From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 08/13] vhost/net: convert to new API: heads->bufs
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 05:05:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200604050332-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8e5c4e5d-9729-2458-893d-a767b758e7ef@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 04:11:54PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2020/6/2 下午9:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Convert vhost net to use the new format-agnostic API.
> > In particular, don't poke at vq internals such as the
> > heads array.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/vhost/net.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> > 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> > index 749a9cf51a59..47af3d1ce3dd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> > @@ -59,13 +59,13 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(experimental_zcopytx, "Enable Zero Copy TX;"
> > * status internally; used for zerocopy tx only.
> > */
> > /* Lower device DMA failed */
> > -#define VHOST_DMA_FAILED_LEN ((__force __virtio32)3)
> > +#define VHOST_DMA_FAILED_LEN (3)
> > /* Lower device DMA done */
> > -#define VHOST_DMA_DONE_LEN ((__force __virtio32)2)
> > +#define VHOST_DMA_DONE_LEN (2)
> > /* Lower device DMA in progress */
> > -#define VHOST_DMA_IN_PROGRESS ((__force __virtio32)1)
> > +#define VHOST_DMA_IN_PROGRESS (1)
> > /* Buffer unused */
> > -#define VHOST_DMA_CLEAR_LEN ((__force __virtio32)0)
> > +#define VHOST_DMA_CLEAR_LEN (0)
>
>
> Another patch for this?
It can't be a separate patch. Without switching to vhost_buf we are
passing vring_used structs around, and that has __virtio32 length. If
switching to vhost_buf, the length is u32.
Just 4 lines, not a lot would be gained by splitting it out anyway.
>
> > #define VHOST_DMA_IS_DONE(len) ((__force u32)(len) >= (__force u32)VHOST_DMA_DONE_LEN)
> > @@ -112,9 +112,12 @@ struct vhost_net_virtqueue {
> > /* last used idx for outstanding DMA zerocopy buffers */
> > int upend_idx;
> > /* For TX, first used idx for DMA done zerocopy buffers
> > - * For RX, number of batched heads
> > + * For RX, number of batched bufs
> > */
> > int done_idx;
> > + /* Outstanding user bufs. UIO_MAXIOV in length. */
> > + /* TODO: we can make this smaller for sure. */
> > + struct vhost_buf *bufs;
> > /* Number of XDP frames batched */
> > int batched_xdp;
> > /* an array of userspace buffers info */
> > @@ -271,6 +274,8 @@ static void vhost_net_clear_ubuf_info(struct vhost_net *n)
> > int i;
> > for (i = 0; i < VHOST_NET_VQ_MAX; ++i) {
> > + kfree(n->vqs[i].bufs);
> > + n->vqs[i].bufs = NULL;
> > kfree(n->vqs[i].ubuf_info);
> > n->vqs[i].ubuf_info = NULL;
> > }
> > @@ -282,6 +287,12 @@ static int vhost_net_set_ubuf_info(struct vhost_net *n)
> > int i;
> > for (i = 0; i < VHOST_NET_VQ_MAX; ++i) {
> > + n->vqs[i].bufs = kmalloc_array(UIO_MAXIOV,
> > + sizeof(*n->vqs[i].bufs),
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!n->vqs[i].bufs)
> > + goto err;
> > +
> > zcopy = vhost_net_zcopy_mask & (0x1 << i);
> > if (!zcopy)
> > continue;
> > @@ -364,18 +375,18 @@ static void vhost_zerocopy_signal_used(struct vhost_net *net,
> > int j = 0;
> > for (i = nvq->done_idx; i != nvq->upend_idx; i = (i + 1) % UIO_MAXIOV) {
> > - if (vq->heads[i].len == VHOST_DMA_FAILED_LEN)
> > + if (nvq->bufs[i].in_len == VHOST_DMA_FAILED_LEN)
> > vhost_net_tx_err(net);
> > - if (VHOST_DMA_IS_DONE(vq->heads[i].len)) {
> > - vq->heads[i].len = VHOST_DMA_CLEAR_LEN;
> > + if (VHOST_DMA_IS_DONE(nvq->bufs[i].in_len)) {
> > + nvq->bufs[i].in_len = VHOST_DMA_CLEAR_LEN;
> > ++j;
> > } else
> > break;
> > }
> > while (j) {
> > add = min(UIO_MAXIOV - nvq->done_idx, j);
> > - vhost_add_used_and_signal_n(vq->dev, vq,
> > - &vq->heads[nvq->done_idx], add);
> > + vhost_put_used_n_bufs(vq, &nvq->bufs[nvq->done_idx], add);
> > + vhost_signal(vq->dev, vq);
> > nvq->done_idx = (nvq->done_idx + add) % UIO_MAXIOV;
> > j -= add;
> > }
> > @@ -390,7 +401,7 @@ static void vhost_zerocopy_callback(struct ubuf_info *ubuf, bool success)
> > rcu_read_lock_bh();
> > /* set len to mark this desc buffers done DMA */
> > - nvq->vq.heads[ubuf->desc].in_len = success ?
