* [ANNOUNCE] exfatprogs-1.0.2 version released [not found] <CGME20200423084908epcas1p1b5d43c33b263b30844fc03a341f67413@epcas1p1.samsung.com> @ 2020-04-23 8:49 ` Namjae Jeon 2020-04-23 13:43 ` Eric Sandeen 2020-04-23 14:44 ` 'Goldwyn Rodrigues' 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Namjae Jeon @ 2020-04-23 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'LKML', linux-fsdevel Cc: 'Hyunchul Lee', 'Eric Sandeen', 'Sedat Dilek', 'Goldwyn Rodrigues' This is the second release of exfatprogs since the initial version(1.0.1). We have received various feedbacks and patches since the previous release and applied them in this release. Thanks for feedback and patches! According to Goldwyn's comments, We renamed the project name from exfat-utils to exfatprogs. However, There is an opinion that just renaming the name is not enough. Because the binary names(mkfs.exfat, fsck.exfat) still are same with ones in current exfat-utils RPM package. If that's real problem, We are considering a long jump with 2.0.0 when adding repair feature. Any feedback is welcome!:) The major changes in this release: * Rename project name to exfatprogs. * label.exfat: Add support for label.exfat to set/get exfat volume label. * Replace iconv library by standard C functions mbstowcs() and wcrtomb(). * Fix the build warnings/errors and add warning options. * Fix several bugs(memory leak, wrong endian conversion, zero out beyond end of file) and cleanup codes * Fix issues on big endian system and on 32bit system. * Add support for Android build system. The git tree is at: https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs The tarballs can be found at: https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs/releases/tag/1.0.2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] exfatprogs-1.0.2 version released 2020-04-23 8:49 ` [ANNOUNCE] exfatprogs-1.0.2 version released Namjae Jeon @ 2020-04-23 13:43 ` Eric Sandeen 2020-04-23 23:35 ` Namjae Jeon 2020-04-23 14:44 ` 'Goldwyn Rodrigues' 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Eric Sandeen @ 2020-04-23 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Namjae Jeon, 'LKML', linux-fsdevel Cc: 'Hyunchul Lee', 'Sedat Dilek', 'Goldwyn Rodrigues' On 4/23/20 3:49 AM, Namjae Jeon wrote: > This is the second release of exfatprogs since the initial version(1.0.1). > We have received various feedbacks and patches since the previous release > and applied them in this release. Thanks for feedback and patches! > > According to Goldwyn's comments, We renamed the project name from > exfat-utils to exfatprogs. However, There is an opinion that just renaming > the name is not enough. Because the binary names(mkfs.exfat, fsck.exfat) > still are same with ones in current exfat-utils RPM package. > > If that's real problem, We are considering a long jump with 2.0.0 when adding > repair feature. > > Any feedback is welcome!:) Just my $0.02 - I think you need to keep the binary names the same, this is a very common naming convention that other software may depend on. At least xfstests certainly expects that the "exfat.$FOO" naming convention is there, and that "exfat" is used consistently across utilities, module names, statfs and blkid output etc. Personally I think it would be sufficient for distribution packages to set the equivalent of a "Conflicts: exfat-utils" in the exfatprogs package so that they cannot be installed simultaneously? The devil is in the details on packaging but there are usually packaging tricks if we need to replace or exclude one package with another. Thanks, -Eric > The major changes in this release: > * Rename project name to exfatprogs. > * label.exfat: Add support for label.exfat to set/get exfat volume label. > * Replace iconv library by standard C functions mbstowcs() and wcrtomb(). > * Fix the build warnings/errors and add warning options. > * Fix several bugs(memory leak, wrong endian conversion, zero out beyond end of file) and cleanup codes > * Fix issues on big endian system and on 32bit system. > * Add support for Android build system. > > The git tree is at: > https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs > > The tarballs can be found at: > https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs/releases/tag/1.0.2 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: [ANNOUNCE] exfatprogs-1.0.2 version released 2020-04-23 13:43 ` Eric Sandeen @ 2020-04-23 23:35 ` Namjae Jeon 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Namjae Jeon @ 2020-04-23 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Eric Sandeen' Cc: 'Hyunchul Lee', 'Sedat Dilek', 'Goldwyn Rodrigues', 'LKML', linux-fsdevel > On 4/23/20 3:49 AM, Namjae Jeon wrote: > > This is the second release of exfatprogs since the initial version(1.0.1). > > We have received various feedbacks and patches since the previous > > release and applied them in this release. Thanks for feedback and patches! > > > > According to Goldwyn's comments, We renamed the project name from > > exfat-utils to exfatprogs. However, There is an opinion that just > > renaming the name is not enough. Because the binary names(mkfs.exfat, > > fsck.exfat) still are same with ones in current exfat-utils RPM package. > > > > If that's real problem, We are considering a long jump with 2.0.0 when > > adding repair feature. > > > > Any feedback is welcome!:) > > Just my $0.02 - I think you need to keep the binary names the same, this is a very common naming > convention that other software may depend on. At least xfstests certainly expects that the > "exfat.