From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/8] dt-bindings: pwm: Support new PWM_USAGE_POWER flag
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 13:38:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210413113805.mjft5jxt3qhsxg6e@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YHR5eyLPqiwhTGrr@workstation.tuxnet>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1142 bytes --]
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 06:46:51PM +0200, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 06:27:23PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 03:27:41PM +0200, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> > > Add the flag and corresponding documentation for PWM_USAGE_POWER.
> >
> > My concern here in the previous round was that PWM_USAGE_POWER isn't a
> > name that intuitively suggests its semantic. Do you disagree?
>
> No. It is more abstract and requires documentation. But I also didn't
> want to waste too much time on discussing names, so I used Thierry's
> suggestion.
If you introduce API thinking about the name before actually introducing
it is a good idea in general. (OK, the name doesn't become part of the
(binary) dt API, but we don't even agree about its semantic here.)
And IMHO a bad name with a good documentation isn't good enough.
Otherwise we can better just agree on using plain numbers in the .dts
files.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-13 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-12 13:27 [PATCH v8 1/8] pwm: pca9685: Switch to atomic API Clemens Gruber
2021-04-12 13:27 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] pwm: pca9685: Support hardware readout Clemens Gruber
2021-04-12 16:21 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-12 13:27 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] pwm: pca9685: Improve runtime PM behavior Clemens Gruber
2021-04-12 13:27 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] dt-bindings: pwm: Support new PWM_USAGE_POWER flag Clemens Gruber
2021-04-12 16:27 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-12 16:46 ` Clemens Gruber
2021-04-13 11:38 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2021-04-13 11:41 ` Thierry Reding
2021-04-13 11:51 ` Thierry Reding
2021-04-13 17:56 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-15 16:27 ` Thierry Reding
2021-04-16 9:32 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-16 10:45 ` Thierry Reding
2021-04-18 13:30 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-16 13:55 ` Thierry Reding
2021-04-16 15:39 ` Rob Herring
2021-04-16 15:54 ` Clemens Gruber
2021-04-17 15:44 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-12 13:27 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] pwm: core: " Clemens Gruber
2021-04-12 13:27 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] pwm: pca9685: " Clemens Gruber
2021-04-12 16:30 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-12 17:11 ` Clemens Gruber
2021-04-13 10:34 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-12 13:27 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] pwm: pca9685: Restrict period change for enabled PWMs Clemens Gruber
2021-04-17 15:46 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-12 13:27 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] pwm: pca9685: Add error messages for failed regmap calls Clemens Gruber
2021-04-17 15:47 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-12 16:18 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] pwm: pca9685: Switch to atomic API Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-12 16:39 ` Clemens Gruber
2021-04-12 20:10 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-13 12:11 ` Clemens Gruber
2021-04-13 12:17 ` Clemens Gruber
2021-04-13 12:37 ` Thierry Reding
2021-04-13 13:06 ` Clemens Gruber
2021-04-13 19:38 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-14 12:09 ` Clemens Gruber
2021-04-14 19:21 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-14 19:45 ` Clemens Gruber
2021-04-15 6:48 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-17 15:37 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-17 16:40 ` Clemens Gruber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210413113805.mjft5jxt3qhsxg6e@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=TheSven73@gmail.com \
--cc=clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).