linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v10 0/7] feec() energy margin removal
@ 2022-06-07 12:32 Vincent Donnefort
  2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 1/7] sched/fair: Provide u64 read for 32-bits arch helper Vincent Donnefort
                   ` (7 more replies)
  0 siblings, 8 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Donnefort @ 2022-06-07 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, mingo, vincent.guittot
  Cc: linux-kernel, dietmar.eggemann, morten.rasmussen, chris.redpath,
	qperret, tao.zhou, kernel-team, vdonnefort

Hi,

Here's a new version of the patch-set to get rid of the energy margin in
feec(). Many thanks to all for the insightful comments I got.

find_energy_efficient() (feec()) will migrate a task to save energy only if
it saves at least 6% of the total energy consumed by the system. This
conservative approach is a problem on a system where a lot of small tasks
create a huge load on the overall: very few of them will be allowed to
migrate to a smaller CPU, wasting a lot of energy. Instead of trying to
determine yet another margin, let's try to remove it.

The first elements of this patch-set are various fixes and improvement that
stabilizes task_util and ensures energy comparison fairness across all CPUs
of the topology. Only once those fixed, we can completely remove the margin
and let feec() aggressively place task and save energy.

This has been validated by two different ways:

First using LISA's eas_behaviour test suite. This is composed of a set of
scenario and verify if the task placement is optimum. No failure have been
observed and it also improved some tests such as Ramp-Down (as the
placement is now more energy oriented) and *ThreeSmall (as no bouncing
between clusters happen anymore).

  * Hikey960: 100% PASSED
  * DB-845C:  100% PASSED
  * RB5:      100% PASSED

Second, using an Android benchmark: PCMark2 on a Pixel4, with a lot of
backports to have a scheduler as close as we can from mainline.

  +------------+-----------------+-----------------+
  |    Test    |      Perf       |    Energy [1]   |
  +------------+-----------------+-----------------+
  | Web2       | -0.3% pval 0.03 | -1.8% pval 0.00 |
  | Video2     | -0.3% pval 0.13 | -5.6% pval 0.00 |
  | Photo2 [2] | -3.8% pval 0.00 | -1%   pval 0.00 |
  | Writing2   |  0%   pval 0.13 | -1%   pval 0.00 |
  | Data2      |  0%   pval 0.8  | -0.43 pval 0.00 |
  +------------+-----------------+-----------------+

The margin removal let the kernel make the best use of the Energy Model,
tasks are more likely to be placed where they fit and this saves a
substantial amount of energy, while having a limited impact on
performances.

[1] This is an energy estimation based on the CPU activity and the Energy
Model for this device. "All models are wrong but some are useful"; yes,
this is an imperfect estimation that doesn't take into account some idle
states and shared power rails. Nonetheless this is based on the information
the kernel has during runtime and it proves the scheduler can take better
decisions based solely on those data.

[2] This is the only performance impact observed. The debugging of this
test showed no issue with task placement. The better score was solely due
to some critical threads held on better performing CPUs. If a thread needs
a higher capacity CPU, the placement must result from a user input (with
e.g. uclamp min) instead of being artificially held on less efficient CPUs
by feec().  Notice also, the experiment didn't use the Android only
latency_sensitive feature which would hide this problem on a real-life
device.

v9 -> v10:
  - Cosmetic changes for comments and commit messages. (Dietmar/Vincent G.)
  - Renaming timestamp variables. (Dietmar)
  - Fix for empty mask in feec(). (Dietmar)
  - Collect Reviewed-by tags.

v8 -> v9:
  - PELT migration decay: Fix barriers to prevent overestimation. (Vincent
    G.)
  - PELT migration decay: Fix CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED=n build.
  - Various readbility improvements. (Dietmar)
  - Collect Reviewed-by tags.

v7 -> v8:
  - PELT migration decay: Refine estimation computation. (vincent G.)
  - PELT migration decay: Do not apply estimation if load_avg is decayed
    (Tao)
  - PELT migration decay: throttled_pelt_idle update ordering for the
    update_blocked_load case. (vincent G.)

v6 -> v7:
  - PELT migration decay: Add missing clock_pelt_idle updates.
  - PELT migration decay: Fix PELT scaling delta for CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH.

v4 -> v5:
  - PELT migration decay: timestamp only at idle time (Vincent G.)
  - PELT migration decay: split timestamp values (enter_idle /
    clock_pelt_idle) (Vincent G.)

v3 -> v4:
  - Minor cosmetic changes (Dietmar)

v2 -> v3:
  - feec(): introduce energy_env struct (Dietmar)
  - PELT migration decay: Only apply when src CPU is idle (Vincent G.)
  - PELT migration decay: Do not apply when cfs_rq is throttled
  - PELT migration decay: Snapshot the lag at cfs_rq's level

v1 -> v2:
  - Fix PELT migration last_update_time (previously root cfs_rq's).
  - Add Dietmar's patches to refactor feec()'s CPU loop.
  - feec(): renaming busy time functions get_{pd,tsk}_busy_time()
  - feec(): pd_cap computation in the first for_each_cpu loop.
  - feec(): create get_pd_max_util() function (previously within
    compute_energy())
  - feec(): rename base_energy_pd to base_energy.

Dietmar Eggemann (3):
  sched, drivers: Remove max param from
    effective_cpu_util()/sched_cpu_util()
  sched/fair: Rename select_idle_mask to select_rq_mask
  sched/fair: Use the same cpumask per-PD throughout
    find_energy_efficient_cpu()

Vincent Donnefort (4):
  sched/fair: Provide u64 read for 32-bits arch helper
  sched/fair: Decay task PELT values during wakeup migration
  sched/fair: Remove task_util from effective utilization in feec()
  sched/fair: Remove the energy margin in feec()

 drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c       |  33 +--
 drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c |   6 +-
 include/linux/sched.h             |   2 +-
 kernel/sched/core.c               |  15 +-
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c  |   5 +-
 kernel/sched/fair.c               | 470 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
 kernel/sched/pelt.h               |  40 ++-
 kernel/sched/sched.h              |  53 +++-
 8 files changed, 400 insertions(+), 224 deletions(-)

-- 
2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 1/7] sched/fair: Provide u64 read for 32-bits arch helper
  2022-06-07 12:32 [PATCH v10 0/7] feec() energy margin removal Vincent Donnefort
@ 2022-06-07 12:32 ` Vincent Donnefort
  2022-06-09 15:23   ` Tao Zhou
  2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 2/7] sched/fair: Decay task PELT values during wakeup migration Vincent Donnefort
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Donnefort @ 2022-06-07 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, mingo, vincent.guittot
  Cc: linux-kernel, dietmar.eggemann, morten.rasmussen, chris.redpath,
	qperret, tao.zhou, kernel-team, vdonnefort, Vincent Donnefort

From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>

Introducing macro helpers u64_u32_{store,load}() to factorize lockless
accesses to u64 variables for 32-bits architectures.

Users are for now cfs_rq.min_vruntime and sched_avg.last_update_time. To
accommodate the later where the copy lies outside of the structure
(cfs_rq.last_udpate_time_copy instead of sched_avg.last_update_time_copy),
use the _copy() version of those helpers.

Those new helpers encapsulate smp_rmb() and smp_wmb() synchronization and
therefore, have a small penalty for 32-bits machines in set_task_rq_fair()
and init_cfs_rq().

Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 77b2048a9326..05614d9b919c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -612,11 +612,8 @@ static void update_min_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 	}
 
 	/* ensure we never gain time by being placed backwards. */
-	cfs_rq->min_vruntime = max_vruntime(cfs_rq->min_vruntime, vruntime);
-#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
-	smp_wmb();
-	cfs_rq->min_vruntime_copy = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
-#endif
+	u64_u32_store(cfs_rq->min_vruntime,
+		      max_vruntime(cfs_rq->min_vruntime, vruntime));
 }
 
 static inline bool __entity_less(struct rb_node *a, const struct rb_node *b)
@@ -3313,6 +3310,11 @@ static inline void cfs_rq_util_change(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int flags)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+static inline u64 cfs_rq_last_update_time(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+{
+	return u64_u32_load_copy(cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time,
+				 cfs_rq->last_update_time_copy);
+}
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
 /*
  * Because list_add_leaf_cfs_rq always places a child cfs_rq on the list
@@ -3423,27 +3425,9 @@ void set_task_rq_fair(struct sched_entity *se,
 	if (!(se->avg.last_update_time && prev))
 		return;
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
-	{
-		u64 p_last_update_time_copy;
-		u64 n_last_update_time_copy;
-
-		do {
-			p_last_update_time_copy = prev->load_last_update_time_copy;
-			n_last_update_time_copy = next->load_last_update_time_copy;
-
-			smp_rmb();
-
-			p_last_update_time = prev->avg.last_update_time;
-			n_last_update_time = next->avg.last_update_time;
+	p_last_update_time = cfs_rq_last_update_time(prev);
+	n_last_update_time = cfs_rq_last_update_time(next);
 
-		} while (p_last_update_time != p_last_update_time_copy ||
-			 n_last_update_time != n_last_update_time_copy);
-	}
-#else
-	p_last_update_time = prev->avg.last_update_time;
-	n_last_update_time = next->avg.last_update_time;
-#endif
 	__update_load_avg_blocked_se(p_last_update_time, se);
 	se->avg.last_update_time = n_last_update_time;
 }
@@ -3796,12 +3780,9 @@ update_cfs_rq_load_avg(u64 now, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 	}
 
 	decayed |= __update_load_avg_cfs_rq(now, cfs_rq);
-
-#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
-	smp_wmb();
-	cfs_rq->load_last_update_time_copy = sa->last_update_time;
-#endif
-
+	u64_u32_store_copy(sa->last_update_time,
+			   cfs_rq->last_update_time_copy,
+			   sa->last_update_time);
 	return decayed;
 }
 
@@ -3933,27 +3914,6 @@ static inline void update_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *s
 	}
 }
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
-static inline u64 cfs_rq_last_update_time(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
-{
-	u64 last_update_time_copy;
-	u64 last_update_time;
-
-	do {
-		last_update_time_copy = cfs_rq->load_last_update_time_copy;
-		smp_rmb();
-		last_update_time = cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time;
-	} while (last_update_time != last_update_time_copy);
-
-	return last_update_time;
-}
-#else
-static inline u64 cfs_rq_last_update_time(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
-{
-	return cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time;
-}
-#endif
-
 /*
  * Synchronize entity load avg of dequeued entity without locking
  * the previous rq.
@@ -6960,21 +6920,8 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
 	if (READ_ONCE(p->__state) == TASK_WAKING) {
 		struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
 		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
-		u64 min_vruntime;
-
-#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
-		u64 min_vruntime_copy;
-
-		do {
-			min_vruntime_copy = cfs_rq->min_vruntime_copy;
-			smp_rmb();
-			min_vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
-		} while (min_vruntime != min_vruntime_copy);
-#else
-		min_vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
-#endif
 
-		se->vruntime -= min_vruntime;
+		se->vruntime -= u64_u32_load(cfs_rq->min_vruntime);
 	}
 
 	if (p->on_rq == TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING) {
@@ -11422,10 +11369,7 @@ static void set_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
 void init_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 {
 	cfs_rq->tasks_timeline = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
-	cfs_rq->min_vruntime = (u64)(-(1LL << 20));
-#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
-	cfs_rq->min_vruntime_copy = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
-#endif
+	u64_u32_store(cfs_rq->min_vruntime, (u64)(-(1LL << 20)));
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	raw_spin_lock_init(&cfs_rq->removed.lock);
 #endif
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 1f97f357aacd..bf4a0ec98678 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -520,6 +520,45 @@ struct cfs_bandwidth { };
 
 #endif	/* CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED */
 
+/*
+ * u64_u32_load/u64_u32_store
+ *
+ * Use a copy of a u64 value to protect against data race. This is only
+ * applicable for 32-bits architectures.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
+# define u64_u32_load_copy(var, copy)       var
+# define u64_u32_store_copy(var, copy, val) (var = val)
+#else
+# define u64_u32_load_copy(var, copy)					\
+({									\
+	u64 __val, __val_copy;						\
+	do {								\
+		__val_copy = copy;					\
+		/*							\
+		 * paired with u64_u32_store, ordering access		\
+		 * to var and copy.					\
+		 */							\
+		smp_rmb();						\
+		__val = var;						\
+	} while (__val != __val_copy);					\
+	__val;								\
+})
+# define u64_u32_store_copy(var, copy, val)				\
+do {									\
+	typeof(val) __val = (val);					\
+	var = __val;							\
+	/*								\
+	 * paired with u64_u32_load, ordering access to var and		\
+	 * copy.							\
+	 */								\
+	smp_wmb();							\
+	copy = __val;							\
+} while (0)
+#endif
+# define u64_u32_load(var)      u64_u32_load_copy(var, var##_copy)
+# define u64_u32_store(var, val) u64_u32_store_copy(var, var##_copy, val)
+
 /* CFS-related fields in a runqueue */
 struct cfs_rq {
 	struct load_weight	load;
@@ -560,7 +599,7 @@ struct cfs_rq {
 	 */
 	struct sched_avg	avg;
 #ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
-	u64			load_last_update_time_copy;
+	u64			last_update_time_copy;
 #endif
 	struct {
 		raw_spinlock_t	lock ____cacheline_aligned;
-- 
2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 2/7] sched/fair: Decay task PELT values during wakeup migration
  2022-06-07 12:32 [PATCH v10 0/7] feec() energy margin removal Vincent Donnefort
  2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 1/7] sched/fair: Provide u64 read for 32-bits arch helper Vincent Donnefort
@ 2022-06-07 12:32 ` Vincent Donnefort
  2022-06-08  9:53   ` Dietmar Eggemann
  2022-06-11 13:56   ` Tao Zhou
  2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 3/7] sched, drivers: Remove max param from effective_cpu_util()/sched_cpu_util() Vincent Donnefort
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Donnefort @ 2022-06-07 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, mingo, vincent.guittot
  Cc: linux-kernel, dietmar.eggemann, morten.rasmussen, chris.redpath,
	qperret, tao.zhou, kernel-team, vdonnefort, Vincent Donnefort

From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>

Before being migrated to a new CPU, a task sees its PELT values
synchronized with rq last_update_time. Once done, that same task will also
have its sched_avg last_update_time reset. This means the time between
the migration and the last clock update will not be accounted for in
util_avg and a discontinuity will appear. This issue is amplified by the
PELT clock scaling. It takes currently one tick after the CPU being idle
to let clock_pelt catching up clock_task.

This is especially problematic for asymmetric CPU capacity systems which
need stable util_avg signals for task placement and energy estimation.

Ideally, this problem would be solved by updating the runqueue clocks
before the migration. But that would require taking the runqueue lock
which is quite expensive [1]. Instead estimate the missing time and update
the task util_avg with that value.

To that end, we need sched_clock_cpu() but it is a costly function. Limit
the usage to the case where the source CPU is idle as we know this is when
the clock is having the biggest risk of being outdated. In this such case,
let's call it cfs_idle_lag the delta time between the rq_clock_pelt value
at rq idle and cfs_rq idle. And rq_idle_lag the delta between "now" and
the rq_clock_pelt at rq idle.

