linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: realtek: clear interrupt during init for rtl8211f
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 17:09:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200617170926.5e582bad@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e81ad573-ba30-a449-4529-d9a578ce0ee7@gmail.com>

On Fri, 15 May 2020 19:30:38 +0200 Heiner Kallweit wrote:


> 
> 
> On 15.05.2020 18:18, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 5/15/2020 12:41 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:  
> >> On Thu, 14 May 2020 21:50:53 +0200 Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >>  
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 14.05.2020 08:25, Jisheng Zhang wrote:  
> >>>> On Wed, 13 May 2020 20:45:13 +0200 Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >>>>  
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 13.05.2020 08:51, Jisheng Zhang wrote:  
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, 12 May 2020 20:43:40 +0200 Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 12.05.2020 12:46, Jisheng Zhang wrote:  
> >>>>>>>> The PHY Register Accessible Interrupt is enabled by default, so
> >>>>>>>> there's such an interrupt during init. In PHY POLL mode case, the
> >>>>>>>> INTB/PMEB pin is alway active, it is not good. Clear the interrupt by
> >>>>>>>> calling rtl8211f_ack_interrupt().  
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> As you say "it's not good" w/o elaborating a little bit more on it:
> >>>>>>> Do you face any actual issue? Or do you just think that it's not nice?  
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The INTB/PMEB pin can be used in two different modes:
> >>>>>> INTB: used for interrupt
> >>>>>> PMEB: special mode for Wake-on-LAN
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The PHY Register Accessible Interrupt is enabled by
> >>>>>> default, there's always such an interrupt during the init. In PHY POLL mode
> >>>>>> case, the pin is always active. If platforms plans to use the INTB/PMEB pin
> >>>>>> as WOL, then the platform will see WOL active. It's not good.
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>> The platform should listen to this pin only once WOL has been configured and
> >>>>> the pin has been switched to PMEB function. For the latter you first would
> >>>>> have to implement the set_wol callback in the PHY driver.
> >>>>> Or where in which code do you plan to switch the pin function to PMEB?  
> >>>>
> >>>> I think it's better to switch the pin function in set_wol callback. But this
> >>>> is another story. No matter WOL has been configured or not, keeping the
> >>>> INTB/PMEB pin active is not good. what do you think?
> >>>>  
> >>>
> >>> It shouldn't hurt (at least it didn't hurt for the last years), because no
> >>> listener should listen to the pin w/o having it configured before.
> >>> So better extend the PHY driver first (set_wol, ..), and then do the follow-up
> >>> platform changes (e.g. DT config of a connected GPIO).  
> >>
> >> There are two sides involved here: the listener, it should not listen to the pin
> >> as you pointed out; the phy side, this patch tries to make the phy side
> >> behave normally -- not keep the INTB/PMEB pin always active. The listener
> >> side behaves correctly doesn't mean the phy side could keep the pin active.
> >>
> >> When .set_wol isn't implemented, this patch could make the system suspend/resume
> >> work properly.
> >>
> >> PS: even with set_wol implemented as configure the pin mode, I think we
> >> still need to clear the interrupt for phy poll mode either in set_wol
> >> or as this patch does.  
> >
> > I agree with Jisheng here, Heiner, is there a reason you are pushing
> > back on the change? Acknowledging prior interrupts while configuring the
> > PHY is a common and established practice.
> >  
> First it's about the justification of the change as such, and second about the
> question whether the change should be in the driver or in phylib.
> 
> Acking interrupts we do already if the PHY is configured for interrupt mode,
> we call phy_clear_interrupt() at the beginning of phy_enable_interrupts()
> and at the end of phy_disable_interrupts().
> When using polling mode there is no strict need to ack interrupts.
> If we say however that interrupts should be acked in general, then I think
> it's not specific to RTL8211F, but it's something for phylib. Most likely
> we would have to add a call to phy_clear_interrupt() to phy_init_hw().

it's specific to RTL8211F from the following two PoV:
1. the PIN is shared between INTB and PMEB.
2. the PHY Register Accessible Interrupt is enabled by default

I didn't see such behaviors with other PHYs.

Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-17  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-12 10:46 [PATCH] net: phy: realtek: clear interrupt during init for rtl8211f Jisheng Zhang
2020-05-12 18:43 ` Heiner Kallweit
2020-05-13  6:51   ` Jisheng Zhang
2020-05-13 18:45     ` Heiner Kallweit
2020-05-14  6:25       ` Jisheng Zhang
2020-05-14 19:50         ` Heiner Kallweit
2020-05-15  7:41           ` Jisheng Zhang
2020-05-15 16:18             ` Florian Fainelli
2020-05-15 17:30               ` Heiner Kallweit
2020-06-17  9:09                 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2020-06-21 20:16                   ` Heiner Kallweit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200617170926.5e582bad@xhacker.debian \
    --to=jisheng.zhang@synaptics.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).