Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] dt-bindings: dma: Convert Qualcomm BAM DMA binding to json format

From: Kuldeep Singh <singh.kuldeep87k@gmail.com>
To: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] dt-bindings: dma: Convert Qualcomm BAM DMA binding to json format
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 21:03:16 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220420153316.GA63129@9a2d8922b8f1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220420132955.GA63070@9a2d8922b8f1>

On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 06:59:55PM +0530, Kuldeep Singh wrote:
> > I appreciate your work Kuldeep, it is important and valuable
> > contribution. It is sad to see duplicated effort, I don't like it for my
> > own patches either. In general, I believe the FIFO approach should be
> > applied, so in this case Bhupesh patches.
> 
> Yep, I also agree with FIFO approach w.r.t contributions. But one thing
> daunts me here is the waiting time with latest revision, it's too high.
> 
> Anyway, Bhupesh had more than BAM changes and was already on v5, I can
> give benefit of doubt to him and won't argue much here.
> 
> Bhupesh, feel free to include my armv7 based dts patches in your series
> otherwise you might stumble DT checks warnings.

Or do you want me to keep my changes separate? Sorry for spam.