The estimated PELT clock is then:

   last_update_time (the cfs_rq's last_update_time)
   + cfs_idle_lag (delta between cfs_rq's update and rq's update)
   + rq_idle_lag (delta between rq's update and now)

  last_update_time = cfs_rq_clock_pelt()
                   = rq_clock_pelt() - cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time

  cfs_idle_lag = rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle -
                 rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle

  rq_idle_lag = sched_clock_cpu() - rq_clock()@rq_idle

The rq_clock_pelt() from last_update_time being the same as
rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle, we can write:

  estimation = rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle - cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time +
               sched_clock_cpu() - rq_clock()@rq_idle

The clocks being not accessible without the rq lock taken, some timestamps
are created:

      rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle        is rq->clock_pelt_idle
      rq_clock()@rq_idle             is rq->enter_idle
      cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time is cfs_rq->throttled_pelt_idle

The rq_idle_lag part of the missing time is however an estimation that
doesn't take into account IRQ and Paravirt time.

[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190709115759.10451-1-chris.redpath@arm.com

Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 05614d9b919c..77f3eb1bf624 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3310,6 +3310,29 @@ static inline void cfs_rq_util_change(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int flags)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+static inline bool load_avg_is_decayed(struct sched_avg *sa)
+{
+	if (sa->load_sum)
+		return false;
+
+	if (sa->util_sum)
+		return false;
+
+	if (sa->runnable_sum)
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * _avg must be null when _sum are null because _avg = _sum / divider
+	 * Make sure that rounding and/or propagation of PELT values never
+	 * break this.
+	 */
+	SCHED_WARN_ON(sa->load_avg ||
+		      sa->util_avg ||
+		      sa->runnable_avg);
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 static inline u64 cfs_rq_last_update_time(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 {
 	return u64_u32_load_copy(cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time,
@@ -3347,27 +3370,12 @@ static inline bool cfs_rq_is_decayed(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 	if (cfs_rq->load.weight)
 		return false;
 
-	if (cfs_rq->avg.load_sum)
-		return false;
-
-	if (cfs_rq->avg.util_sum)
-		return false;
-
-	if (cfs_rq->avg.runnable_sum)
+	if (!load_avg_is_decayed(&cfs_rq->avg))
 		return false;
 
 	if (child_cfs_rq_on_list(cfs_rq))
 		return false;
 
-	/*
-	 * _avg must be null when _sum are null because _avg = _sum / divider
-	 * Make sure that rounding and/or propagation of PELT values never
-	 * break this.
-	 */
-	SCHED_WARN_ON(cfs_rq->avg.load_avg ||
-		      cfs_rq->avg.util_avg ||
-		      cfs_rq->avg.runnable_avg);
-
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -3706,6 +3714,89 @@ static inline void add_tg_cfs_propagate(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, long runnable_sum
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
+static inline void migrate_se_pelt_lag(struct sched_entity *se)
+{
+	u64 throttled = 0, now, lut;
+	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
+	struct rq *rq;
+	bool is_idle;
+
+	if (load_avg_is_decayed(&se->avg))
+		return;
+
+	cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+	rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	is_idle = is_idle_task(rcu_dereference(rq->curr));
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	/*
+	 * The lag estimation comes with a cost we don't want to pay all the
+	 * time. Hence, limiting to the case where the source CPU is idle and
+	 * we know we are at the greatest risk to have an outdated clock.
+	 */
+	if (!is_idle)
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * Estimated "now" is: last_update_time + cfs_idle_lag + rq_idle_lag, where:
+	 *
+	 *   last_update_time (the cfs_rq's last_update_time)
+	 *	= cfs_rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle
+	 *      = rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle
+	 *        - cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time@cfs_rq_idle
+	 *
+	 *   cfs_idle_lag (delta between cfs_rq's update and rq's update)
+	 *      = rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle - rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle
+	 *
+	 *   rq_idle_lag (delta between rq's update and now)
+	 *      = sched_clock_cpu() - rq_clock()@rq_idle
+	 *
+	 * We can then write:
+	 *
+	 *    now = rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle - cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time +
+	 *          sched_clock_cpu() - rq_clock()@rq_idle
+	 * Where:
+	 *      rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle        is rq->clock_pelt_idle
+	 *      rq_clock()@rq_idle             is rq->clock_idle
+	 *      cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time@cfs_rq_idle is
+	 *      cfs_rq->throttled_pelt_idle
+	 */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
+	throttled = u64_u32_load(cfs_rq->throttled_pelt_idle);
+	/* The clock has been stopped for throttling */
+	if (throttled == U64_MAX)
+		return;
+#endif
+	now = u64_u32_load(rq->clock_pelt_idle);
+	/*
+	 * Paired with _update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(). It ensures at the worst case
+	 * is observed the old clock_pelt_idle value and the new clock_idle,
+	 * which lead to an underestimation. The opposite would lead to an
+	 * overestimation.
+	 */
+	smp_rmb();
+	lut = cfs_rq_last_update_time(cfs_rq);
+
+	now -= throttled;
+	if (now < lut)
+		/*
+		 * cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time is more recent than our
+		 * estimation, let's use it.
+		 */
+		now = lut;
+	else
+		now += sched_clock_cpu(cpu_of(rq)) - u64_u32_load(rq->clock_idle);
+
+	__update_load_avg_blocked_se(now, se);
+}
+#else
+static void migrate_se_pelt_lag(struct sched_entity *se) {}
+#endif
+
 /**
  * update_cfs_rq_load_avg - update the cfs_rq's load/util averages
  * @now: current time, as per cfs_rq_clock_pelt()
@@ -4437,6 +4528,9 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
 	 */
 	if ((flags & (DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE)) != DEQUEUE_SAVE)
 		update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq);
+
+	if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 0)
+		update_idle_cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -6911,6 +7005,8 @@ static void detach_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se);
  */
 static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
 {
+	struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
+
 	/*
 	 * As blocked tasks retain absolute vruntime the migration needs to
 	 * deal with this by subtracting the old and adding the new
@@ -6918,7 +7014,6 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
 	 * the task on the new runqueue.
 	 */
 	if (READ_ONCE(p->__state) == TASK_WAKING) {
-		struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
 		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
 
 		se->vruntime -= u64_u32_load(cfs_rq->min_vruntime);
@@ -6930,25 +7025,29 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
 		 * rq->lock and can modify state directly.
 		 */
 		lockdep_assert_rq_held(task_rq(p));
-		detach_entity_cfs_rq(&p->se);
+		detach_entity_cfs_rq(se);
 
 	} else {
+		remove_entity_load_avg(se);
+
 		/*
-		 * We are supposed to update the task to "current" time, then
-		 * its up to date and ready to go to new CPU/cfs_rq. But we
-		 * have difficulty in getting what current time is, so simply
-		 * throw away the out-of-date time. This will result in the
-		 * wakee task is less decayed, but giving the wakee more load
-		 * sounds not bad.
+		 * Here, the task's PELT values have been updated according to
+		 * the current rq's clock. But if that clock hasn't been
+		 * updated in a while, a substantial idle time will be missed,
+		 * leading to an inflation after wake-up on the new rq.
+		 *
+		 * Estimate the missing time from the cfs_rq last_update_time
+		 * and update sched_avg to improve the PELT continuity after
+		 * migration.
 		 */
-		remove_entity_load_avg(&p->se);
+		migrate_se_pelt_lag(se);
 	}
 
 	/* Tell new CPU we are migrated */
-	p->se.avg.last_update_time = 0;
+	se->avg.last_update_time = 0;
 
 	/* We have migrated, no longer consider this task hot */
-	p->se.exec_start = 0;
+	se->exec_start = 0;
 
 	update_scan_period(p, new_cpu);
 }
@@ -8114,6 +8213,9 @@ static bool __update_blocked_fair(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
 		if (update_cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq), cfs_rq)) {
 			update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq);
 
+			if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 0)
+				update_idle_cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq);
+
 			if (cfs_rq == &rq->cfs)
 				decayed = true;
 		}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/pelt.h b/kernel/sched/pelt.h
index 4ff2ed4f8fa1..3a0e0dc28721 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/pelt.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/pelt.h
@@ -61,6 +61,25 @@ static inline void cfs_se_util_change(struct sched_avg *avg)
 	WRITE_ONCE(avg->util_est.enqueued, enqueued);
 }
 
+static inline u64 rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
+	assert_clock_updated(rq);
+
+	return rq->clock_pelt - rq->lost_idle_time;
+}
+
+/* The rq is idle, we can sync to clock_task */
+static inline void _update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq)
+{
+	rq->clock_pelt  = rq_clock_task(rq);
+
+	u64_u32_store(rq->clock_idle, rq_clock(rq));
+	/* Paired with smp_rmb in migrate_se_pelt_lag() */
+	smp_wmb();
+	u64_u32_store(rq->clock_pelt_idle, rq_clock_pelt(rq));
+}
+
 /*
  * The clock_pelt scales the time to reflect the effective amount of
  * computation done during the running delta time but then sync back to
@@ -76,8 +95,7 @@ static inline void cfs_se_util_change(struct sched_avg *avg)
 static inline void update_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq, s64 delta)
 {
 	if (unlikely(is_idle_task(rq->curr))) {
-		/* The rq is idle, we can sync to clock_task */
-		rq->clock_pelt  = rq_clock_task(rq);
+		_update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(rq);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -130,17 +148,23 @@ static inline void update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq)
 	 */
 	if (util_sum >= divider)
 		rq->lost_idle_time += rq_clock_task(rq) - rq->clock_pelt;
+
+	_update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(rq);
 }
 
-static inline u64 rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq)
+#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
+static inline void update_idle_cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 {
-	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
-	assert_clock_updated(rq);
+	u64 throttled;
 
-	return rq->clock_pelt - rq->lost_idle_time;
+	if (unlikely(cfs_rq->throttle_count))
+		throttled = U64_MAX;
+	else
+		throttled = cfs_rq->throttled_clock_pelt_time;
+
+	u64_u32_store(cfs_rq->throttled_pelt_idle, throttled);
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
 /* rq->task_clock normalized against any time this cfs_rq has spent throttled */
 static inline u64 cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 {
@@ -150,6 +174,7 @@ static inline u64 cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 	return rq_clock_pelt(rq_of(cfs_rq)) - cfs_rq->throttled_clock_pelt_time;
 }
 #else
+static inline void update_idle_cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { }
 static inline u64 cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 {
 	return rq_clock_pelt(rq_of(cfs_rq));
@@ -204,6 +229,7 @@ update_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq, s64 delta) { }
 static inline void
 update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq) { }
 
+static inline void update_idle_cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { }
 #endif
 
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index bf4a0ec98678..de5c99bea7be 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -648,6 +648,10 @@ struct cfs_rq {
 	int			runtime_enabled;
 	s64			runtime_remaining;
 
+	u64			throttled_pelt_idle;
+#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
+	u64                     throttled_pelt_idle_copy;
+#endif
 	u64			throttled_clock;
 	u64			throttled_clock_pelt;
 	u64			throttled_clock_pelt_time;
@@ -1020,6 +1024,12 @@ struct rq {
 	u64			clock_task ____cacheline_aligned;
 	u64			clock_pelt;
 	unsigned long		lost_idle_time;
+	u64			clock_pelt_idle;
+	u64			clock_idle;
+#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
+	u64			clock_pelt_idle_copy;
+	u64			clock_idle_copy;
+#endif
 
 	atomic_t		nr_iowait;
 
-- 
2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 3/7] sched, drivers: Remove max param from effective_cpu_util()/sched_cpu_util()
  2022-06-07 12:32 [PATCH v10 0/7] feec() energy margin removal Vincent Donnefort
  2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 1/7] sched/fair: Provide u64 read for 32-bits arch helper Vincent Donnefort
  2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 2/7] sched/fair: Decay task PELT values during wakeup migration Vincent Donnefort
@ 2022-06-07 12:32 ` Vincent Donnefort
  2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 4/7] sched/fair: Rename select_idle_mask to select_rq_mask Vincent Donnefort
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Donnefort @ 2022-06-07 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, mingo, vincent.guittot
  Cc: linux-kernel, dietmar.eggemann, morten.rasmussen, chris.redpath,
	qperret, tao.zhou, kernel-team, vdonnefort

From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>

effective_cpu_util() already has a `int cpu' parameter which allows to
retrieve the CPU capacity scale factor (or maximum CPU capacity) inside
this function via an arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu).

A lot of code calling effective_cpu_util() (or the shim
sched_cpu_util()) needs the maximum CPU capacity, i.e. it will call
arch_scale_cpu_capacity() already.
But not having to pass it into effective_cpu_util() will make the EAS
wake-up code easier, especially when the maximum CPU capacity reduced
by the thermal pressure is passed through the EAS wake-up functions.

Due to the asymmetric CPU capacity support of arm/arm64 architectures,
arch_scale_cpu_capacity(int cpu) is a per-CPU variable read access via
per_cpu(cpu_scale, cpu) on such a system.
On all other architectures it is a a compile-time constant
(SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE).

Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

diff --git a/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c b/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
index f5eced0842b3..6a88eb7e9f75 100644
--- a/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
+++ b/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
@@ -71,34 +71,19 @@ static u64 set_pd_power_limit(struct dtpm *dtpm, u64 power_limit)
 
 static u64 scale_pd_power_uw(struct cpumask *pd_mask, u64 power)
 {
-	unsigned long max = 0, sum_util = 0;
+	unsigned long max, sum_util = 0;
 	int cpu;
 
-	for_each_cpu_and(cpu, pd_mask, cpu_online_mask) {
-
-		/*
-		 * The capacity is the same for all CPUs belonging to
-		 * the same perf domain, so a single call to
-		 * arch_scale_cpu_capacity() is enough. However, we
-		 * need the CPU parameter to be initialized by the
-		 * loop, so the call ends up in this block.
-		 *
-		 * We can initialize 'max' with a cpumask_first() call
-		 * before the loop but the bits computation is not
-		 * worth given the arch_scale_cpu_capacity() just
-		 * returns a value where the resulting assembly code
-		 * will be optimized by the compiler.
-		 */
-		max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
-		sum_util += sched_cpu_util(cpu, max);
-	}
-
 	/*
-	 * In the improbable case where all the CPUs of the perf
-	 * domain are offline, 'max' will be zero and will lead to an
-	 * illegal operation with a zero division.
+	 * The capacity is the same for all CPUs belonging to
+	 * the same perf domain.
 	 */
-	return max ? (power * ((sum_util << 10) / max)) >> 10 : 0;
+	max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpumask_first(pd_mask));
+
+	for_each_cpu_and(cpu, pd_mask, cpu_online_mask)
+		sum_util += sched_cpu_util(cpu);
+
+	return (power * ((sum_util << 10) / max)) >> 10;
 }
 
 static u64 get_pd_power_uw(struct dtpm *dtpm)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c
index b8151d95a806..b263b0fde03c 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c
@@ -137,11 +137,9 @@ static u32 cpu_power_to_freq(struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_cdev,
 static u32 get_load(struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_cdev, int cpu,
 		    int cpu_idx)
 {
-	unsigned long max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
-	unsigned long util;
+	unsigned long util = sched_cpu_util(cpu);
 
-	util = sched_cpu_util(cpu, max);
-	return (util * 100) / max;
+	return (util * 100) / arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
 }
 #else /* !CONFIG_SMP */
 static u32 get_load(struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_cdev, int cpu,
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index c46f3a63b758..88b8817b827d 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2257,7 +2257,7 @@ static inline bool owner_on_cpu(struct task_struct *owner)
 }
 
