linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <jiri@resnulli.us>, <ivecera@redhat.com>,
	<kuba@kernel.org>, <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>,
	<olteanv@gmail.com>, <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	<UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 10/13] bridge: mrp: Implement netlink interface to configure MRP
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 21:16:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200420191637.5skfpcayidzkb43w@soft-dev3.microsemi.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <066720c4-ddc4-ce71-734f-932b6a342e01@cumulusnetworks.com>

The 04/20/2020 20:18, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On 20/04/2020 18:09, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > Implement netlink interface to configure MRP. The implementation
> > will do sanity checks over the attributes and then eventually call the MRP
> > interface.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
> > ---
> >  net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 117 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c
> >
> > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..0ff42e7c7f57
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> > +
> > +#include <net/genetlink.h>
> > +
> > +#include <uapi/linux/mrp_bridge.h>
> > +#include "br_private.h"
> > +#include "br_private_mrp.h"
> > +
> > +static const struct nla_policy br_mrp_policy[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_MAX + 1] = {
> > +     [IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_UNSPEC]        = { .type = NLA_REJECT },
> > +     [IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_INSTANCE]      = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
> > +                                         .len = sizeof(struct br_mrp_instance)},
> > +     [IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_PORT_STATE]    = { .type = NLA_U32 },
> > +     [IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_PORT_ROLE]     = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
> > +                                         .len = sizeof(struct br_mrp_port_role)},
> > +     [IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_STATE]    = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
> > +                                         .len = sizeof(struct br_mrp_ring_state)},
> > +     [IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_ROLE]     = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
> > +                                         .len = sizeof(struct br_mrp_ring_role)},
> > +     [IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST]    = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
> > +                                         .len = sizeof(struct br_mrp_start_test)},
> > +};
> > +
> > +int br_mrp_parse(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p,
> > +              struct nlattr *attr, int cmd, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> > +{
> > +     struct nlattr *tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_MAX + 1];
> > +     int err;
> > +
> > +     if (br->stp_enabled != BR_NO_STP) {
> > +             NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "MRP can't be enabled if STP is already enabled\n");
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     err = nla_parse_nested(tb, IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_MAX, attr,
> > +                            NULL, extack);
> > +     if (err)
> > +             return err;
> > +
> > +     if (tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_INSTANCE]) {
> > +             struct br_mrp_instance *instance =
> > +                     nla_data(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_INSTANCE]);
> > +
> > +             if (cmd == RTM_SETLINK)
> > +                     err = br_mrp_add(br, instance);
> > +             else
> > +                     err = br_mrp_del(br, instance);
> > +             if (err)
> > +                     return err;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_PORT_STATE]) {
> > +             enum br_mrp_port_state_type state =
> > +                     nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_PORT_STATE]);
> > +
> > +             err = br_mrp_set_port_state(p, state);
> > +             if (err)
> > +                     return err;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_PORT_ROLE]) {
> > +             struct br_mrp_port_role *role =
> > +                     nla_data(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_PORT_ROLE]);
> > +
> > +             err = br_mrp_set_port_role(p, role);
> > +             if (err)
> > +                     return err;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_STATE]) {
> > +             struct br_mrp_ring_state *state =
> > +                     nla_data(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_STATE]);
> > +
> > +             err = br_mrp_set_ring_state(br, state);
> > +             if (err)
> > +                     return err;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_ROLE]) {
> > +             struct br_mrp_ring_role *role =
> > +                     nla_data(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_ROLE]);
> > +
> > +             err = br_mrp_set_ring_role(br, role);
> > +             if (err)
> > +                     return err;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST]) {
> > +             struct br_mrp_start_test *test =
> > +                     nla_data(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST]);
> > +
> > +             err = br_mrp_start_test(br, test);
> > +             if (err)
> > +                     return err;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int br_mrp_port_open(struct net_device *dev, u8 loc)
> > +{
> > +     struct net_bridge_port *p;
> > +     int err = 0;
> > +
> > +     p = br_port_get_rcu(dev);
> > +     if (!p) {
> > +             err = -EINVAL;
> > +             goto out;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     p->loc = loc;
> > +     br_ifinfo_notify(RTM_NEWLINK, NULL, p);
> > +
> > +out:
> > +     return err;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(br_mrp_port_open);
> >
> 
> I just noticed the EXPORT_SYMBOL() here, why do you need it?

Actually is not needed. But I am thinking to drop patch 4. The reason
for patch nr 4, was that the drivers should notify when the ports lost
the continuity. But currently there is no driver using the MRP then
there is no point to have. I will add it back once the drivers start to
use the MRP.

> 

-- 
/Horatiu

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-20 19:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-20 15:09 [PATCH net-next 00/13] net: bridge: mrp: Add support for Media Redundancy Protocol(MRP) Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 01/13] bridge: uapi: mrp: Add mrp attributes Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 02/13] net: bridge: Add port attribute IFLA_BRPORT_MRP_RING_OPEN Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 03/13] bridge: mrp: Update Kconfig Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 04/13] bridge: mrp: Expose function br_mrp_port_open Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 17:30   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2020-04-20 19:26     ` Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 05/13] bridge: mrp: Add MRP interface Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 06/13] bridge: mrp: Extend bridge interface Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 07/13] switchdev: mrp: Extend switchdev API to offload MRP Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 08/13] bridge: switchdev: mrp: Implement MRP API for switchdev Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 09/13] bridge: mrp: Connect MRP API with the switchev API Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 17:17   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2020-04-20 19:13     ` Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-21  8:44   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2020-04-21  9:31     ` Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 10/13] bridge: mrp: Implement netlink interface to configure MRP Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 17:18   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2020-04-20 19:16     ` Horatiu Vultur [this message]
2020-04-21  8:47   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2020-04-21  9:17     ` Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 11/13] bridge: mrp: Update Makefile Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 12/13] bridge: mrp: Integrate MRP into the bridge Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 13/13] net: bridge: Add checks for enabling the STP Horatiu Vultur

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200420191637.5skfpcayidzkb43w@soft-dev3.microsemi.net \
    --to=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).