Re: [PATCH RFC 07/13] vhost: format-independent API for used buffers

[Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>]

On 2020/6/4 下午5:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>    static bool vhost_notify(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>>>    {
>>>    	__u16 old, new;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
>>> index a67bda9792ec..6c10e99ff334 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
>>> @@ -67,6 +67,13 @@ struct vhost_desc {
>>>    	u16 id;
>>>    };
>>> +struct vhost_buf {
>>> +	u32 out_len;
>>> +	u32 in_len;
>>> +	u16 descs;
>>> +	u16 id;
>>> +};
>> So it looks to me the struct vhost_buf can work for both split ring and
>> packed ring.
>>
>> If this is true, we'd better make struct vhost_desc work for both.
>>
>> Thanks
> Both vhost_desc and vhost_buf can work for split and packed.
>
> Do you mean we should add packed ring support based on this?
> For sure, this is one of the motivators for the patchset.
>

Somehow. But the reason I ask is that I see "split" suffix is used in 
patch 1 as:

peek_split_desc()
pop_split_desc()
push_split_desc()

But that suffix is not used for the new used ring API invented in this 
patch.

Thanks