> > + nvq->bufs[ubuf->desc].in_len = success ?
> > VHOST_DMA_DONE_LEN : VHOST_DMA_FAILED_LEN;
> > cnt = vhost_net_ubuf_put(ubufs);
> > @@ -452,7 +463,8 @@ static void vhost_net_signal_used(struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq)
> > if (!nvq->done_idx)
> > return;
> > - vhost_add_used_and_signal_n(dev, vq, vq->heads, nvq->done_idx);
> > + vhost_put_used_n_bufs(vq, nvq->bufs, nvq->done_idx);
> > + vhost_signal(dev, vq);
> > nvq->done_idx = 0;
> > }
> > @@ -558,6 +570,7 @@ static void vhost_net_busy_poll(struct vhost_net *net,
> > static int vhost_net_tx_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_net *net,
> > struct vhost_net_virtqueue *tnvq,
> > + struct vhost_buf *buf,
> > unsigned int *out_num, unsigned int *in_num,
> > struct msghdr *msghdr, bool *busyloop_intr)
> > {
> > @@ -565,10 +578,10 @@ static int vhost_net_tx_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_net *net,
> > struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq = &rnvq->vq;
> > struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq = &tnvq->vq;
> > - int r = vhost_get_vq_desc(tvq, tvq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(tvq->iov),
> > - out_num, in_num, NULL, NULL);
> > + int r = vhost_get_avail_buf(tvq, buf, tvq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(tvq->iov),
> > + out_num, in_num, NULL, NULL);
> > - if (r == tvq->num && tvq->busyloop_timeout) {
> > + if (!r && tvq->busyloop_timeout) {
> > /* Flush batched packets first */
> > if (!vhost_sock_zcopy(vhost_vq_get_backend(tvq)))
> > vhost_tx_batch(net, tnvq,
> > @@ -577,8 +590,8 @@ static int vhost_net_tx_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_net *net,
> > vhost_net_busy_poll(net, rvq, tvq, busyloop_intr, false);
> > - r = vhost_get_vq_desc(tvq, tvq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(tvq->iov),
> > - out_num, in_num, NULL, NULL);
> > + r = vhost_get_avail_buf(tvq, buf, tvq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(tvq->iov),
> > + out_num, in_num, NULL, NULL);
> > }
> > return r;
> > @@ -607,6 +620,7 @@ static size_t init_iov_iter(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, struct iov_iter *iter,
> > static int get_tx_bufs(struct vhost_net *net,
> > struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq,
> > + struct vhost_buf *buf,
> > struct msghdr *msg,
> > unsigned int *out, unsigned int *in,
> > size_t *len, bool *busyloop_intr)
> > @@ -614,9 +628,9 @@ static int get_tx_bufs(struct vhost_net *net,
> > struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &nvq->vq;
> > int ret;
> > - ret = vhost_net_tx_get_vq_desc(net, nvq, out, in, msg, busyloop_intr);
> > + ret = vhost_net_tx_get_vq_desc(net, nvq, buf, out, in, msg, busyloop_intr);
> > - if (ret < 0 || ret == vq->num)
> > + if (ret <= 0)
> > return ret;
> > if (*in) {
> > @@ -761,7 +775,7 @@ static void handle_tx_copy(struct vhost_net *net, struct socket *sock)
> > struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX];
> > struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &nvq->vq;
> > unsigned out, in;
> > - int head;
> > + int ret;
> > struct msghdr msg = {
> > .msg_name = NULL,
> > .msg_namelen = 0,
> > @@ -773,6 +787,7 @@ static void handle_tx_copy(struct vhost_net *net, struct socket *sock)
> > int err;
> > int sent_pkts = 0;
> > bool sock_can_batch = (sock->sk->sk_sndbuf == INT_MAX);
> > + struct vhost_buf buf;
> > do {
> > bool busyloop_intr = false;
> > @@ -780,13 +795,13 @@ static void handle_tx_copy(struct vhost_net *net, struct socket *sock)
> > if (nvq->done_idx == VHOST_NET_BATCH)
> > vhost_tx_batch(net, nvq, sock, &msg);
> > - head = get_tx_bufs(net, nvq, &msg, &out, &in, &len,
> > - &busyloop_intr);
> > + ret = get_tx_bufs(net, nvq, &buf, &msg, &out, &in, &len,
> > + &busyloop_intr);
> > /* On error, stop handling until the next kick. */
> > - if (unlikely(head < 0))
> > + if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> > break;
> > /* Nothing new? Wait for eventfd to tell us they refilled. */
> > - if (head == vq->num) {
> > + if (!ret) {
> > if (unlikely(busyloop_intr)) {
> > vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
> > } else if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev,
> > @@ -808,7 +823,7 @@ static void handle_tx_copy(struct vhost_net *net, struct socket *sock)
> > goto done;
> > } else if (unlikely(err != -ENOSPC)) {
> > vhost_tx_batch(net, nvq, sock, &msg);
> > - vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, 1);
> > + vhost_discard_avail_bufs(vq, &buf, 1);
> > vhost_net_enable_vq(net, vq);
> > break;
> > }
> > @@ -829,7 +844,7 @@ static void handle_tx_copy(struct vhost_net *net, struct socket *sock)
> > /* TODO: Check specific error and bomb out unless ENOBUFS? */
> > err = sock->ops->sendmsg(sock, &msg, len);
> > if (unlikely(err < 0)) {
> > - vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, 1);
> > + vhost_discard_avail_bufs(vq, &buf, 1);
>
>
> Do we need to decrease first_desc in vhost_discard_avail_bufs()?
