linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	Hoan Tran <hoan@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] gpio: dwapb: Read GPIO base from gpio-base property
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 16:58:39 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210802135839.4clqd34npppwasyh@mobilestation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210726125436.58685-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

+Cc Rob

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 03:54:34PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> For backward compatibility with some legacy devices introduce
> a new (*) property gpio-base to read GPIO base. This will allow
> further cleanup of the driver.
> 
> *) Note, it's not new for GPIO library since mockup driver is
>    using it already.

You are right but I don't think it's a good idea to advertise the
pure Linux-internal property "gpio-base" to any use-case like OF
and ACPI FW nodes. Especially seeing we don't have it described in the
DT-bindings and noting that the mockup driver is dedicated for the
GPIO tests only. What about restricting the property usage for the
SW-nodes only by adding an additional check: is_software_node() here?

@Linus, @Bartosz, @Rob, what do you think about that?

-Sergey

> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
> index f6ae69d5d644..e3011d4e17b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
> @@ -581,7 +581,8 @@ static struct dwapb_platform_data *dwapb_gpio_get_pdata(struct device *dev)
>  			pp->ngpio = DWAPB_MAX_GPIOS;
>  		}
>  
> -		pp->gpio_base	= -1;
> +		if (fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "gpio-base", &pp->gpio_base))
> +			pp->gpio_base = -1;
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * Only port A can provide interrupts in all configurations of
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-02 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-26 12:54 [PATCH v1 1/4] gpio: dwapb: Unify ACPI enumeration checks in get_irq() and configure_irqs() Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-26 12:54 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] gpio: dwapb: Read GPIO base from gpio-base property Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-02 13:58   ` Serge Semin [this message]
2021-08-02 15:52     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-04 12:44       ` Serge Semin
2021-08-04 14:43         ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-11 12:40           ` Linus Walleij
2021-08-11 12:47             ` Serge Semin
2021-08-11 12:37   ` Linus Walleij
2021-08-11 13:11     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-26 12:54 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Convert GPIO to use software nodes Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-11  8:38   ` Linus Walleij
2021-08-11 10:55     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-16 13:05   ` Lee Jones
2021-08-16 13:18     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-16 13:33       ` Lee Jones
2021-08-16 14:00         ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-16 14:19           ` Lee Jones
2021-08-16 14:53             ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-17  7:26               ` Lee Jones
2021-08-17 11:23                 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-18  6:34                   ` Lee Jones
2021-08-18 11:04                     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-09-21 15:25                   ` Lee Jones
2021-07-26 12:54 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] gpio: dwapb: Get rid of legacy platform data Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-02 14:07   ` Serge Semin
2021-08-02 15:54     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-02  8:48 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] gpio: dwapb: Unify ACPI enumeration checks in get_irq() and configure_irqs() Lee Jones
2021-08-02 13:40 ` Serge Semin
2021-08-02 18:37   ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210802135839.4clqd34npppwasyh@mobilestation \
    --to=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
    --cc=Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=hoan@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).