linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: build warning after merge of the rcu tree
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 15:38:02 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220615153802.49eeb827@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1372 bytes --]

Hi all,

After merging the rcu tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
this warning:

Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst:2220: WARNING: Malformed table.

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| **Quick Quiz**:                                                       |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| But what if my driver has a hardware interrupt handler that can run   |
| for many seconds? I cannot invoke schedule() from an hardware         |
| interrupt handler, after all!                                         |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| **Answer**:                                                           |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| One approach is to do ``ct_irq_exit();ct_irq_enter();`` every so    |
| often. But given that long-running interrupt handlers can cause other |
| problems, not least for response time, shouldn't you work to keep     |
| your interrupt handler's runtime within reasonable bounds?            |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

Introduced by commit

  6c5218715286 ("context_tracking: Take IRQ eqs entrypoints over RCU")

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2022-06-15  5:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-15  5:38 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2022-06-15 13:55 ` linux-next: build warning after merge of the rcu tree Paul E. McKenney
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-01-25  3:33 Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-25 13:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-07-26  2:32 Stephen Rothwell
2023-07-26  3:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-07-26  3:48   ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-07-26  6:37     ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-04-06  4:43 Stephen Rothwell
2023-04-06 14:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-21  2:50 Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-21  3:01 ` Boqun Feng
2022-11-07  3:26 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-07  5:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-07  9:28   ` Akira Yokosawa
2021-03-04  1:41 Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-04  1:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-07  8:20 Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-07 16:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-07 17:48   ` Jonathan Corbet
2020-12-07 18:53     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-03-10  2:27 Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-10  2:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-12  5:06 Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-12  6:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-12  6:38   ` Eric Dumazet
2019-12-12  6:57     ` Eric Dumazet
2020-01-10 21:57       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-01-15 16:42       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-12 11:40   ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-13  1:31     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-01-06 17:51 ` Olof Johansson
2020-01-06 18:10   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-01-06 21:08     ` Olof Johansson
2020-01-06 21:43       ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-21  6:48 Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-21 13:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-24  4:23 Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-24 12:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-25  0:46   ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-25  5:04     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-03-25  5:05 Stephen Rothwell
2011-03-25 19:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-06  2:14 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-06  2:32 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-06  3:02   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-06  5:37   ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220615153802.49eeb827@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).