>
>
> > vhost_net_enable_vq(net, vq);
> > break;
> > }
> > @@ -837,8 +852,7 @@ static void handle_tx_copy(struct vhost_net *net, struct socket *sock)
> > pr_debug("Truncated TX packet: len %d != %zd\n",
> > err, len);
> > done:
> > - vq->heads[nvq->done_idx].id = cpu_to_vhost32(vq, head);
> > - vq->heads[nvq->done_idx].len = 0;
> > + nvq->bufs[nvq->done_idx] = buf;
> > ++nvq->done_idx;
> > } while (likely(!vhost_exceeds_weight(vq, ++sent_pkts, total_len)));
> > @@ -850,7 +864,7 @@ static void handle_tx_zerocopy(struct vhost_net *net, struct socket *sock)
> > struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX];
> > struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &nvq->vq;
> > unsigned out, in;
> > - int head;
> > + int ret;
> > struct msghdr msg = {
> > .msg_name = NULL,
> > .msg_namelen = 0,
> > @@ -864,6 +878,7 @@ static void handle_tx_zerocopy(struct vhost_net *net, struct socket *sock)
> > struct vhost_net_ubuf_ref *uninitialized_var(ubufs);
> > bool zcopy_used;
> > int sent_pkts = 0;
> > + struct vhost_buf buf;
> > do {
> > bool busyloop_intr;
> > @@ -872,13 +887,13 @@ static void handle_tx_zerocopy(struct vhost_net *net, struct socket *sock)
> > vhost_zerocopy_signal_used(net, vq);
> > busyloop_intr = false;
> > - head = get_tx_bufs(net, nvq, &msg, &out, &in, &len,
> > - &busyloop_intr);
> > + ret = get_tx_bufs(net, nvq, &buf, &msg, &out, &in, &len,
> > + &busyloop_intr);
> > /* On error, stop handling until the next kick. */
> > - if (unlikely(head < 0))
> > + if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> > break;
> > /* Nothing new? Wait for eventfd to tell us they refilled. */
> > - if (head == vq->num) {
> > + if (!ret) {
> > if (unlikely(busyloop_intr)) {
> > vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
> > } else if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq))) {
> > @@ -897,8 +912,8 @@ static void handle_tx_zerocopy(struct vhost_net *net, struct socket *sock)
> > struct ubuf_info *ubuf;
> > ubuf = nvq->ubuf_info + nvq->upend_idx;
> > - vq->heads[nvq->upend_idx].id = cpu_to_vhost32(vq, head);
> > - vq->heads[nvq->upend_idx].len = VHOST_DMA_IN_PROGRESS;
> > + nvq->bufs[nvq->upend_idx] = buf;
> > + nvq->bufs[nvq->upend_idx].in_len = VHOST_DMA_IN_PROGRESS;
> > ubuf->callback = vhost_zerocopy_callback;
> > ubuf->ctx = nvq->ubufs;
> > ubuf->desc = nvq->upend_idx;
> > @@ -930,17 +945,19 @@ static void handle_tx_zerocopy(struct vhost_net *net, struct socket *sock)
> > nvq->upend_idx = ((unsigned)nvq->upend_idx - 1)
> > % UIO_MAXIOV;
> > }
> > - vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, 1);
> > + vhost_discard_avail_bufs(vq, &buf, 1);
> > vhost_net_enable_vq(net, vq);
> > break;
> > }
> > if (err != len)
> > pr_debug("Truncated TX packet: "
> > " len %d != %zd\n", err, len);
> > - if (!zcopy_used)
> > - vhost_add_used_and_signal(&net->dev, vq, head, 0);
> > - else
> > + if (!zcopy_used) {
> > + vhost_put_used_buf(vq, &buf);
> > + vhost_signal(&net->dev, vq);
>
>
> Do we need something like vhost_put_used_and_signal()?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> > + } else {
> > vhost_zerocopy_signal_used(net, vq);
> > + }
> > vhost_net_tx_packet(net);
> > } while (likely(!vhost_exceeds_weight(vq, ++sent_pkts, total_len)));
> > }
> > @@ -1004,7 +1021,7 @@ static int vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len(struct vhost_net *net, struct sock *sk,
> > int len = peek_head_len(rnvq, sk);
> > if (!len && rvq->busyloop_timeout) {
> > - /* Flush batched heads first */
> > + /* Flush batched bufs first */
> > vhost_net_signal_used(rnvq);
> > /* Both tx vq and rx socket were polled here */
> > vhost_net_busy_poll(net, rvq, tvq, busyloop_intr, true);
> > @@ -1022,11 +1039,11 @@ static int vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len(struct vhost_net *net, struct sock *sk,
> > * @iovcount - returned count of io vectors we fill
> > * @log - vhost log
> > * @log_num - log offset
> > - * @quota - headcount quota, 1 for big buffer
> > - * returns number of buffer heads allocated, negative on error
> > + * @quota - bufcount quota, 1 for big buffer
> > + * returns number of buffers allocated, negative on error
> > */
> > static int get_rx_bufs(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> > - struct vring_used_elem *heads,
> > + struct vhost_buf *bufs,
> > int datalen,
> > unsigned *iovcount,
> > struct vhost_log *log,
> > @@ -1035,30 +1052,24 @@ static int get_rx_bufs(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> > {
> > unsigned int out, in;
> > int seg = 0;
> > - int headcount = 0;
> > - unsigned d;
> > + int bufcount = 0;
> > int r, nlogs = 0;
> > /* len is always initialized before use since we are always called with
> > * datalen > 0.
