[ANNOUNCE] 5.10.83-rt58

[ANNOUNCE] 5.10.83-rt58

[Luis Claudio R. Goncalves]

Hello RT Folks!

I'm pleased to announce the 5.10.83-rt58 stable release.

This release is just an update to the new stable 5.10.83
version and no RT specific changes have been made.

You can get this release via the git tree at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-stable-rt.git

  branch: v5.10-rt
  Head SHA1: 63bd813e523a6e08bb4bb04b71903d252cbcae80

Or to build 5.10.83-rt58 directly, the following patches should be applied:

  https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/linux-5.10.tar.xz

  https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/patch-5.10.83.xz

  https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/patch-5.10.83-rt58.patch.xz

Enjoy!
Luis

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 5.10.83-rt58

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

On 2021-12-02 19:05:53 [-0300], Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce the 5.10.83-rt58 stable release.
…
>   https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/patch-5.10.83-rt58.patch.xz

Any particular reason why every patch has "v4.9-rt" in the Subject line?

> Enjoy!
> Luis

Sebastian

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 5.10.83-rt58

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 21:17:12 +0100
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:

> On 2021-12-02 19:05:53 [-0300], Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote:
> > I'm pleased to announce the 5.10.83-rt58 stable release.  
> …
> >   https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/patch-5.10.83-rt58.patch.xz  
> 
> Any particular reason why every patch has "v4.9-rt" in the Subject line?

I'm guessing because he just took over 5.10-rt and did not update his
scripts ;-)

-- Steve

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 5.10.83-rt58

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

On 2021-12-07 15:20:49 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 21:17:12 +0100
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
> 
> > On 2021-12-02 19:05:53 [-0300], Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote:
> > > I'm pleased to announce the 5.10.83-rt58 stable release.  
> > …
> > >   https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/patch-5.10.83-rt58.patch.xz  
> > 
> > Any particular reason why every patch has "v4.9-rt" in the Subject line?
> 
> I'm guessing because he just took over 5.10-rt and did not update his
> scripts ;-)

It seems to confuse ppl. Is there a reason to have it?

> -- Steve

Sebastian

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 5.10.83-rt58

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 21:56:28 +0100
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:

> On 2021-12-07 15:20:49 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 21:17:12 +0100
> > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
> >   
> > > On 2021-12-02 19:05:53 [-0300], Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote:  
> > > > I'm pleased to announce the 5.10.83-rt58 stable release.    
> > > …  
> > > >   https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/patch-5.10.83-rt58.patch.xz    
> > > 
> > > Any particular reason why every patch has "v4.9-rt" in the Subject line?  
> > 
> > I'm guessing because he just took over 5.10-rt and did not update his
> > scripts ;-)  
> 
> It seems to confuse ppl. Is there a reason to have it?
>

It shouldn't. The point I'm making is that this is Luis's first release of
5.10-rt, and it sounds like it had some issues.

Luis, you may want to see what happened and fix it.

Thanks,

-- Steve

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 5.10.83-rt58

[Luis Goncalves]

On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 6:02 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 21:56:28 +0100
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > On 2021-12-07 15:20:49 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 21:17:12 +0100
> > > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 2021-12-02 19:05:53 [-0300], Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote:
> > > > > I'm pleased to announce the 5.10.83-rt58 stable release.
> > > > …
> > > > >   https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/patch-5.10.83-rt58.patch.xz
> > > >
> > > > Any particular reason why every patch has "v4.9-rt" in the Subject line?
> > >
> > > I'm guessing because he just took over 5.10-rt and did not update his
> > > scripts ;-)
> >
> > It seems to confuse ppl. Is there a reason to have it?
> >
>
> It shouldn't. The point I'm making is that this is Luis's first release of
> 5.10-rt, and it sounds like it had some issues.
>
> Luis, you may want to see what happened and fix it.

Yes, I am really sorry that escaped my review. I focused on testing
the code and missed something that obvious.

Sorry for the confusion I caused.

Steven, Sebastian, would it be worth a v5.10.83-rt59 with the patch
subjects fixed?

Thanks for spotting that,
Luis

>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Steve
>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 5.10.83-rt58

[Pavel Machek]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 850 bytes --]

Hi!
> 
> I'm pleased to announce the 5.10.83-rt58 stable release.
> 
> This release is just an update to the new stable 5.10.83
> version and no RT specific changes have been made.

Thank you. CIP project started doing 5.10.X based releases, and we
include -rt tree, too. To make my job tiny bit easier, would it be
possible to CC: pavel@denx.de on release announcemnts?

Tree is available at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/log/?h=linux-5.10.y-cip-rt
.

What may be more interesting is that we are running tests over at
gitlab:

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/linux-cip/tree/linux-5.10.y-cip-rt

Thanks and best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 5.10.83-rt58

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

On 2021-12-08 10:14:41 [-0300], Luis Goncalves wrote:
> Yes, I am really sorry that escaped my review. I focused on testing
> the code and missed something that obvious.
> 
> Sorry for the confusion I caused.
> 
> Steven, Sebastian, would it be worth a v5.10.83-rt59 with the patch
> subjects fixed?

No, I don't think that it is worth it. Please correct it for the next
release.
I'm not sure if there is a need for the base version in the patch tag.

> Thanks for spotting that,
> Luis

Sebastian

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 5.10.83-rt58

[Luis Goncalves]

On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:48 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> On 2021-12-08 10:14:41 [-0300], Luis Goncalves wrote:
> > Yes, I am really sorry that escaped my review. I focused on testing
> > the code and missed something that obvious.
> >
> > Sorry for the confusion I caused.
> >
> > Steven, Sebastian, would it be worth a v5.10.83-rt59 with the patch
> > subjects fixed?
>
> No, I don't think that it is worth it. Please correct it for the next
> release.
> I'm not sure if there is a need for the base version in the patch tag.

Thank you! I will fix that for the next release.

Luis