From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@digitalocean.com>,
Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@digitalocean.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Vineeth Pillai <viremana@linux.microsoft.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@gmail.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.intel@gmail.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
fweisbec@gmail.com, keescook@chromium.org, kerrnel@google.com,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
vineeth@bitbyteword.org, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
Agata Gruza <agata.gruza@intel.com>,
Antonio Gomez Iglesias <antonio.gomez.iglesias@intel.com>,
graf@amazon.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, dfaggioli@suse.com,
pjt@google.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, derkling@google.com,
benbjiang@tencent.com,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>,
James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, OWeisse@umich.edu,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@oracle.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>,
jsbarnes@google.com, chris.hyser@oracle.com,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 10/32] sched: Fix priority inversion of cookied task with sibling
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:05:19 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201125230519.GC163610@balbir-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201124183038.GG1021337@google.com>
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 01:30:38PM -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 09:41:23AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 06:19:40PM -0500, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > >
> > > The rationale is as follows. In the core-wide pick logic, even if
> > > need_sync == false, we need to go look at other CPUs (non-local CPUs) to
> > > see if they could be running RT.
> > >
> > > Say the RQs in a particular core look like this:
> > > Let CFS1 and CFS2 be 2 tagged CFS tags. Let RT1 be an untagged RT task.
> > >
> > > rq0 rq1
> > > CFS1 (tagged) RT1 (not tag)
> > > CFS2 (tagged)
> > >
> > > Say schedule() runs on rq0. Now, it will enter the above loop and
> > > pick_task(RT) will return NULL for 'p'. It will enter the above if() block
> > > and see that need_sync == false and will skip RT entirely.
> > >
> > > The end result of the selection will be (say prio(CFS1) > prio(CFS2)):
> > > rq0 rq1
> > > CFS1 IDLE
> > >
> > > When it should have selected:
> > > rq0 r1
> > > IDLE RT
> > >
> > > Joel saw this issue on real-world usecases in ChromeOS where an RT task
> > > gets constantly force-idled and breaks RT. Lets cure it.
> > >
> > > NOTE: This problem will be fixed differently in a later patch. It just
> > > kept here for reference purposes about this issue, and to make
> > > applying later patches easier.
> > >
> >
> > The changelog is hard to read, it refers to above if(), whereas there
> > is no code snippet in the changelog.
>
> Yeah sorry, it comes from this email where I described the issue:
> http://lore.kernel.org/r/20201023175724.GA3563800@google.com
>
> I corrected the changelog and appended the patch below. Also pushed it to:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jfern/linux.git/log/?h=coresched
>
> > Also, from what I can see following
> > the series, p->core_cookie is not yet set anywhere (unless I missed it),
> > so fixing it in here did not make sense just reading the series.
>
> The interface patches for core_cookie are added later, that's how it is. The
> infrastructure comes first here. It would also not make sense to add
> interface first as well so I think the current ordering is fine.
>
Some comments below to help make the code easier to understand
> ---8<-----------------------
>
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Subject: [PATCH] sched: Fix priority inversion of cookied task with sibling
>
> The rationale is as follows. In the core-wide pick logic, even if
> need_sync == false, we need to go look at other CPUs (non-local CPUs) to
> see if they could be running RT.
>
> Say the RQs in a particular core look like this:
> Let CFS1 and CFS2 be 2 tagged CFS tags. Let RT1 be an untagged RT task.
>
> rq0 rq1
> CFS1 (tagged) RT1 (not tag)
> CFS2 (tagged)
>
> The end result of the selection will be (say prio(CFS1) > prio(CFS2)):
> rq0 rq1
> CFS1 IDLE
>
> When it should have selected:
> rq0 r1
> IDLE RT
>
> Fix this issue by forcing need_sync and restarting the search if a
> cookied task was discovered. This will avoid this optimization from
> making incorrect picks.
>
> Joel saw this issue on real-world usecases in ChromeOS where an RT task
> gets constantly force-idled and breaks RT. Lets cure it.
>
> NOTE: This problem will be fixed differently in a later patch. It just
> kept here for reference purposes about this issue, and to make
> applying later patches easier.
>
> Reported-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 4ee4902c2cf5..53af817740c0 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -5195,6 +5195,7 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
> need_sync = !!rq->core->core_cookie;
>
> /* reset state */
> +reset:
> rq->core->core_cookie = 0UL;
> if (rq->core->core_forceidle) {
> need_sync = true;
> @@ -5242,14 +5243,8 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
> /*
> * If there weren't no cookies; we don't need to
> * bother with the other siblings.
> - * If the rest of the core is not running a tagged
> - * task, i.e. need_sync == 0, and the current CPU
> - * which called into the schedule() loop does not
> - * have any tasks for this class, skip selecting for
> - * other siblings since there's no point. We don't skip
> - * for RT/DL because that could make CFS force-idle RT.
> */
> - if (i == cpu && !need_sync && class == &fair_sched_class)
> + if (i == cpu && !need_sync)
> goto next_class;
>
> continue;
> @@ -5259,7 +5254,20 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
> * Optimize the 'normal' case where there aren't any
> * cookies and we don't need to sync up.
> */
> - if (i == cpu && !need_sync && !p->core_cookie) {
> + if (i == cpu && !need_sync) {
> + if (p->core_cookie) {
> + /*
> + * This optimization is only valid as
> + * long as there are no cookies
This is not entirely true, need_sync is a function of core cookies, so I
think this needs more clarification, it sounds like we enter this when
the core has no cookies, but the task has a core_cookie? The term cookie
is quite overloaded when used in the context of core vs task.
Effectively from what I understand this means that p wants to be
coscheduled, but the core itself is not coscheduling anything at the
moment, so we need to see if we should do a sync and that sync might
cause p to get kicked out and a higher priority class to come in?