> > */
> > u32 uninitialized_var(len);
> > - while (datalen > 0 && headcount < quota) {
> > + while (datalen > 0 && bufcount < quota) {
> > if (unlikely(seg >= UIO_MAXIOV)) {
> > r = -ENOBUFS;
> > goto err;
> > }
> > - r = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov + seg,
> > - ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov) - seg, &out,
> > - &in, log, log_num);
> > - if (unlikely(r < 0))
> > + r = vhost_get_avail_buf(vq, bufs + bufcount, vq->iov + seg,
> > + ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov) - seg, &out,
> > + &in, log, log_num);
> > + if (unlikely(r <= 0))
> > goto err;
> > - d = r;
> > - if (d == vq->num) {
> > - r = 0;
> > - goto err;
> > - }
> > if (unlikely(out || in <= 0)) {
> > vq_err(vq, "unexpected descriptor format for RX: "
> > "out %d, in %d\n", out, in);
> > @@ -1069,14 +1080,12 @@ static int get_rx_bufs(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> > nlogs += *log_num;
> > log += *log_num;
> > }
> > - heads[headcount].id = cpu_to_vhost32(vq, d);
> > len = iov_length(vq->iov + seg, in);
> > - heads[headcount].len = cpu_to_vhost32(vq, len);
> > datalen -= len;
> > - ++headcount;
> > + ++bufcount;
> > seg += in;
> > }
> > - heads[headcount - 1].len = cpu_to_vhost32(vq, len + datalen);
> > + bufs[bufcount - 1].in_len = len + datalen;
> > *iovcount = seg;
> > if (unlikely(log))
> > *log_num = nlogs;
> > @@ -1086,9 +1095,9 @@ static int get_rx_bufs(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> > r = UIO_MAXIOV + 1;
> > goto err;
> > }
> > - return headcount;
> > + return bufcount;
> > err:
> > - vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, headcount);
> > + vhost_discard_avail_bufs(vq, bufs, bufcount);
> > return r;
> > }
> > @@ -1113,7 +1122,7 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
> > };
> > size_t total_len = 0;
> > int err, mergeable;
> > - s16 headcount;
> > + int bufcount;
> > size_t vhost_hlen, sock_hlen;
> > size_t vhost_len, sock_len;
> > bool busyloop_intr = false;
> > @@ -1147,14 +1156,14 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
> > break;
> > sock_len += sock_hlen;
> > vhost_len = sock_len + vhost_hlen;
> > - headcount = get_rx_bufs(vq, vq->heads + nvq->done_idx,
> > - vhost_len, &in, vq_log, &log,
> > - likely(mergeable) ? UIO_MAXIOV : 1);
> > + bufcount = get_rx_bufs(vq, nvq->bufs + nvq->done_idx,
> > + vhost_len, &in, vq_log, &log,
> > + likely(mergeable) ? UIO_MAXIOV : 1);
> > /* On error, stop handling until the next kick. */
> > - if (unlikely(headcount < 0))
> > + if (unlikely(bufcount < 0))
> > goto out;
> > /* OK, now we need to know about added descriptors. */
> > - if (!headcount) {
> > + if (!bufcount) {
> > if (unlikely(busyloop_intr)) {
> > vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
> > } else if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq))) {
> > @@ -1171,7 +1180,7 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
> > if (nvq->rx_ring)
> > msg.msg_control = vhost_net_buf_consume(&nvq->rxq);
> > /* On overrun, truncate and discard */
> > - if (unlikely(headcount > UIO_MAXIOV)) {
> > + if (unlikely(bufcount > UIO_MAXIOV)) {
> > iov_iter_init(&msg.msg_iter, READ, vq->iov, 1, 1);
> > err = sock->ops->recvmsg(sock, &msg,
> > 1, MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_TRUNC);
> > @@ -1195,7 +1204,7 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
> > if (unlikely(err != sock_len)) {
> > pr_debug("Discarded rx packet: "
> > " len %d, expected %zd\n", err, sock_len);
> > - vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, headcount);
> > + vhost_discard_avail_bufs(vq, nvq->bufs + nvq->done_idx, bufcount);
