Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: opp: Allow multi-worded node names

[Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>]

On 22-10-21, 09:40, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 22.10.2021 07:43, Viresh Kumar пишет:
> > On 20-10-21, 09:46, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 02:19:05AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >>> Not all OPP table names and OPP entries consist of a single word. In
> >>> particular NVIDIA Tegra OPP tables use multi-word names. Allow OPP node
> >>> and OPP entry name to have multi-worded names to silence DT checker
> >>> warnings about the multi-word names separated by hyphen.
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml | 4 ++--
> >>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml
> >>> index ae3ae4d39843..298cf24af270 100644
> >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml
> >>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ select: false
> >>>  
> >>>  properties:
> >>>    $nodename:
> >>> -    pattern: '^opp-table(-[a-z0-9]+)?$'
> >>> +    pattern: '^opp-table(-[a-z0-9]+)*$'
> >>
> >> I don't see how this helps you. What I see needed upstream is a prefix:
> >>
> >> '-?opp-table(-[0-9]+)?$'
> > 
> > I wonder if we should disallow that to keep naming more 
> 
> I also think that postfix variant should be disallowed for consistency.
> I sent out patches for both variants.
> 
> V2 uses pattern that supports both naming schemes. If V2 is less
> appropriate, then please take this V1.

I didn't like V2, we can mandate to keep it like opp-* and opp-table-*.

This patch looked okay to me, lets see what Rob has to say.

-- 
viresh