linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] lib/atomic64_test.c: convert to use KUnit
@ 2022-06-16 18:04 Daniel Latypov
  2022-06-17  8:02 ` David Gow
  2022-06-18  8:16 ` kernel test robot
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Latypov @ 2022-06-16 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mark.rutland, boqun.feng
  Cc: linux-kernel, kunit-dev, peterz, Daniel Latypov, David Gow,
	Brendan Higgins, Michael Ellerman

The test currently is a bunch of checks (implemented using BUG_ON())
that can be built into the kernel or as a module.

Convert it to a KUnit test, which can also run in both modes.
From a user's perspective, this change adds a CONFIG_KUNIT=y dep and
changes the output format of the test [1] and makes it less destructive
on failure. The test itself is the same.

This hopefully makes the test easier to run and more consistent with
similar tests in lib/.
Since it has no dependencies, it can be run without explicitly setting
up a .kunitconfig via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run atomic
...
[13:53:44] Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
[13:53:44] ============================================================
[13:53:47] =================== atomic (2 subtests) ====================
[13:53:47] [PASSED] test_atomic
[13:53:47] [PASSED] test_atomic64
[13:53:47] ===================== [PASSED] atomic ======================
[13:53:47] ============================================================
[13:53:47] Testing complete. Passed: 2, Failed: 0, Crashed: 0, Skipped: 0, Errors: 0
[13:53:47] Elapsed time: 13.902s total, 1.629s configuring, 9.331s building, 2.852s running

It can be run on ARCH=x86_64 (and others) via:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64 atomic

The message about which platform the test ran on won't show up in
kunit.py, but still gets printed out in dmesg, e.g.
> TAP version 14
> 1..1
>     # Subtest: atomic
>     1..2
>     ok 1 - test_atomic
>     ok 2 - test_atomic64
>     # atomic: ran on x86-64 platform with CX8 and with SSE
> # atomic: pass:2 fail:0 skip:0 total:2
> # Totals: pass:2 fail:0 skip:0 total:2
> ok 1 - atomic

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/ktap.html

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Tested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc)
---
Meta: this is a resend of https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220502192327.81153-1-dlatypov@google.com/
Michael kindly pointed me to the right MAINTAINERS entry (this test file
isn't covered by it, and it slipped my mind to check the non-test code).

I've waited until 5.19-rc1 so that the relevant KUnit patches this
depended on have been merged.
Rebasing and tweaking the commit message a bit are the only changes.
---
 lib/Kconfig.debug   |   4 +-
 lib/atomic64_test.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 2e24db4bff19..4cf1ce8910f6 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -2147,7 +2147,9 @@ config PERCPU_TEST
 	  If unsure, say N.
 
 config ATOMIC64_SELFTEST
-	tristate "Perform an atomic64_t self-test"
+	tristate "Perform an atomic64_t self-test" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+	depends on KUNIT
+	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
 	help
 	  Enable this option to test the atomic64_t functions at boot or
 	  at module load time.
diff --git a/lib/atomic64_test.c b/lib/atomic64_test.c
index d9d170238165..46cb0130f8d0 100644
--- a/lib/atomic64_test.c
+++ b/lib/atomic64_test.c
@@ -5,13 +5,9 @@
  * Copyright © 2010  Luca Barbieri
  */
 
-#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
+#include <kunit/test.h>
 
-#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/bug.h>
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/atomic.h>
-#include <linux/module.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
 #include <asm/cpufeature.h>	/* for boot_cpu_has below */
@@ -23,9 +19,7 @@ do {								\
 	r = v0;							\
 	atomic##bit##_##op(val, &v);				\
 	r c_op val;						\
-	WARN(atomic##bit##_read(&v) != r, "%Lx != %Lx\n",	\
-		(unsigned long long)atomic##bit##_read(&v),	\
-		(unsigned long long)r);				\
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic##bit##_read(&v), r);	\
 } while (0)
 