Balbir Singh.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-25 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 150+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-17 23:19 [PATCH -tip 00/32] Core scheduling (v9) Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 01/32] sched: Wrap rq::lock access Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-19 23:31 ` Singh, Balbir
2020-11-20 16:55 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-22 8:52 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 02/32] sched: Introduce sched_class::pick_task() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-19 23:56 ` Singh, Balbir
2020-11-20 16:58 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 23:19 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-25 16:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-11-26 9:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-26 10:17 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-11-26 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 03/32] sched/fair: Fix pick_task_fair crashes due to empty rbtree Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-20 10:15 ` Singh, Balbir
2020-11-20 18:11 ` Vineeth Pillai
2020-11-23 22:31 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-24 8:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 04/32] sched: Core-wide rq->lock Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-22 9:11 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-24 8:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-26 0:35 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 05/32] sched/fair: Add a few assertions Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 06/32] sched: Basic tracking of matching tasks Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 07/32] sched: Add core wide task selection and scheduling Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 08/32] sched/fair: Fix forced idle sibling starvation corner case Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-22 10:35 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 09/32] sched/fair: Snapshot the min_vruntime of CPUs on force idle Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-22 11:44 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-23 12:31 ` Vineeth Pillai
2020-11-23 23:31 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-24 9:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-25 23:17 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-26 8:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 10/32] sched: Fix priority inversion of cookied task with sibling Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-22 22:41 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-24 18:30 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 23:05 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2020-11-26 8:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-26 22:27 ` Balbir Singh
2020-12-01 17:49 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 11/32] sched: Enqueue task into core queue only after vruntime is updated Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 12/32] sched: Simplify the core pick loop for optimized case Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-24 12:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-24 17:04 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 8:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 13/32] sched: Trivial forced-newidle balancer Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-23 4:38 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-23 15:07 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-23 23:35 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-24 0:32 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-25 21:28 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 14/32] sched: migration changes for core scheduling Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-22 23:54 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-23 4:36 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-24 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-25 3:12 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-25 22:57 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-26 3:20 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-26 8:32 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-26 9:26 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-30 9:33 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-30 12:29 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-12-02 14:09 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-12-03 1:06 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-30 10:35 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-11-30 12:32 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 15/32] sched: Improve snapshotting of min_vruntime for CGroups Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-24 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-24 17:07 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-24 10:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 16/32] irq_work: Cleanup Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 17/32] arch/x86: Add a new TIF flag for untrusted tasks Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-23 5:18 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 18/32] kernel/entry: Add support for core-wide protection of kernel-mode Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-24 16:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-24 17:52 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 9:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 17:55 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-26 5:37 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 19/32] entry/idle: Enter and exit kernel protection during idle entry and exit Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-24 16:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-24 18:03 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 18:24 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 20/32] entry/kvm: Protect the kernel when entering from guest Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 21/32] sched: CGroup tagging interface for core scheduling Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 22/32] sched: Split the cookie and setup per-task cookie on fork Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-25 11:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 18:56 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 11:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 19:20 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-01 19:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-02 6:36 ` Josh Don
2020-12-02 7:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-04 0:20 ` Josh Don
2020-12-06 17:49 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 11:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 19:16 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 19:11 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-01 19:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-06 18:15 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 18:38 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 18:52 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-30 23:05 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 23/32] sched: Add a per-thread core scheduling interface Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-25 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 19:36 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-02 21:47 ` Chris Hyser
2020-12-02 23:13 ` chris hyser
2020-12-06 17:34 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-07 21:48 ` chris hyser
2020-12-09 18:52 ` Chris Hyser
2020-12-14 19:31 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-14 19:44 ` chris hyser
2020-12-14 23:25 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-15 14:56 ` chris hyser
2020-12-15 16:23 ` chris hyser
2020-12-15 18:13 ` Dhaval Giani
2020-12-16 0:35 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 24/32] sched: Release references to the per-task cookie on exit Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-25 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 25/32] sched: Refactor core cookie into struct Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 26/32] sched: Add a second-level tag for nested CGroup usecase Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-25 13:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-30 23:10 ` Balbir Singh
2020-12-01 20:08 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-02 6:18 ` Josh Don
2020-12-02 8:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-02 18:53 ` Tejun Heo
2020-12-04 0:51 ` Josh Don
2020-12-04 15:45 ` Tejun Heo
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 27/32] sched/debug: Add CGroup node for printing group cookie if SCHED_DEBUG Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 28/32] kselftest: Add tests for core-sched interface Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 29/32] sched: Move core-scheduler interfacing code to a new file Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:20 ` [PATCH -tip 30/32] Documentation: Add core scheduling documentation Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:20 ` [PATCH -tip 31/32] sched: Add a coresched command line option Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-19 23:39 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-25 13:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-26 0:11 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:20 ` [PATCH -tip 32/32] sched: Debug bits Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-12-01 0:21 ` Balbir Singh
2021-01-15 15:10 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-24 11:48 ` [PATCH -tip 00/32] Core scheduling (v9) Vincent Guittot
2020-11-24 15:08 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-03 6:16 ` Ning, Hongyu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201125230519.GC163610@balbir-desktop \
--to=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=OWeisse@umich.edu \
--cc=aaron.lwe@gmail.com \
--cc=agata.gruza@intel.com \
--cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
--cc=antonio.gomez.iglesias@intel.com \
--cc=aubrey.intel@gmail.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=benbjiang@tencent.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chris.hyser@oracle.com \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=derkling@google.com \
--cc=dfaggioli@suse.com \
--cc=dhaval.giani@oracle.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=jdesfossez@digitalocean.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=jsbarnes@google.com \
--cc=junaids@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kerrnel@google.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=naravamudan@digitalocean.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
--cc=viremana@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).