 /* Returns effective CPU energy utilization, as seen by the scheduler */
-unsigned long sched_cpu_util(int cpu, unsigned long max);
+unsigned long sched_cpu_util(int cpu);
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RSEQ
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 53596842f0d8..c531976ee960 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7107,12 +7107,14 @@ struct task_struct *idle_task(int cpu)
  * required to meet deadlines.
  */
 unsigned long effective_cpu_util(int cpu, unsigned long util_cfs,
-				 unsigned long max, enum cpu_util_type type,
+				 enum cpu_util_type type,
 				 struct task_struct *p)
 {
-	unsigned long dl_util, util, irq;
+	unsigned long dl_util, util, irq, max;
 	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 
+	max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
+
 	if (!uclamp_is_used() &&
 	    type == FREQUENCY_UTIL && rt_rq_is_runnable(&rq->rt)) {
 		return max;
@@ -7192,10 +7194,9 @@ unsigned long effective_cpu_util(int cpu, unsigned long util_cfs,
 	return min(max, util);
 }
 
-unsigned long sched_cpu_util(int cpu, unsigned long max)
+unsigned long sched_cpu_util(int cpu)
 {
-	return effective_cpu_util(cpu, cpu_util_cfs(cpu), max,
-				  ENERGY_UTIL, NULL);
+	return effective_cpu_util(cpu, cpu_util_cfs(cpu), ENERGY_UTIL, NULL);
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 3dbf351d12d5..1207c78f85c1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -157,11 +157,10 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy,
 static void sugov_get_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
 {
 	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu);
-	unsigned long max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(sg_cpu->cpu);
 
-	sg_cpu->max = max;
+	sg_cpu->max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(sg_cpu->cpu);
 	sg_cpu->bw_dl = cpu_bw_dl(rq);
-	sg_cpu->util = effective_cpu_util(sg_cpu->cpu, cpu_util_cfs(sg_cpu->cpu), max,
+	sg_cpu->util = effective_cpu_util(sg_cpu->cpu, cpu_util_cfs(sg_cpu->cpu),
 					  FREQUENCY_UTIL, NULL);
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 77f3eb1bf624..f87ff939cbf3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6704,12 +6704,11 @@ static long
 compute_energy(struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu, struct perf_domain *pd)
 {
 	struct cpumask *pd_mask = perf_domain_span(pd);
-	unsigned long cpu_cap = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpumask_first(pd_mask));
-	unsigned long max_util = 0, sum_util = 0;
-	unsigned long _cpu_cap = cpu_cap;
+	unsigned long max_util = 0, sum_util = 0, cpu_cap;
 	int cpu;
 
-	_cpu_cap -= arch_scale_thermal_pressure(cpumask_first(pd_mask));
+	cpu_cap = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpumask_first(pd_mask));
+	cpu_cap -= arch_scale_thermal_pressure(cpumask_first(pd_mask));
 
 	/*
 	 * The capacity state of CPUs of the current rd can be driven by CPUs
@@ -6746,10 +6745,10 @@ compute_energy(struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu, struct perf_domain *pd)
 		 * is already enough to scale the EM reported power
 		 * consumption at the (eventually clamped) cpu_capacity.
 		 */
-		cpu_util = effective_cpu_util(cpu, util_running, cpu_cap,
-					      ENERGY_UTIL, NULL);
+		cpu_util = effective_cpu_util(cpu, util_running, ENERGY_UTIL,
+					      NULL);
 
-		sum_util += min(cpu_util, _cpu_cap);
+		sum_util += min(cpu_util, cpu_cap);
 
 		/*
 		 * Performance domain frequency: utilization clamping
@@ -6758,12 +6757,12 @@ compute_energy(struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu, struct perf_domain *pd)
 		 * NOTE: in case RT tasks are running, by default the
 		 * FREQUENCY_UTIL's utilization can be max OPP.
 		 */
-		cpu_util = effective_cpu_util(cpu, util_freq, cpu_cap,
-					      FREQUENCY_UTIL, tsk);
-		max_util = max(max_util, min(cpu_util, _cpu_cap));
+		cpu_util = effective_cpu_util(cpu, util_freq, FREQUENCY_UTIL,
+					      tsk);
+		max_util = max(max_util, min(cpu_util, cpu_cap));
 	}
 
-	return em_cpu_energy(pd->em_pd, max_util, sum_util, _cpu_cap);
+	return em_cpu_energy(pd->em_pd, max_util, sum_util, cpu_cap);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index de5c99bea7be..287f0b06d4dd 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -2895,7 +2895,7 @@ enum cpu_util_type {
 };
 
 unsigned long effective_cpu_util(int cpu, unsigned long util_cfs,
-				 unsigned long max, enum cpu_util_type type,
+				 enum cpu_util_type type,
 				 struct task_struct *p);
 
 static inline unsigned long cpu_bw_dl(struct rq *rq)
-- 
2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 4/7] sched/fair: Rename select_idle_mask to select_rq_mask
  2022-06-07 12:32 [PATCH v10 0/7] feec() energy margin removal Vincent Donnefort
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 3/7] sched, drivers: Remove max param from effective_cpu_util()/sched_cpu_util() Vincent Donnefort
@ 2022-06-07 12:32 ` Vincent Donnefort
  2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 5/7] sched/fair: Use the same cpumask per-PD throughout find_energy_efficient_cpu() Vincent Donnefort
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Donnefort @ 2022-06-07 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, mingo, vincent.guittot
  Cc: linux-kernel, dietmar.eggemann, morten.rasmussen, chris.redpath,
	qperret, tao.zhou, kernel-team, vdonnefort

From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>

Decouple the name of the per-cpu cpumask select_idle_mask from its usage
in select_idle_[cpu/capacity]() of the CFS run-queue selection
(select_task_rq_fair()).

This is to support the reuse of this cpumask in the Energy Aware
Scheduling (EAS) path (find_energy_efficient_cpu()) of the CFS run-queue
selection.

Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index c531976ee960..68f5eb8a1de7 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -9502,7 +9502,7 @@ static struct kmem_cache *task_group_cache __read_mostly;
 #endif
 
 DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, load_balance_mask);
-DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, select_idle_mask);
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, select_rq_mask);
 
 void __init sched_init(void)
 {
@@ -9551,7 +9551,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
 	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
 		per_cpu(load_balance_mask, i) = (cpumask_var_t)kzalloc_node(
 			cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(i));
-		per_cpu(select_idle_mask, i) = (cpumask_var_t)kzalloc_node(
+		per_cpu(select_rq_mask, i) = (cpumask_var_t)kzalloc_node(
 			cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(i));
 	}
 #endif /* CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK */
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index f87ff939cbf3..bb5311cc5a44 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5898,7 +5898,7 @@ static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 
 /* Working cpumask for: load_balance, load_balance_newidle. */
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, load_balance_mask);
-DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, select_idle_mask);
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, select_rq_mask);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
 
@@ -6388,7 +6388,7 @@ static inline int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd
  */
 static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool has_idle_core, int target)
 {
-	struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_idle_mask);
+	struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_rq_mask);
 	int i, cpu, idle_cpu = -1, nr = INT_MAX;
 	struct rq *this_rq = this_rq();
 	int this = smp_processor_id();
@@ -6474,7 +6474,7 @@ select_idle_capacity(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
 	int cpu, best_cpu = -1;
 	struct cpumask *cpus;
 
-	cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_idle_mask);
+	cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_rq_mask);
 	cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr);
 
 	task_util = uclamp_task_util(p);
-- 
2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 5/7] sched/fair: Use the same cpumask per-PD throughout find_energy_efficient_cpu()
  2022-06-07 12:32 [PATCH v10 0/7] feec() energy margin removal Vincent Donnefort
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 4/7] sched/fair: Rename select_idle_mask to select_rq_mask Vincent Donnefort
@ 2022-06-07 12:32 ` Vincent Donnefort
  2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 6/7] sched/fair: Remove task_util from effective utilization in feec() Vincent Donnefort
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Donnefort @ 2022-06-07 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, mingo, vincent.guittot
  Cc: linux-kernel, dietmar.eggemann, morten.rasmussen, chris.redpath,
	qperret, tao.zhou, kernel-team, vdonnefort

From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>

The Perf Domain (PD) cpumask (struct em_perf_domain.cpus) stays
invariant after Energy Model creation, i.e. it is not updated after
CPU hotplug operations.

That's why the PD mask is used in conjunction with the cpu_online_mask
(or Sched Domain cpumask). Thereby the cpu_online_mask is fetched
multiple times (in compute_energy()) during a run-queue selection
for a task.

cpu_online_mask may change during this time which can lead to wrong
energy calculations.

To be able to avoid this, use the select_rq_mask per-cpu cpumask to
create a cpumask out of PD cpumask and cpu_online_mask and pass it
through the function calls of the EAS run-queue selection path.

The PD cpumask for max_spare_cap_cpu/compute_prev_delta selection
(find_energy_efficient_cpu()) is now ANDed not only with the SD mask
but also with the cpu_online_mask. This is fine since this cpumask
has to be in syc with the one used for energy computation
(compute_energy()).
An exclusive cpuset setup with at least one asymmetric CPU capacity
island (hence the additional AND with the SD cpumask) is the obvious
exception here.

Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index bb5311cc5a44..08e604ddf520 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6701,14 +6701,14 @@ static unsigned long cpu_util_without(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
  * task.
  */
 static long
-compute_energy(struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu, struct perf_domain *pd)
+compute_energy(struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu, struct cpumask *cpus,
+	       struct perf_domain *pd)
 {
-	struct cpumask *pd_mask = perf_domain_span(pd);
 	unsigned long max_util = 0, sum_util = 0, cpu_cap;
 	int cpu;
 
-	cpu_cap = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpumask_first(pd_mask));
-	cpu_cap -= arch_scale_thermal_pressure(cpumask_first(pd_mask));
+	cpu_cap = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpumask_first(cpus));
+	cpu_cap -= arch_scale_thermal_pressure(cpumask_first(cpus));
 
 	/*
 	 * The capacity state of CPUs of the current rd can be driven by CPUs
@@ -6719,7 +6719,7 @@ compute_energy(struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu, struct perf_domain *pd)
 	 * If an entire pd is outside of the current rd, it will not appear in
 	 * its pd list and will not be accounted by compute_energy().
 	 */
-	for_each_cpu_and(cpu, pd_mask, cpu_online_mask) {
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) {
 		unsigned long util_freq = cpu_util_next(cpu, p, dst_cpu);
 		unsigned long cpu_util, util_running = util_freq;
 		struct task_struct *tsk = NULL;
@@ -6806,6 +6806,7 @@ compute_energy(struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu, struct perf_domain *pd)
  */
 static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 {
+	struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_rq_mask);
 	unsigned long prev_delta = ULONG_MAX, best_delta = ULONG_MAX;
 	struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(smp_processor_id())->rd;
 	int cpu, best_energy_cpu = prev_cpu, target = -1;
@@ -6840,7 +6841,9 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 		unsigned long base_energy_pd;
 		int max_spare_cap_cpu = -1;
 
-		for_each_cpu_and(cpu, perf_domain_span(pd), sched_domain_span(sd)) {
+		cpumask_and(cpus, perf_domain_span(pd), cpu_online_mask);
+
+		for_each_cpu_and(cpu, cpus, sched_domain_span(sd)) {
 			if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr))
 				continue;
 
@@ -6877,12 +6880,12 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 			continue;
 
 		/* Compute the 'base' energy of the pd, without @p */
-		base_energy_pd = compute_energy(p, -1, pd);
+		base_energy_pd = compute_energy(p, -1, cpus, pd);
 		base_energy += base_energy_pd;
 
 		/* Evaluate the energy impact of using prev_cpu. */
 		if (compute_prev_delta) {
-			prev_delta = compute_energy(p, prev_cpu, pd);
+			prev_delta = compute_energy(p, prev_cpu, cpus, pd);
 			if (prev_delta < base_energy_pd)
 				goto unlock;
 			prev_delta -= base_energy_pd;
@@ -6891,7 +6894,8 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 
 		/* Evaluate the energy impact of using max_spare_cap_cpu. */
 		if (max_spare_cap_cpu >= 0) {
-			cur_delta = compute_energy(p, max_spare_cap_cpu, pd);
+			cur_delta = compute_energy(p, max_spare_cap_cpu, cpus,
+						   pd);
 			if (cur_delta < base_energy_pd)
 				goto unlock;
 			cur_delta -= base_energy_pd;
-- 
2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 6/7] sched/fair: Remove task_util from effective utilization in feec()
  2022-06-07 12:32 [PATCH v10 0/7] feec() energy margin removal Vincent Donnefort
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 5/7] sched/fair: Use the same cpumask per-PD throughout find_energy_efficient_cpu() Vincent Donnefort
@ 2022-06-07 12:32 ` Vincent Donnefort
  2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 7/7] sched/fair: Remove the energy margin " Vincent Donnefort
  2022-06-09 12:53 ` [PATCH v10 0/7] feec() energy margin removal Lukasz Luba
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Donnefort @ 2022-06-07 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, mingo, vincent.guittot
  Cc: linux-kernel, dietmar.eggemann, morten.rasmussen, chris.redpath,
	qperret, tao.zhou, kernel-team, vdonnefort, Vincent Donnefort

From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>

The energy estimation in find_energy_efficient_cpu() (feec()) relies on
the computation of the effective utilization for each CPU of a perf domain
(PD). This effective utilization is then used as an estimation of the busy
time for this pd. The function effective_cpu_util() which gives this value,
scales the utilization relative to IRQ pressure on the CPU to take into
account that the IRQ time is hidden from the task clock. The IRQ scaling is
as follow:

   effective_cpu_util = irq + (cpu_cap - irq)/cpu_cap * util

Where util is the sum of CFS/RT/DL utilization, cpu_cap the capacity of
the CPU and irq the IRQ avg time.

If now we take as an example a task placement which doesn't raise the OPP
on the candidate CPU, we can write the energy delta as:

  delta = OPPcost/cpu_cap * (effective_cpu_util(cpu_util + task_util) -
                             effective_cpu_util(cpu_util))
        = OPPcost/cpu_cap * (cpu_cap - irq)/cpu_cap * task_util

We end-up with an energy delta depending on the IRQ avg time, which is a
problem: first the time spent on IRQs by a CPU has no effect on the
additional energy that would be consumed by a task. Second, we don't want
to favour a CPU with a higher IRQ avg time value.

Nonetheless, we need to take the IRQ avg time into account. If a task
placement raises the PD's frequency, it will increase the energy cost for
the entire time where the CPU is busy. A solution is to only use
effective_cpu_util() with the CPU contribution part. The task contribution
is added separately and scaled according to prev_cpu's IRQ time.