 /*
@@ -46,8 +40,8 @@ do {								\
 	atomic##bit##_set(&v, v0);				\
 	r = v0;							\
 	r c_op val;						\
-	BUG_ON(atomic##bit##_##op(val, &v) != r);		\
-	BUG_ON(atomic##bit##_read(&v) != r);			\
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic##bit##_##op(val, &v), r);	\
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic##bit##_read(&v), r);	\
 } while (0)
 
 #define TEST_FETCH(bit, op, c_op, val)				\
@@ -55,8 +49,8 @@ do {								\
 	atomic##bit##_set(&v, v0);				\
 	r = v0;							\
 	r c_op val;						\
-	BUG_ON(atomic##bit##_##op(val, &v) != v0);		\
-	BUG_ON(atomic##bit##_read(&v) != r);			\
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic##bit##_##op(val, &v), v0);	\
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic##bit##_read(&v), r);	\
 } while (0)
 
 #define RETURN_FAMILY_TEST(bit, op, c_op, val)			\
@@ -72,8 +66,8 @@ do {								\
 #define TEST_ARGS(bit, op, init, ret, expect, args...)		\
 do {								\
 	atomic##bit##_set(&v, init);				\
-	BUG_ON(atomic##bit##_##op(&v, ##args) != ret);		\
-	BUG_ON(atomic##bit##_read(&v) != expect);		\
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic##bit##_##op(&v, ##args), ret);\
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic##bit##_read(&v), expect);	\
 } while (0)
 
 #define XCHG_FAMILY_TEST(bit, init, new)				\
@@ -101,7 +95,7 @@ do {							\
 			i, (i) - one, (i) - one);	\
 } while (0)
 
-static __init void test_atomic(void)
+static void test_atomic(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	int v0 = 0xaaa31337;
 	int v1 = 0xdeadbeef;
@@ -144,7 +138,7 @@ static __init void test_atomic(void)
 }
 
 #define INIT(c) do { atomic64_set(&v, c); r = c; } while (0)
-static __init void test_atomic64(void)
+static void test_atomic64(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	long long v0 = 0xaaa31337c001d00dLL;
 	long long v1 = 0xdeadbeefdeafcafeLL;
@@ -156,12 +150,12 @@ static __init void test_atomic64(void)
 
 	atomic64_t v = ATOMIC64_INIT(v0);
 	long long r = v0;
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	atomic64_set(&v, v1);
 	r = v1;
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
-	BUG_ON(atomic64_read(&v) != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic64_read(&v), r);
 
 	TEST(64, add, +=, onestwos);
 	TEST(64, add, +=, -one);
@@ -190,12 +184,12 @@ static __init void test_atomic64(void)
 	INIT(v0);
 	atomic64_inc(&v);
 	r += one;
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	INIT(v0);
 	atomic64_dec(&v);
 	r -= one;
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	INC_RETURN_FAMILY_TEST(64, v0);
 	DEC_RETURN_FAMILY_TEST(64, v0);
@@ -204,73 +198,76 @@ static __init void test_atomic64(void)
 	CMPXCHG_FAMILY_TEST(64, v0, v1, v2);
 
 	INIT(v0);
-	BUG_ON(atomic64_add_unless(&v, one, v0));
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, atomic64_add_unless(&v, one, v0));
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	INIT(v0);
-	BUG_ON(!atomic64_add_unless(&v, one, v1));
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, atomic64_add_unless(&v, one, v1));
 	r += one;
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	INIT(onestwos);
-	BUG_ON(atomic64_dec_if_positive(&v) != (onestwos - 1));
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic64_dec_if_positive(&v), (onestwos - 1));
 	r -= one;
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	INIT(0);
-	BUG_ON(atomic64_dec_if_positive(&v) != -one);
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic64_dec_if_positive(&v), -one);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	INIT(-one);
-	BUG_ON(atomic64_dec_if_positive(&v) != (-one - one));
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic64_dec_if_positive(&v), (-one - one));
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	INIT(onestwos);
-	BUG_ON(!atomic64_inc_not_zero(&v));
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, atomic64_inc_not_zero(&v));
 	r += one;
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	INIT(0);
-	BUG_ON(atomic64_inc_not_zero(&v));
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, atomic64_inc_not_zero(&v));
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	INIT(-one);
-	BUG_ON(!atomic64_inc_not_zero(&v));
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, atomic64_inc_not_zero(&v));
 	r += one;
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	/* Confirm the return value fits in an int, even if the value doesn't */
 	INIT(v3);
+
 	r_int = atomic64_inc_not_zero(&v);
-	BUG_ON(!r_int);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NE(test, r_int, 0);
 }
 
