one_device':
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1413:55: error: 'bdev_handle' undeclared (first use in this function)
>  1413 |         if (btrfs_skip_registration(disk_super, path, bdev_handle->bdev->bd_dev,
>       |                                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1413:55: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   cc019bc0d55b ("btrfs: do not skip re-registration for the mounted device")
> 
> I have used the btrfs-fixes tree from next-20240315 for today.
> 
> This is actually caused by an interaction with commit
> 
>   9ae061cf2a46 ("btrfs: port device access to file")
> 
> which has been in Linus' tree since March 12 (and linux-next since Feb 26).

I would really appreciate if all infrastructure changes to btrfs code
have CC:linux-btrfs@, the whole series "Open block devices as files" has
never been CCed so the build breakage is noticed only by accident. Also
I wonder why I have to repeatedly ask for that and why people think that
doing broad changes to code maintained by somebody else is ok.

There are 26 patches in linux-next intersecting fs/btrfs most of which I
see for the first time now. I don't have time to read fsdevel@ regularly
and act rather on events (i.e. CC or mails).

VFS is in the center of many other subsystems I understand that adding
the CC: manually is not feasible but scripting "if $path add CC:$subsys"
should be doable, namely when it's not just one-time job. Please try to
find some middle ground between efforts and patch workflow sanity.
Thanks for understanding.

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs-fixes tree

[Anand Jain]

On 3/18/24 03:47, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the btrfs-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c: In function 'btrfs_scan_one_device':
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1413:55: error: 'bdev_handle' undeclared (first use in this function)
>   1413 |         if (btrfs_skip_registration(disk_super, path, bdev_handle->bdev->bd_dev,
>        |                                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1413:55: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>    cc019bc0d55b ("btrfs: do not skip re-registration for the mounted device")
> 
> I have used the btrfs-fixes tree from next-20240315 for today.
> 


> This is actually caused by an interaction with commit
> 
>    9ae061cf2a46 ("btrfs: port device access to file")
> 

Ah, unaware of this change. Thanks for the report.
A new fix, built on top of this change, has now been sent out.

As the Linux-next branch no longer has the commit cc019bc0d55b,
I've sent out the entire patch again.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/57a63f9905549f22618a85991b775fba76104412.1710732026.git.anand.jain@oracle.com/


Thanks, Anand

> which has been in Linus' tree since March 12 (and linux-next since Feb 26).

linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs-fixes tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 939 bytes --]

Hi all,

After merging the btrfs-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:

fs/btrfs/volumes.c: In function 'btrfs_scan_one_device':
fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1413:55: error: 'bdev_handle' undeclared (first use in this function)
 1413 |         if (btrfs_skip_registration(disk_super, path, bdev_handle->bdev->bd_dev,
      |                                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~
fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1413:55: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in

Caused by commit

  cc019bc0d55b ("btrfs: do not skip re-registration for the mounted device")

I have used the btrfs-fixes tree from next-20240315 for today.

This is actually caused by an interaction with commit

  9ae061cf2a46 ("btrfs: port device access to file")

which has been in Linus' tree since March 12 (and linux-next since Feb 26).
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]