linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
To: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@intel.com>,
	"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
	"Tim C . Chen" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 09/23] sched/fair: Use task-class performance score to pick the busiest group
Date: Fri,  9 Sep 2022 16:11:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220909231205.14009-10-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220909231205.14009-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>

update_sd_pick_busiest() keeps on selecting as the busiest group scheduling
groups of identical priority. Since both groups have the same priority,
either group is a good choice. The classes of tasks in the scheduling
groups can break this tie.

Pick as busiest the scheduling group that yields a higher task-class
performance score after load balancing.

Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Tim C. Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 97731f81b570..7368a0b453ee 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -8777,6 +8777,60 @@ static void compute_ilb_sg_task_class_scores(struct sg_lb_task_class_stats *clas
 	sgs->task_class_score_before = group_score;
 }
 
+/**
+ * sched_asym_class_prefer - Select a sched group based on its classes of tasks
+ * @a:	Load balancing statistics of @sg_a
+ * @b:	Load balancing statistics of @sg_b
+ *
+ * Returns: true if preferring @a yields a higher overall throughput after
+ * balancing load. Returns false otherwise.
+ */
+static bool sched_asym_class_prefer(struct sg_lb_stats *a,
+				    struct sg_lb_stats *b)
+{
+	if (!sched_task_classes_enabled())
+		return false;
+
+	/* @a increases overall throughput after load balance. */
+	if (a->task_class_score_after > b->task_class_score_after)
+		return true;
+
+	/*
+	 * If @a and @b yield the same overall throughput, pick @a if
+	 * its current throughput is lower than that of @b.
+	 */
+	if (a->task_class_score_after == b->task_class_score_after)
+		return a->task_class_score_before < b->task_class_score_before;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+/**
+ * sched_asym_class_pick - Select a sched group based on classes of tasks
+ * @a:		A scheduling group
+ * @b:		A second scheduling group
+ * @a_stats:	Load balancing statistics of @a
+ * @b_stats:	Load balancing statistics of @b
+ *
+ * Returns: true if @a has the same priority and @a has classes of tasks that
+ * yield higher overall throughput after load balance. Returns false otherwise.
+ */
+static bool sched_asym_class_pick(struct sched_group *a,
+				  struct sched_group *b,
+				  struct sg_lb_stats *a_stats,
+				  struct sg_lb_stats *b_stats)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Only use the class-specific preference selection if both sched
+	 * groups have the same priority.
+	 */
+	if (arch_asym_cpu_priority(a->asym_prefer_cpu) !=
+	    arch_asym_cpu_priority(b->asym_prefer_cpu))
+		return false;
+
+	return sched_asym_class_prefer(a_stats, b_stats);
+}
+
 #else /* CONFIG_SCHED_TASK_CLASSES */
 static void update_rq_task_classes_stats(struct sg_lb_task_class_stats *class_sgs,
 					 struct rq *rq)
@@ -8793,6 +8847,14 @@ static void compute_ilb_sg_task_class_scores(struct sg_lb_task_class_stats *clas
 {
 }
 
+static bool sched_asym_class_pick(struct sched_group *a,
+				  struct sched_group *b,
+				  struct sg_lb_stats *a_stats,
+				  struct sg_lb_stats *b_stats)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_TASK_CLASSES */
 
 /**
@@ -9049,6 +9111,12 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
 		/* Prefer to move from lowest priority CPU's work */
 		if (sched_asym_prefer(sg->asym_prefer_cpu, sds->busiest->asym_prefer_cpu))
 			return false;
+
+		/* @sg and @sds::busiest have the same priority. */
+		if (sched_asym_class_pick(sds->busiest, sg, &sds->busiest_stat, sgs))
+			return false;
+
+		/* @sg has lower priority than @sds::busiest. */
 		break;
 
 	case group_misfit_task:
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-09 23:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-09 23:11 [RFC PATCH 00/23] sched: Introduce classes of tasks for load balance Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 01/23] sched/task_struct: Introduce classes of tasks Ricardo Neri
2022-09-14 13:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-16 14:41     ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 13:01       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-02 22:32         ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 02/23] sched: Add interfaces for " Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 03/23] sched/core: Initialize the class of a new task Ricardo Neri
2022-09-26 14:57   ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-26 21:53     ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 13:04     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-27 15:48       ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-01 20:32       ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 04/23] sched/core: Add user_tick as argument to scheduler_tick() Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 05/23] sched/core: Move is_core_idle() out of fair.c Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 06/23] sched/core: Update the classification of the current task Ricardo Neri
2022-09-14 13:44   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-16 14:42     ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 07/23] sched/fair: Collect load-balancing stats for task classes Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 08/23] sched/fair: Compute task-class performance scores for load balancing Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27  9:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-26  3:57     ` Ricardo Neri
2022-10-26  8:55       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-27  3:30         ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` Ricardo Neri [this message]
2022-09-27 11:01   ` [RFC PATCH 09/23] sched/fair: Use task-class performance score to pick the busiest group Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-05 23:38     ` Ricardo Neri
2022-10-06  8:37       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-06 19:07         ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 10/23] sched/fair: Use classes of tasks when selecting a busiest runqueue Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 11:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-07 23:36     ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 11/23] thermal: intel: hfi: Introduce Hardware Feedback Interface classes Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 12/23] thermal: intel: hfi: Convert table_lock to use flags-handling variants Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 11:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-27 11:36     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-26  3:59       ` Ricardo Neri
2022-10-26  3:58     ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 13/23] x86/cpufeatures: Add the Intel Thread Director feature definitions Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 14/23] thermal: intel: hfi: Update the class of the current task Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 11:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-07 20:34     ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 15/23] thermal: intel: hfi: Report per-cpu class-specific performance scores Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 11:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-05 23:59     ` Ricardo Neri
2022-10-06  8:52       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-06  9:14         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-06 15:05           ` Brown, Len
2022-10-06 16:14             ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-07 11:20               ` Len Brown
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 16/23] thermal: intel: hfi: Define a default classification for unclassified tasks Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 17/23] thermal: intel: hfi: Enable the Intel Thread Director Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 12:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-06  1:50     ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 18/23] sched/task_struct: Add helpers for task classification Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 11:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-08  0:38     ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 19/23] sched/core: Initialize helpers of " Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 20/23] thermal: intel: hfi: Implement model-specific checks for " Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 21/23] x86/cpufeatures: Add feature bit for HRESET Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 22/23] x86/hreset: Configure history reset Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 12:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-02 22:34     ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 23/23] x86/process: Reset hardware history in context switch Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 12:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-03 23:07     ` Ricardo Neri
2022-10-06  8:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-06 22:55         ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 12:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-02 22:02     ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 13:15   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-02 22:12     ` Ricardo Neri
2022-10-02 22:15       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-03 19:49         ` Ricardo Neri
2022-10-03 19:55           ` Borislav Petkov
     [not found] ` <20220910072120.2651-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2022-09-16 14:51   ` [RFC PATCH 06/23] sched/core: Update the classification of the current task Ricardo Neri
2022-10-11 19:12 ` Trying to apply patch set Carlos Bilbao
2022-10-18  2:31   ` Ricardo Neri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220909231205.14009-10-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).