No change for the FREQUENCY_UTIL component of the energy estimation. We
still want to get the actual frequency that would be selected after the
task placement.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 08e604ddf520..780aee03b3cc 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6694,61 +6694,96 @@ static unsigned long cpu_util_without(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
 }
 
 /*
- * compute_energy(): Estimates the energy that @pd would consume if @p was
- * migrated to @dst_cpu. compute_energy() predicts what will be the utilization
- * landscape of @pd's CPUs after the task migration, and uses the Energy Model
- * to compute what would be the energy if we decided to actually migrate that
- * task.
+ * energy_env - Utilization landscape for energy estimation.
+ * @task_busy_time: Utilization contribution by the task for which we test the
+ *                  placement. Given by eenv_task_busy_time().
+ * @pd_busy_time:   Utilization of the whole perf domain without the task
+ *                  contribution. Given by eenv_pd_busy_time().
+ * @cpu_cap:        Maximum CPU capacity for the perf domain.
+ * @pd_cap:         Entire perf domain capacity. (pd->nr_cpus * cpu_cap).
+ */
+struct energy_env {
+	unsigned long task_busy_time;
+	unsigned long pd_busy_time;
+	unsigned long cpu_cap;
+	unsigned long pd_cap;
+};
+
+/*
+ * Compute the task busy time for compute_energy(). This time cannot be
+ * injected directly into effective_cpu_util() because of the IRQ scaling.
+ * The latter only makes sense with the most recent CPUs where the task has
+ * run.
  */
-static long
-compute_energy(struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu, struct cpumask *cpus,
-	       struct perf_domain *pd)
+static inline void eenv_task_busy_time(struct energy_env *eenv,
+				       struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 {
-	unsigned long max_util = 0, sum_util = 0, cpu_cap;
+	unsigned long busy_time, max_cap = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(prev_cpu);
+	unsigned long irq = cpu_util_irq(cpu_rq(prev_cpu));
+
+	if (unlikely(irq >= max_cap))
+		busy_time = max_cap;
+	else
+		busy_time = scale_irq_capacity(task_util_est(p), irq, max_cap);
+
+	eenv->task_busy_time = busy_time;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Compute the perf_domain (PD) busy time for compute_energy(). Based on the
+ * utilization for each @pd_cpus, it however doesn't take into account
+ * clamping since the ratio (utilization / cpu_capacity) is already enough to
+ * scale the EM reported power consumption at the (eventually clamped)
+ * cpu_capacity.
+ *
+ * The contribution of the task @p for which we want to estimate the
+ * energy cost is removed (by cpu_util_next()) and must be calculated
+ * separately (see eenv_task_busy_time). This ensures:
+ *
+ *   - A stable PD utilization, no matter which CPU of that PD we want to place
+ *     the task on.
+ *
+ *   - A fair comparison between CPUs as the task contribution (task_util())
+ *     will always be the same no matter which CPU utilization we rely on
+ *     (util_avg or util_est).
+ *
+ * Set @eenv busy time for the PD that spans @pd_cpus. This busy time can't
+ * exceed @eenv->pd_cap.
+ */
+static inline void eenv_pd_busy_time(struct energy_env *eenv,
+				     struct cpumask *pd_cpus,
+				     struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	unsigned long busy_time = 0;
 	int cpu;
 
-	cpu_cap = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpumask_first(cpus));
-	cpu_cap -= arch_scale_thermal_pressure(cpumask_first(cpus));
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, pd_cpus) {
+		unsigned long util = cpu_util_next(cpu, p, -1);
 
-	/*
-	 * The capacity state of CPUs of the current rd can be driven by CPUs
-	 * of another rd if they belong to the same pd. So, account for the
-	 * utilization of these CPUs too by masking pd with cpu_online_mask
-	 * instead of the rd span.
-	 *
-	 * If an entire pd is outside of the current rd, it will not appear in
-	 * its pd list and will not be accounted by compute_energy().
-	 */
-	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) {
-		unsigned long util_freq = cpu_util_next(cpu, p, dst_cpu);
-		unsigned long cpu_util, util_running = util_freq;
-		struct task_struct *tsk = NULL;
+		busy_time += effective_cpu_util(cpu, util, ENERGY_UTIL, NULL);
+	}
 
-		/*
-		 * When @p is placed on @cpu:
-		 *
-		 * util_running = max(cpu_util, cpu_util_est) +
-		 *		  max(task_util, _task_util_est)
-		 *
-		 * while cpu_util_next is: max(cpu_util + task_util,
-		 *			       cpu_util_est + _task_util_est)
-		 */
-		if (cpu == dst_cpu) {
-			tsk = p;
-			util_running =
-				cpu_util_next(cpu, p, -1) + task_util_est(p);
-		}
+	eenv->pd_busy_time = min(eenv->pd_cap, busy_time);
+}
 
-		/*
-		 * Busy time computation: utilization clamping is not
-		 * required since the ratio (sum_util / cpu_capacity)
-		 * is already enough to scale the EM reported power
-		 * consumption at the (eventually clamped) cpu_capacity.
-		 */
-		cpu_util = effective_cpu_util(cpu, util_running, ENERGY_UTIL,
-					      NULL);
+/*
+ * Compute the maximum utilization for compute_energy() when the task @p
+ * is placed on the cpu @dst_cpu.
+ *
+ * Returns the maximum utilization among @eenv->cpus. This utilization can't
+ * exceed @eenv->cpu_cap.
+ */
+static inline unsigned long
+eenv_pd_max_util(struct energy_env *eenv, struct cpumask *pd_cpus,
+		 struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu)
+{
+	unsigned long max_util = 0;
+	int cpu;
 
-		sum_util += min(cpu_util, cpu_cap);
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, pd_cpus) {
+		struct task_struct *tsk = (cpu == dst_cpu) ? p : NULL;
+		unsigned long util = cpu_util_next(cpu, p, dst_cpu);
+		unsigned long cpu_util;
 
 		/*
 		 * Performance domain frequency: utilization clamping
@@ -6757,12 +6792,29 @@ compute_energy(struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu, struct cpumask *cpus,
 		 * NOTE: in case RT tasks are running, by default the
 		 * FREQUENCY_UTIL's utilization can be max OPP.
 		 */
-		cpu_util = effective_cpu_util(cpu, util_freq, FREQUENCY_UTIL,
-					      tsk);
-		max_util = max(max_util, min(cpu_util, cpu_cap));
+		cpu_util = effective_cpu_util(cpu, util, FREQUENCY_UTIL, tsk);
+		max_util = max(max_util, cpu_util);
 	}
 
-	return em_cpu_energy(pd->em_pd, max_util, sum_util, cpu_cap);
+	return min(max_util, eenv->cpu_cap);
+}
+
+/*
+ * compute_energy(): Use the Energy Model to estimate the energy that @pd would
+ * consume for a given utilization landscape @eenv. When @dst_cpu < 0, the task
+ * contribution is ignored.
+ */
+static inline unsigned long
+compute_energy(struct energy_env *eenv, struct perf_domain *pd,
+	       struct cpumask *pd_cpus, struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu)
+{
+	unsigned long max_util = eenv_pd_max_util(eenv, pd_cpus, p, dst_cpu);
+	unsigned long busy_time = eenv->pd_busy_time;
+
+	if (dst_cpu >= 0)
+		busy_time = min(eenv->pd_cap, busy_time + eenv->task_busy_time);
+
+	return em_cpu_energy(pd->em_pd, max_util, busy_time, eenv->cpu_cap);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -6808,11 +6860,12 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 {
 	struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_rq_mask);
 	unsigned long prev_delta = ULONG_MAX, best_delta = ULONG_MAX;
-	struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(smp_processor_id())->rd;
 	int cpu, best_energy_cpu = prev_cpu, target = -1;
-	unsigned long cpu_cap, util, base_energy = 0;
+	struct root_domain *rd = this_rq()->rd;
+	unsigned long base_energy = 0;
 	struct sched_domain *sd;
 	struct perf_domain *pd;
+	struct energy_env eenv;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	pd = rcu_dereference(rd->pd);
@@ -6835,22 +6888,39 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 	if (!task_util_est(p))
 		goto unlock;
 
+	eenv_task_busy_time(&eenv, p, prev_cpu);
+
 	for (; pd; pd = pd->next) {
-		unsigned long cur_delta, spare_cap, max_spare_cap = 0;
+		unsigned long cpu_cap, cpu_thermal_cap, util;
+		unsigned long cur_delta, max_spare_cap = 0;
 		bool compute_prev_delta = false;
 		unsigned long base_energy_pd;
 		int max_spare_cap_cpu = -1;
 
 		cpumask_and(cpus, perf_domain_span(pd), cpu_online_mask);
 
-		for_each_cpu_and(cpu, cpus, sched_domain_span(sd)) {
+		if (cpumask_empty(cpus))
+			continue;
+
+		/* Account thermal pressure for the energy estimation */
+		cpu = cpumask_first(cpus);
+		cpu_thermal_cap = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
+		cpu_thermal_cap -= arch_scale_thermal_pressure(cpu);
+
+		eenv.cpu_cap = cpu_thermal_cap;
+		eenv.pd_cap = 0;
+
+		for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) {
+			eenv.pd_cap += cpu_thermal_cap;
+
+			if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sched_domain_span(sd)))
+				continue;
+
 			if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr))
 				continue;
 
 			util = cpu_util_next(cpu, p, cpu);
 			cpu_cap = capacity_of(cpu);
-			spare_cap = cpu_cap;
-			lsub_positive(&spare_cap, util);
 
 			/*
 			 * Skip CPUs that cannot satisfy the capacity request.
@@ -6863,15 +6933,17 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 			if (!fits_capacity(util, cpu_cap))
 				continue;
 
+			lsub_positive(&cpu_cap, util);
+
 			if (cpu == prev_cpu) {
 				/* Always use prev_cpu as a candidate. */
 				compute_prev_delta = true;
-			} else if (spare_cap > max_spare_cap) {
+			} else if (cpu_cap > max_spare_cap) {
 				/*
 				 * Find the CPU with the maximum spare capacity
 				 * in the performance domain.
 				 */
-				max_spare_cap = spare_cap;
+				max_spare_cap = cpu_cap;
 				max_spare_cap_cpu = cpu;
 			}
 		}
@@ -6879,13 +6951,16 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 		if (max_spare_cap_cpu < 0 && !compute_prev_delta)
 			continue;
 
+		eenv_pd_busy_time(&eenv, cpus, p);
 		/* Compute the 'base' energy of the pd, without @p */
-		base_energy_pd = compute_energy(p, -1, cpus, pd);
+		base_energy_pd = compute_energy(&eenv, pd, cpus, p, -1);
 		base_energy += base_energy_pd;
 
 		/* Evaluate the energy impact of using prev_cpu. */
 		if (compute_prev_delta) {
-			prev_delta = compute_energy(p, prev_cpu, cpus, pd);
+			prev_delta = compute_energy(&eenv, pd, cpus, p,
+						    prev_cpu);
+			/* CPU utilization has changed */
 			if (prev_delta < base_energy_pd)
 				goto unlock;
 			prev_delta -= base_energy_pd;
@@ -6894,8 +6969,9 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 
 		/* Evaluate the energy impact of using max_spare_cap_cpu. */
 		if (max_spare_cap_cpu >= 0) {
-			cur_delta = compute_energy(p, max_spare_cap_cpu, cpus,
-						   pd);
+			cur_delta = compute_energy(&eenv, pd, cpus, p,
+						   max_spare_cap_cpu);
+			/* CPU utilization has changed */
 			if (cur_delta < base_energy_pd)
 				goto unlock;
 			cur_delta -= base_energy_pd;
-- 
2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 7/7] sched/fair: Remove the energy margin in feec()
  2022-06-07 12:32 [PATCH v10 0/7] feec() energy margin removal Vincent Donnefort
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 6/7] sched/fair: Remove task_util from effective utilization in feec() Vincent Donnefort
@ 2022-06-07 12:32 ` Vincent Donnefort
  2022-06-09 12:53 ` [PATCH v10 0/7] feec() energy margin removal Lukasz Luba
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Donnefort @ 2022-06-07 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, mingo, vincent.guittot
  Cc: linux-kernel, dietmar.eggemann, morten.rasmussen, chris.redpath,
	qperret, tao.zhou, kernel-team, vdonnefort, Vincent Donnefort

From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>

find_energy_efficient_cpu() integrates a margin to protect tasks from
bouncing back and forth from a CPU to another. This margin is set as being
6% of the total current energy estimated on the system. This however does
not work for two reasons:

1. The energy estimation is not a good absolute value:

compute_energy() used in feec() is a good estimation for task placement as
it allows to compare the energy with and without a task. The computed
delta will give a good overview of the cost for a certain task placement.
It, however, doesn't work as an absolute estimation for the total energy
of the system. First it adds the contribution to idle CPUs into the
energy, second it mixes util_avg with util_est values. util_avg contains
the near history for a CPU usage, it doesn't tell at all what the current
utilization is. A system that has been quite busy in the near past will
hold a very high energy and then a high margin preventing any task
migration to a lower capacity CPU, wasting energy. It even creates a
negative feedback loop: by holding the tasks on a less efficient CPU, the
margin contributes in keeping the energy high.

2. The margin handicaps small tasks:

On a system where the workload is composed mostly of small tasks (which is
often the case on Android), the overall energy will be high enough to
create a margin none of those tasks can cross. On a Pixel4, a small
utilization of 5% on all the CPUs creates a global estimated energy of 140
joules, as per the Energy Model declaration of that same device. This
means, after applying the 6% margin that any migration must save more than
8 joules to happen. No task with a utilization lower than 40 would then be
able to migrate away from the biggest CPU of the system.

The 6% of the overall system energy was brought by the following patch:

 (eb92692b2544 sched/fair: Speed-up energy-aware wake-ups)

It was previously 6% of the prev_cpu energy. Also, the following one
made this margin value conditional on the clusters where the task fits:

 (8d4c97c105ca sched/fair: Only compute base_energy_pd if necessary)

We could simply revert that margin change to what it was, but the original
version didn't have strong grounds neither and as demonstrated in (1.) the
estimated energy isn't a good absolute value. Instead, removing it
completely. It is indeed, made possible by recent changes that improved
energy estimation comparison fairness (sched/fair: Remove task_util from
effective utilization in feec()) (PM: EM: Increase energy calculation
precision) and task utilization stabilization (sched/fair: Decay task
util_avg during migration)

Without a margin, we could have feared bouncing between CPUs. But running
LISA's eas_behaviour test coverage on three different platforms (Hikey960,
RB-5 and DB-845) showed no issue.

Removing the energy margin enables more energy-optimized placements for a
more energy efficient system.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 780aee03b3cc..b8541a9c30c3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6860,9 +6860,8 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 {
 	struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_rq_mask);
 	unsigned long prev_delta = ULONG_MAX, best_delta = ULONG_MAX;
-	int cpu, best_energy_cpu = prev_cpu, target = -1;
 	struct root_domain *rd = this_rq()->rd;
-	unsigned long base_energy = 0;
+	int cpu, best_energy_cpu, target = -1;
 	struct sched_domain *sd;
 	struct perf_domain *pd;
 	struct energy_env eenv;
@@ -6894,8 +6893,8 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 		unsigned long cpu_cap, cpu_thermal_cap, util;
 		unsigned long cur_delta, max_spare_cap = 0;
 		bool compute_prev_delta = false;
-		unsigned long base_energy_pd;
 		int max_spare_cap_cpu = -1;
+		unsigned long base_energy;
 
 		cpumask_and(cpus, perf_domain_span(pd), cpu_online_mask);
 
@@ -6953,17 +6952,16 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 
 		eenv_pd_busy_time(&eenv, cpus, p);
 		/* Compute the 'base' energy of the pd, without @p */
-		base_energy_pd = compute_energy(&eenv, pd, cpus, p, -1);
-		base_energy += base_energy_pd;
+		base_energy = compute_energy(&eenv, pd, cpus, p, -1);
 
 		/* Evaluate the energy impact of using prev_cpu. */
 		if (compute_prev_delta) {
 			prev_delta = compute_energy(&eenv, pd, cpus, p,
 						    prev_cpu);
 			/* CPU utilization has changed */
-			if (prev_delta < base_energy_pd)
+			if (prev_delta < base_energy)
 				goto unlock;
-			prev_delta -= base_energy_pd;
+			prev_delta -= base_energy;
 			best_delta = min(best_delta, prev_delta);
 		}
 
@@ -6972,9 +6970,9 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 			cur_delta = compute_energy(&eenv, pd, cpus, p,
 						   max_spare_cap_cpu);
 			/* CPU utilization has changed */
-			if (cur_delta < base_energy_pd)
+			if (cur_delta < base_energy)
 				goto unlock;
-			cur_delta -= base_energy_pd;
+			cur_delta -= base_energy;
 			if (cur_delta < best_delta) {
 				best_delta = cur_delta;
 				best_energy_cpu = max_spare_cap_cpu;
@@ -6983,12 +6981,7 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
-	/*
-	 * Pick the best CPU if prev_cpu cannot be used, or if it saves at
-	 * least 6% of the energy used by prev_cpu.
-	 */
-	if ((prev_delta == ULONG_MAX) ||
-	    (prev_delta - best_delta) > ((prev_delta + base_energy) >> 4))
+	if (best_delta < prev_delta)
 		target = best_energy_cpu;
 
 	return target;
-- 
2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] sched/fair: Decay task PELT values during wakeup migration
  2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 2/7] sched/fair: Decay task PELT values during wakeup migration Vincent Donnefort
@ 2022-06-08  9:53   ` Dietmar Eggemann
  2022-06-11 13:56   ` Tao Zhou
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Dietmar Eggemann @ 2022-06-08  9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vincent Donnefort, peterz, mingo, vincent.guittot
  Cc: linux-kernel, morten.rasmussen, chris.redpath, qperret, tao.zhou,
	kernel-team

On 07/06/2022 14:32, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>

[...]