-static __init int test_atomics_init(void)
-{
-	test_atomic();
-	test_atomic64();
+static struct kunit_case atomic_test_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_atomic),
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_atomic64),
+	{},
+};
 
+static void atomic_suite_exit(struct kunit_suite *suite)
+{
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
-	pr_info("passed for %s platform %s CX8 and %s SSE\n",
+	kunit_info(suite, "ran on %s platform %s CX8 and %s SSE\n",
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-		"x86-64",
+		   "x86-64",
 #elif defined(CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG64)
-		"i586+",
+		   "i586+",
 #else
-		"i386+",
+		   "i386+",
 #endif
-	       boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CX8) ? "with" : "without",
-	       boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XMM) ? "with" : "without");
-#else
-	pr_info("passed\n");
+		   boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CX8) ? "with" : "without",
+		   boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XMM) ? "with" : "without");
 #endif
-
-	return 0;
 }
 
-static __exit void test_atomics_exit(void) {}
+static struct kunit_suite atomic_test_suite = {
+	.name = "atomic",
+	.test_cases = atomic_test_cases,
+	.suite_exit = atomic_suite_exit,
+};
 
-module_init(test_atomics_init);
-module_exit(test_atomics_exit);
+kunit_test_suites(&atomic_test_suite);
 
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

base-commit: 8ab2afa23bd197df47819a87f0265c0ac95c5b6a
-- 
2.36.1.476.g0c4daa206d-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] lib/atomic64_test.c: convert to use KUnit
@ 2022-05-02 19:23 Daniel Latypov
  2022-05-03  6:13 ` David Gow
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Latypov @ 2022-05-02 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: brendanhiggins, davidgow
  Cc: linux-kernel, kunit-dev, linux-kselftest, skhan, mpe, Daniel Latypov

The test currently is a bunch of checks (implemented using BUG_ON())
that can be built into the kernel or as a module.

Convert it to a KUnit test, which can also run in both modes.
From a user's perspective, this change adds a CONFIG_KUNIT=y dep and
changes the output format of the test [1]. The test itself is the same.

This hopefully makes the test easier to run and more consistent with
similar tests in lib/.
Since it has no dependencies, it can be run without explicitly setting
up a .kunitconfig via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run atomic
...
[13:53:44] Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
[13:53:44] ============================================================
[13:53:47] =================== atomic (2 subtests) ====================
[13:53:47] [PASSED] test_atomic
[13:53:47] [PASSED] test_atomic64
[13:53:47] ===================== [PASSED] atomic ======================
[13:53:47] ============================================================
[13:53:47] Testing complete. Passed: 2, Failed: 0, Crashed: 0, Skipped: 0, Errors: 0
[13:53:47] Elapsed time: 13.902s total, 1.629s configuring, 9.331s building, 2.852s running

It can be run on ARCH=x86_64 (and others) via:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64 atomic

The message about which platform the test ran on won't show up in
kunit.py, but still gets printed out in dmesg, e.g.
> TAP version 14
> 1..1
>     # Subtest: atomic
>     1..2
>     ok 1 - test_atomic
>     ok 2 - test_atomic64
>     # atomic: ran on x86-64 platform with CX8 and with SSE
> # atomic: pass:2 fail:0 skip:0 total:2
> # Totals: pass:2 fail:0 skip:0 total:2
> ok 1 - atomic

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/ktap.html
---
Meta:
1. this patch applies on top of the kunit branch,
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/?h=kunit

2. checkpatch complains about aligning with parens, but it wants me to
indent the `#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64` which seems inappropriate in context.