$FOO" naming convention is there, and that "exfat" is used consistently across utilities, > module names, statfs and blkid output etc. Okay, I will keep them. And he is saying that the version of mkfs/fsck.exfat in exfatprogs should be higher than the version 1.3.1 of mkfs/fsck.exfat in current exfat-utils package to reduce the confusion of old users. For this reason, it confuses me whether it makes sense to significantly increase the version. So I'm thinking about raising the version to 2.0.0 when the big feature like repair comes in. > > Personally I think it would be sufficient for distribution packages to set the equivalent of a > "Conflicts: exfat-utils" in the exfatprogs package so that they cannot be installed simultaneously? > The devil is in the details on packaging but there are usually packaging tricks if we need to replace > or exclude one package with another. Oh, there's a way. Thanks for your opinion! > > Thanks, > -Eric > > > The major changes in this release: > > * Rename project name to exfatprogs. > > * label.exfat: Add support for label.exfat to set/get exfat volume label. > > * Replace iconv library by standard C functions mbstowcs() and wcrtomb(). > > * Fix the build warnings/errors and add warning options. > > * Fix several bugs(memory leak, wrong endian conversion, zero out > > beyond end of file) and cleanup codes > > * Fix issues on big endian system and on 32bit system. > > * Add support for Android build system. > > > > The git tree is at: > > > > https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=f7b9f8ba-aa6aa104-f7b873f5-0cc47a31 > > ba82-14a9f1852cdf3dd6&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fexfatprogs%2Fex > > fatprogs > > > > The tarballs can be found at: > > > > https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=35b018cd-68634173-35b19382-0cc47a31 > > ba82-7c9ab2990d663462&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fexfatprogs%2Fex > > fatprogs%2Freleases%2Ftag%2F1.0.2 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] exfatprogs-1.0.2 version released 2020-04-23 8:49 ` [ANNOUNCE] exfatprogs-1.0.2 version released Namjae Jeon 2020-04-23 13:43 ` Eric Sandeen @ 2020-04-23 14:44 ` 'Goldwyn Rodrigues' 2020-04-23 14:55 ` Eric Sandeen 2020-04-23 23:38 ` Namjae Jeon 1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: 'Goldwyn Rodrigues' @ 2020-04-23 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Namjae Jeon Cc: 'LKML', linux-fsdevel, 'Hyunchul Lee', 'Eric Sandeen', 'Sedat Dilek' Hi Namjae, On 17:49 23/04, Namjae Jeon wrote: > This is the second release of exfatprogs since the initial version(1.0.1). > We have received various feedbacks and patches since the previous release > and applied them in this release. Thanks for feedback and patches! > > According to Goldwyn's comments, We renamed the project name from > exfat-utils to exfatprogs. However, There is an opinion that just renaming > the name is not enough. Because the binary names(mkfs.exfat, fsck.exfat) > still are same with ones in current exfat-utils RPM package. > > If that's real problem, We are considering a long jump with 2.0.0 when adding > repair feature. > > Any feedback is welcome!:) I agree with Eric. We can add "Conflicts" flag to make sure there are conflicting capabilities in packages. > > The major changes in this release: > * Rename project name to exfatprogs. > * label.exfat: Add support for label.exfat to set/get exfat volume label. > * Replace iconv library by standard C functions mbstowcs() and wcrtomb(). > * Fix the build warnings/errors and add warning options. > * Fix several bugs(memory leak, wrong endian conversion, zero out beyond end of file) and cleanup codes > * Fix issues on big endian system and on 32bit system. > * Add support for Android build system. > > The git tree is at: > https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs > > The tarballs can be found at: > https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs/releases/tag/1.0.2 > Can we follow the standard of source tarballs be <projectname>-<version>.tar.gz? In this case, exfat-1.0.2.tar.gz instead of 1.0.2.tar.gz? -- Goldwyn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] exfatprogs-1.0.2 version released 2020-04-23 14:44 ` 'Goldwyn Rodrigues' @ 2020-04-23 14:55 ` Eric Sandeen 2020-04-23 23:38 ` Namjae Jeon 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Eric