> To that end, we need sched_clock_cpu() but it is a costly function. Limit
> the usage to the case where the source CPU is idle as we know this is when
> the clock is having the biggest risk of being outdated. In this such case,

s/In this such case/in such a case

> let's call it cfs_idle_lag the delta time between the rq_clock_pelt value
> at rq idle and cfs_rq idle.

s/it cfs_idle_lag the delta time between the rq_clock_pelt value at rq
idle and cfs_rq idle./the delta time between the rq_clock_pelt value
> at rq idle and cfs_rq idle cfs_idle_lag?

 And rq_idle_lag the delta between "now" and
> the rq_clock_pelt at rq idle.
> 

--->

> The estimated PELT clock is then:
> 
>    last_update_time (the cfs_rq's last_update_time)
>    + cfs_idle_lag (delta between cfs_rq's update and rq's update>    + rq_idle_lag (delta between rq's update and now)
> 
>   last_update_time = cfs_rq_clock_pelt()
>                    = rq_clock_pelt() - cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time
> 
>   cfs_idle_lag = rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle -
>                  rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle
> 
>   rq_idle_lag = sched_clock_cpu() - rq_clock()@rq_idle
> 
> The rq_clock_pelt() from last_update_time being the same as
> rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle, we can write:
> 
>   estimation = rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle - cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time +
>                sched_clock_cpu() - rq_clock()@rq_idle
> 
> The clocks being not accessible without the rq lock taken, some timestamps
> are created:
> 
>       rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle        is rq->clock_pelt_idle
>       rq_clock()@rq_idle             is rq->enter_idle
>       cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time is cfs_rq->throttled_pelt_idle
> 

<--- ^^^

This whole block seems to be the same information as the comment block
in migrate_se_pelt_lag(). But you haven't updated it in v10. Maybe you
can get rid of this here and point to the comment block in
migrate_se_pelt_lag() from here instead to guarantee consistency?
Otherwise they should be in sync.

[...]

> +	/*
> +	 * Estimated "now" is: last_update_time + cfs_idle_lag + rq_idle_lag, where:
> +	 *
> +	 *   last_update_time (the cfs_rq's last_update_time)
> +	 *	= cfs_rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle
> +	 *      = rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle
> +	 *        - cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time@cfs_rq_idle
> +	 *
> +	 *   cfs_idle_lag (delta between cfs_rq's update and rq's update)

Isn't this:            (delta between rq's update and cfs_rq's update) ?

> +	 *      = rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle - rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle
> +	 *
> +	 *   rq_idle_lag (delta between rq's update and now)

Isn't this:              (delta between now and rq's update) ?

> +	 *      = sched_clock_cpu() - rq_clock()@rq_idle
> +	 *
> +	 * We can then write:
> +	 *
> +	 *    now = rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle - cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time +
> +	 *          sched_clock_cpu() - rq_clock()@rq_idle
> +	 * Where:
> +	 *      rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle        is rq->clock_pelt_idle
> +	 *      rq_clock()@rq_idle             is rq->clock_idle
                                         is rq->clock_pelt_idle
                                         is rq->clock_idle

> +	 *      cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time@cfs_rq_idle is
> +	 *      cfs_rq->throttled_pelt_idle
                                          is cfs_rq->throttled_pelt_idle

Maybe align the `is foo` for readability?

[...]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v10 0/7] feec() energy margin removal
  2022-06-07 12:32 [PATCH v10 0/7] feec() energy margin removal Vincent Donnefort
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 7/7] sched/fair: Remove the energy margin " Vincent Donnefort
@ 2022-06-09 12:53 ` Lukasz Luba
  2022-06-14 11:47   ` Vincent Donnefort
  7 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lukasz Luba @ 2022-06-09 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vincent Donnefort
  Cc: linux-kernel, dietmar.eggemann, morten.rasmussen, chris.redpath,
	qperret, tao.zhou, kernel-team, peterz, mingo, vincent.guittot

Hi Vincent,

On 6/7/22 13:32, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Here's a new version of the patch-set to get rid of the energy margin in
> feec(). Many thanks to all for the insightful comments I got.
> 
> find_energy_efficient() (feec()) will migrate a task to save energy only if
> it saves at least 6% of the total energy consumed by the system. This
> conservative approach is a problem on a system where a lot of small tasks
> create a huge load on the overall: very few of them will be allowed to
> migrate to a smaller CPU, wasting a lot of energy. Instead of trying to
> determine yet another margin, let's try to remove it.
> 
> The first elements of this patch-set are various fixes and improvement that
> stabilizes task_util and ensures energy comparison fairness across all CPUs
> of the topology. Only once those fixed, we can completely remove the margin
> and let feec() aggressively place task and save energy.
> 

I've run this patch set on pixel6 (android-mainline) and gathered energy
values from the meter during the PCmark 3.0.

It looks good, with these patches we have ~10% lower energy usage and
only ~3% lower score.

There are no other issues, everything works fine. Feel free to add:

Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>

to the whole patch set.

Regards,
Lukasz

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v10 1/7] sched/fair: Provide u64 read for 32-bits arch helper
  2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 1/7] sched/fair: Provide u64 read for 32-bits arch helper Vincent Donnefort
@ 2022-06-09 15:23   ` Tao Zhou
  2022-06-14 11:45     ` Vincent Donnefort
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Tao Zhou @ 2022-06-09 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vincent Donnefort
  Cc: peterz, mingo, vincent.guittot, linux-kernel, dietmar.eggemann,
	morten.rasmussen, chris.redpath, qperret, kernel-team, Tao Zhou

On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 01:32:48PM +0100, Vincent Donnefort wrote:

> From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
> 
> Introducing macro helpers u64_u32_{store,load}() to factorize lockless
> accesses to u64 variables for 32-bits architectures.
> 
> Users are for now cfs_rq.min_vruntime and sched_avg.last_update_time. To
> accommodate the later where the copy lies outside of the structure
> (cfs_rq.last_udpate_time_copy instead of sched_avg.last_update_time_copy),
> use the _copy() version of those helpers.
> 
> Those new helpers encapsulate smp_rmb() and smp_wmb() synchronization and
> therefore, have a small penalty for 32-bits machines in set_task_rq_fair()
> and init_cfs_rq().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 77b2048a9326..05614d9b919c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -612,11 +612,8 @@ static void update_min_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* ensure we never gain time by being placed backwards. */
> -	cfs_rq->min_vruntime = max_vruntime(cfs_rq->min_vruntime, vruntime);
> -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> -	smp_wmb();
> -	cfs_rq->min_vruntime_copy = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> -#endif
> +	u64_u32_store(cfs_rq->min_vruntime,
> +		      max_vruntime(cfs_rq->min_vruntime, vruntime));
>  }
>  
>  static inline bool __entity_less(struct rb_node *a, const struct rb_node *b)
> @@ -3313,6 +3310,11 @@ static inline void cfs_rq_util_change(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int flags)
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +static inline u64 cfs_rq_last_update_time(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> +{
> +	return u64_u32_load_copy(cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time,
> +				 cfs_rq->last_update_time_copy);
> +}
>  #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
>  /*
>   * Because list_add_leaf_cfs_rq always places a child cfs_rq on the list
> @@ -3423,27 +3425,9 @@ void set_task_rq_fair(struct sched_entity *se,
>  	if (!(se->avg.last_update_time && prev))
>  		return;
>  
> -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> -	{
> -		u64 p_last_update_time_copy;
> -		u64 n_last_update_time_copy;
> -
> -		do {
> -			p_last_update_time_copy = prev->load_last_update_time_copy;
> -			n_last_update_time_copy = next->load_last_update_time_copy;
> -
> -			smp_rmb();
> -
> -			p_last_update_time = prev->avg.last_update_time;
> -			n_last_update_time = next->avg.last_update_time;
> +	p_last_update_time = cfs_rq_last_update_time(prev);
> +	n_last_update_time = cfs_rq_last_update_time(next);
>  
> -		} while (p_last_update_time != p_last_update_time_copy ||
> -			 n_last_update_time != n_last_update_time_copy);
> -	}
> -#else
> -	p_last_update_time = prev->avg.last_update_time;
> -	n_last_update_time = next->avg.last_update_time;
> -#endif
>  	__update_load_avg_blocked_se(p_last_update_time, se);
>  	se->avg.last_update_time = n_last_update_time;
>  }
> @@ -3796,12 +3780,9 @@ update_cfs_rq_load_avg(u64 now, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  	}
>  
>  	decayed |= __update_load_avg_cfs_rq(now, cfs_rq);
> -
> -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> -	smp_wmb();
> -	cfs_rq->load_last_update_time_copy = sa->last_update_time;
> -#endif
> -
> +	u64_u32_store_copy(sa->last_update_time,
> +			   cfs_rq->last_update_time_copy,
> +			   sa->last_update_time);
>  	return decayed;
>  }
>  
> @@ -3933,27 +3914,6 @@ static inline void update_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *s
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> -static inline u64 cfs_rq_last_update_time(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> -{
> -	u64 last_update_time_copy;
> -	u64 last_update_time;
> -
> -	do {
> -		last_update_time_copy = cfs_rq->load_last_update_time_copy;
> -		smp_rmb();
> -		last_update_time = cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time;
> -	} while (last_update_time != last_update_time_copy);
> -
> -	return last_update_time;
> -}
> -#else
> -static inline u64 cfs_rq_last_update_time(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> -{
> -	return cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time;
> -}
> -#endif
> -
>  /*
>   * Synchronize entity load avg of dequeued entity without locking
>   * the previous rq.
> @@ -6960,21 +6920,8 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
>  	if (READ_ONCE(p->__state) == TASK_WAKING) {
>  		struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
>  		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> -		u64 min_vruntime;
> -
> -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> -		u64 min_vruntime_copy;
> -
> -		do {
> -			min_vruntime_copy = cfs_rq->min_vruntime_copy;
> -			smp_rmb();
> -			min_vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> -		} while (min_vruntime != min_vruntime_copy);
> -#else
> -		min_vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> -#endif
>  
> -		se->vruntime -= min_vruntime;
> +		se->vruntime -= u64_u32_load(cfs_rq->min_vruntime);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (p->on_rq == TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING) {
> @@ -11422,10 +11369,7 @@ static void set_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
>  void init_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  {
>  	cfs_rq->tasks_timeline = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
> -	cfs_rq->min_vruntime = (u64)(-(1LL << 20));
> -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> -	cfs_rq->min_vruntime_copy = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> -#endif
> +	u64_u32_store(cfs_rq->min_vruntime, (u64)(-(1LL << 20)));
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  	raw_spin_lock_init(&cfs_rq->removed.lock);
>  #endif
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index 1f97f357aacd..bf4a0ec98678 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -520,6 +520,45 @@ struct cfs_bandwidth { };
>  
>  #endif	/* CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED */
>  
> +/*
> + * u64_u32_load/u64_u32_store
> + *
> + * Use a copy of a u64 value to protect against data race. This is only
> + * applicable for 32-bits architectures.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> +# define u64_u32_load_copy(var, copy)       var
> +# define u64_u32_store_copy(var, copy, val) (var = val)
> +#else
> +# define u64_u32_load_copy(var, copy)					\
> +({									\
> +	u64 __val, __val_copy;						\
> +	do {								\
> +		__val_copy = copy;					\
> +		/*							\
> +		 * paired with u64_u32_store, ordering access		\

s/u64_u32_store/u64_u32_store_copy()/

> +		 * to var and copy.					\
> +		 */							\
> +		smp_rmb();						\
> +		__val = var;						\
> +	} while (__val != __val_copy);					\
> +	__val;								\
> +})
> +# define u64_u32_store_copy(var, copy, val)				\
> +do {									\
> +	typeof(val) __val = (val);					\
> +	var = __val;							\
> +	/*								\
> +	 * paired with u64_u32_load, ordering access to var and		\

s/u64_u32_load/u64_u32_load_copy()/

> +	 * copy.							\
> +	 */								\
> +	smp_wmb();							\
> +	copy = __val;							\
> +} while (0)

Try again here from me.
The semantics of this macro is different from the original code.
To be consistent with the original code, the 'copy = __val;' should
be changed to 'copy = var'. Why not original code here.

They are different in that the var can be changed currently on another
CPU and copy can be different from __val.

Documentation/memory-barriers.txt(line 1351, 5.19.0-rc1-rt1):
In section:
(*) What are memory barriers?
     - Multicopy atomicity.
The example there can be referenced here I think.

And I feel that here the smp_wmb() should be changed to smp_mb(). One user
of this macro have the load/write  write. Another user have write  write
if I am not wrong.

Also,

'Memory Barriers: a Hardware View for Software Hackers' (July 23, 2010)
Section: 6.3 Example 2, I just scrolled to the code in table 3 and check
that the semantics there is almost the same with the semantics here.

I do not have confidence to convince anything just after some days when I
read it.

According to those two examples, if the small penalty is small, this
u64_u32_store_copy() macro should be changed like this:

# define u64_u32_store_copy(var, copy, val)				\
do {									\
	typeof(val) __val = (val);					\
	var = __val;							\
	/*								\
	 * paired with u64_u32_load_copy(), ordering access to var and	\
	 * copy.							\
	 */								\
	smp_mb();							\
	copy = var;							\
} while (0)

Not sure and this is the continuation to my reply to this patch in v4.