3. this file doesn't seem to have a clear maintainer, so I assume this
conversion is fine to go through the kunit branch. The only observable
differences are the new CONFIG_KUNIT=y dep and more standardized (KTAP)
output format.
---
 lib/Kconfig.debug   |   4 +-
 lib/atomic64_test.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 075cd25363ac..4cf8d5feda0a 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -2223,7 +2223,9 @@ config PERCPU_TEST
 	  If unsure, say N.
 
 config ATOMIC64_SELFTEST
-	tristate "Perform an atomic64_t self-test"
+	tristate "Perform an atomic64_t self-test" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+	depends on KUNIT
+	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
 	help
 	  Enable this option to test the atomic64_t functions at boot or
 	  at module load time.
diff --git a/lib/atomic64_test.c b/lib/atomic64_test.c
index d9d170238165..46cb0130f8d0 100644
--- a/lib/atomic64_test.c
+++ b/lib/atomic64_test.c
@@ -5,13 +5,9 @@
  * Copyright © 2010  Luca Barbieri
  */
 
-#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
+#include <kunit/test.h>
 
-#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/bug.h>
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/atomic.h>
-#include <linux/module.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
 #include <asm/cpufeature.h>	/* for boot_cpu_has below */
@@ -23,9 +19,7 @@ do {								\
 	r = v0;							\
 	atomic##bit##_##op(val, &v);				\
 	r c_op val;						\
-	WARN(atomic##bit##_read(&v) != r, "%Lx != %Lx\n",	\
-		(unsigned long long)atomic##bit##_read(&v),	\
-		(unsigned long long)r);				\
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic##bit##_read(&v), r);	\
 } while (0)
 
 /*
@@ -46,8 +40,8 @@ do {								\
 	atomic##bit##_set(&v, v0);				\
 	r = v0;							\
 	r c_op val;						\
-	BUG_ON(atomic##bit##_##op(val, &v) != r);		\
-	BUG_ON(atomic##bit##_read(&v) != r);			\
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic##bit##_##op(val, &v), r);	\
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic##bit##_read(&v), r);	\
 } while (0)
 
 #define TEST_FETCH(bit, op, c_op, val)				\
@@ -55,8 +49,8 @@ do {								\
 	atomic##bit##_set(&v, v0);				\
 	r = v0;							\
 	r c_op val;						\
-	BUG_ON(atomic##bit##_##op(val, &v) != v0);		\
-	BUG_ON(atomic##bit##_read(&v) != r);			\
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic##bit##_##op(val, &v), v0);	\
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic##bit##_read(&v), r);	\
 } while (0)
 
 #define RETURN_FAMILY_TEST(bit, op, c_op, val)			\
@@ -72,8 +66,8 @@ do {								\
 #define TEST_ARGS(bit, op, init, ret, expect, args...)		\
 do {								\
 	atomic##bit##_set(&v, init);				\
-	BUG_ON(atomic##bit##_##op(&v, ##args) != ret);		\
-	BUG_ON(atomic##bit##_read(&v) != expect);		\
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic##bit##_##op(&v, ##args), ret);\
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic##bit##_read(&v), expect);	\
 } while (0)
 
 #define XCHG_FAMILY_TEST(bit, init, new)				\
@@ -101,7 +95,7 @@ do {							\
 			i, (i) - one, (i) - one);	\
 } while (0)
 
-static __init void test_atomic(void)
+static void test_atomic(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	int v0 = 0xaaa31337;
 	int v1 = 0xdeadbeef;
@@ -144,7 +138,7 @@ static __init void test_atomic(void)
 }
 
 #define INIT(c) do { atomic64_set(&v, c); r = c; } while (0)
-static __init void test_atomic64(void)
+static void test_atomic64(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	long long v0 = 0xaaa31337c001d00dLL;
 	long long v1 = 0xdeadbeefdeafcafeLL;
@@ -156,12 +150,12 @@ static __init void test_atomic64(void)
 
 	atomic64_t v = ATOMIC64_INIT(v0);
 	long long r = v0;
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	atomic64_set(&v, v1);
 	r = v1;
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
-	BUG_ON(atomic64_read(&v) != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic64_read(&v), r);
 