> > continue;
> > }
> > /* Supply virtio_net_hdr if VHOST_NET_F_VIRTIO_NET_HDR */
> > @@ -1214,15 +1223,15 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
> > }
> > /* TODO: Should check and handle checksum. */
> > - num_buffers = cpu_to_vhost16(vq, headcount);
> > + num_buffers = cpu_to_vhost16(vq, bufcount);
> > if (likely(mergeable) &&
> > copy_to_iter(&num_buffers, sizeof num_buffers,
> > &fixup) != sizeof num_buffers) {
> > vq_err(vq, "Failed num_buffers write");
> > - vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, headcount);
> > + vhost_discard_avail_bufs(vq, nvq->bufs + nvq->done_idx, bufcount);
> > goto out;
> > }
> > - nvq->done_idx += headcount;
> > + nvq->done_idx += bufcount;
> > if (nvq->done_idx > VHOST_NET_BATCH)
> > vhost_net_signal_used(nvq);
> > if (unlikely(vq_log))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-04 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-02 13:05 [PATCH RFC 00/13] vhost: format independence Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-02 13:05 ` [PATCH RFC 01/13] vhost: option to fetch descriptors through an independent struct Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-03 7:13 ` Jason Wang
2020-06-03 9:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-03 12:04 ` Jason Wang
2020-06-07 13:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-02 13:05 ` [PATCH RFC 02/13] vhost: use batched version by default Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-03 7:15 ` Jason Wang
2020-06-02 13:06 ` [PATCH RFC 03/13] vhost: batching fetches Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-03 7:27 ` Jason Wang
2020-06-04 8:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-05 3:40 ` Jason Wang
2020-06-07 13:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-08 3:35 ` Jason Wang
2020-06-08 6:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-02 13:06 ` [PATCH RFC 04/13] vhost: cleanup fetch_buf return code handling Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-03 7:29 ` Jason Wang
2020-06-04 9:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-02 13:06 ` [PATCH RFC 05/13] vhost/net: pass net specific struct pointer Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-02 13:06 ` [PATCH RFC 06/13] vhost: reorder functions Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-02 13:06 ` [PATCH RFC 07/13] vhost: format-independent API for used buffers Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-03 7:58 ` Jason Wang
2020-06-04 9:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-04 9:18 ` Jason Wang
2020-06-04 10:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-02 13:06 ` [PATCH RFC 08/13] vhost/net: convert to new API: heads->bufs Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-03 8:11 ` Jason Wang
2020-06-04 9:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2020-06-02 13:06 ` [PATCH RFC 09/13] vhost/net: avoid iov length math Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-02 13:06 ` [PATCH RFC 10/13] vhost/test: convert to the buf API Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-02 13:06 ` [PATCH RFC 11/13] vhost/scsi: switch to buf APIs Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-05 8:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-02 13:06 ` [PATCH RFC 12/13] vhost/vsock: switch to the buf API Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-05 8:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-02 13:06 ` [PATCH RFC 13/13] vhost: drop head based APIs Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200604050332-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).