Thanks,
Tao
> +#endif
> +# define u64_u32_load(var)      u64_u32_load_copy(var, var##_copy)
> +# define u64_u32_store(var, val) u64_u32_store_copy(var, var##_copy, val)
> +
>  /* CFS-related fields in a runqueue */
>  struct cfs_rq {
>  	struct load_weight	load;
> @@ -560,7 +599,7 @@ struct cfs_rq {
>  	 */
>  	struct sched_avg	avg;
>  #ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> -	u64			load_last_update_time_copy;
> +	u64			last_update_time_copy;
>  #endif
>  	struct {
>  		raw_spinlock_t	lock ____cacheline_aligned;
> -- 
> 2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] sched/fair: Decay task PELT values during wakeup migration
  2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 2/7] sched/fair: Decay task PELT values during wakeup migration Vincent Donnefort
  2022-06-08  9:53   ` Dietmar Eggemann
@ 2022-06-11 13:56   ` Tao Zhou
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Tao Zhou @ 2022-06-11 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vincent Donnefort
  Cc: peterz, mingo, vincent.guittot, linux-kernel, dietmar.eggemann,
	morten.rasmussen, chris.redpath, qperret, kernel-team, Tao Zhou

On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 01:32:49PM +0100, Vincent Donnefort wrote:

> From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
> 
> Before being migrated to a new CPU, a task sees its PELT values
> synchronized with rq last_update_time. Once done, that same task will also
> have its sched_avg last_update_time reset. This means the time between
> the migration and the last clock update will not be accounted for in
> util_avg and a discontinuity will appear. This issue is amplified by the
> PELT clock scaling. It takes currently one tick after the CPU being idle
> to let clock_pelt catching up clock_task.
> 
> This is especially problematic for asymmetric CPU capacity systems which
> need stable util_avg signals for task placement and energy estimation.
> 
> Ideally, this problem would be solved by updating the runqueue clocks
> before the migration. But that would require taking the runqueue lock
> which is quite expensive [1]. Instead estimate the missing time and update
> the task util_avg with that value.
> 
> To that end, we need sched_clock_cpu() but it is a costly function. Limit
> the usage to the case where the source CPU is idle as we know this is when
> the clock is having the biggest risk of being outdated. In this such case,
> let's call it cfs_idle_lag the delta time between the rq_clock_pelt value
> at rq idle and cfs_rq idle. And rq_idle_lag the delta between "now" and
> the rq_clock_pelt at rq idle.
> 
> The estimated PELT clock is then:
> 
>    last_update_time (the cfs_rq's last_update_time)
>    + cfs_idle_lag (delta between cfs_rq's update and rq's update)
>    + rq_idle_lag (delta between rq's update and now)
> 
>   last_update_time = cfs_rq_clock_pelt()
>                    = rq_clock_pelt() - cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time
> 
>   cfs_idle_lag = rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle -
>                  rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle
> 
>   rq_idle_lag = sched_clock_cpu() - rq_clock()@rq_idle
> 
> The rq_clock_pelt() from last_update_time being the same as
> rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle, we can write:
> 
>   estimation = rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle - cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time +
>                sched_clock_cpu() - rq_clock()@rq_idle
> 
> The clocks being not accessible without the rq lock taken, some timestamps
> are created:
> 
>       rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle        is rq->clock_pelt_idle
>       rq_clock()@rq_idle             is rq->enter_idle
>       cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time is cfs_rq->throttled_pelt_idle
> 
> The rq_idle_lag part of the missing time is however an estimation that
> doesn't take into account IRQ and Paravirt time.
> 
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190709115759.10451-1-chris.redpath@arm.com
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 05614d9b919c..77f3eb1bf624 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -3310,6 +3310,29 @@ static inline void cfs_rq_util_change(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int flags)
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +static inline bool load_avg_is_decayed(struct sched_avg *sa)
> +{
> +	if (sa->load_sum)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (sa->util_sum)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (sa->runnable_sum)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * _avg must be null when _sum are null because _avg = _sum / divider
> +	 * Make sure that rounding and/or propagation of PELT values never
> +	 * break this.
> +	 */
> +	SCHED_WARN_ON(sa->load_avg ||
> +		      sa->util_avg ||
> +		      sa->runnable_avg);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  static inline u64 cfs_rq_last_update_time(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  {
>  	return u64_u32_load_copy(cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time,
> @@ -3347,27 +3370,12 @@ static inline bool cfs_rq_is_decayed(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  	if (cfs_rq->load.weight)
>  		return false;
>  
> -	if (cfs_rq->avg.load_sum)
> -		return false;
> -
> -	if (cfs_rq->avg.util_sum)
> -		return false;
> -
> -	if (cfs_rq->avg.runnable_sum)
> +	if (!load_avg_is_decayed(&cfs_rq->avg))
>  		return false;
>  
>  	if (child_cfs_rq_on_list(cfs_rq))
>  		return false;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * _avg must be null when _sum are null because _avg = _sum / divider
> -	 * Make sure that rounding and/or propagation of PELT values never
> -	 * break this.
> -	 */
> -	SCHED_WARN_ON(cfs_rq->avg.load_avg ||
> -		      cfs_rq->avg.util_avg ||
> -		      cfs_rq->avg.runnable_avg);
> -
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> @@ -3706,6 +3714,89 @@ static inline void add_tg_cfs_propagate(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, long runnable_sum
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
> +static inline void migrate_se_pelt_lag(struct sched_entity *se)
> +{
> +	u64 throttled = 0, now, lut;
> +	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
> +	struct rq *rq;
> +	bool is_idle;
> +
> +	if (load_avg_is_decayed(&se->avg))
> +		return;
> +
> +	cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> +	rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	is_idle = is_idle_task(rcu_dereference(rq->curr));
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The lag estimation comes with a cost we don't want to pay all the
> +	 * time. Hence, limiting to the case where the source CPU is idle and
> +	 * we know we are at the greatest risk to have an outdated clock.
> +	 */
> +	if (!is_idle)
> +		return;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Estimated "now" is: last_update_time + cfs_idle_lag + rq_idle_lag, where:
> +	 *
> +	 *   last_update_time (the cfs_rq's last_update_time)
> +	 *	= cfs_rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle
> +	 *      = rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle
> +	 *        - cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time@cfs_rq_idle
> +	 *
> +	 *   cfs_idle_lag (delta between cfs_rq's update and rq's update)
> +	 *      = rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle - rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle
> +	 *
> +	 *   rq_idle_lag (delta between rq's update and now)
> +	 *      = sched_clock_cpu() - rq_clock()@rq_idle
> +	 *
> +	 * We can then write:
> +	 *
> +	 *    now = rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle - cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time +
> +	 *          sched_clock_cpu() - rq_clock()@rq_idle
> +	 * Where:
> +	 *      rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle        is rq->clock_pelt_idle
> +	 *      rq_clock()@rq_idle             is rq->clock_idle
> +	 *      cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time@cfs_rq_idle is
> +	 *      cfs_rq->throttled_pelt_idle
> +	 */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +	throttled = u64_u32_load(cfs_rq->throttled_pelt_idle);
> +	/* The clock has been stopped for throttling */
> +	if (throttled == U64_MAX)
> +		return;
> +#endif
> +	now = u64_u32_load(rq->clock_pelt_idle);
> +	/*
> +	 * Paired with _update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(). It ensures at the worst case
> +	 * is observed the old clock_pelt_idle value and the new clock_idle,
> +	 * which lead to an underestimation. The opposite would lead to an
> +	 * overestimation.
> +	 */

The sentence of 'The opposite would lead to an overestimation' means that
clock_pelt_idle is new clock_idle is old if I am not wrong. If clock_pelt_idle
is new then clock_idle is new too. The later is the updated state of both, IMHO
 this sentence does not stand.

> +	smp_rmb();
> +	lut = cfs_rq_last_update_time(cfs_rq);
> +
> +	now -= throttled;
> +	if (now < lut)
> +		/*
> +		 * cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time is more recent than our
> +		 * estimation, let's use it.
> +		 */
> +		now = lut;
> +	else
> +		now += sched_clock_cpu(cpu_of(rq)) - u64_u32_load(rq->clock_idle);
> +
> +	__update_load_avg_blocked_se(now, se);
> +}
> +#else
> +static void migrate_se_pelt_lag(struct sched_entity *se) {}
> +#endif
> +
>  /**
>   * update_cfs_rq_load_avg - update the cfs_rq's load/util averages
>   * @now: current time, as per cfs_rq_clock_pelt()
> @@ -4437,6 +4528,9 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
>  	 */
>  	if ((flags & (DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE)) != DEQUEUE_SAVE)
>  		update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq);
> +
> +	if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 0)
> +		update_idle_cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -6911,6 +7005,8 @@ static void detach_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se);
>   */
>  static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
>  {
> +	struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * As blocked tasks retain absolute vruntime the migration needs to
>  	 * deal with this by subtracting the old and adding the new
> @@ -6918,7 +7014,6 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
>  	 * the task on the new runqueue.
>  	 */
>  	if (READ_ONCE(p->__state) == TASK_WAKING) {
> -		struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
>  		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
>  
>  		se->vruntime -= u64_u32_load(cfs_rq->min_vruntime);
> @@ -6930,25 +7025,29 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
>  		 * rq->lock and can modify state directly.
>  		 */
>  		lockdep_assert_rq_held(task_rq(p));
> -		detach_entity_cfs_rq(&p->se);
> +		detach_entity_cfs_rq(se);
>  
>  	} else {
> +		remove_entity_load_avg(se);
> +
>  		/*
> -		 * We are supposed to update the task to "current" time, then
> -		 * its up to date and ready to go to new CPU/cfs_rq. But we
> -		 * have difficulty in getting what current time is, so simply
> -		 * throw away the out-of-date time. This will result in the
> -		 * wakee task is less decayed, but giving the wakee more load
> -		 * sounds not bad.
> +		 * Here, the task's PELT values have been updated according to
> +		 * the current rq's clock. But if that clock hasn't been
> +		 * updated in a while, a substantial idle time will be missed,
> +		 * leading to an inflation after wake-up on the new rq.
> +		 *
> +		 * Estimate the missing time from the cfs_rq last_update_time
> +		 * and update sched_avg to improve the PELT continuity after
> +		 * migration.
>  		 */
> -		remove_entity_load_avg(&p->se);
> +		migrate_se_pelt_lag(se);
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Tell new CPU we are migrated */
> -	p->se.avg.last_update_time = 0;
> +	se->avg.last_update_time = 0;
>  
>  	/* We have migrated, no longer consider this task hot */
> -	p->se.exec_start = 0;
> +	se->exec_start = 0;
>  
>  	update_scan_period(p, new_cpu);
>  }
> @@ -8114,6 +8213,9 @@ static bool __update_blocked_fair(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
>  		if (update_cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq), cfs_rq)) {
>  			update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq);
>  
> +			if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 0)
> +				update_idle_cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq);
> +
>  			if (cfs_rq == &rq->cfs)
>  				decayed = true;
>  		}
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/pelt.h b/kernel/sched/pelt.h
> index 4ff2ed4f8fa1..3a0e0dc28721 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/pelt.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/pelt.h
> @@ -61,6 +61,25 @@ static inline void cfs_se_util_change(struct sched_avg *avg)
>  	WRITE_ONCE(avg->util_est.enqueued, enqueued);
>  }
>  
> +static inline u64 rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
> +	assert_clock_updated(rq);
> +
> +	return rq->clock_pelt - rq->lost_idle_time;
> +}
> +
> +/* The rq is idle, we can sync to clock_task */
> +static inline void _update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> +	rq->clock_pelt  = rq_clock_task(rq);
> +
> +	u64_u32_store(rq->clock_idle, rq_clock(rq));
> +	/* Paired with smp_rmb in migrate_se_pelt_lag() */
> +	smp_wmb();
> +	u64_u32_store(rq->clock_pelt_idle, rq_clock_pelt(rq));
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * The clock_pelt scales the time to reflect the effective amount of
>   * computation done during the running delta time but then sync back to
> @@ -76,8 +95,7 @@ static inline void cfs_se_util_change(struct sched_avg *avg)
>  static inline void update_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq, s64 delta)
>  {
>  	if (unlikely(is_idle_task(rq->curr))) {
> -		/* The rq is idle, we can sync to clock_task */
> -		rq->clock_pelt  = rq_clock_task(rq);
> +		_update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(rq);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -130,17 +148,23 @@ static inline void update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq)
>  	 */
>  	if (util_sum >= divider)
>  		rq->lost_idle_time += rq_clock_task(rq) - rq->clock_pelt;
> +
> +	_update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(rq);
>  }
>  
> -static inline u64 rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +static inline void update_idle_cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  {
> -	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
> -	assert_clock_updated(rq);
> +	u64 throttled;
>  
> -	return rq->clock_pelt - rq->lost_idle_time;
> +	if (unlikely(cfs_rq->throttle_count))
> +		throttled = U64_MAX;
> +	else
> +		throttled = cfs_rq->throttled_clock_pelt_time;
> +
> +	u64_u32_store(cfs_rq->throttled_pelt_idle, throttled);
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
>  /* rq->task_clock normalized against any time this cfs_rq has spent throttled */
>  static inline u64 cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  {
> @@ -150,6 +174,7 @@ static inline u64 cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  	return rq_clock_pelt(rq_of(cfs_rq)) - cfs_rq->throttled_clock_pelt_time;
>  }
>  #else
> +static inline void update_idle_cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { }
>  static inline u64 cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  {
>  	return rq_clock_pelt(rq_of(cfs_rq));
> @@ -204,6 +229,7 @@ update_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq, s64 delta) { }
>  static inline void
>  update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq) { }
>  
> +static inline void update_idle_cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { }
>  #endif
>  
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index bf4a0ec98678..de5c99bea7be 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -648,6 +648,10 @@ struct cfs_rq {
>  	int			runtime_enabled;
>  	s64			runtime_remaining;
>  
> +	u64			throttled_pelt_idle;
> +#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> +	u64                     throttled_pelt_idle_copy;
> +#endif
>  	u64			throttled_clock;
>  	u64			throttled_clock_pelt;
>  	u64			throttled_clock_pelt_time;
> @@ -1020,6 +1024,12 @@ struct rq {
>  	u64			clock_task ____cacheline_aligned;
>  	u64			clock_pelt;
>  	unsigned long		lost_idle_time;
> +	u64			clock_pelt_idle;
> +	u64			clock_idle;
> +#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> +	u64			clock_pelt_idle_copy;
> +	u64			clock_idle_copy;
> +#endif
>  
>  	atomic_t		nr_iowait;
>  
> -- 
> 2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v10 1/7] sched/fair: Provide u64 read for 32-bits arch helper
  2022-06-09 15:23   ` Tao Zhou
@ 2022-06-14 11:45     ` Vincent Donnefort
  2022-06-14 14:28       ` Tao Zhou
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Donnefort @ 2022-06-14 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tao Zhou
  Cc: peterz, mingo, vincent.guittot, linux-kernel, dietmar.eggemann,
	morten.rasmussen, chris.redpath, qperret, kernel-team