Sandeen @ 2020-04-23 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Goldwyn Rodrigues', Namjae Jeon Cc: 'LKML', linux-fsdevel, 'Hyunchul Lee', 'Sedat Dilek' On 4/23/20 9:44 AM, 'Goldwyn Rodrigues' wrote: > Hi Namjae, ... >> The git tree is at: >> https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs >> >> The tarballs can be found at: >> https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs/releases/tag/1.0.2 >> > > Can we follow the standard of source tarballs be > <projectname>-<version>.tar.gz? In this case, exfat-1.0.2.tar.gz > instead of 1.0.2.tar.gz? better yet exfatprogs-1.0.2.tar.gz :) Thanks, -Eric ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: [ANNOUNCE] exfatprogs-1.0.2 version released 2020-04-23 14:44 ` 'Goldwyn Rodrigues' 2020-04-23 14:55 ` Eric Sandeen @ 2020-04-23 23:38 ` Namjae Jeon 2020-04-24 2:32 ` 'Goldwyn Rodrigues' 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Namjae Jeon @ 2020-04-23 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Goldwyn Rodrigues' Cc: 'LKML', linux-fsdevel, 'Hyunchul Lee', 'Eric Sandeen', 'Sedat Dilek' > Hi Namjae, Hi Goldwyn, > > On 17:49 23/04, Namjae Jeon wrote: > > This is the second release of exfatprogs since the initial version(1.0.1). > > We have received various feedbacks and patches since the previous > > release and applied them in this release. Thanks for feedback and patches! > > > > According to Goldwyn's comments, We renamed the project name from > > exfat-utils to exfatprogs. However, There is an opinion that just > > renaming the name is not enough. Because the binary names(mkfs.exfat, > > fsck.exfat) still are same with ones in current exfat-utils RPM package. > > > > If that's real problem, We are considering a long jump with 2.0.0 when > > adding repair feature. > > > > Any feedback is welcome!:) > > I agree with Eric. We can add "Conflicts" flag to make sure there are conflicting capabilities in > packages. Okay. > > > > > The major changes in this release: > > * Rename project name to exfatprogs. > > * label.exfat: Add support for label.exfat to set/get exfat volume label. > > * Replace iconv library by standard C functions mbstowcs() and wcrtomb(). > > * Fix the build warnings/errors and add warning options. > > * Fix several bugs(memory leak, wrong endian conversion, zero out > > beyond end of file) and cleanup codes > > * Fix issues on big endian system and on 32bit system. > > * Add support for Android build system. > > > > The git tree is at: > > > > https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=c2ec59b9-9f266c0e-c2edd2f6-0cc47a30 > > 03e8-e469846ab6add112&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fexfatprogs%2Fex > > fatprogs > > > > The tarballs can be found at: > > > > https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=88473660-d58d03d7-8846bd2f-0cc47a30 > > 03e8-7bb3906eafbb32bc&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fexfatprogs%2Fex > > fatprogs%2Freleases%2Ftag%2F1.0.2 > > > > Can we follow the standard of source tarballs be <projectname>-<version>.tar.gz? In this case, exfat- > 1.0.2.tar.gz instead of 1.0.2.tar.gz? Ah, When I tried to download it through this link, source tarballs was exfatprogs-1.0.2.tar.gz... Am I missing something ? > > -- > Goldwyn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] exfatprogs-1.0.2 version released 2020-04-23 23:38 ` Namjae Jeon @ 2020-04-24 2:32 ` 'Goldwyn Rodrigues' 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: 'Goldwyn Rodrigues' @ 2020-04-24 2:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Namjae Jeon Cc: 'LKML', linux-fsdevel, 'Hyunchul Lee', 'Eric Sandeen', 'Sedat Dilek' Hi Namjae, On 8:38 24/04, Namjae Jeon wrote: <snip> > > > > > > The tarballs can be found at: > > > > > > https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=88473660-d58d03d7-8846bd2f-0cc47a30 > > > 03e8-7bb3906eafbb32bc&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fexfatprogs%2Fex > > > fatprogs%2Freleases%2Ftag%2F1.0.2 > > > > > > > Can we follow the standard of source tarballs be <projectname>-<version>.tar.gz? In this case, exfat- > > 1.0.2.tar.gz instead of 1.0.2.tar.gz? > Ah, When I tried to download it through this link, source tarballs was exfatprogs-1.0.2.tar.gz... > Am I missing something ? The filename on the link is: https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs/archive/1.0.2.tar.gz When I extract it, it extracts to exfatprogs-1.0.2 though. -- Goldwyn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-24 2:33 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <CGME20200423084908epcas1p1b5d43c33b263b30844fc03a341f67413@epcas1p1.samsung.com> 2020-04-23 8:49 ` [ANNOUNCE] exfatprogs-1.0.2 version released Namjae Jeon 2020-04-23 13:43 ` Eric Sandeen 2020-04-23 23:35 ` Namjae Jeon 2020-04-23 14:44 ` 'Goldwyn Rodrigues' 2020-04-23 14:55 ` Eric Sandeen 2020-04-23 23:38 ` Namjae Jeon 2020-04-24 2:32 ` 'Goldwyn Rodrigues'
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).