From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: Cl?ment Leger <cleger@kalrayinc.com>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
linux-remoteproc <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>,
linux-doc <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>,
Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@st.com>, s-anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] remoteproc: Rename rproc_elf_sanity_check for elf32
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:20:31 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200310152031.GA25781@xps15> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200310000005.GF14744@builder>
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 05:00:05PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue 03 Mar 00:02 PST 2020, Cl?ment Leger wrote:
>
> > Hi Bjorn,
> >
> > ----- On 3 Mar, 2020, at 00:13, Bjorn Andersson bjorn.andersson@linaro.org wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon 02 Mar 01:38 PST 2020, Clement Leger wrote:
> > >
> > >> Since this function will be modified to support both elf32 and elf64,
> > >> rename the existing one to elf32 (which is the only supported format
> > >> at the moment). This will allow not to introduce possible side effect
> > >> when adding elf64 support (ie: all backends will still support only
> > >> elf32 if not requested explicitely using rproc_elf_sanity_check).
> > >>
> > >
> > > Is there a reason for preventing ELF64 binaries be loaded?
> >
> > I decided to go this way to let driver maintainer decide if they want
> > to support elf64 to avoid problems with 64bits addresses/sizes which do
> > not fit in their native type (size_t for instance). This is probably
> > not going to happen and there are additionnal checks before calling
> > rproc_da_to_va. And addresses should be filtered by rproc_da_to_va.
> > So, actually it seems there is no reason to forbid supporting elf32/64
> > for all drivers.
> >
>
> I was hoping to hear some additional feedback on this from others.
I didn't follow up on this one because I agreed with your assesment and didn't
think it was needed.
Simply put I would rather see rproc_elf_sanity_check() gain support for elf64
and let the platform code decide what to do with format they don't support
rather than spinning a new function.
>
> I've merge the patch as is, but think it would be nice to clean this up
> and just have the driver ignore if fed a 32 or 64-elf.
It would be really nice to see this cleaned up in time for the coming merge
window...
Thanks
Mathieu
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > Clément
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Bjorn
> > >
> > >> Signed-off-by: Clement Leger <cleger@kalray.eu>
> > >> ---
> > >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 2 +-
> > >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c | 6 +++---
> > >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 2 +-
> > >> drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c | 2 +-
> > >> drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c | 2 +-
> > >> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 2 +-
> > >> 6 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > >> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > >> index 4bfaf4a3c4a3..99f0b796fbc7 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > >> @@ -2055,7 +2055,7 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char
> > >> *name,
> > >> rproc->ops->load = rproc_elf_load_segments;
> > >> rproc->ops->parse_fw = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table;
> > >> rproc->ops->find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table;
> > >> - rproc->ops->sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check;
> > >> + rproc->ops->sanity_check = rproc_elf32_sanity_check;
> > >> rproc->ops->get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr;
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
> > >> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
> > >> index c2a9783cfb9a..5a67745f2638 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
> > >> @@ -25,13 +25,13 @@
> > >> #include "remoteproc_internal.h"
> > >>
> > >> /**
> > >> - * rproc_elf_sanity_check() - Sanity Check ELF firmware image
> > >> + * rproc_elf_sanity_check() - Sanity Check ELF32 firmware image
> > >> * @rproc: the remote processor handle
> > >> * @fw: the ELF firmware image
> > >> *
> > >> * Make sure this fw image is sane.
> > >> */
> > >> -int rproc_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> > >> +int rproc_elf32_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> > >> {
> > >> const char *name = rproc->firmware;
> > >> struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> > >> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ int rproc_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct
> > >> firmware *fw)
> > >>
> > >> return 0;
> > >> }
> > >> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_elf_sanity_check);
> > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_elf32_sanity_check);
> > >>
> > >> /**
> > >> * rproc_elf_get_boot_addr() - Get rproc's boot address.