On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 11:23:07PM +0800, Tao Zhou wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 01:32:48PM +0100, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> 
> > From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
> > 
> > Introducing macro helpers u64_u32_{store,load}() to factorize lockless
> > accesses to u64 variables for 32-bits architectures.
> > 
> > Users are for now cfs_rq.min_vruntime and sched_avg.last_update_time. To
> > accommodate the later where the copy lies outside of the structure
> > (cfs_rq.last_udpate_time_copy instead of sched_avg.last_update_time_copy),
> > use the _copy() version of those helpers.
> > 
> > Those new helpers encapsulate smp_rmb() and smp_wmb() synchronization and
> > therefore, have a small penalty for 32-bits machines in set_task_rq_fair()
> > and init_cfs_rq().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 77b2048a9326..05614d9b919c 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -612,11 +612,8 @@ static void update_min_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/* ensure we never gain time by being placed backwards. */
> > -	cfs_rq->min_vruntime = max_vruntime(cfs_rq->min_vruntime, vruntime);
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> > -	smp_wmb();
> > -	cfs_rq->min_vruntime_copy = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> > -#endif
> > +	u64_u32_store(cfs_rq->min_vruntime,
> > +		      max_vruntime(cfs_rq->min_vruntime, vruntime));
> >  }
> >  
> >  static inline bool __entity_less(struct rb_node *a, const struct rb_node *b)
> > @@ -3313,6 +3310,11 @@ static inline void cfs_rq_util_change(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int flags)
> >  }
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > +static inline u64 cfs_rq_last_update_time(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > +{
> > +	return u64_u32_load_copy(cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time,
> > +				 cfs_rq->last_update_time_copy);
> > +}
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> >  /*
> >   * Because list_add_leaf_cfs_rq always places a child cfs_rq on the list
> > @@ -3423,27 +3425,9 @@ void set_task_rq_fair(struct sched_entity *se,
> >  	if (!(se->avg.last_update_time && prev))
> >  		return;
> >  
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> > -	{
> > -		u64 p_last_update_time_copy;
> > -		u64 n_last_update_time_copy;
> > -
> > -		do {
> > -			p_last_update_time_copy = prev->load_last_update_time_copy;
> > -			n_last_update_time_copy = next->load_last_update_time_copy;
> > -
> > -			smp_rmb();
> > -
> > -			p_last_update_time = prev->avg.last_update_time;
> > -			n_last_update_time = next->avg.last_update_time;
> > +	p_last_update_time = cfs_rq_last_update_time(prev);
> > +	n_last_update_time = cfs_rq_last_update_time(next);
> >  
> > -		} while (p_last_update_time != p_last_update_time_copy ||
> > -			 n_last_update_time != n_last_update_time_copy);
> > -	}
> > -#else
> > -	p_last_update_time = prev->avg.last_update_time;
> > -	n_last_update_time = next->avg.last_update_time;
> > -#endif
> >  	__update_load_avg_blocked_se(p_last_update_time, se);
> >  	se->avg.last_update_time = n_last_update_time;
> >  }
> > @@ -3796,12 +3780,9 @@ update_cfs_rq_load_avg(u64 now, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	decayed |= __update_load_avg_cfs_rq(now, cfs_rq);
> > -
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> > -	smp_wmb();
> > -	cfs_rq->load_last_update_time_copy = sa->last_update_time;
> > -#endif
> > -
> > +	u64_u32_store_copy(sa->last_update_time,
> > +			   cfs_rq->last_update_time_copy,
> > +			   sa->last_update_time);
> >  	return decayed;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -3933,27 +3914,6 @@ static inline void update_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *s
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> > -static inline u64 cfs_rq_last_update_time(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > -{
> > -	u64 last_update_time_copy;
> > -	u64 last_update_time;
> > -
> > -	do {
> > -		last_update_time_copy = cfs_rq->load_last_update_time_copy;
> > -		smp_rmb();
> > -		last_update_time = cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time;
> > -	} while (last_update_time != last_update_time_copy);
> > -
> > -	return last_update_time;
> > -}
> > -#else
> > -static inline u64 cfs_rq_last_update_time(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > -{
> > -	return cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time;
> > -}
> > -#endif
> > -
> >  /*
> >   * Synchronize entity load avg of dequeued entity without locking
> >   * the previous rq.
> > @@ -6960,21 +6920,8 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
> >  	if (READ_ONCE(p->__state) == TASK_WAKING) {
> >  		struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
> >  		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> > -		u64 min_vruntime;
> > -
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> > -		u64 min_vruntime_copy;
> > -
> > -		do {
> > -			min_vruntime_copy = cfs_rq->min_vruntime_copy;
> > -			smp_rmb();
> > -			min_vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> > -		} while (min_vruntime != min_vruntime_copy);
> > -#else
> > -		min_vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> > -#endif
> >  
> > -		se->vruntime -= min_vruntime;
> > +		se->vruntime -= u64_u32_load(cfs_rq->min_vruntime);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	if (p->on_rq == TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING) {
> > @@ -11422,10 +11369,7 @@ static void set_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
> >  void init_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> >  {
> >  	cfs_rq->tasks_timeline = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
> > -	cfs_rq->min_vruntime = (u64)(-(1LL << 20));
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> > -	cfs_rq->min_vruntime_copy = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> > -#endif
> > +	u64_u32_store(cfs_rq->min_vruntime, (u64)(-(1LL << 20)));
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> >  	raw_spin_lock_init(&cfs_rq->removed.lock);
> >  #endif
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > index 1f97f357aacd..bf4a0ec98678 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > @@ -520,6 +520,45 @@ struct cfs_bandwidth { };
> >  
> >  #endif	/* CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED */
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * u64_u32_load/u64_u32_store
> > + *
> > + * Use a copy of a u64 value to protect against data race. This is only
> > + * applicable for 32-bits architectures.
> > + */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> > +# define u64_u32_load_copy(var, copy)       var
> > +# define u64_u32_store_copy(var, copy, val) (var = val)
> > +#else
> > +# define u64_u32_load_copy(var, copy)					\
> > +({									\
> > +	u64 __val, __val_copy;						\
> > +	do {								\
> > +		__val_copy = copy;					\
> > +		/*							\
> > +		 * paired with u64_u32_store, ordering access		\
> 
> s/u64_u32_store/u64_u32_store_copy()/

Ack.

> 
> > +		 * to var and copy.					\
> > +		 */							\
> > +		smp_rmb();						\
> > +		__val = var;						\
> > +	} while (__val != __val_copy);					\
> > +	__val;								\
> > +})
> > +# define u64_u32_store_copy(var, copy, val)				\
> > +do {									\
> > +	typeof(val) __val = (val);					\
> > +	var = __val;							\
> > +	/*								\
> > +	 * paired with u64_u32_load, ordering access to var and		\
> 
> s/u64_u32_load/u64_u32_load_copy()/

Ack.

> 
> > +	 * copy.							\
> > +	 */								\
> > +	smp_wmb();							\
> > +	copy = __val;							\
> > +} while (0)
> 
> Try again here from me.
> The semantics of this macro is different from the original code.
> To be consistent with the original code, the 'copy = __val;' should
> be changed to 'copy = var'. Why not original code here.
> 
> They are different in that the var can be changed currently on another
> CPU and copy can be different from __val.

I'm not sure I understand your point here. We are using a temporary variable to
set both var and copy. They'll end-up with the same value which is what we want.

If what you worries is a concurrent write, you need a lock to modify the
last_update_time or the min_vruntime (and the other values introduced
by this patchset).

This is not about reading an up to date value, it is about reading a sane one.

> 
> Documentation/memory-barriers.txt(line 1351, 5.19.0-rc1-rt1):
> In section:
> (*) What are memory barriers?
>      - Multicopy atomicity.
> The example there can be referenced here I think.
> 
> And I feel that here the smp_wmb() should be changed to smp_mb(). One user
> of this macro have the load/write  write. Another user have write  write
> if I am not wrong.

I do not get this part. the _store_copy() only store var and copy. Hence the
smp_wmb. While the _load_copy() only load var and and copy, hence the smp_rmb.

This is actually described in the section "SMP BARRIER PAIRING".

> 
> Also,
> 
> 'Memory Barriers: a Hardware View for Software Hackers' (July 23, 2010)
> Section: 6.3 Example 2, I just scrolled to the code in table 3 and check
> that the semantics there is almost the same with the semantics here.
> 
> I do not have confidence to convince anything just after some days when I
> read it.
> 
> According to those two examples, if the small penalty is small, this
> u64_u32_store_copy() macro should be changed like this:
> 
> # define u64_u32_store_copy(var, copy, val)				\
> do {									\
> 	typeof(val) __val = (val);					\
> 	var = __val;							\
> 	/*								\
> 	 * paired with u64_u32_load_copy(), ordering access to var and	\
> 	 * copy.							\
> 	 */								\
> 	smp_mb();							\
> 	copy = var;							\
> } while (0)
> 
> Not sure and this is the continuation to my reply to this patch in v4.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tao
> > +#endif
> > +# define u64_u32_load(var)      u64_u32_load_copy(var, var##_copy)
> > +# define u64_u32_store(var, val) u64_u32_store_copy(var, var##_copy, val)
> > +
> >  /* CFS-related fields in a runqueue */
> >  struct cfs_rq {	
> >  	struct load_weight	load;
> > @@ -560,7 +599,7 @@ struct cfs_rq {
> >  	 */
> >  	struct sched_avg	avg;
> >  #ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> > -	u64			load_last_update_time_copy;
> > +	u64			last_update_time_copy;
> >  #endif
> >  	struct {
> >  		raw_spinlock_t	lock ____cacheline_aligned;
> > -- 
> > 2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@android.com.
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v10 0/7] feec() energy margin removal
  2022-06-09 12:53 ` [PATCH v10 0/7] feec() energy margin removal Lukasz Luba
@ 2022-06-14 11:47   ` Vincent Donnefort
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Donnefort @ 2022-06-14 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lukasz Luba
  Cc: linux-kernel, dietmar.eggemann, morten.rasmussen, chris.redpath,
	qperret, tao.zhou, kernel-team, peterz, mingo, vincent.guittot

On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 01:53:22PM +0100, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
> 
> On 6/7/22 13:32, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Here's a new version of the patch-set to get rid of the energy margin in
> > feec(). Many thanks to all for the insightful comments I got.
> > 
> > find_energy_efficient() (feec()) will migrate a task to save energy only if
> > it saves at least 6% of the total energy consumed by the system. This
> > conservative approach is a problem on a system where a lot of small tasks
> > create a huge load on the overall: very few of them will be allowed to
> > migrate to a smaller CPU, wasting a lot of energy. Instead of trying to
> > determine yet another margin, let's try to remove it.
> > 
> > The first elements of this patch-set are various fixes and improvement that
> > stabilizes task_util and ensures energy comparison fairness across all CPUs
> > of the topology. Only once those fixed, we can completely remove the margin
> > and let feec() aggressively place task and save energy.
> > 
> 
> I've run this patch set on pixel6 (android-mainline) and gathered energy
> values from the meter during the PCmark 3.0.
> 
> It looks good, with these patches we have ~10% lower energy usage and
> only ~3% lower score.
> 
> There are no other issues, everything works fine. Feel free to add:
> 
> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
> 
> to the whole patch set.
> 
> Regards,
> Lukasz

Thanks a lot Lukasz!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v10 1/7] sched/fair: Provide u64 read for 32-bits arch helper
  2022-06-14 11:45     ` Vincent Donnefort
@ 2022-06-14 14:28       ` Tao Zhou
  2022-06-21  8:32         ` Vincent Donnefort
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Tao Zhou @ 2022-06-14 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vincent Donnefort
  Cc: peterz, mingo, vincent.guittot, linux-kernel, dietmar.eggemann,
	morten.rasmussen, chris.redpath, qperret, kernel-team, Tao Zhou

On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 12:45:50PM +0100, Vincent Donnefort wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 11:23:07PM +0800, Tao Zhou wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 01:32:48PM +0100, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> > 
> > > From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
> > > 
> > > Introducing macro helpers u64_u32_{store,load}() to factorize lockless
> > > accesses to u64 variables for 32-bits architectures.
> > > 
> > > Users are for now cfs_rq.min_vruntime and sched_avg.last_update_time. To
> > > accommodate the later where the copy lies outside of the structure
> > > (cfs_rq.last_udpate_time_copy instead of sched_avg.last_update_time_copy),
> > > use the _copy() version of those helpers.
> > > 
> > > Those new helpers encapsulate smp_rmb() and smp_wmb() synchronization and
> > > therefore, have a small penalty for 32-bits machines in set_task_rq_fair()
> > > and init_cfs_rq().
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > index 77b2048a9326..05614d9b919c 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > @@ -612,11 +612,8 @@ static void update_min_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > >  	/* ensure we never gain time by being placed backwards. */
> > > -	cfs_rq->min_vruntime = max_vruntime(cfs_rq->min_vruntime, vruntime);
> > > -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> > > -	smp_wmb();
> > > -	cfs_rq->min_vruntime_copy = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> > > -#endif
> > > +	u64_u32_store(cfs_rq->min_vruntime,
> > > +		      max_vruntime(cfs_rq->min_vruntime, vruntime));
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static inline bool __entity_less(struct rb_node *a, const struct rb_node *b)
> > > @@ -3313,6 +3310,11 @@ static inline void cfs_rq_util_change(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int flags)
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > > +static inline u64 cfs_rq_last_update_time(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > > +{
> > > +	return u64_u32_load_copy(cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time,
> > > +				 cfs_rq->last_update_time_copy);
> > > +}
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> > >  /*
> > >   * Because list_add_leaf_cfs_rq always places a child cfs_rq on the list
> > > @@ -3423,27 +3425,9 @@ void set_task_rq_fair(struct sched_entity *se,
> > >  	if (!(se->avg.last_update_time && prev))
> > >  		return;
> > >  
> > > -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> > > -	{
> > > -		u64 p_last_update_time_copy;
> > > -		u64 n_last_update_time_copy;
> > > -
> > > -		do {
> > > -			p_last_update_time_copy = prev->load_last_update_time_copy;
> > > -			n_last_update_time_copy = next->load_last_update_time_copy;
> > > -
> > > -			smp_rmb();
> > > -
> > > -			p_last_update_time = prev->avg.last_update_time;
> > > -			n_last_update_time = next->avg.last_update_time;
> > > +	p_last_update_time = cfs_rq_last_update_time(prev);
> > > +	n_last_update_time = cfs_rq_last_update_time(next);
> > >  
> > > -		} while (p_last_update_time != p_last_update_time_copy ||
> > > -			 n_last_update_time != n_last_update_time_copy);
> > > -	}
> > > -#else
> > > -	p_last_update_time = prev->avg.last_update_time;
> > > -	n_last_update_time = next->avg.last_update_time;
> > > -#endif
> > >  	__update_load_avg_blocked_se(p_last_update_time, se);
> > >  	se->avg.last_update_time = n_last_update_time;
> > >  }
> > > @@ -3796,12 +3780,9 @@ update_cfs_rq_load_avg(u64 now, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > >  	decayed |= __update_load_avg_cfs_rq(now, cfs_rq);
> > > -
> > > -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> > > -	smp_wmb();
> > > -	cfs_rq->load_last_update_time_copy = sa->last_update_time;
> > > -#endif
> > > -
> > > +	u64_u32_store_copy(sa->last_update_time,
> > > +			   cfs_rq->last_update_time_copy,
> > > +			   sa->last_update_time);
> > >  	return decayed;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > @@ -3933,27 +3914,6 @@ static inline void update_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *s
> > >  	}
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> > > -static inline u64 cfs_rq_last_update_time(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > > -{
> > > -	u64 last_update_time_copy;
> > > -	u64 last_update_time;
> > > -
> > > -	do {
> > > -		last_update_time_copy = cfs_rq->load_last_update_time_copy;
> > > -		smp_rmb();
> > > -		last_update_time = cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time;
> > > -	} while (last_update_time != last_update_time_copy);
> > > -
> > > -	return last_update_time;
> > > -}
> > > -#else
> > > -static inline u64 cfs_rq_last_update_time(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > > -{
> > > -	return cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time;
> > > -}
> > > -#endif
> > > -
> > >  /*
> > >   * Synchronize entity load avg of dequeued entity without locking
> > >   * the previous rq.
> > > @@ -6960,21 +6920,8 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
> > >  	if (READ_ONCE(p->__state) == TASK_WAKING) {
> > >  		struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
> > >  		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> > > -		u64 min_vruntime;
> > > -
> > > -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> > > -		u64 min_vruntime_copy;
> > > -
> > > -		do {
> > > -			min_vruntime_copy = cfs_rq->min_vruntime_copy;
> > > -			smp_rmb();
> > > -			min_vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> > > -		} while (min_vruntime != min_vruntime_copy);
> > > -#else
> > > -		min_vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> > > -#endif
> > >  
> > > -		se->vruntime -= min_vruntime;
> > > +		se->vruntime -= u64_u32_load(cfs_rq->min_vruntime);
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > >  	if (p->on_rq == TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING) {
> > > @@ -11422,10 +11369,7 @@ static void set_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
> > >  void init_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > >  {
> > >  	cfs_rq->tasks_timeline = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
> > > -	cfs_rq->min_vruntime = (u64)(-(1LL << 20));
> > > -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> > > -	cfs_rq->min_vruntime_copy = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> > > -#endif
> > > +	u64_u32_store(cfs_rq->min_vruntime, (u64)(-(1LL << 20)));
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > >  	raw_spin_lock_init(&cfs_rq->removed.lock);
> > >  #endif
> > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > > index 1f97f357aacd..bf4a0ec98678 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > > +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > > @@ -520,6 +520,45 @@ struct cfs_bandwidth { };
> > >  
> > >  #endif	/* CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED */
> > >  
> > > +/*
> > > + * u64_u32_load/u64_u32_store
> > > + *
> > > + * Use a copy of a u64 value to protect against data race. This is only
> > > + * applicable for 32-bits architectures.
> > > + */
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> > > +# define u64_u32_load_copy(var, copy)       var
> > > +# define u64_u32_store_copy(var, copy, val) (var = val)
> > > +#else
> > > +# define u64_u32_load_copy(var, copy)					\
> > > +({									\
> > > +	u64 __val, __val_copy;						\
> > > +	do {								\
> > > +		__val_copy = copy;					\
> > > +		/*							\
> > > +		 * paired with u64_u32_store, ordering access		\
> > 
> > s/u64_u32_store/u64_u32_store_copy()/
> 
> Ack.
> 
> > 
> > > +		 * to var and copy.					\
> > > +		 */							\
> > > +		smp_rmb();						\
> > > +		__val = var;						\
> > > +	} while (__val != __val_copy);					\
> > > +	__val;								\
> > > +})
> > > +# define u64_u32_store_copy(var, copy, val)				\
> > > +do {									\
> > > +	typeof(val) __val = (val);					\
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
        Instructs to store a local __val..(I missed this sorry)
        The time for these cycles is possible that eg. cfs_rq->min_vruntime
        has been updated in this period. But here locally store the
        old value.