 	TEST(64, add, +=, onestwos);
 	TEST(64, add, +=, -one);
@@ -190,12 +184,12 @@ static __init void test_atomic64(void)
 	INIT(v0);
 	atomic64_inc(&v);
 	r += one;
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	INIT(v0);
 	atomic64_dec(&v);
 	r -= one;
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	INC_RETURN_FAMILY_TEST(64, v0);
 	DEC_RETURN_FAMILY_TEST(64, v0);
@@ -204,73 +198,76 @@ static __init void test_atomic64(void)
 	CMPXCHG_FAMILY_TEST(64, v0, v1, v2);
 
 	INIT(v0);
-	BUG_ON(atomic64_add_unless(&v, one, v0));
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, atomic64_add_unless(&v, one, v0));
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	INIT(v0);
-	BUG_ON(!atomic64_add_unless(&v, one, v1));
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, atomic64_add_unless(&v, one, v1));
 	r += one;
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	INIT(onestwos);
-	BUG_ON(atomic64_dec_if_positive(&v) != (onestwos - 1));
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic64_dec_if_positive(&v), (onestwos - 1));
 	r -= one;
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	INIT(0);
-	BUG_ON(atomic64_dec_if_positive(&v) != -one);
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic64_dec_if_positive(&v), -one);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	INIT(-one);
-	BUG_ON(atomic64_dec_if_positive(&v) != (-one - one));
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, atomic64_dec_if_positive(&v), (-one - one));
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	INIT(onestwos);
-	BUG_ON(!atomic64_inc_not_zero(&v));
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, atomic64_inc_not_zero(&v));
 	r += one;
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	INIT(0);
-	BUG_ON(atomic64_inc_not_zero(&v));
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, atomic64_inc_not_zero(&v));
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	INIT(-one);
-	BUG_ON(!atomic64_inc_not_zero(&v));
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, atomic64_inc_not_zero(&v));
 	r += one;
-	BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, v.counter, r);
 
 	/* Confirm the return value fits in an int, even if the value doesn't */
 	INIT(v3);
+
 	r_int = atomic64_inc_not_zero(&v);
-	BUG_ON(!r_int);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NE(test, r_int, 0);
 }
 
-static __init int test_atomics_init(void)
-{
-	test_atomic();
-	test_atomic64();
+static struct kunit_case atomic_test_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_atomic),
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_atomic64),
+	{},
+};
 
+static void atomic_suite_exit(struct kunit_suite *suite)
+{
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
-	pr_info("passed for %s platform %s CX8 and %s SSE\n",
+	kunit_info(suite, "ran on %s platform %s CX8 and %s SSE\n",
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-		"x86-64",
+		   "x86-64",
 #elif defined(CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG64)
-		"i586+",
+		   "i586+",
 #else
-		"i386+",
+		   "i386+",
 #endif
-	       boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CX8) ? "with" : "without",
-	       boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XMM) ? "with" : "without");
-#else
-	pr_info("passed\n");
+		   boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CX8) ? "with" : "without",
+		   boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XMM) ? "with" : "without");
 #endif
-
-	return 0;
 }
 
-static __exit void test_atomics_exit(void) {}
+static struct kunit_suite atomic_test_suite = {
+	.name = "atomic",
+	.test_cases = atomic_test_cases,
+	.suite_exit = atomic_suite_exit,
+};
 
-module_init(test_atomics_init);
-module_exit(test_atomics_exit);
+kunit_test_suites(&atomic_test_suite);
 
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

base-commit: 38289a26e1b8a37755f3e07056ca416c1ee2a2e8
-- 
2.36.0.464.gb9c8b46e94-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-06-18  8:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-06-16 18:04 [PATCH] lib/atomic64_test.c: convert to use KUnit Daniel Latypov
2022-06-17  8:02 ` David Gow
2022-06-18  8:16 ` kernel test robot
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-05-02 19:23 Daniel Latypov
2022-05-03  6:13 ` David Gow
2022-05-12 18:52 ` Brendan Higgins
2022-05-13  3:05 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-05-13 16:25   ` Daniel Latypov

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).