linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, jiri@resnulli.us, ivecera@redhat.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, olteanv@gmail.com,
	andrew@lunn.ch, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/13] bridge: mrp: Expose function br_mrp_port_open
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 20:30:34 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc388b70-701c-4600-791b-8170683a7666@cumulusnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200420150947.30974-5-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>

On 20/04/2020 18:09, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> In case the HW is capable to detect when the MRP ring is open or closed. It is
> expected that the network driver will notify the SW that the ring is open or
> closed.
> 
> The function br_mrp_port_open is used to notify the kernel that one of the ports
> stopped receiving MRP_Test frames. The argument 'loc' has a value of '1' when
> the port stopped receiving MRP_Test and '0' when it started to receive MRP_Test.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mrp_bridge.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/mrp_bridge.h
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mrp_bridge.h b/include/linux/mrp_bridge.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..61c1f0d395c7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/mrp_bridge.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
> +
> +#ifndef _LINUX_MRP_BRIDGE_H
> +#define _LINUX_MRO_BRIDGE_H
> +
> +#include <linux/netdevice.h>
> +
> +/* The drivers are responsible to call this function when it detects that the
> + * MRP port stopped receiving MRP_Test frames or it started to receive MRP_Test.
> + * The argument dev represents the port and loc(Lost of Continuity) has a value
> + * of 1 when it stopped receiving MRP_Test frames and a value of 0 when it
> + * started to receive frames.
> + * Needs to be called with rcu_read_lock().
> + *
> + * This eventually notify the userspace which is required to react on these
> + * changes.
> + */
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_MRP)
> +int br_mrp_port_open(struct net_device *dev, u8 loc);
> +#else
> +static inline int br_mrp_port_open(struct net_device *dev, u8 loc)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +#endif
> 

I see that in order to pass this "loc" to br_ifinfo_notify() you add a new port variable,
but it's a boolean, so you can just use the port flags for it which will simplify things a lot
and remove some ifdefs along the way. And please rename it to something longer (so it's easier
to get what it does).

One question - now that it's always sent to user-space as IFLA_BRPORT_MRP_RING_OPEN attribute
wouldn't it be a problem, or is it read as a current state?
I mean you'll receive that attribute about a port even if you get a completely unrelated to MRP
notification (e.g. about a vlan change).

Thanks,
 Nik

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-20 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-20 15:09 [PATCH net-next 00/13] net: bridge: mrp: Add support for Media Redundancy Protocol(MRP) Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 01/13] bridge: uapi: mrp: Add mrp attributes Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 02/13] net: bridge: Add port attribute IFLA_BRPORT_MRP_RING_OPEN Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 03/13] bridge: mrp: Update Kconfig Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 04/13] bridge: mrp: Expose function br_mrp_port_open Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 17:30   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov [this message]
2020-04-20 19:26     ` Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 05/13] bridge: mrp: Add MRP interface Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 06/13] bridge: mrp: Extend bridge interface Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 07/13] switchdev: mrp: Extend switchdev API to offload MRP Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 08/13] bridge: switchdev: mrp: Implement MRP API for switchdev Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 09/13] bridge: mrp: Connect MRP API with the switchev API Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 17:17   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2020-04-20 19:13     ` Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-21  8:44   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2020-04-21  9:31     ` Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 10/13] bridge: mrp: Implement netlink interface to configure MRP Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 17:18   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2020-04-20 19:16     ` Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-21  8:47   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2020-04-21  9:17     ` Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 11/13] bridge: mrp: Update Makefile Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 12/13] bridge: mrp: Integrate MRP into the bridge Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-20 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next 13/13] net: bridge: Add checks for enabling the STP Horatiu Vultur

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cc388b70-701c-4600-791b-8170683a7666@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --to=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).