> > > +	var = __val;							\
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^
        Original code here will load the even updated(more recently)
        eg. cfs_rq->min_vruntime from other cpus update(the load here
        is also need a read pair barrier, so I reference that use the
        smp_mb, but I do not know).

        I mean the __val here is more possible to be stale. That the
        ->min_vruntime or ->lut is not latest.

Your code simplify something but not lead to be more accurate compared to
original code. Is it possible to delete that local store and restore
the Data Dependancies that the original code do if your code is not DD.

All the above may be wrong. Thanks for your time.

> > > +	/*								\
> > > +	 * paired with u64_u32_load, ordering access to var and		\
> > 
> > s/u64_u32_load/u64_u32_load_copy()/
> 
> Ack.
> 
> > 
> > > +	 * copy.							\
> > > +	 */								\
> > > +	smp_wmb();							\
> > > +	copy = __val;							\
> > > +} while (0)
> > 
> > Try again here from me.
> > The semantics of this macro is different from the original code.
> > To be consistent with the original code, the 'copy = __val;' should
> > be changed to 'copy = var'. Why not original code here.
> > 
> > They are different in that the var can be changed currently on another
> > CPU and copy can be different from __val.
> 
> I'm not sure I understand your point here. We are using a temporary variable to
> set both var and copy. They'll end-up with the same value which is what we want.
> If what you worries is a concurrent write, you need a lock to modify the
> last_update_time or the min_vruntime (and the other values introduced
> by this patchset).
> 
> This is not about reading an up to date value, it is about reading a sane one.
> 
> > 
> > Documentation/memory-barriers.txt(line 1351, 5.19.0-rc1-rt1):
> > In section:
> > (*) What are memory barriers?
> >      - Multicopy atomicity.
> > The example there can be referenced here I think.
> > 
> > And I feel that here the smp_wmb() should be changed to smp_mb(). One user
> > of this macro have the load/write  write. Another user have write  write
> > if I am not wrong.
> 
> I do not get this part. the _store_copy() only store var and copy. Hence the
> smp_wmb. While the _load_copy() only load var and and copy, hence the smp_rmb.
> 
> This is actually described in the section "SMP BARRIER PAIRING".
> 
> > 
> > Also,
> > 
> > 'Memory Barriers: a Hardware View for Software Hackers' (July 23, 2010)
> > Section: 6.3 Example 2, I just scrolled to the code in table 3 and check
> > that the semantics there is almost the same with the semantics here.
> > 
> > I do not have confidence to convince anything just after some days when I
> > read it.
> > 
> > According to those two examples, if the small penalty is small, this
> > u64_u32_store_copy() macro should be changed like this:
> > 
> > # define u64_u32_store_copy(var, copy, val)				\
> > do {									\
> > 	typeof(val) __val = (val);					\
> > 	var = __val;							\
> > 	/*								\
> > 	 * paired with u64_u32_load_copy(), ordering access to var and	\
> > 	 * copy.							\
> > 	 */								\
> > 	smp_mb();							\
> > 	copy = var;							\
> > } while (0)
> > 
> > Not sure and this is the continuation to my reply to this patch in v4.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Tao
> > > +#endif
> > > +# define u64_u32_load(var)      u64_u32_load_copy(var, var##_copy)
> > > +# define u64_u32_store(var, val) u64_u32_store_copy(var, var##_copy, val)
> > > +
> > >  /* CFS-related fields in a runqueue */
> > >  struct cfs_rq {	
> > >  	struct load_weight	load;
> > > @@ -560,7 +599,7 @@ struct cfs_rq {
> > >  	 */
> > >  	struct sched_avg	avg;
> > >  #ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> > > -	u64			load_last_update_time_copy;
> > > +	u64			last_update_time_copy;
> > >  #endif
> > >  	struct {
> > >  		raw_spinlock_t	lock ____cacheline_aligned;
> > > -- 
> > > 2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog
> > 
> > -- 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@android.com.
> > 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v10 1/7] sched/fair: Provide u64 read for 32-bits arch helper
  2022-06-14 14:28       ` Tao Zhou
@ 2022-06-21  8:32         ` Vincent Donnefort
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Donnefort @ 2022-06-21  8:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tao Zhou
  Cc: peterz, mingo, vincent.guittot, linux-kernel, dietmar.eggemann,
	morten.rasmussen, chris.redpath, qperret, kernel-team

On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 10:28:31PM +0800, Tao Zhou wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 12:45:50PM +0100, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 11:23:07PM +0800, Tao Zhou wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 01:32:48PM +0100, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> > > 
> > > > From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Introducing macro helpers u64_u32_{store,load}() to factorize lockless
> > > > accesses to u64 variables for 32-bits architectures.
> > > > 
> > > > Users are for now cfs_rq.min_vruntime and sched_avg.last_update_time. To
> > > > accommodate the later where the copy lies outside of the structure
> > > > (cfs_rq.last_udpate_time_copy instead of sched_avg.last_update_time_copy),
> > > > use the _copy() version of those helpers.
> > > > 
> > > > Those new helpers encapsulate smp_rmb() and smp_wmb() synchronization and
> > > > therefore, have a small penalty for 32-bits machines in set_task_rq_fair()
> > > > and init_cfs_rq().
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > > index 77b2048a9326..05614d9b919c 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > > @@ -612,11 +612,8 @@ static void update_min_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > >  	/* ensure we never gain time by being placed backwards. */
> > > > -	cfs_rq->min_vruntime = max_vruntime(cfs_rq->min_vruntime, vruntime);
> > > > -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> > > > -	smp_wmb();
> > > > -	cfs_rq->min_vruntime_copy = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> > > > -#endif
> > > > +	u64_u32_store(cfs_rq->min_vruntime,
> > > > +		      max_vruntime(cfs_rq->min_vruntime, vruntime));
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > >  static inline bool __entity_less(struct rb_node *a, const struct rb_node *b)
> > > > @@ -3313,6 +3310,11 @@ static inline void cfs_rq_util_change(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int flags)
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > >  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > > > +static inline u64 cfs_rq_last_update_time(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	return u64_u32_load_copy(cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time,
> > > > +				 cfs_rq->last_update_time_copy);
> > > > +}
> > > >  #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> > > >  /*
> > > >   * Because list_add_leaf_cfs_rq always places a child cfs_rq on the list
> > > > @@ -3423,27 +3425,9 @@ void set_task_rq_fair(struct sched_entity *se,
> > > >  	if (!(se->avg.last_update_time && prev))
> > > >  		return;
> > > >  
> > > > -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> > > > -	{
> > > > -		u64 p_last_update_time_copy;
> > > > -		u64 n_last_update_time_copy;
> > > > -
> > > > -		do {
> > > > -			p_last_update_time_copy = prev->load_last_update_time_copy;
> > > > -			n_last_update_time_copy = next->load_last_update_time_copy;
> > > > -
> > > > -			smp_rmb();
> > > > -
> > > > -			p_last_update_time = prev->avg.last_update_time;
> > > > -			n_last_update_time = next->avg.last_update_time;
> > > > +	p_last_update_time = cfs_rq_last_update_time(prev);
> > > > +	n_last_update_time = cfs_rq_last_update_time(next);
> > > >  
> > > > -		} while (p_last_update_time != p_last_update_time_copy ||
> > > > -			 n_last_update_time != n_last_update_time_copy);
> > > > -	}
> > > > -#else
> > > > -	p_last_update_time = prev->avg.last_update_time;
> > > > -	n_last_update_time = next->avg.last_update_time;
> > > > -#endif
> > > >  	__update_load_avg_blocked_se(p_last_update_time, se);
> > > >  	se->avg.last_update_time = n_last_update_time;
> > > >  }
> > > > @@ -3796,12 +3780,9 @@ update_cfs_rq_load_avg(u64 now, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > >  	decayed |= __update_load_avg_cfs_rq(now, cfs_rq);
> > > > -
> > > > -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> > > > -	smp_wmb();
> > > > -	cfs_rq->load_last_update_time_copy = sa->last_update_time;
> > > > -#endif
> > > > -
> > > > +	u64_u32_store_copy(sa->last_update_time,
> > > > +			   cfs_rq->last_update_time_copy,
> > > > +			   sa->last_update_time);
> > > >  	return decayed;
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > @@ -3933,27 +3914,6 @@ static inline void update_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *s
> > > >  	}
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> > > > -static inline u64 cfs_rq_last_update_time(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > > > -{
> > > > -	u64 last_update_time_copy;
> > > > -	u64 last_update_time;
> > > > -
> > > > -	do {
> > > > -		last_update_time_copy = cfs_rq->load_last_update_time_copy;
> > > > -		smp_rmb();
> > > > -		last_update_time = cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time;
> > > > -	} while (last_update_time != last_update_time_copy);
> > > > -
> > > > -	return last_update_time;
> > > > -}
> > > > -#else
> > > > -static inline u64 cfs_rq_last_update_time(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > > > -{
> > > > -	return cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time;
> > > > -}
> > > > -#endif
> > > > -
> > > >  /*
> > > >   * Synchronize entity load avg of dequeued entity without locking
> > > >   * the previous rq.
> > > > @@ -6960,21 +6920,8 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
> > > >  	if (READ_ONCE(p->__state) == TASK_WAKING) {
> > > >  		struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
> > > >  		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> > > > -		u64 min_vruntime;
> > > > -
> > > > -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> > > > -		u64 min_vruntime_copy;
> > > > -
> > > > -		do {
> > > > -			min_vruntime_copy = cfs_rq->min_vruntime_copy;
> > > > -			smp_rmb();
> > > > -			min_vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> > > > -		} while (min_vruntime != min_vruntime_copy);
> > > > -#else
> > > > -		min_vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> > > > -#endif
> > > >  
> > > > -		se->vruntime -= min_vruntime;
> > > > +		se->vruntime -= u64_u32_load(cfs_rq->min_vruntime);
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > >  	if (p->on_rq == TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING) {
> > > > @@ -11422,10 +11369,7 @@ static void set_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
> > > >  void init_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	cfs_rq->tasks_timeline = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
> > > > -	cfs_rq->min_vruntime = (u64)(-(1LL << 20));
> > > > -#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> > > > -	cfs_rq->min_vruntime_copy = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> > > > -#endif
> > > > +	u64_u32_store(cfs_rq->min_vruntime, (u64)(-(1LL << 20)));
> > > >  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > > >  	raw_spin_lock_init(&cfs_rq->removed.lock);
> > > >  #endif
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > > > index 1f97f357aacd..bf4a0ec98678 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > > > +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > > > @@ -520,6 +520,45 @@ struct cfs_bandwidth { };
> > > >  
> > > >  #endif	/* CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED */
> > > >  
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * u64_u32_load/u64_u32_store
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Use a copy of a u64 value to protect against data race. This is only
> > > > + * applicable for 32-bits architectures.
> > > > + */
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> > > > +# define u64_u32_load_copy(var, copy)       var
> > > > +# define u64_u32_store_copy(var, copy, val) (var = val)
> > > > +#else
> > > > +# define u64_u32_load_copy(var, copy)					\
> > > > +({									\
> > > > +	u64 __val, __val_copy;						\
> > > > +	do {								\
> > > > +		__val_copy = copy;					\
> > > > +		/*							\
> > > > +		 * paired with u64_u32_store, ordering access		\
> > > 
> > > s/u64_u32_store/u64_u32_store_copy()/
> > 
> > Ack.
> > 
> > > 
> > > > +		 * to var and copy.					\
> > > > +		 */							\
> > > > +		smp_rmb();						\
> > > > +		__val = var;						\
> > > > +	} while (__val != __val_copy);					\
> > > > +	__val;								\
> > > > +})
> > > > +# define u64_u32_store_copy(var, copy, val)				\
> > > > +do {									\
> > > > +	typeof(val) __val = (val);					\
>         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>         Instructs to store a local __val..(I missed this sorry)
>         The time for these cycles is possible that eg. cfs_rq->min_vruntime
>         has been updated in this period. But here locally store the
>         old value.

Concurent copies are not possible, min_vruntime needs a lock to be
written.

> 
> > > > +	var = __val;							\
>         ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>         Original code here will load the even updated(more recently)
>         eg. cfs_rq->min_vruntime from other cpus update(the load here
>         is also need a read pair barrier, so I reference that use the
>         smp_mb, but I do not know).
> 
>         I mean the __val here is more possible to be stale. That the
>         ->min_vruntime or ->lut is not latest.
> 
> Your code simplify something but not lead to be more accurate compared to
> original code. Is it possible to delete that local store and restore
> the Data Dependancies that the original code do if your code is not DD.
> 
> All the above may be wrong. Thanks for your time.
> 

[...]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-06-21  8:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-06-07 12:32 [PATCH v10 0/7] feec() energy margin removal Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 1/7] sched/fair: Provide u64 read for 32-bits arch helper Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-09 15:23   ` Tao Zhou
2022-06-14 11:45     ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-14 14:28       ` Tao Zhou
2022-06-21  8:32         ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 2/7] sched/fair: Decay task PELT values during wakeup migration Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-08  9:53   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-06-11 13:56   ` Tao Zhou
2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 3/7] sched, drivers: Remove max param from effective_cpu_util()/sched_cpu_util() Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 4/7] sched/fair: Rename select_idle_mask to select_rq_mask Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 5/7] sched/fair: Use the same cpumask per-PD throughout find_energy_efficient_cpu() Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 6/7] sched/fair: Remove task_util from effective utilization in feec() Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 7/7] sched/fair: Remove the energy margin " Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-09 12:53 ` [PATCH v10 0/7] feec() energy margin removal Lukasz Luba
2022-06-14 11:47   ` Vincent Donnefort

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).