From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hugetlb: fix update_and_free_page contig page struct assumption
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:25:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210218172500.GA4718@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210218144554.GS2858050@casper.infradead.org>
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 02:45:54PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:02:52AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:49:25 -0800 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> wrote:
> > > page structs are not guaranteed to be contiguous for gigantic pages. The
> >
> > June 2014. That's a long lurk time for a bug. I wonder if some later
> > commit revealed it.
>
> I would suggest that gigantic pages have not seen much use. Certainly
> performance with Intel CPUs on benchmarks that I've been involved with
> showed lower performance with 1GB pages than with 2MB pages until quite
> recently.
I suggested in another thread that maybe it is time to consider
dropping this "feature"
If it has been slightly broken for 7 years it seems a good bet it
isn't actually being used.
The cost to fix GUP to be compatible with this will hurt normal
GUP performance - and again, that nobody has hit this bug in GUP
further suggests the feature isn't used..
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-18 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-17 18:49 [PATCH 1/2] hugetlb: fix update_and_free_page contig page struct assumption Mike Kravetz
2021-02-17 18:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] hugetlb: fix copy_huge_page_from_user " Mike Kravetz
2021-02-17 19:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] hugetlb: fix update_and_free_page " Andrew Morton
2021-02-17 19:38 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-02-18 14:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-02-18 17:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-02-18 17:27 ` Zi Yan
2021-02-18 17:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-18 17:40 ` Zi Yan
2021-02-18 17:51 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-02-18 18:50 ` Zi Yan
2021-02-18 17:34 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-02-18 21:43 ` Mike Kravetz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210218172500.GA4718@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dbueso@suse.de \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).