* Re: Applied "regulator: mt6359: Add support for MT6359 regulator" to the regulator tree
@ 2020-02-26 11:47 Mark Brown
2020-03-02 5:53 ` Wen Su
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2020-02-26 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wen Su; +Cc: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 279 bytes --]
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 01:24:11PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> The patch
>
> regulator: mt6359: Add support for MT6359 regulator
>
> has been applied to the regulator tree at
...and dropped because the MFD dependency isn't on a newly added driver
like it appeared.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Applied "regulator: mt6359: Add support for MT6359 regulator" to the regulator tree
2020-02-26 11:47 Applied "regulator: mt6359: Add support for MT6359 regulator" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
@ 2020-03-02 5:53 ` Wen Su
2020-03-02 12:36 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wen Su @ 2020-03-02 5:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi Mark,
On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 11:47 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 01:24:11PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > The patch
> >
> > regulator: mt6359: Add support for MT6359 regulator
> >
> > has been applied to the regulator tree at
>
> ...and dropped because the MFD dependency isn't on a newly added driver
> like it appeared.
I am sorry to bother you. How should I proceed for this patch set which
including regulator driver and MFD header file ? Please give advice.
Thank you.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Applied "regulator: mt6359: Add support for MT6359 regulator" to the regulator tree
2020-03-02 5:53 ` Wen Su
@ 2020-03-02 12:36 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2020-03-02 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wen Su; +Cc: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 416 bytes --]
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 01:53:52PM +0800, Wen Su wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 11:47 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > ...and dropped because the MFD dependency isn't on a newly added driver
> > like it appeared.
> I am sorry to bother you. How should I proceed for this patch set which
> including regulator driver and MFD header file ? Please give advice.
It should be fine as is once the MFD bits are figured out.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-02 12:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-02-26 11:47 Applied "regulator: mt6359: Add support for MT6359 regulator" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
2020-03-02 5:53 ` Wen Su
2020-03-02 12:36 ` Mark Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).