From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
hpa@zytor.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/11] x86: make sure _etext includes function sections
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2020 17:43:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202002091742.7B1E6BF19@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200207092423.GC14914@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 10:24:23AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:02:36PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > Also, in the shiny new era of
> > Intel-CPUs-can’t-handle-Jcc-spanning-a-cacheline, function alignment
> > may actually matter.
>
> *groan*, indeed. I just went and looked that up. I missed this one in
> all the other fuss :/
>
> So per:
>
> https://www.intel.com/content/dam/support/us/en/documents/processors/mitigations-jump-conditional-code-erratum.pdf
>
> the toolchain mitigations only work if the offset in the ifetch window
> (32 bytes) is preserved. Which seems to suggest we ought to align all
> functions to 32byte before randomizing it, otherwise we're almost
> guaranteed to change this offset by the act of randomizing.
Wheee! This sounds like in needs to be fixed generally, yes? (And I see
"FUNCTION_ALIGN" macro is currently 16 bytes...
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-10 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-05 22:39 [RFC PATCH 00/11] Finer grained kernel address space randomization Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-05 22:39 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] modpost: Support >64K sections Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-06 12:38 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-05 22:39 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] x86: tools/relocs: Support >64K section headers Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-06 12:39 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-05 22:39 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] x86/boot: Allow a "silent" kaslr random byte fetch Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-06 1:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-02-06 11:48 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-06 16:58 ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-05 22:39 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] x86/boot/KASLR: Introduce PRNG for faster shuffling Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-06 1:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-02-06 15:10 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
[not found] ` <CAGiyFdes26XnNeDfaz-vkm+bU7MBYQiK3xty2EigGjOXBGui2w@mail.gmail.com>
2020-02-07 9:05 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-07 16:52 ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-05 22:39 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] x86: Makefile: Add build and config option for CONFIG_FG_KASLR Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-06 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-06 11:52 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-25 17:55 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-02-26 19:13 ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-03-24 21:24 ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-03-25 15:34 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-05 22:39 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] x86: make sure _etext includes function sections Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-06 12:26 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-06 13:15 ` Jann Horn
2020-02-06 16:27 ` David Laight
2020-02-06 14:39 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-02-06 15:29 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-02-06 16:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-02-06 14:57 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-02-06 15:45 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-02-06 19:41 ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-06 20:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-02-07 9:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-10 1:43 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2020-02-10 10:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-10 15:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
2020-02-10 16:36 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-02-21 19:50 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-02-21 23:05 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-02-05 22:39 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] x86/tools: Adding relative relocs for randomized functions Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-06 12:37 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-05 22:39 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] x86: Add support for finer grained KASLR Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-06 1:17 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-02-06 11:56 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-06 17:36 ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-06 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-06 12:06 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-06 14:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-06 17:25 ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-06 17:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-06 17:43 ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-25 17:49 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-02-26 19:26 ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-05 22:39 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] kallsyms: hide layout and expose seed Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-06 12:32 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-06 17:51 ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-06 19:27 ` Jann Horn
2020-03-02 19:01 ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-03-02 19:08 ` Kees Cook
2020-03-02 19:19 ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-27 2:42 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-27 16:02 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-28 3:36 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-05 22:39 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] module: Reorder functions Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-06 12:41 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-11 12:39 ` Jessica Yu
2020-02-05 22:39 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] x86/boot: Move "boot heap" out of .bss Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-06 0:11 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-02-06 0:33 ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2020-02-06 11:13 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-06 14:25 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-02-06 21:32 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202002091742.7B1E6BF19@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=kristen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).