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > >> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > >> index 0deae5f237b8..28639c588d58 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > >> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len);
> > >> phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr);
> > >> int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc);
> > >>
> > >> -int rproc_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> > >> +int rproc_elf32_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> > >> u64 rproc_elf_get_boot_addr(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> > >> int rproc_elf_load_segments(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> > >> int rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c
> > >> b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c
> > >> index a3268d95a50e..a6cbfa452764 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c
> > >> @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = {
> > >> .parse_fw = st_rproc_parse_fw,
> > >> .load = rproc_elf_load_segments,
> > >> .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
> > >> - .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check,
> > >> + .sanity_check = rproc_elf32_sanity_check,
> > >> .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
> > >> };
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c
> > >> b/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c
> > >> index 09bcb4d8b9e0..3cca8b65a8db 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c
> > >> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops slim_rproc_ops = {
> > >> .da_to_va = slim_rproc_da_to_va,
> > >> .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
> > >> .load = rproc_elf_load_segments,
> > >> - .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check,
> > >> + .sanity_check = rproc_elf32_sanity_check,
> > >> };
> > >>
> > >> /**
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> > >> index a18f88044111..9a8b5f5e2572 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> > >> @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = {
> > >> .load = rproc_elf_load_segments,
> > >> .parse_fw = stm32_rproc_parse_fw,
> > >> .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
> > >> - .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check,
> > >> + .sanity_check = rproc_elf32_sanity_check,
> > >> .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
> > >> };
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> 2.15.0.276.g89ea799
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-10 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <04be3345-698d-29b0-7b4b-7eed088e490d@st.com>
2019-08-19 11:45 ` [PATCH] rproc: Add elf64 support in elf loader Clement Leger
2019-09-13 10:58 ` Clément Leger
2019-10-04 8:27 ` Clément Leger
2019-10-04 18:42 ` [PATCH v2] remoteproc: " Clement Leger
2020-01-09 9:31 ` Clément Leger
2020-01-24 0:53 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-01-24 8:24 ` Clément Leger
2020-01-24 18:10 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-01-24 21:58 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-01-27 8:33 ` Clément Leger
2020-01-28 17:14 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-01-29 8:55 ` Clément Leger
2020-01-29 16:30 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-02-04 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] remoteproc: Use u64 len for da_to_va Clement Leger
2020-02-04 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] remoteproc: Add elf64 support in elf loader Clement Leger
2020-02-04 16:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] remoteproc: Use u64 len for da_to_va Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-02-04 17:10 ` Clément Leger
2020-02-04 17:42 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-02-04 17:44 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] remoteproc: Add elf64 support to elf loader Clement Leger
2020-02-04 17:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] remoteproc: Use u64 len for da_to_va Clement Leger
2020-02-05 21:06 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-02-04 17:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] remoteproc: Add elf64 support in elf loader Clement Leger
2020-02-05 22:49 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-02-06 8:37 ` Clément Leger
2020-02-06 15:05 ` Clément Leger
2020-02-06 17:48 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-02-07 7:57 ` Clément Leger
2020-02-10 16:22 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] remoteproc: Add elf64 support Clement Leger
2020-02-10 16:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] remoteproc: Use u64 len for da_to_va Clement Leger
2020-02-11 15:53 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-02-11 16:39 ` Clément Leger
2020-02-11 17:24 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-02-11 22:37 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-02-12 10:37 ` Clément Leger
2020-02-12 21:59 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-02-18 10:10 ` Clément Leger
2020-02-18 17:01 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-02-10 16:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] remoteproc: Use u64 type for boot_addr Clement Leger
2020-02-10 16:22 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] remoteproc: Add elf helpers to access elf64 and elf32 fields Clement Leger
2020-02-10 16:22 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] remoteproc: Add elf64 support in elf loader Clement Leger
2020-02-10 16:22 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] remoteproc: Adapt coredump to generate correct elf type Clement Leger
2020-02-11 23:11 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-02-11 15:57 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] remoteproc: Add elf64 support Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-02-11 23:12 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-02-12 8:15 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-03-02 9:38 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] " Clement Leger
2020-03-02 9:38 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] remoteproc: Use size_t type for len in da_to_va Clement Leger
2020-03-02 23:06 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-03-09 17:52 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-27 7:37 ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-03-02 9:38 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] remoteproc: Use size_t instead of int for rproc_mem_entry len Clement Leger
2020-03-02 23:07 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-03-09 19:21 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-02 9:38 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] remoteproc: Use u64 type for boot_addr Clement Leger
2020-03-02 23:08 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-03-09 19:52 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-10 7:59 ` Clément Leger
2020-03-10 19:32 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-03-02 9:38 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] remoteproc: Add elf helpers to access elf64 and elf32 fields Clement Leger
2020-03-02 23:12 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-03-09 19:56 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-02 9:38 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] remoteproc: Rename rproc_elf_sanity_check for elf32 Clement Leger
2020-03-02 23:13 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-03-03 8:02 ` Clément Leger
2020-03-10 0:00 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-03-10 15:20 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2020-03-10 15:38 ` Clément Leger
2020-03-10 19:18 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-10 19:30 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-03-02 9:39 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] remoteproc: Add elf64 support in elf loader Clement Leger
2020-03-02 9:39 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] remoteproc: Allow overriding only sanity_check Clement Leger
2020-03-02 9:39 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] remoteproc: Adapt coredump to generate correct elf type Clement Leger
2020-03-03 22:01 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-03-09 20:32 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-09 23:57 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-03-10 8:12 ` Clément Leger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200310152031.GA25781@xps15 \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=cleger@kalrayinc.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.pallardy@st.com \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=patrice.chotard@st.com \
--cc=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).