* Re: Applied "regulator: mt6359: Add support for MT6359 regulator" to the regulator tree
@ 2020-02-26 11:47 Mark Brown
2020-03-02 5:53 ` Wen Su
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2020-02-26 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wen Su; +Cc: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 279 bytes --]
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 01:24:11PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> The patch
>
> regulator: mt6359: Add support for MT6359 regulator
>
> has been applied to the regulator tree at
...and dropped because the MFD dependency isn't on a newly added driver
like it appeared.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: Applied "regulator: mt6359: Add support for MT6359 regulator" to the regulator tree 2020-02-26 11:47 Applied "regulator: mt6359: Add support for MT6359 regulator" to the regulator tree Mark Brown @ 2020-03-02 5:53 ` Wen Su 2020-03-02 12:36 ` Mark Brown 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Wen Su @ 2020-03-02 5:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Brown; +Cc: linux-kernel Hi Mark, On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 11:47 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 01:24:11PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > The patch > > > > regulator: mt6359: Add support for MT6359 regulator > > > > has been applied to the regulator tree at > > ...and dropped because the MFD dependency isn't on a newly added driver > like it appeared. I am sorry to bother you. How should I proceed for this patch set which including regulator driver and MFD header file ? Please give advice. Thank you. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Applied "regulator: mt6359: Add support for MT6359 regulator" to the regulator tree 2020-03-02 5:53 ` Wen Su @ 2020-03-02 12:36 ` Mark Brown 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Mark Brown @ 2020-03-02 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wen Su; +Cc: linux-kernel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 416 bytes --] On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 01:53:52PM +0800, Wen Su wrote: > On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 11:47 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > ...and dropped because the MFD dependency isn't on a newly added driver > > like it appeared. > I am sorry to bother you. How should I proceed for this patch set which > including regulator driver and MFD header file ? Please give advice. It should be fine as is once the MFD bits are figured out. [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-02 12:36 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-02-26 11:47 Applied "regulator: mt6359: Add support for MT6359 regulator" to the regulator tree Mark Brown 2020-03-02 5:53 ` Wen Su 2020-03-02 12:36 ` Mark Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).